Agenda 8:00-8:30: Recap of Day 1 8.30-10:00: Developmental theory - - PDF document

agenda
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Agenda 8:00-8:30: Recap of Day 1 8.30-10:00: Developmental theory - - PDF document

Day 2 Assessment, diagnosis and treatment of personality problems in youth Carla Sharp, Ph.D. csharp2@uh.edu Agenda 8:00-8:30: Recap of Day 1 8.30-10:00: Developmental theory 10:00-10:30: Break and refreshments 10:30-11:30: Examples from


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Day 2 Assessment, diagnosis and treatment of personality problems in youth

Carla Sharp, Ph.D. csharp2@uh.edu

Agenda

8:00-8:30: Recap of Day 1 8.30-10:00: Developmental theory 10:00-10:30: Break and refreshments 10:30-11:30: Examples from your work settings 11.30-12.30: MBT: Core components

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Agenda

8:00-8:30: Recap of Day 1 8.30-10:00: Developmental theory 10:00-10:30: Break and refreshments 10:30-11:30: Examples from your work settings 11.30-12.30: MBT: Core components

Recap of Day 1

  • 3 things that you remember
  • 3 frustrations or confusions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Agenda

8:00-8:30: Recap of Day 1 8.30-10:00: Developmental theory 10:00-10:30: Break and refreshments 10:30-11:30: Examples from your work settings 11.30-12.30: MBT: Core components

Developmental theory: A mentalizing lens

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v =8hLubgpY2_w

  • “The capacity to reflect on one’s own thoughts and

feelings and those of others to predict and understand behavior”

  • People can change their minds/I can change my mind.
  • Things are not always as they seem/things are not

always as I think they are.

  • Promotes uncertainty and curiosity; seeks clarification;

not-knowing.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

A working definition of mentalization

Mentalizing is a form of imaginative mental activity, namely, perceiving and interpreting human behaviour in terms of intentional mental states (e.g. needs, desires, feelings, beliefs, goals, purposes, and reasons).

Mentalizing

1970s 1990s/2000 1990s/onwards 1980s/1990s Mental elaboration/ symbolization Theory of mind Theory of mind/ mentalizing Mentalizing Mentalizing 1990s/onwards

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

20 40 60 80 100 120 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Number of Publications Year

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Mentalizing vs related constructs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLT7ieO3h Tk

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Implicit/automatic

  • Perceived/Felt/Acted
  • Emotional Resonance
  • Empathy (Match)
  • Non conscious
  • Procedural
  • Non verbal
  • Non Reflective
  • Fast, requires little effort,

focused attention or intention

  • Facilitated by arousal

Explicit/controlled

  • Interpreted
  • Explained
  • Perspective
  • Conscious (or potentially

conscious)

  • Can be verbalized
  • Reflective (coherence)
  • Slower, sequential, requires

attention, intention and effort

  • Inhibited by arousal
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Wife: My darling, did you remember to pick up the dry cleaning? Husband: Oh no. I forgot. I’m sorry. Wife (feeling annoyed and thinking that he did not really want to do it in the first place): Oh no! I need the black dress for tonight’s work function. I wish you told me that you weren’t going to pick it up and I would have made an effort to pick it up myself. Husband: I just told you I forgot. I meant to pick it up. I’m really sorry. Wife (remembering the last time her husband forgot to pick up one of the children from soccer practice): When I asked you, you looked like you didn’t really want to do it. I could have easily swung by to pick it up if you’d been honest about it. I’d much rather you don’t commit to help out if you don’t think you can follow through. At least then I know I need to get it done myself. Wife: My darling, did you remember to pick up the dry cleaning? Husband: Oh no. I forgot. I’m sorry. Wife (feeling annoyed thinking that he did not really want to do it in the first place): Oh no! I need the black dress for tonight’s work function. I’ll make a plan…. but listen, can I talk to you about a broader issue this relates to? Husband: Sure. What’s up? Wife (remembering the last time her husband forgot to pick up one of the children from soccer practice): I know I might be completely off base here, but when you forget to do something like pick up the dry cleaning after we agreed you’d do it, it makes me feel that I or our family is not a priority. It might just be some insecurity on my part, but our relationship is important to me and I want to get your perspective on this.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

You wake up in the middle of the night from a noise downstairs. As you tip-toe into the living room, you see that the window has been broken and a stranger is busy rummaging through your

  • drawers. When the stranger turns around

towards you, you notice that he is carrying a knife.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Cognitive mentalizing

  • Leslie (1987): meta-representations

– an agent – an informational relation that specifies the agent’s attitude (pretending, believing, desiring, and so forth) – an aspect of reality that grounds the agent’s attitude – the content of the agent’s attitude.

