Agenda Project Overview Phase 1 Screening Design Workshop Phase 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
agenda
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Agenda Project Overview Phase 1 Screening Design Workshop Phase 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 13, 2023 30 likes •600 views

Agenda Project Overview Phase 1 Screening Design Workshop Phase 2 and Phase 3 Screening Recommendations 2 Project Overview Screen Complete Streets Projects Identify List of Priority Projects $18 million for

slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Project Overview
  • Phase 1 Screening
  • Design Workshop
  • Phase 2 and Phase 3 Screening
  • Recommendations

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Overview

  • Screen Complete Streets Projects
  • Identify List of Priority Projects
  • $18 million for construction over 3 years

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What are Complete Streets?

Source: Complete Streets Coalition website; Dan Burden ‐ photograph

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Complete Streets are streets designed and operated to enable safe access for ALL USERS.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why are Complete Streets Important?

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Increased Safety

  • 2008: > 5,000 pedestrian/bicyclist deaths and >120,000 injuries
  • Pedestrian crashes are twice as likely in places without sidewalks

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Over 65: 21% of Americans

20.4% of Brevard Residents*

  • Under 15: 16% in Brevard County*
  • Many low income Americans do not

have access to automobiles 10.5% of residents live below the poverty line in Brevard County 4.5% of households own no automobiles **

Expand the Ability to Move Around

33%

Americans don’t drive

55%

Americans rather drive less

Source: * 2010 Census ** US Census Bureau, American Community Survey (2006-2010) 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Supports Vibrant Communities

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Project Eligibility

  • Complete Streets Policy Adopted
  • Collector or Arterial Roadways Eligible for

Federal Transportation Funding

  • Potential Improvements Address Three or

More Modes

  • Public Support
  • The Sponsoring Jurisdiction is LAP Certified

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Screening

11

Phase Purpose

  • 1. Project

Identification Create List of Candidate Projects

  • 2. Feasibility Analysis

Identify projects that can be implemented in the near term

  • 3. Project Selection

Recommend Complete Streets projects

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Agenda

  • Project Overview
  • Phase 1 Screening
  • Design Workshop
  • Phase 2 and Phase 3 Screening
  • Recommendations

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Screening

13

Phase Purpose

  • 1. Project Identification

Create List of Candidate Projects All Corridors Suitable Areas Opportunity Corridor Long List of Candidate Corridors Local Support Candidate Projects

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Suitable Area Scoring

14

Metric Criteria Points Existing Bicycle Pedestrian and Transit Generators Functional Accessibility Index Score of 80th percentile or above 1 Future Bicycle Pedestrian and Transit Generators Designated in the Comprehensive Plan as mixed use, activity center, integrated business center,

  • r in a designated CRA, Enterprise Zone or

Foreign Trade Zone 1 Tourism Located in a historic district, art district, or where two or more tourist sites are within a quarter mile of each other 1 Parks and Recreation Areas Within a quarter mile of a park 1

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Functional Accessibility Index – Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan Functional Model

Characteristics Weight Both Major Road ‐5 Residential Density 1 Automobile Dependency 1 Age Group 1 Function Schools 35 Transit Facilities 30 Connectivity 25 Commerce 20 Job Density 15 Civic Centers 10 Social Centers 5

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Functional Accessibility Score – 80th Percentile and Above

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Future Bicycle Pedestrian and Transit Generators

Redevelopment Areas/CDBG Target Areas

1. East Mims CDBG Target Area 2. South Street CDBG Target Area 3. Titusville Downtown CRA 4. Indian River City CDBG Target Area 5. Sharpes CDBG Target Area 6. West Canaveral Groves CDBG Target Area 7. Cape Canaveral CRA 8. US 1 Corridor CRA 9. North Tropical Trail CDBG Target Area 10. Tate Industrial Park Foreign Trade Zone 11. West Cocoa CDBG Target Area 12. Diamond Square CRA 13. Downtown Cocoa CRA 14. Rockledge CRA 15. Merritt Island Redevelopment Agency CRA 16. Downtown Cocoa Beach CRA 17. Satellite Beach CRA 18. North Melbourne CDBG Target Area 19. Olde Eau Gallie Riverfront CRA 20. Ellis Industrial Corridor CRA 21. Babcock Street CRA 22. Wickham Road Mixed Use Corridor CRA 23. Historic Downtown Melbourne CRA 24. New Haven Commercial Corridor CRA 25. Old Town Business Corridor CRA 26. South Melbourne CDBG Target Area 27. Bayfront CRA

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Tourism

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Parks

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Suitable Areas

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Metric Criteria Points

Safety

Sidewalks Provided on both sides Missing on 1 side Missing on both sides 1 2 Bicycle Lanes Roadways with ADT less than 3,000 vpd (or) 4 foot shoulder or bicycle lane provided for roadways with volumes greater than 3,000 vpd Missing on roadways with volumes greater than 3,000 vpd 2 Pedestrian/Bicycle Five Year Crash Analysis Less than 2 crashes 2 to 4 crashes 5 or more crashes Fatality 1 2 3

