AFIB Anti-coagulation . Schirmer JACC Dec 2010;56:2067 Clinical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

afib anti coagulation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

AFIB Anti-coagulation . Schirmer JACC Dec 2010;56:2067 Clinical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AFIB Anti-coagulation . Schirmer JACC Dec 2010;56:2067 Clinical Trials - Aristotle Apixaban 5mg bid vs Warfarin 18,201 subjects with at least 2 episodes of AFIB and CHADS2 - 1 or more (mean 2.1) Non-inferiority design Stroke


slide-1
SLIDE 1

.

AFIB – Anti-coagulation

Schirmer JACC Dec 2010;56:2067

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Clinical Trials - Aristotle

Grainger et al. NEJM 2011;365;981

  • Apixaban 5mg bid vs Warfarin
  • 18,201 subjects with at least 2 episodes of AFIB and

CHADS2 - 1 or more (mean 2.1)

  • Non-inferiority design
  • Stroke or systemic embolism as Primary EP
  • Safety EP was major bleeding
  • Apixiban previously shown to reduce risk of same EP

by 55% in those who could not take Warfarin

  • Mean age 70 with 2/3 male
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Clinical Trials - Aristotle

Grainger et al. NEJM 2011;365;981

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Clinical Trials - Aristotle

Grainger et al. NEJM 2011;365;981

slide-5
SLIDE 5

.

AFIB – ROCKET AFIB

  • Presented at AHA 2010
  • 14000 patients with AFIB randomized to

Rivaroxaban or Coumadin

  • Very high risk with 90% CHADS2 3 or above
  • 55% had a previous CVA
  • CVA and systemic embolism over 40 months
slide-6
SLIDE 6

20 40 60 80 100 120 240 360 480 600 720 840

Days since randomization Cumulative event rate (%)

Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin: ROCKET AF Trial

14,264 Patients (Blinded)

Rates of major bleeding Rivaroxaban Warfarin P

  • Any

2.13 3.09 <0.001

  • Fatal

0.4 0.8 0.003

  • Intracranial hem

0.33 0.80 <0.001 No./100 patient-year

1 2 3 4 5 6 120 240 360 480 600 720 840

Per-protocol population Events: stroke or systemic embolism

Warfarin

HR 0.79 (0.66-0.96) P<0.0001 for noninferiority

Rivaroxaban

3143509-1

Patel: NEJM, 2011

With permission B. Gersh 2012

slide-7
SLIDE 7

3169948-4

Summary of Recent Clinical Trials

*Creatine clearance <30 mL/min

Dose Endpoints

  • Stroke/systemic

embolism 150 mgm bid 110 mgm bid (not in USA) 75 mgm bid* 20 mgm/day 5 mgm bid** Superiority ( age >75 yrs with 150 mgm bid ) Noninferior

**2.5 mgm bid in high-risk pts Age >80 yrs Wt <60 kg Creatinine >1.5 mgm dL

Drug Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixiban Target Thrombin Factor Xa Factor Xa 150 mgm bid – superiority 110 mgm bid – noninferior

  • Bleeding
  • Intracranial

hemorrhage

With permission B. Gersh 2012

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Clinical Trials – Atlas TIMI 51

Mega et al. NEJM 2011;365 (Nov 2011)

  • Rivaroxaban 2.5 or 5 mg bid vs placebo
  • 15,526 ACS patients for mean of 13 months
  • Primary EP of CV death, MI or stroke
  • Mean age 61
  • 50% STEMI and 60% had PCI or CABG with index

event

  • >90% on ASA and Plavix
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Clinical Trials – Atlas TIMI 51

Mega et al. NEJM 2011;365 (Nov 2011)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Clinical Trials – Atlas TIMI 51

Mega et al. NEJM 2011;365 (Nov 2011)

Increased IC bleeding 0.6 vs 0.2 %

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Clinical Trials – APPRAISE-2

  • Higher risk group of ACS patients
  • HR 0.95 for Apixaban vs placebo for primary EP of

death, MI and stroke

  • At 12 months, event rate almost double ATLAS –

ACS2 study

Alexander et al. NEJM 2011

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Clinical Trials – Stem cell infusion

Williams et al. Circ Res 2011;108:792

  • 8 subjects with endovascular , intra-myocardial

injection

  • Autologous bone marrow derived progenitor cells
  • Injected into scar and peri-scar areas
  • CMR end-point at 3, 6 and 12 months
  • Novel due to looking at chronic scar patients and

evaluating reverse remodeling

  • Preliminary data from TAC- HFT
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Clinical Trials – Stem cell infusion

Williams et al. Circ Res 2011;108:792

  • Bone marrow aspirates

– Mononuclear cells (n=4) reinfused within 4 hours – Mesenchymal cells (n=4) cultured and reinfused in 5 weeks

  • Injected by catheter up to 10 areas identified by CMR

maps

  • EF 20-50% and presence of scar on CMR
  • CMR evaluated EF, volumes, % scar, RWM
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Clinical Trials – Stem cell infusion

Williams et al. Circ Res 2011;108:792

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Clinical Trials – Stem cell infusion

Williams et al. Circ Res 2011;108:792

Decrease in both ESV and EDV EF doesn’t change

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Clinical Trials – Stem cell infusion

Williams et al. Circ Res 2011;108:792

Decrease in both RWM and amount of scar Early change in RWM predicted later remodeling

RWM