  • <I BELIEVE (of) you think (that) “I’m being mean on

purpose”>.

  • “Thinking” language

Non-representational thinking M-reprentations/metacognitive thinking “She wants to be friends with me” She would like to be friends with me” “We could be good friends” “He was going to call me last night” “We had it all figured out last time we talked” “She is upset”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 Non-representational thinking M-reprentations/metacognitive thinking “She wants to be friends with me” “I think she wants to be friends with me” She would like to be friends with me” “We could be good friends” “He was going to call me last night” “We had it all figured out last time we talked” “She is upset” Non-representational thinking M-reprentations/metacognitive thinking “She wants to be friends with me” “I think she wants to be friends with me” She would like to be friends with me” I wonder if she would like to be friends with me” “We could be good friends” “He was going to call me last night” “We had it all figured out last time we talked” “She is upset”

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 Non-representational thinking M-reprentations/metacognitive thinking “She wants to be friends with me” “I think she wants to be friends with me” She would like to be friends with me” I wonder if she would like to be friends with me” “We could be good friends” “I believe we could be good friends” “He was going to call me last night” “We had it all figured out last time we talked” “She is upset” Non-representational thinking M-reprentations/metacognitive thinking “She wants to be friends with me” “I think she wants to be friends with me” She would like to be friends with me” I wonder if she would like to be friends with me” “We could be good friends” “I believe we could be good friends” “He was going to call me last night” “I thought he was going to call me last night” “We had it all figured out last time we talked” “She is upset”

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 Non-representational thinking M-reprentations/metacognitive thinking “She wants to be friends with me” “I think she wants to be friends with me” She would like to be friends with me” I wonder if she would like to be friends with me” “We could be good friends” “I believe we could be good friends” “He was going to call me last night” “I thought he was going to call me last night” “We had it all figured out last time we talked” “I was under the impression that we figured it all out last time we talked”. “She is upset” Non-representational thinking M-reprentations/metacognitive thinking “She wants to be friends with me” “I think she wants to be friends with me” She would like to be friends with me” I wonder if she would like to be friends with me” “We could be good friends” “I believe we could be good friends” “He was going to call me last night” “I thought he was going to call me last night” “We had it all figured out last time we talked” “I was under the impression that we figured it all out last time we talked”. “She is upset” “She seems to be feeling upset”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Affective mentalizing

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apzXGEbZht0
  • Being “present”, “in the room”, “connecting”
  • Smiling, touching, synchrony, turn taking, sharing of

joy, mutual attention, mutual engagement, containment, eye contact, physical closeness, touch, empathy and validation

  • Often unconscious/implicit but can me made conscious
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Wife: My darling, did you remember to pick up the dry cleaning? Husband: Oh no. I forgot. I’m sorry. Wife (feeling annoyed and thinking that he did not really want to do it in the first place): Oh no! I need the black dress for tonight’s work function. I wish you told me that you weren’t going to pick it up and I would have made an effort to pick it up myself. Husband: I just told you I forgot. I meant to pick it up. I’m really sorry. Wife (remembering the last time her husband forgot to pick up one of the children from soccer practice): When I asked you, you looked like you didn’t really want to do it. I could have easily swung by to pick it up if you’d been honest about it. I’d much rather you don’t commit to help out if you don’t think you can follow through. At least then I know I need to get it done myself.

Mentalizing the self vs. the other

Wife: My darling, did you remember to pick up the dry cleaning? Husband: Oh no. I forgot. I’m sorry. Wife (feeling annoyed thinking that he did not really want to do it in the first place): Oh no! I need the black dress for tonight’s work function. I’ll make a plan…. but listen, can I talk to you about a broader issue this relates to? Husband: Sure. What’s up? Wife (remembering the last time her husband forgot to pick up one of the children from soccer practice): I know I might be completely off base here, but when you forget to do something like pick up the dry cleaning after we agreed you’d do it, it makes me feel that I or our family is not a priority. It might just be some insecurity on my part, but our relationship is important to me and I want to get your perspective on this.

Mentalizing the self vs. the other

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Internal vs. external

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Implicit- Automatic- Non -conscious- Immediate. Explicit-controlled Conscious Reflective Mental interior cue focused Mental exterior cue focused Cognitive agent:attitude propositions Affective self:affect state propositions Other Self

What guides whether we are going to mentalize or not?

  • Capacity

– Biological – Learnt

  • Goals and values

– The deep objective

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Why so much on definition?