Support/Expand Existing Multimodal Investments

Proximity to Existing Sidewalk or Bicycle Lanes New sidewalk would connect to existing sidewalks or extend an existing sidewalk along an arterial or collector road or new bicycle facility would connect to existing bicycle facilities or extending an existing bicycle facility 1 Transit One or more routes located along the corridor One or more routes traverse the corridor 3 1

Permeability of Roadway/ Compatibility with Multimodal Transportation

Posted Speed 25 to 30 mph 35 mph 40 to 45 mph Over 45 mph 2 1 Segment Not Considered Traffic Volumes Under 3,000 vpd 3,000 to 18,000 vpd Over 18,000 vpd 2 1

Opportunity Corridor Scoring Criteria

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Phase I Screening Criteria

Suitable Areas Score: 3 or Greater Opportunity Corridor Score: 7 or Greater

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Long List of Corridors

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Agenda

  • Project Overview
  • Phase 1 Screening
  • Design Workshop
  • Phase 2 and Phase 3 Screening
  • Recommendations

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Design Workshop

Dates: July 8, 9, and 10, 2013 Meeting goals: Define Candidate Corridors that proceed to Phase 2 and Phase 3 analysis

  • Corridor extents
  • Potential cross‐sections
  • Amenities
  • Landscape scale
  • Bus stop/shelters
  • Lighting
  • Traffic calming measures; and/or
  • Benches/other pedestrian features

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Design Workshop

26

14 Corridors Recommended by Local Jurisdictions

  • 1. SR 406 (Garden Street), Titusville
  • 2. Singleton Avenue, Titusville
  • 3. Park Avenue, Titusville
  • 4. Hopkins Avenue, Titusville
  • 5. N Atlantic Avenue, Cape Canaveral
  • 6. SR 520 (King Street & Willard Street One‐

Way Pair), Cocoa

  • 7. Peachtree Street, Cocoa
  • 8. Florida Avenue, Cocoa
  • 9. Minutemen Causeway, Cocoa Beach
  • 10. Pineapple Avenue, Melbourne
  • 11. Hickory Street, Melbourne
  • 12. Front Street, Melbourne
  • 13. Country Club Road, Melbourne
  • 14. Palm Bay Road, Palm Bay
slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Design Workshop

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Candidate Projects

28

11 Corridors Moved to Phase 2 and 3 Analysis

  • 1. Singleton Avenue, Titusville
  • 2. Hopkins Avenue, Titusville
  • 3. N Atlantic Avenue, Cape Canaveral
  • 4. Peachtree Street, Cocoa
  • 5. Florida Avenue, Cocoa
  • 6. Minutemen Causeway, Cocoa Beach
  • 7. Pineapple Avenue, Melbourne
  • 8. Hickory Street, Melbourne
  • 9. Front Street, Melbourne
  • 10. Country Club Road, Melbourne
  • 11. Palm Bay Road, Palm Bay
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Agenda

  • Project Overview
  • Phase 1 Analysis
  • Design Workshop
  • Phase 2 and Phase 3 Screening
  • Recommendations

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Screening

30

Phase Purpose

  • 1. Project

Identification Create List of Candidate Projects

  • 2. Feasibility Analysis

Identify projects that can be implemented in the near term

  • 3. Project Selection

Recommend Complete Streets projects

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Phase II Feasibility Analysis Scoring Criteria

1.Meet Complete Streets Project Criteria 2.Complete Streets Goals Supported by Municipality 3.Timeline/Constructability

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Phase II Feasibility Analysis Scoring Criteria

32

Metric Criteria

Meet Complete Streets Project Criteria

Serves Three or More Modes Walking, biking, transit, or automobile travel Ability to Cross Roadway Proposed number of lanes Proposed design speed Average distance between pedestrian crossings

Complete Streets Goals Supported by Municipality

Compatible with current design standards/ Supported by managing agency Identify Concerns Documented Local Support Documented support by local elected officials and local residents/business owners

Timing/ Constructability

ROW Impacts Quantify Access Issues

Effects on median openings and driveway openings

Utility Impacts Quantify Permitting Requires permits from the St. Johns River Water Management District, Florida Department of Transportation, Brevard County, and/or railroad Environmental Wetland impacts, habitat impacts Constructability Issues Project specific concerns identified Maintenance of Traffic Ability to maintain access and mobility through construction

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Phase II Feasibility Analysis Summary

33

Project Complete Streets Goals Supported by Municipality

Singleton Ave. Hopkins Ave.

  • N. Atlantic Ave.

Peachtree St. Florida Ave. Minutemen Causeway Pineapple Ave. Hickory St. Front St. Country Club Rd. Palm Bay Rd. Analysis assumes no ROW purchase required and minimal utility relocation in ROW

Design Plans adopted by City Council or CRA. Documented public support Support for Complete Street project, but conceptual cross‐section has not been presented publicly Support for Complete Street project, but conceptual cross‐section has not been presented

  • publicly. Concern about

local opposition

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Phase II Feasibility Analysis Summary

34

Project Timing/ Constructability

Singleton Ave. Hopkins Ave.

