AGENDA ' Why are we here? ' Electrification Plan - Substitute House - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

agenda
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

AGENDA ' Why are we here? ' Electrification Plan - Substitute House - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ELECTRI F ICATI ON OF TRANSPORTATION PLAN Y#UR T^RruS?-ffif,) f;NffiffiffiY PR?-rutr$? v llrr 203 NffiWffir-lffim H?,, ?ffi W ,dM - I BEilTAil PAN SolarConnectons REITON PUD AGENDA ' Why are we here? ' Electrification Plan -


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ELECTRI F ICATI ON OF TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Y#UR T^RruS?-ffif,) f;NffiffiffiY PÆR?-årutr$?

203

NffiWffir-¡lßffim H?,, ?ffi üW

,dM
  • BEilTAil PAN

SolarConnectíons

llrr

v

I

REITON PUD
slide-2
SLIDE 2

AGENDA ' Why are we here? ' Electrification Plan - Substitute House Bill l5 l2

  • Quiz - EV Statistics
  • Electrification Plan Findings

' Path Forward / Recommendation

' Near term / Long term

t Conclusion

" Questions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

WHYAREWE HERE?

  • EV adoption is growing momentum and is identified by many policy makers as

a key de-carbonization strategy

' We can help influence & promote EV sales

  • EtectricVehicles (EVs) increase revenues during slowed load growth

' Opportunity to sell excess energy at retail vs wholesale rates

' SHB I 5 l2 allows PUDs to...

  • Promote EV adoption, advertise and offer rebates

' Decarbonize transportat¡on sector w¡th clean hydro

  • Aligçs with some customer interests
  • Trusted Energy Partner

å

rt

Ël

Æk

**EEffiM-

slide-4
SLIDE 4

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL I5I2

ELECTRI FI CATI O N O F TRAN SPO RTATI O N ' Section l. Electric Utility can determine its appropriate role in electrification of transportat¡on

"*

Y*""ˡ1;'' :' '

.

infrastructure

' Section 2. Outreach & investment does not exceed 0.25% net costs to ratepayers ' Section 3."May consider"

  • Applicability of multiple options across all customer classes
  • lmpact on utility's load and whether demand response and dynamic pricing are

aPProPnate

  • System reliability and distribution system efficiencies

rability concerns of software

cÌH!{,¡oo,

  • -trEmÍnt1--
slide-5
SLIDE 5

.4.

/

a

a

a

J

clo4#,¡oo,

titrùflFaø -

slide-6
SLIDE 6

HENWILL GLOBAL EV SALES SURPASS GAS CAR SALES?

. A) 2037 B) 20s0 C) 20e9

2037

Global EV and ICE share of long-term passenger vehicle sales

Share of annualsales

ri¡

too% 80%

6O/o

4O"/" 2Ao/"

O"/o

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2o,4c

Source: BloombagNEF

nf!

tcE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HOW MANY LEVELS OF CHARGINGAREAVAILABLE?

A) | Level B) 2 Levels C) 3 Levels

ü

O

Level 1 Level 2

120V

240V

Level 3 480V

3 Levels

UP TO 80 AMPS

300

AMPS

Level I charging
  • r "trickle charg¡ng"
uses standðrd l2OV electr¡cal outlêts. l2OV circu¡ts are âlso used by most home êlectronics. Tesla owners can charge on a regular
  • utlet w¡th the
NEMA 5-15 adapter that comes with eðch new vèh¡clê.

2 miles of Tesla range per hour charging

1.4 kW power delivery Level 2 chargers use 24OV electricål c¡rcuits, sim¡lar to those used by electric dryers and stovetops. Teslê "Connectors," Plugless' ïeslå W¡reless Charger, & most publ¡c charg¡ng stations are Level 2 chargers.

9-52 miles of

iesla range pei

hour charging

3.7 -17.2kW power del¡very Lêvel 3 direct current fêst chðrgers use ultra hiqh-power 48OV circuits at public charging stat¡ons. Superchãrgers are Level 3 chargers.

Up to l7O m¡ of Tesla range ¡n ¡ust 30 m¡ns charging

Up to l4O kW power del¡very
slide-8
SLIDE 8

HOW MUCH

CHARGER IN

DOES IT COSTTO INSTALL.A LEVEL}

MY HOME?