THE MENTALIZING STANCE

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

The optimal mentalizer

  • She is relaxed and flexible, not “stuck” in one point of view
  • She can be playful, with humour that engages rather than hurting or distancing
  • She can solve problems by give-and-take between her own and others’

perspectives

  • She describes her own experience, rather than defining other people’s experience
  • r intentions
  • She conveys “ownership” of her behaviour rather than a sense that it “happens” to

her

  • She is curious about other people’s perspectives, and expects to have their own

views extended by others’

  • Her mentalizing is context-dependent: she can move flexibly between automatic-

implicit mentalizing and controlled/deliberate mentalizing as the situation demands. A mother, arriving tired at home after a full day of work, finds her 8-year daughter has not completed her homework as previously agreed upon. The mother puts down her bag, sighs and looks at her daughter, who is sitting in front of the television watching a favorite show. “What?” says her daughter. Mom responds by saying, “You know what”. Her daughter appears baffled. Mom sighs again and reminds her daughter in a somewhat exasperated tone that they agreed at school drop-off that the 8-year old would complete her homework at after-school care. Her daughter explains that she forgot, and mom says, “Well, that’s not good enough. Go sit down now and do your homework while I start dinner. No buts! Now! Go sit down.” The daughter becomes distressed and says that she wants to finish her show. Mom becomes more exasperated and says, “I don’t want to be saddled with your homework after dinner. Do it now! Or no more television for you for the rest of the week.” By now, the daughter is crying and runs off to her room. Sharp, Shohet, Givon, & Penner, under review

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

A mother, arriving tired at home after a full day of work, finds her 8-year daughter has not completed her homework as previously agreed upon. She finds her daughter sitting on the couch watching a favorite TV

  • show. She quietly sits down next to her daughter, takes the remote control and says: “Sarah, can I pause

your show for a moment as I have something important to talk you about.” Her daughter says, “Yes,” and turns to her mom. Her mom, making eye contact, says, “I can see you are busy watching your favorite show, but I realize that your homework is still not done, and we will need time to go over it together. What about we look at it together to see what still needs to be done, and then we can decide how to fit it all in around dinner?” Sarah grudgingly agrees (partly because her show has not been completely switched off and she is agreeing to come up with a plan to get the homework done and not necessarily having to do the homework right now). “Ah!” says her mom. “Look at this!” Your teacher has asked you to do more exercises in fractions. What do you think about that?” Sarah then says that it’s easy to do that. Her mom says, “Will you show me how you do it?” By now, Sarah is somewhat excited about showing her mom how fractions work, and she begins to work on her homework. After the first problem is completed her mom says, “Excellent work – I like how you first think through the problem and then write down your answer.” Sarah smiles and starts on the next problem. Her mom then says, “It’s close to dinner time, do you want to continue on with the fractions while I make dinner and then watch your show after dinner? Or do you want to wait till after dinner to do your homework?” Because Sarah is excited by the positive feedback and the thought of completing her homework, she elects to carry on with homework while her mom cooks dinner.

Sharp, Shohet, Givon, & Penner, under review

SLOWING DOWN THE INTERACTION

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Infancy (0-6 months)

  • Body awareness
  • Some awareness of caregiver’s attention.
  • Detects, responds to, and directs other’s

attention to her face and body

  • Some awareness that she is separate from the

world.

  • Affectively rich communicative exchanges with

caregiver.

Infancy (6-12 months)

  • Physical self-recognition.
  • Begin to move from self-orientation

to social orientation.

  • Begins to understand that actions

have goals.

  • Development of teleological

thinking: the use of observable physical reality to make inferences about goal-directed nature of actions, e.g. Sees bottle of milk  Drink bottle of milk.

  • Beginnings to understand cause and

effect.

  • Social referencing: seeks out the

caregiver’s emotional reactions to gauge her own affective reactions.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Toddlerhood (2-3 years)

  • Understands that actions emanate from

unobservable mental states, but cannot actively reflect on mental states of others.

  • Implicit/automatic mentalizing capacity, e.g.

Sister cries  Comforts sister

  • Can recognize basic emotion/facial expressions.
  • The idea of “me” emerges through pronoun use;

Autobiographical memory emerges

  • Pretend play develops which is the first practice

in decoupling the mind from reality, but pretend games feels very real and child can get lost in magical thinking.

  • What is in my mind is real: psychic equivalence.
  • Begin to experience social emotions
slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Early childhood (4-5 years)

  • Monumental achievement in

passing the false belief task.

  • Can now decouple the mind from

reality.

  • Achieve rudimentary

explicit/controlled mentalizing capacity: can verbally reason and interpret behavior and intentions behind behavior.

  • The capacity to deceive develops.
  • Begin making causal references to

mental states.

  • Significant increase in mental state

language.

