AFRC Annual Meeting 2019 Legal Program Overview Offense Defense - - PDF document

afrc annual meeting 2019 legal program overview
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019 Legal Program Overview Offense Defense - - PDF document

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019 Legal Program Overview Offense Defense O&C Act Protect agency tools DNR Trust mandate Develop legal precedent Unsupported regulatory Defend timber volume decisions (Critical Habitat) Defend our members AFRC


slide-1
SLIDE 1

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Legal Program Overview

Offense

O&C Act DNR Trust mandate Unsupported regulatory decisions (Critical Habitat)

Defense

Protect agency tools Develop legal precedent Defend timber volume Defend our members

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Litigation Casino

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

District Court Ninth Circuit 1 TRO 2 Prel. Injunction 3, 4 IPA 6 Summary Judgment 5 PI Appeal 9 Merits Appeal 7, 8 IPA

slide-4
SLIDE 4

O&C Act

O&C Lands: shall be managed … for permanent forest production, and the timber thereon shall be sold, cut, and removed in conformity with the princip[le] of sustained yield CSNM Expansion: No portion of the monument shall be considered to be suited for timber production, and no part of the monument shall be used in a calculation or provision of a sustained yield of timber.

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-5
SLIDE 5

O&C Act– Current Litigation

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

AFRC cases

  • Monument
  • RMP Challenge
  • “Swanson III”

Others

  • AOCC
  • Murphy
  • Pac. Rivers et al.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

O&C Act Developments

Washington, DC:

 Monument & RMP cases remanded for

explanation until June 3 Oregon:

 Pac. Rivers’ RMP challenge rejected  Reaffirms O&C Act is a “dominant use”

statute

 Magistrate Judge has recommended ruling in

favor of government in Monument suit

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WA DNR – Trust Mandate

[T]hese are real, enforceable trusts that impose upon the state the same fiduciary duties applicable to private trustees.

Washington Supreme

Court in Skamania

  • County. v. State (1984)

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-8
SLIDE 8

WA DNR – Fiduciary Duty

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

What is fiduciary duty?

 Undivided loyalty  Diligence  Impartiality  Compliance with trust terms

slide-9
SLIDE 9

WA DNR – Fiduciary Duty

What is fiduciary duty? A trustee is held to something stricter than the morals of the market place. Not honesty alone, but the punctilio of an honor the most sensitive, is then the standard of behavior.

  • New York Court of Appeals in Meinhard v. Salmon (1928)

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-10
SLIDE 10

WA DNR – Fiduciary Duty and Marbled Murrelet

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Farm Bill Categorical Exclusion (CE)

In order to use the Farm Bill CE, projects must:

  • Maximize retention of old-growth and large trees to the extent the trees

promote stands that are resilient to insect and disease threats;

  • Consider the best available scientific information; and
  • Be developed and implemented through a collaborative process that

includes multiple interested persons representing diverse interests and is transparent and non-exclusive.

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Farm Bill CE

A project that uses the Farm Bill CE:

  • May not exceed 3,000 treated acres;
  • Must be located in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI), or

in condition classes 2 or 3 in Fire Regime Groups I, II, or III.

  • May not include the establishment of permanent roads.

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Sunny South Project

 First case to challenge use of Farm Bill CE  Three Issues

 Whether the landscape designation (by

the Chief) of insect and disease treatment areas required the preparation of a NEPA analysis.

 Whether the Forest Service was required to

engage in “extraordinary circumstances” review.

 If so, whether impacts on the California

Spotted Owl required an EA.

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Lostine Corridor Public Safety Project

What does collaborative process mean under the Farm Bill?

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Moose Creek Vegetation Project

Representative Stand Before Treatment After Treatment – Commercial Thin

Did the Forest Service demonstrate that the project maximizes the retention

  • f old

growth?

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-16
SLIDE 16

WEYERHAEUSER CO. V. U.S. FWS

What does critical habitat mean? Is a decision not to exclude areas subject to judicial review?

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-17
SLIDE 17

WEYERHAEUSER CO. V. U.S. FWS

According to the ordinary understanding of how adjectives work, “critical habitat” must also be “habitat.”

  • Supreme Court opinion

(Chief Justice Roberts)

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Softwood Lumber

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Softwood Lumber

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019

Panel Decision on Anti-Dumping Measures

Upholds methodology used by US

Subject to appeal to WTO Appellate Body

NAFTA panel to review injury determination by ITC, May 7 2019 Countervailing Duty Dispute

WTO Panel review underway

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Questions?

Lawson Fite Sara Ghafouri American Forest Resource Council 700 NE Multnomah St., Ste. 320 Portland, OR 97232 (503) 222-9505; (971) 801-4864 (Lawson cell); (650) 279-3569 (Sara cell) Lfite@amforest.org sghafouri@amforest.org

AFRC Annual Meeting 2019