120 V Alternating Current

to Vehicle

208 or 240 V Alternating Current to Vehicle 480 V Direct Current to Vehicle 480 V Direct Current to Vehicle 2-5 miles range per hour

  • f charging

10-20 miles range per hour of charging 60-80 miles range per 20 minutes of charging 100-200 miles ranger per L5 minutes of ,charging J!772 J1772

Jt772 Combo,

CHAdeMO, Tesla JL772 Combo, CHAdeMO, Tesla, The ,cost (:an run from 550,000

to 5300,000 Minimal, because this is a

standard wall outlet. Most EVs come standard with a Level I cord set. Home A home installation costs Home, between 5500 and $2,000, while workplace, and

a commercial installatíon could publíc

cost $6,0t10 to st0,000. The cost r:an run from 550,000

to 5300,000

Public

C,iEH*,

BErmtPan Public Charger Type Technical

Time

Plug Tlpe

  • f

and ldeal Locations Level 1 Level 2 Fast Charger Ultrafast Charger

SourceAPPA

slide-9
SLIDE 9 t

HOW MANY EVS =THE DISTRICT'SANNUAL

LOAD GROWTH OF 0.27%?

A) 655 B) 1,678 C) 6,215

  • 1,678 EVs

Assumes:

  • ' 2,801 kwh annually for Chevy Bolt driven 10,000 miles

' 4,700,293 kwh is 0.27% of District total annual load / 2,801 kwh annual EV load = 1,678 EVs

' Perspect¡ve:

' Benton County has 466 Registered EVs (as orDec 20t8)

:. ì

coniffi]{,aoa,

BETMflNI'

  • ì¡ì-

.Sk

l, -\'

Jrr D

¡'

slide-10
SLIDE 10

421542 Plug ln Electric Vehicles Registered in Washington

As of December 31, 2Ol8

San Jrnn

24r',

L

H

I

Stwens Whitm¡n G.rfeld

36

  • l¡¡nogs¡

41

Dougle*

Gr.nt

Ferty Uncoln

I

Oreille

õ

40 27A

GlrËr

JClrrton

Gr¡ys Harùor

724

Xæn

22rÐ

Gl¡elü¡

2q^1

279

9t

l$tütæ

86 85

Âdams

fo

0- 50

51 -1û0 101 -200 201 -300

. 301 -400 ffi +or -soo

I sot *1,ooo I r,oor -2.ûoû

lU¡hld.h¡ln

Paciñc

Lcrt¡

164 56

I

lb5m¡

l7t

Fr¡nür

112

GolumH¡

a2

4

Wrll¡r

übll¡.

93 3

Gill¡tI

176

Asotin Sl¡anrani¡

31

d

l$¡cl¡m

57

Out of stete

412

Snohomish

4,486

King

23,662 2,919

Pierce

slide-11
SLIDE 11

HOW MANY EVS = I MW DEMAND?

A) t4 B) r40 C) t,400

140 EVs

t Assumes: ' Level 2 charge n24O volt 30 amp breaker

' 240 volt x 30 amp breaker / I ,000 = 7.2 kw per level 2 charger ' 1,000 bw t 7.2 kw per charger = I 39 EVs per I MW demand

  • Perspective:

' lnitially slight impact on District capacity need

' District Summer peak 43lMW w¡nter peak 37lMW

It will take many years to

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HOW MANY EVSWOULD SNAKE RIVER DAMS POWER?

A) 150,000 B) l.sM C) 3.1 M D) I Delorean

3.1 M¡llion EVs

' Assumes: Snake River Dams generate 1,000 aMW annually

' 8,760,000 kwh 12,801 kwh per EV t 1,000 aMW snake river annual output = 3. I million EVs

¡ls ttt t)t

t Perspect¡ve:

2.9 Million Washington registered auros Dec 20 I 6 42,s4zWashington registered EVs Dec 20 l8

,Æl{ooo,

  • n-ErÍon-ntt -
J. t1
slide-13
SLIDE 13

HOW MUCHWOULD I SAVEANNUALLY

DRIVI NG AN EVVS GASVEHICLE?