Middle childhood (6-11 years)

  • Higher-order mentalizing develops (“He thinks she thinks that…”).
  • Lies, jokes, irony, sarcasm.
  • Can carefully construct lies.
  • Increases in perspective-taking skills.
  • Social emotions (shame, pride, embarrassment).
  • Social comparison.
  • Social exclusion.
  • Understands personality traits and use them to explain behavior.
  • Self-narrative begins but concrete and unintegrated.
  • How one should think and feel.
  • Mentalizing acks authenticity: pretend mode.
  • Positively skewed self concept.
  • WWW.APPI.ORG/GILMORE
slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Adolescence

  • Social reorientation takes place
  • Identity consolidation begins
  • Identity: = intrapersonal and interpersonal continuity; making sense/meaning from

self-concept

  • Cognitive development facilitates integration of self-representations and multiple

self-hypotheses

  • Autonomous self begins to emerge
  • Cognitive development impedes control over emotions
  • Shared reflection with peers
  • Mature perspective taking abilities, but self-consciousness and imaginary audience
  • Stepping outside the social dyad to view self as social objects that is observed by
  • thers
  • Abstract representations of self
  • As control over emotions increase, greater sense of agency emerges

Agentic, self-determining author

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

The child does not do this all alone

  • How brains are built….

54

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28 Distal Factors Proximal Factors BPD: Core Features

Constitutional Factors Early Caregiving Context Stress/Arousal

  • Dysfunctional

relationships

  • Affect dysregulation
  • Impulsivity

Pre-mentalizing modes

  • f social cognition

Attachment disruptions

  • Identity diffusion
  • Dissociation
  • Feelings of inner

pain and emptiness

Poor self-other differentiation Impairments in integration of cognition and affect Low threshold for attachment activation and controlled mental deactivation Fonagy & Luyten, 2009 Hypersensitivity to mental states

Distal Factors Proximal Factors BPD: Core Features

Constitutional Factors Early Caregiving Context Stress/Arousal

  • Dysfunctional

relationships

  • Affect dysregulation
  • Impulsivity

Pre-mentalizing modes

  • f social cognition

Attachment disruptions

  • Identity diffusion
  • Dissociation
  • Feelings of inner

pain and emptiness

Poor self-other differentiation Impairments in integration of cognition and affect Hypersensitivity to mental states Low threshold for attachment activation and controlled mental deactivation Fonagy & Luyten, 2009

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Prementalizing Modes of Subjectivity

Psychic equivalence: – Mind-world isomorphism; mental reality = outer reality; internal has power of external – Intolerance of alternative perspectives – Reflects domination of self:affect state thinking with limited internal focus – Because I think it, it is true. – What is in my mind, is out there in nature. – My perspective reflects reality. Pretend mode: – Ideas form no bridge between inner and outer reality; mental world decoupled from external reality – “dissociation” of thought, pseudo-mentalizing – Reflects explicit mentalizing being dominated by implicit, inadequate internal focus, poor belief-desire reasoning and vulnerability to fusion with others – Using mental state words, but lacks coherence and authenticity. Teleological stance: – A focus on understanding actions in terms of their physical as opposed to mental constraints – Cannot accept anything other than a modification in the realm of the physical as a true index of the intentions of the

  • ther.

– Extreme exterior focus – Misuse of mentalization for teleological ends (harming others) becomes possible because of lack of implicit as well as explicit mentalizing; the end justifies the means – Absent mind; quick fix thinking

58

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Attachment, ER and BPD

N = 228, 57.9% female SS, CERQ, PAI-BOR Kim, Sharp, & Carbonne (2013). PD:TRT

Attachment, experiential avoidance and mentalizing

Vanwoerden, Kalpakci, & Sharp (2015). Comprehensive Psychiatry

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Attachment, thwarted belongingness and affective problems

N = 133; 64.7% female; 24.1% Black; 40.6% Hispanic SS, INQ, YSR

Venta, Mellick, Schatte & Sharp (2014) JSCP

Family conflict, TB, PB and BPD

Kalpakci, Venta, & Sharp (2014) BPDED

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Crowell et al. (2009), D&P

Adolescence as a sensitive period

  • Agentic, self-determining

author emerges

  • Relationships expand beyond

the caregiver-child dyad

  • Adolescents are biased more

by functionally mature limbic regions during adolescence (imbalance of limbic relative to prefrontal control), compared to children, in whom these systems are both still developing, and adults, in whom they fully mature

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Identity diffusion in adolescence

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Agenda

8:00-8:30: Recap of Day 1 8.30-10:00: Developmental theory 10:00-10:30: Break and refreshments 10:30-11:30: Examples from your work settings 11.30-12.30: MBT: Core components

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

MBT: Core components

A working definition of mentalization

Mentalizing is a form of imaginative mental activity, namely, perceiving and interpreting human behaviour in terms of intentional mental states (e.g. needs, desires, feelings, beliefs, goals, purposes, and reasons).

