SLIDE 21 CA Rajat B Talati 16‐01‐2019 21
I T C Re ve rsa l o n Sa le a fte r re c e ipt o f O.C.
I
T C re ve rsa l ne e d to b e do ne b y fo llo wing Rule 42 o f CGST Rule s, 2017
Que stio n a rise s whe the r re ve rsa l o f who le pro je c t-wise I
T C ne e ds to b e do ne ? ?
Rule 42 sta te s tha t re ve rsa l o f “I
T C in a T a x Pe rio d” ne e ds to b e do ne , i.e . I T C
- f the ta x pe rio d in whic h suc h re ve rsa l ha s to b e e ffe c te d (mo nth/ q ua rte r)
Co lle c to r o f Ce ntra l E
xc ise vs. Da i Ic hi Ka rka ria L
L T 353- a lso sta te s tha t “c re dit ne e d no t b e re ve rse d if sub se q ue ntly the fina l pro duc t is e xe mpte d fro m duty a nd whe n the c re dit ha s b e e n ta ke n le g a lly”
Se c .17(5) (c ) & (d) ta lks a b o ut no n-a va ilme nt o f I
T C o n c o nstruc tio n o f immo va b le pro pe rty (o the r tha n P&M) fo r o wn use
Supplie s a fte r OC – is it ‘ o wn use ’ ? Re q uire s re ve rsa l?
41
Anti-Pro fite e ring me a sure [Se c .171(1) o f CGST Ac t,2017]
Se c .171(1) - “Any re duc tio n in ra te o f ta x o n a ny supply o f g o o ds o r se rvic e s o r the
b e ne fit o f input ta x c re dit sha ll b e pa sse d o n to the re c ipie nt b y wa y o f c o mme nsura te re duc tio n in pric e s.”
Old Ac ts ha d c e rta in disa llo wa nc e s o f ta xe s pa id due to whic h full input ta x c re dits
we re no t a va ila b le . Ho we ve r, GST e nsure s se a mle ss flo w o f c re dits, whic h e nsure s tha t the re is no b lo c ka g e o f c re dits whic h wo uld le a d to inc re a se in c o sts.
He nc e , a ny suc h b e ne fit de rive d must b e pa sse d o n to the re c ipie nt a nd no t
re ta ine d b y the wo rks c o ntra c to r/ de ve lo pe r.
Pl. re fe r to Pre ss re le a se da te d 15.6.2017 - Ministry o f F
ina nc e -GOI
I
n c a se o f M/ s Pyra mid I nfra te c h Pvt. L td [2018(9) T MI 1107 – Na tio na l Anti-Pro fite e ring Autho rity] o rde r is pa sse d.
42