Þ

Ð

A) $ 100 B) $SOO C) S 1,000 D) 75 Latte coffees

$ t,000

t Assumes: ' 2,801 kwh annually for a Chevy Bolt driven

l0,OO0 miles charging at home

' $3 per gallon gas at 25mpg vs $0.0739 lffh

at 3.57 mpkWh

,lo4!{,,0o,

RElmflruo :jj.,-,-l -_

slide-14
SLIDE 14

HOW MUCHWOULD I SAVEANNLJALLY

DRIVI NG AN EVVS GASVEHICLE ?

A) $+00 B) s 1000 c) $2,800

'tl

.$4ó0

@ s0 MPG

. $ 1,000

@2s MPG

. $2,800

@ r0 MPG

Aa.fó gøg

i4

slide-15
SLIDE 15

WHAT % OF USANNUAL CARS SALES

ARE ELECTRIC? A) .s%

B) l0% c) 5% D) < ¡%

Global EV and ICE share of long-term passenger vehicle sales

' <ly"

Share of annual sales

t00% 80% 60%

4A%

20%

  • %

20]5 202A 2025 2030 2035 2040

Source: EloombergNEF

rEV

tcE

Ga¡otu 91.û*

0igs{l z.sLl

19Ë

Elæüic û"?%

0.6Ë

,ffino^

Dilmxmø

a^a

gnlÊrd.&¡rtd¡l¡

slide-16
SLIDE 16

WHAT % OF US EV SALESARE LEASED?

A) 80% B) s0% c) 30% D) s%

  • 80% Lease EV vs 30% Lease entire lJ.S. fleet

BUY

LEASE

  • 100 %

0%

PaY for 1Û0% wth a buY

WhatShould I Do?

,o

  • o,

ßÍrrûil Pa0 % based on wnat I use

1
  • /o

customizedpayments

slide-17
SLIDE 17

\

WHAT ISTHE UTILITY PAYBACK FORA

$250 ALL-ELECTR|C EV REBATE?

A) I year B) 3 years C) 12 years

<3Years

5250 EV Rebate Payback Analysis

(based on Chevy Bolt driven 10,000 miles annually)

Payback Years Range

t.8 - 2.7

t/

Revenue Difference

Range sLoe - s137

Retail Revenue

5207

Market

Revenue

Range s7o - se8

Retail Rate kwh s0.073e

Market Rate kwh

s0.2s0 - s0.3s0

kwh Sold to Customer

2,800

kwh Sold to Market

2,800

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ELECTRIFICATION PLAN FINDINGS

...:.:Ti¡'{{.:

'

''f' þ.

2!.

'tr'

F?.

l8

cÆl{sp.ut

Eeffoflnta

slide-19
SLIDE 19

VEHICLETYPES

PLUT,IN HVSFIÞ

.-,

  • $OURCES OF

ENTRCY CONSUMPTION

ÊMtssroNs

fr

t

ß

ill

ß ì \ .

l:ll I'lt

ÊFrl!5.,:", ALL"ÊLÊCTRIC HYôRIü COHVINfIOHAL
slide-20
SLIDE 20

EV CHARGING LOCATIONS

i[,ü';x,

J\r ia

I iüllr.; l';""'ulL I l-"r-,i:ljr

,-i{: fc::

:ú17

tr:':5

Ële ctririty delivere.d 2i].lt .l

itr:5

Ln ar{f, ef \

20

cÌ,FMsn,

ßEtmflPaø

92.196 6.3t6 2.OtÉ 93,196 5¡796 2.9% 77.3%

6.6X

9.596 Source: lnternational Council on Clean Tramportatson
slide-21
SLIDE 21

EV LOAD SHAPE

. IHnn',e'-1

  • IHr:rr'*--J

¡ c,. fß'.i:nr*:-[-"

,

i"ï':rt Li

J ù -

iHrlc'ltÈ-L I

Þ

lU

&

F

,E

(E

I 31"r

Fr.rblir:-L?