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Successful mentalizing of people and relationships

The person….

  • Is relaxed and flexible, not ‘stuck’ in one point of view
  • Can be playful, with humour that engages rather than hurting
  • r distancing
  • Can solve problems by give-and-take between own and
  • thers’ perspectives
  • Describes their own experience, rather than defining other

people’s experience or intentions

  • Conveys ‘ownership’ of their behaviour rather than a sense

that it ‘happens’ to them

  • Is curious about other people’s perspectives, and expect to

have their own views extended by others’

Our sense of self & capacity for self-regulation are acquired through interpersonal interaction

Caregiver’s marked mirroring of baby’s constitutional self-states enables him to begin to form representations of his experience, laying the foundation for mentalizing

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

The development of the ‘mentalizing self’

  • The capacity to mentalize emerges through

interaction with the caregiver:

  • The quality of the attachment relationship

– If the parent is:

  • Able to reflect on infant’s intentions

accurately

  • Does not overwhelm the infant

– Then this:

  • Assists in developing affect regulation
  • Helps develop child’s sense of a mind and of

a reflective self

To summarize:

  • Attachment and mentalization are loosely coupled systems existing in a state of

partial exclusivity.

  • Mentalization has its roots in the sense of being understood by an attachment

figure, – it can be more challenging to maintain mentalization in the context of an attachment relationship (e.g. the relationship with the therapist) (Gunderson,

1996).

  • BPD associated with hyperactive attachment systems as a result of their history

and/or biological predisposition

  • But without activation of the attachment system in therapy borderline PD patients

will never learn to function psychologically in the context of interpersonal relationships.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

The goal of therapy

Taking the risk of attempting new ways to communicate, cope and relate in order to replace a non-mentalizing illusion of control and attachment with a mentalizing approach that offers the opportunity for real mastery and genuine attachments

The literacy of interaction

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

THE MENTALIZING STANCE

Mentalizing begets mentalizing

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

The mentalizing stance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIzhoXvbtB Q

The mentalizing stance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9kak-Q8li8

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

The mentalizing stance

  • Not-Knowing

– Neither therapist nor patient experiences interactions other than impressionistically – Differentiate self from other – Acceptance of different perspectives – Active questioning – Eschew your need to understand – do not feel under obligation to understand the non-understandable. – Not the expert

  • Monitor you own mistakes

– Model honesty and courage via acknowledgement of your own mistakes

  • Current
  • Future

– Suggest that mistakes offer opportunities to re-visit to learn more about contexts, experiences, and feelings

The mentalizing stance

  • Inquisitive

– Inquiring – Respectful – Curious – Tentative – Mentalizing out loud: making hypotheses explicit – Sharing hunches

  • Avoid undermining mentalizing

– Try to be clever – Complicated, long interventions – Psychobabble – Theory-based assumptions – Certainty – Attribute patient’s experience to a general pattern rather than specific detail – Long silence, non-contingency – Transference to explore unconscious repetitions of the past

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

The mentalizing stance

  • Feelings of competence

– Searches actively for examples (or episodes) of good mentalization – Enlarges upon them

  • Non-teleological

– Stay with the mind – Respectful – No skill building!

  • Intentional

– Communicate the intention to understand – Feel the intention to understand

The mentalizing stance

  • “This may sound stupid, but can I just check this?
  • “What I don’t understand is...”
  • “Do you mind if I look around? I think I may be on a wild goose chase, but do you

mind if I….? “

  • “I can see how you get to that but when I think about it, it occurs to me that he

may have been pre-occupied with something rather than ignoring you”

  • “I notice that your voice changes when you talk about that.”
  • “Is that the way you see it too?”
  • “So your mom feel this but I’m wondering if you recognize this as something that

happens at home?”

  • “So what happened?”
  • “How did you feel when that happened”
  • “What did you make of it?”
  • “How did you manage that?”
slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

General Principles - MBT

  • Primary aim is to increase capacity to mentalize self and others
  • Maintain or regain mentalizing of clinician
  • Monitor patient mentalizing capacity
  • Manage arousal levels
  • Focus on patient’s mind
  • Seek out moment of mentalizing vulnerability or breakdown
  • Address current events and immediate states of mind
  • Step-wise intervention process starting with empathic validation

Less Mentalizing More Mentalizing

Empathize, support, and validate Explore, clarify, and expand Challenge Mentalizing the relationship Basic (practice) mentalizing

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Mentalizing interventions

  • Identify a break in mentalizing – psychic equivalence, pretend, teleological
  • Empathize, support, and validate
  • Rewind
  • Explore, clarify, and expand
  • Affect focus
  • Using the relationship to explore affect
  • Contrary Moves
  • Challenge
  • Mentalizing the relationship
  • Formulation

