Agenda Welcome + Introductions Special Topic: MICs Break - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Agenda Welcome + Introductions Special Topic: MICs Break - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Regional Centers Framework Update Project Stakeholder Working Group July 27, 2016 Agenda Welcome + Introductions Special Topic: MICs Break Discussion: Framework Alternatives Next steps 2 Why this matters: The Regional
Agenda
2
- Welcome + Introductions
- Special Topic: MICs
- Break
- Discussion: Framework Alternatives
- Next steps
Why this matters: The Regional Centers Framework is how we focus and support growth in the region.
4
Project Timeline
Stakeholder Working Group: June - December
- Discuss findings from research phase
- Develop alternative frameworks
Special Topic: MICs
6
- Understand implications of findings
- Hear from different perspectives re MICs
- Discuss changes to framework to
address findings
- Give staff direction to develop draft MIC
framework alternatives for September SWG meeting
SWG MIC Discussion
Findings 2:
Manufacturing/Industrial Centers, industrial lands, and emerging job centers
- 2A. Center Type
8
RGC activity/acre MIC jobs/acre
- 2A. Center Type
9
RGC transit MIC transit
- 2A. Center Type
10
Question:
- How should the framework
differentiate manufacturing/industrial areas from mixed-use centers?
- 2B. Growth & Scale
11
Current MICs Candidate MICs
- 2B. Growth & Scale
12
Questions:
- How should the framework recognize
and support different scales of manufacturing/industrial areas?
- How should the framework address
discrepancies between existing MIC performance and expectations for new MICs?
- 2C. Infrastructure &
Resources
13
Outside the framework: Deep sea ports Freight road corridors Intermodal connectors Inside the framework: Existing incompatible uses Protective zoning?
14
Question:
- How should the framework best
preserve the lands, infrastructure, and resources that are most critical to sustain industrial and manufacturing sectors—both within and outside of MICs?
- 2C. Infrastructure &
Resources
15
How should the framework address…
- Additional criteria?
- Tiers?
- MICS below current threshold?
- Incompatible uses?
- Other key infrastructure?
- Transit access?
- Environmentally sensitive areas?
SWG Discussion
BREAK
Discussion:
Framework Alternatives
18
- Understand components of a
framework
- Discuss changes to framework to
address findings
- Give staff direction to develop draft
MIC & RGC framework alternatives for September SWG meeting
SWG Discussion
Key questions for the Stakeholder Working Group:
- How should the framework
shape the review and classification of centers?
- What should be the criteria and
thresholds used for eligibility, classification, and evaluation of centers?
Criteria: measurable characteristics of a center that may be used to assess and classify a center.
- Minimum eligibility criteria
- Classification criteria
- Performance measures
Tiers: the number and type of categories, and the criteria thresholds that distinguish categories from one another. For example, based on density:
- Super-regional: minimum xx activity units
per acre (au/ac)
- Regional: minimum xx au/ac
- Subregional: minimum xx au/ac
- Local: minimum x au/ac
24
- Criteria for tiers?
- Transit service measures?
- Approach to findings:
additional concepts?
SWG Discussion
Next meeting: September 21st
For more information…
25
Please contact Sara Maxana (at smaxana@psrc.org or 206-971-3288)
- r Liz Underwood-Bultmann (at lunderwood-