F'ub'fir ûtFÌ "'

L) 1, E

í¡

_ht td

E

  • L

I

ti t

I

I

1l

Hour of Day

.. t. ai

É-

2l

Level I chargers have

a flatter load benefit

to the District

Source: USDOE

slide-22
SLIDE 22

PATH FO RWARD I RECOM M EN DATION

' NearTerm- Commission adopt EV Plan

  • Begin promoting benefits of owning an EV

' Offer $250 customer Rebate on purchase of EV

. Promotes load growth . Provides information for potential future pilot programs

i.e. - TOU rates, demand response, system impact stud¡es, etc.

' Logo & wrap District Chevy Bolt ' Correlate Snake River dams value to EV

  • Regional program awareness and surveillance
  • Continue EVITA involvement (grants and customer education)
  • LongTerm
  • lntegrate EV Connections with Conservation Connections & Solar Connections prograrns

' Customer education - life cycle cost, web, presentations, car dealers, etc.

Þjscribution system impacts,load shape analysis, demand response optbûs

slide-23
SLIDE 23

CONCLUSION

  • EV adoption is gaining momentum

' Opportun¡ty to sell excess energy at retail rather than wholesale rates ' Benefits all of our customers ' Substitute House Bill (SHB l5l2) ' Allows rebates and promot¡ng EV adoption ' Rebate $250 per customer EV purchases to promote load growth ' Provides stat¡stical informat¡on for potential future pilot programs ' i.e. - TOU rates, demand response, system impact studies, etc. ' Reduces carbon emissions from Transportation sector ' Demonstrates being our customers'Trusted Energy Partner

tTi

slide-24
SLIDE 24

(t-,

z

  • tr

(t)

IJJ

f

  • 6
c\¡
slide-25
SLIDE 25

MARKET SALES PROJECTTONS

Global EV and ICE share of long-term passenger vehicle sales

Share of annual sales

too%

B0%

60% 40% 20%

  • %

/

2015 2020 2A25 2030 2035 2040

  • f\/

tcE

.:

Source: BlaombergNEF

slide-26
SLIDE 26

EV Cor Fuel Cost Stotistics

Gasoline Vehicle Electric Vehicle d at Home

Cha

ffi.t

Assumpt¡ons

1O,0OO Miles per Year

S 3.oo S/Gal of Gasoline

25 Míles per Gallon

Assumptions

1O,OOO Míles per Year S o.o718 S/kWh of Elecltric¡ty

3.57 Miles per kWh Chevy Bolt*

S O.LZ Cost per mile

s o.o2 cost per mile

Results

4OO Annual Gallons of Gas

S 1-,2OCI Gasoline

Resuhs

2,801 Annual kWh of Electr¡city

2OI Electricíty at home

sl,ztoo

s1,2OO s1,æCI

5æo

s600 s4oo

s2OO

5- Gasoline ElectriciÇ at home

s

E

t¡- c,

6
  • rr;t

fit

=

c

g

* https;//www"iueleconomy.gov/feg/Powetsearch.do?act¡onalts&poth=3&yea17=2O7g&yea12=2O2O&vtype=E)ectric&srchtyp=n¿*4¡
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Chevy Bolt Wrop Exomples

4fidãê{4s'tlvñsf

"'g¡ffim 'Ê

5

g,ÉxTOt{Þf
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Future fost chqrge stotions l.5MW

fiEVBite

HOËE IÀtUtÅCTURÊRg e !n addil¡on to å buck. Éd¡s is a[so loo*ing to eriter the Ûlfrastru€üJrc rnãr*el s.¡ifü treir trn chãrgiEg Êtãtitrls bult spesifi€äly fsr elecft¡c iructÉ and EVs wifü lsìTiôg nseds- ,t:r..,.,J,tf.tìi_,'arrl je;t 3: l:' å!:::a:.,1;i".-a:r:å;+ .. t,,s -€i{l l¡/h¡¡e the cünent ¡n&aslrueture markel is looking ¡nto SSIKVlJ chargæ. At¡is plarrs cn making üre-ìs a lud¡creus 1.sMUl,- For some Þerspective. a Teslå Sr¡p,ercltãrgierloday ¡s c¿pÞe{, at l2l,t(lll¡- Ât¡$ vrånts üÌe- SttA mi¡e rangêd bucLs to clrårge å-ffi zeÍo to f,uI iì i¡st 15 manules.
slide-29
SLIDE 29