MBT-A

MBT-A Training of therapists Weekly (MBT-A) and monthly (MBT-F) supervision Weekly MBT-A Sessions for 1 year Weekly MBT-A Sessions for 1 year

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

MBT-A

MBT-A Training of therapists Weekly (MBT-A) and monthly (MBT-F) supervision Weekly MBT-A Sessions for 1 year Weekly MBT-A Sessions for 1 year

Mentalizing stance Video/audio clips

Assessment phase

  • 3-4 sessions
  • Range of assessment tools can be used
  • Getting to know

– The patient – The patient’s history – The patient’s relational context – The meaning of the reason for referral – The patient’s coping strategies – The patient’s mentalizing abilities

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

MBT Formulation

  • Background
  • Personality style
  • Engagement in therapy
  • Self-harm in context
  • Mentalization
  • Treatment plan
  • Crisis plan

Background Information. When you were referred to this service you reported a two year history of feeling depressed and harming yourself. At times you have felt so depressed that life did not feel worth

  • living. You thought your parent’s divorce three years ago, your mother’s subsequent depression, your

father's drinking and his recent violent relationship with his girlfriend all played a role to make you

  • depressed. You spoke about feeling guilty as if it was your fault. Before you came to us for help you

entered into a relationship in which you allowed someone to treat you in a disrespectful manner, almost as if you were being punished. All of this made you feel terrible about yourself. Personality Style. You are a very brave young person who has coped with a lot in your life. You were also very brave to speak to me about your feelings and stuff that happened in your life. You are kind and caring to others and you have been a very reliable friend to your friends. It is sad to notice how you cannot see your own beautiful qualities and how you constantly expect people to dislike you. This can make you feel so anxious in social situations that you tend to withdraw yourself, but the problem with this way of coping is that it does not allow others to be close to you and in that way it reinforces you view that they do not like you. You also told me that in your relationships things can be up and down at times. You explained that you have a desire to be close to people but as soon as you are close to them, you feel ripped apart by anxieties that they will let you down or reject you. This, you said, can make you feel so anxious that you can feel as if you are on a rollercoaster emotionally with large mood swings. From our discussions I had the impression that sometimes when you have strong feelings inside you, you cope with it by either cutting yourself or by switching your emotions off until you feel empty. Is that what happens to you?

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

When we spoke about you switching your emotions off, I thought about it afterwards and I thought that although I can see that it feels as if this coping style helps you at the time, I did wonder whether it does not also make you feel disconnected from what you or other people feel and whether it is then not difficult to understand what is going and I wondered if it may be at times like this that you feel action is the only thing available to you – and whether it may be at these times that you have a tendency to harm yourself. What do you think about that? In listening to the way you spoke about yourself, I felt myself feeling very sad about the constant negative ways in which you see yourself. I was also struck by how you seem to relate to other people in a self sacrificing manner and how at times you allow them to take advantage of you. Perhaps in therapy we can work on all these aspects and help you to develop a desire to look after yourself and to allow others to look after you rather than hurt you. You are a lovely person and you deserve more than what you currently allow yourself to have. Treatment Plan. We propose to offer you a treatment in which we suggest a combination of individual therapy once a week and family therapy once or twice a month delivered by the community team.

Sharp & Rossouw (in press)

Crisis plan example: teen

Trigger factors that you and I identified are times when you feel rejected, humiliated, or bad about yourself. As we have discussed, these feelings do not just arrive out of the blue; they are likely to have been triggered in a close relationship. When you have those feelings you tend to rush into an action to take the feelings away. When you feel like that again, I would like you to use the COPING SKILLS APP. STOP AND PAUSE. Try focusing on your breathing or on one of your senses. Then try and reflect – what are you feeling? What happened before you had the feeling? Did something happen between you and someone else? Can you try and pause before you make an assumption about what they are feeling and thinking. Remember we cannot see into someone else’s mind and we can make mistakes when we make assumptions about what they feel. Sometimes we are so overwhelmed with our own feelings, we assume others feel it to. Signed: Patient Signed: Parent Signed: Therapist Sharp & Rossouw (in press)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Crisis plan example: parent

As we discussed, X’s self-harm is often in the context of very strong feelings that she finds hard to manage. Here are three dos and three don’ts that may help you at times of risk: Do: Listen, Understand, Help to mentalize Don’t: Panic, Blame, Punish

Sharp & Rossouw (in press)