  • N. Atlantic Ave.

Peachtree St. Florida Ave. Minutemen Causeway Pineapple Ave. Hickory St. Front St. Country Club Rd. Palm Bay Rd.

Increasing Complexity/ Possible Concerns

Analysis assumes no ROW purchase required and minimal utility relocation in ROW

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Screening

35

Phase Purpose

  • 1. Project

Identification Create List of Candidate Projects

  • 2. Feasibility Analysis

Identify projects that can be implemented in the near term

  • 3. Project Selection

Recommend Complete Streets Projects

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Phase III Project Ranking Score Criteria

  • 1. Quality of Complete Streets Project
  • 2. Cost/Benefit Analysis
  • 3. Land Uses Supported
  • 4. Supports Bike/Pedestrian/Transit Infrastructure/Planning
  • 5. Complete Streets Goals Supported by Municipality
slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Metric Criteria

Quality of Complete Streets Project

MMLOS Pedestrian and bicycle LOS as calculated by HCM 2010 criteria Ability to Cross Roadway Proposed design speed Average distance between pedestrian crossings Pedestrian amenities included lighting/street furniture/bus stop amenities/landscaping

Cost/ Benefit Analysis

Cost per mile Crash history Number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes between 2006‐2011 Percent of bicycle facilities added Percent coverage as compared to existing conditions Percent of pedestrian facilities added Percent coverage as compared to existing conditions Coordination with other projects Programmed improvements along or adjacent to corridor

Land Uses Supported

Residential Units within a half mile Commercial Acreage within a half mile Schools/parks /civic uses served by project within ½ mile Number within a half mile Tourism Historic districts or tourist site cluster areas served Multimodal Supportive Land Use Areas and Redevelopment Districts If located within a multimodal supportive future land use, redevelopment area, or CDBG target area

Supports Bike/ Pedestrian/ Transit Infrastructure/ Planning

Ridership of transit route served Ridership on route as a percent of total ridership on SCAT in 2012 Serves area with low automobile ownership rates Proximity to future rail stations Located within a quarter or mile of a future rail station Connection the existing or proposed regional trail system Located within a quarter or mile of a proposed regional trail

Complete Streets Goals Supported by Municipality

Local matching funds Percent of project costs covered by local funds

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Excerpt from Phase III Scoring Spreadsheet

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Phase III Project Ranking Scoring

39

Project Rank

  • N. Atlantic Ave.

1 Minutemen Causeway 2 Florida Ave. 3 Hickory St. 4 Peachtree St. 5 Hopkins Ave. 6 Country Club Rd. 7 Front St. 8 Pineapple Ave. 9 Palm Bay Rd. 10 Singleton Ave. 11

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Agenda

  • Project Overview
  • Phase 1 Screening
  • Design Workshop
  • Phase 2 and Phase 3 Screening
  • Recommendations

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Recommended Projects

  • Hickory Street, Melbourne
  • Hopkins Avenue, Titusville
  • N Atlantic Avenue, Cape Canaveral
  • Peachtree Street, Cocoa
  • Florida Avenue, Cocoa
  • Minutemen Causeway, Cocoa Beach
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Hopkins Avenue

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Hopkins Avenue

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

  • N. Atlantic Avenue
slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

  • N. Atlantic Avenue

Source: John Pekar, Consultant, City

  • f Cape Canaveral
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Peachtree Street

46

“Before” graphic to be provided at meeting.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Peachtree Street

47

“After” graphic to be provided at meeting.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Florida Avenue

48

“Before” graphic to be provided at meeting.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Florida Avenue

49

“After” graphic to be provided at meeting.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Minutemen Causeway

50

Source: Miller Legg

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Minutemen Causeway

51

Source: Miller Legg

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Minutemen Causeway

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Minutemen Causeway

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Hickory Street

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Hickory Street

55

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Phase III Project Readiness Scoring Criteria

Metric Criteria Scale

Recommended Cross Section Approved Language supporting complete streets project provided by Board 0.5 Conceptual plans approved by Board or Redevelopment Agency 3 City has approved design beyond conceptual plans 5 Local Matching Funds Approved No Funds Identified Funding source identified by not set aside 1 to 4 Funds identified in CIP or Approved by Board 5 Project Development None Completed Conceptual plans developed 2 30% plans complete 8 60% to 100% plans complete 10

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Recommended Project Phasing

57

Project Readiness Project Recommended Funding Dates Corridor Analysis/ Design Review Design Construction

Shovel Ready

  • N. Atlantic Avenue

2014/15 Minutemen Causeway 2013/14 2014/15 Requires Design Work/Evaluation Florida Avenue 2013/2014 2014/15 2015/16 Peachtree Street 2014/15 2015/16 Hickory Street 2013/2014 2014/15 2015/16 Require Public Engagement/Permitting Hopkins 2013/2014 2015/16 2016/17