EV Cor Fuel Cost Stqtistics

Electric Vehicle Charged at Home Electric Vehicle Charged at DC Charger Gasoline Vehicle

Assumpüons 10,000 M¡les perYear

S

3.00 S/Gal of Gasoline

25 Miles per Gallon

S o.fz Cost per mile

ksults

¿lO0 Annual Gallons of Gas

S L,200 Gasoline

Asumptiom 10,m0 Miles perYear

5

0.0718 S/kwh of Electr¡c¡ty 3.57 Miles per kwh Chew Bolt+

S

0.02 Cost per mile

Resr¡lts

2,801 Annual kWh of Electricity 201 Electricity at home Assumfdons

90 Miles per 30 minutes charge **

S o.25 Cost per m¡nute S Z.SO Costfor30minute charge S o.08 Cost per mile

Results

2,8o1 Annual kwh of Electricity

5 833 Electr¡c¡ty{DcFastCharger}

s

sl,4oo

Gæoline Electric¡ty at home Electricity {DC Fast Cl¡argerl

+ https://www.f ueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSeorch.do?oction=olts&poth=3&year7=2079&yeo12=2120&vtype=Etectric&srchtyp=newAÍv + * https ://ww w. ch ev ro let. co m /e lec't r¡c/ b olt- ev -e lectric-ca r

t,200

1.,000 58OO

s600 s40o s2oo s s

  • =

t!

  • v,
  • t,

a!

5 g

Ê 5

slide-30
SLIDE 30

L5,æ8 Average Residential Customer Annual Usage 2,500 Annual Usage Nissan Leaf driven 10,000 miles (sourced Seattle City Light)

18,148 Annual new total usage (equals L6%ancrease due to EV charging) 0.07L8 Residential Rate Schedule LL kwh Energy Rate

S

L80 Total annual electricity cost to charge EV at current Residential Rate Schedule 1L 0.0553 Residential Ficticious Rate Schedule 11EV TOU Off Peak kWh Energy Rate (7'7% of on peak rate) 138 Total annual electricity cost to charge EV ¡f charged ONLY during off peak with Ficticious half price TOU Rate

4I Annual Savings 3 Monthly Savings

0.0553 Residential Ficticious Rate Schedule L1EV TOU Off Peak kWh Energy Rate (77% of on peak rate)

1-59 Total annual electricity cost to charge EV ¡f charged HAIF TIME during off peak with Ficticious half price TOU Rat

  • 21. Annual Savings

2 Monthly Savings

s s s

S

s s

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Electric Vehicle Program Roadmap

Leadersh¡p Team Strategíc Planníng Review Ev Program Pro¡ect agreement Adopt electrif¡cat¡on of trðnsportat¡on plan September 24 2019 hplement EV Rebate program October 2019 July * October 2019 Commission Updates Chris Johnson Transformer size review before paying customer rebates Distribution grid load impact review Mike lrving - Lead October 2019 Develop EV brand and loto Wrap D¡strict EV Bolt with brand and EV promot¡on Develop EV Promotion materials (web, social media, bannerc, etcl Customer Education (Workshops) Continue Legislation tracking and influence Marketing / Educet¡on Jodi Henderson - Lead
  • ctober 2019
net cost to customer Determ¡ne program (Max%96¡ate increase) Analyze SB1512 Assumpt¡ons Program Considerat¡ons (Charger rebate, lOU rate option) EV Supports washington State llXl% carbon free emphasis Collaboration for potential grants EVITA & DOC Electrification Plan Development Chris Johnson - Lead September 2019 Determine value of TOU rates Determine how to capture EV TOU Data (customer, manufacturer, or EV charger) Determine how NISC would bíll EV TOU rates Time of use EV rate a nalysis Keith Mercer - Lead December 2019 Ev lnfo on costs and compar¡son to gas vehicles Vehicles types available today end ¡n the future Rèsearch avaílable incent¡ves (Utility, Dealer) Research what other utilit¡es are offering Understand changing Standards & Locatíons Economics of Electric Vehicle Vickie Bergum - Lead Ongoing
slide-32
SLIDE 32