Crisis plan example: parent

Don’t blame her and don’t blame yourself. Just try to understand what she felt before she wanted to harm herself and help her to speak about the feelings and the events leading up to the feelings. If the events involved you, listen and try to understand her perspective without becoming defensive. You don’t have to hold the same perspective, but it is important that you validate her perspective. If there was a misunderstanding between you that you contributed to, own up to it. You are not here to win battles, but to restore the connection between you. If she is very aroused, speaking too much is not helpful. Just be kind and supportive, and say things like: “I am not angry with you, I am here to help you and keep you safe. Something has made you so upset. I don’t know what it is and if it is something I have done, I am sorry. I really want to understand. Talk when you are ready, but until then, I will just be with you to keep you safe.” If she wants to hurt herself, you could say: “I really don’t want you to hurt yourself. You deserve so much

  • more. Let’s try one of the alternatives. I will help you; shall we get a bowl of ice?”

If she is suicidal, you could say: “Killing yourself is not an option. I love you and do not want you to kill

  • yourself. You are not alone. We will get through this together. I am going to stay here with you to keep

you safe. Let’s try to think of something that will help right now. Will distraction help—maybe going for a walk or watching TV?” If all else fails, call the clinic, or if it is after hours, you may have to take her to the emergency department.

Sharp & Rossouw (in press)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Initial phase

  • Provide formulation and psychoeducation
  • Use empathy, empathy, empathy!
  • Establish emotional contact
  • Establish a positive alliance

Sharp & Rossouw (in press)

Initial phase

The following is an example of a first session with a very anxious 14-year-old who presented to a service for children and adolescents with mental health difficulties, following a suicide attempt. She had taken an overdose in an attempt to escape from a torturous inner world dominated by anxiety, panic, and constant feelings of emptiness. The example illustrates the therapist’s efforts to engage with the patient and make emotional contact with her. It also shows the therapist’s efforts to ameliorate the patient’s anxiety by not allowing uncomfortable silences.

Sharp & Rossouw (in press)

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Therapist: Welcome. I am glad you came; from what your mom said on the phone, it sounded as if it was difficult for you to come. So, that tells me you must have been quite brave to come. Patient: [silent, looking down] Therapist: Is it okay to be here? Patient: It’s awkward to talk to people. Therapist: I understand that, especially now, because I am still a stranger to you. If you think, at any stage, that I say something that makes you feel that I don’t understand, please tell me. Would you mind just giving me an idea of what happened and how you came to be here? Patient: I had problems at school... [silence] Therapist: I am sorry to hear that; what happened? Patient: I was bullied by some kids, and I’m worried about the exams. I’m scared of what people think of me. Therapist: Tell me more. Patient: I’m worried that I will do badly on the exams and that the teacher will be angry. Therapist: Do you have a horrible teacher? Patient: She sometimes takes marks off just to make me feel bad so that I work harder. Therapist: Gosh, how does that make you feel? Patient: It upsets me, and then I feel angry, and I think I didn’t work hard enough. Therapist: It sounds to me that when the teacher does that, you get cross with yourself, but she is the one who is doing something wrong, not you, so why should you get cross with yourself? Patient: I always get cross with myself. Therapist: Do you think you just feel cross, or do you feel other things, too? Patient: I think I feel sad. Therapist: What do you think is making you sad? Patient: I try so hard. Therapist: Yes, I understand that. And when she takes marks off like that, do you feel as if she does not notice how hard you try? Patient: Yes. [cries] Therapist: I wonder if that feels quite cruel to you. Patient: Yes. Therapist: Is she just a horrible, cruel woman? Why do you think she does that? Patient: She says she does it to help me, to motivate me to work harder. Therapist: But that isn’t the way it makes you feel, is it? It sounds to me like you feel that nothing you do is good enough. Patient: Yes. Therapist: Do you think she knows how you suffer? Patient: No, I think she thinks it is a game. Therapist: If people play games with my feelings, I sometimes get angry. Patient: I am very bad with anger. Therapist: Tell me more...

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51 Less Mentalizing More Mentalizing

Empathize, support, and validate Explore, clarify, and expand Challenge Mentalizing the relationship Basic (practice) mentalizing

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Middle phase

This is an example of a session with Peter, a 15-year-old boy who was referred with a history of cutting himself, taking overdoses, and having great difficulty managing relationships at school. Peter also had a strong history of violent outbursts and impulsive behavior, and on one

  • ccasion he had been reprimanded by the police for attacking another
  • boy. He grew up with his mother and two half-siblings from different
  • fathers. His mother has a history of drug abuse. Peter experienced life

as unpredictable when he was growing up, surrounded by volatile relationships and inconsistent boundaries, which had left him with very little ability to manage his own feelings, and hence he frequently fell back on concrete ways of trying to reassure himself of his safety and concrete ways of managing his feelings.