History of the Electric C

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Woshington Stote Substitute House B¡ll I 5l 2

g

st¡âLr
  • t tåa Soû{ of ¡L¡rrc'dhttwt
  • f Èù. Sb&
ôl cù!.f Àpp!ô'rei Sæstey
  • t St¡Èa
sbb
  • l rsbl'f¡q¿oD
66th !.egisiarure 20i9 Regular Sess¿on CERTI FICÀÎIO¡¡ OF' g:¡ROLL!.!E}I?

sttBsl¡lftIE soosE BrLL 1512

Fð3eél by tì!É IIOü* Y¡¡cl¡ :1, lt:3 Tè6s ú{ :;¡y: ll gdise4 by ll¡e saaá¿€ ,tpr¡! :0. .¿019 TÈ5e 1È :¡ðyi :: :, &!ris!d !ecr¡" Cl¡ré, Cle¡k ùf llo|e¿
  • f
R*preiÊât:t!'re:
  • f
Sl6te êf fschltqlor¡, Co ¡:€! .e.l|ty rhsi the ÀÈt¡e:¡rd

sltBltrtttrlr trwsE Bt¡¡

l5t2

Þdyid 5T l¡OusÈ O! Reprè-:::tÈr¿: 6¡d È!!e SÊrsla O:, lhe dåtet

:lEif SECTIOS. S€c, 3, À n€r sÊclion :s addèd to chåpt€r 54.:6 {1) Tt¡e com!ssj-on Õf ¿ pubÌ:c ilt"i"I¡t}r distric¿

ædT ddopt ðn

€lectrifaa¿tron

  • f

tsansportaÈaon pìan ehèL, à! a *:ninun, p" 2

S¡13 1512. P!

estab!ish€s

å elect- ri f rcat i:on

nel cosl-s tÕ râ

findinq thðt
  • ucredch
¿nd :nvesÈEeBt !* t'h€
  • f
t.rðnsporlatros :nlr¡¡structure do€s not inc:e¿se r:ì j.n Ëxce$:t of ofre-qudrter Õ1 oe€ perceat"

:;ubs€ct.ion {1) of thr-5 sectron, t}!e conñfs:ìior of a pub}:r uti::ty distric¿ iåT cons!de: sofie or aj.; of i!¡e folj.ori.nq: (a)

Tl¡€

applicabllity

  • f

sull¿pl"e

  • pÌ.:ons

for e]ec¿rj.tic¿t.ror

  • l

trðesportåLioa ècross ä,¡l cu-storer ciasses; lb) che iap¿ct of €lectrifacation

  • n the di,strict'ç

Ìoad, ênd Hllethe¡ deËnd respÕnse

  • E oth€r ì,oad nanagement opportunities,

iñc¡udinq dir€cf loåd conLrof ånd dyn¡rnic priciug. ð!€ operat:onaiì.y åppropr¡¿tei {c, systeã reliabiì!ty and distribut¡on :¡ysten €f!icielci.€s; ldl int.eropererbriity conce$s, :eaj.udi.ng lLe interopërab¡lat'i

  • f hardr¿re

Ãad soft.hare systens i.n eiectrrÉj.Ë¿¡t-ion of transportå¡!o¡

proposai-s,- p ^ón :o$
  • dne

(31 å publi.c ueility dastgic!: r.àyr upen ßai-ing a dec€rñiaati.oro:n ¡ccordance ni,¿h subseceion (ll ô{ thls sect'¡on, otle! asçent:'r€ progråRs :* the elÊctr:fj-cåt:on

  • a trånsportå¿:on to: :ts cùstoEe!.,,

ì.ncìudirrq the pronotion o! e:ectrrc v€hicl€ ¿doptj.on and advertis:ng

i.ncen:;ves,
  • r rebdt€s-

progr¿ns to prmoee tbe dis¿ricr's

slide-34
SLIDE 34

I

?

lr,

"

:.

7

4¡ 'evrto

I

rl +

/t

t

¿

Options to Pursue

,f**Fff'l

COL LA EOR AT ION

{

.l

;.\'

û ;tt-

l

) Å!o

sr i

Y'