Sharp & Rossouw (in press)

Middle phase

  • Engage in the bulk of the work
  • Address non-mentalizing
  • With patients in emotionally aroused states, pause, go back, and explore

feelings and trigger factors

  • With patients in affective storms, stay calm, avoid complex or transference

interpretations, keep interpretations simple and non-threatening, stay emotionally attuned, and avoid silences

  • Address misinterpretations
  • Explore alternative possibilities
  • Open feelings up to explore more subtle feelings underneath
  • Help patients to mentalize others

Sharp & Rossouw (in press)

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Peter: I broke up with Michelle. You remember that I wanted to see her last Friday, and she said she was

  • busy. Later, I found out that she was only busy for one hour, and I could have seen her. So, on Saturday, I

thought I’m not having this; I may as well end it with her rather than wait around for her. Therapist: What did you feel on Friday? Peter: I sent her a text Saturday and said, “If you don’t call me by 5 o’clock, it’s over.” I used to think that she wasn’t answering her phone because it was broken, but, funnily enough, just after I sent the text, she texted straight back saying, “I am sorry, but I am a happy person, and you are always moaning, and it brings me down.” So, I thought, okay, whatever, and just left it. Therapist: Gosh, you must have felt very hurt. Peter: No, I tried to convince myself that I felt nothing. I just don’t understand; I was always happy when I was with her. I don’t see how she could say that I am always moaning. The only thing I moaned about was that she just never answered her phone. Any boyfriend would want that, right? Therapist: So, when she didn’t answer her phone, what did that feel like? Peter: It felt as if she didn’t care. Jenny [another ex-girlfriend] always answered her phone, and that is how I knew she cared. Therapist: And when you felt that she didn’t care, how did that make you feel? Peter: Anxious, and then I would phone her non-stop, and I would text and leave messages. It’s not right to ignore me like this.

Therapist: So, the more she didn’t answer, the more anxious you would get. Peter: Sometimes I would call her 20 times, and she would ignore me. I know why. Therapist: And when you were anxious, what thoughts did you have, and what were you anxious about? Peter: I think that she’s met someone else. And I sort of saw it coming, so Friday evening, when I went dancing, I flirted with people and then I met this new girl. She’s not really new; she is a sort of a friend. So, I thought that I’d like to take her out, so I pretended to be drunk, and then I told her that I would like to take her out. I thought that if I pretended to be drunk and she said no, then I would just say the next day that I was drunk and that I don’t remember anything. Then I won’t have to feel

  • embarrassed. So, she didn’t do that but said that she’d like to go out with me. On

Saturday, when I dumped Michelle, I already had the other one lined up, so I didn’t really care about Michelle anymore [pretend]. Now life has moved on and this weekend I will go out with her for the first time. And this week I felt really happy. This girl is really special. We have so much in common; she is pretty… Therapist: Can I just slow things down a bit to try and catch up?

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Peter: Yes, it is a bit fast, isn’t it? I always do that—I always have one in reserve. The minute I see trouble coming, I get one in reserve. Therapist: It seems to me that all of this action about phoning her so many times and getting another girl in reserve are ways in which you try to manage a terribly anxious feeling inside you. Peter: Yes, but now I don’t feel it because the new girl answers her phone all the time, so I know she likes me. Therapist: You said that when Michelle didn’t answer her phone, you got anxious. Is that all you felt, or did you have other feelings, too? Peter: I felt anxious that she was seeing another guy and then I phoned again and again. Therapist: If I thought that someone I like was seeing someone else, it would make me feel angry. Peter: Yes, I felt like I could smash my phone up. I wanted to break her door down. Therapist: So, part of phoning her so many times was also an angry thing. Peter: Yes, I suppose it was a bit smothering; maybe that is why she said that I was

  • moaning. But any guy would be upset if he was ignored...
slide-55
SLIDE 55

55 Less Mentalizing More Mentalizing

Empathize, support, and validate Explore, clarify, and expand Challenge Mentalizing the relationship Basic (practice) mentalizing

Final phase of treatment

  • Last 2 months
  • Increase independence and responsibility
  • Enhance social stability
  • Work through pending separation
  • Consolidate gains
  • Taper treatment over a longer time when needed
  • Develop an outcome formulation

Sharp & Rossouw (in press)

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56 Less Mentalizing More Mentalizing

Empathize, support, and validate Explore, clarify, and expand Challenge Mentalizing the relationship Basic (practice) mentalizing

Agenda

8:00-8:30: Recap of Day 1 8.30-10:00: Developmental theory 10:00-10:30: Break and refreshments 10:30-11:30: Examples from your work settings 11.30-12.30: MBT: Core components

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

Last day coming up tomorrow!

Start mentalizing!!!