AECM A PRESENTED BY: Malathi Srivatsan aECM Team Co-Lead 1 WHY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

aecm
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

AECM A PRESENTED BY: Malathi Srivatsan aECM Team Co-Lead 1 WHY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AECM A PRESENTED BY: Malathi Srivatsan aECM Team Co-Lead 1 WHY SURFACE ENGINEERING FOR CELL CULTURE? 17,000 people sustain a spinal cord injury in the United States annually. Neurons are killed or permanently damaged. Unlike


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

AECM

PRESENTED BY: Malathi Srivatsan aECM Team Co-Lead

A

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 17,000 people sustain a spinal cord injury in the

United States annually.

  • Neurons are killed or permanently damaged.
  • Unlike other cells, neurons do not divide to

replace dead neurons.

  • To over come loss of function, Neural Progenitor

Cells (NPCs) which have the ability to differentiate into neurons could be used for transplantation. Need improved methods for in vitro and in vivo application.

TASK: Defining methods using surfaces to obtain enough functional new neurons to replace dead or damaged cells in nervous system

2

WHY SURFACE ENGINEERING FOR CELL CULTURE?

A

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Complexities in and around nervous system to be considered for promoting differentiation

3

A

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CASE is addressing the challenge by fabricating innovative growth surfaces for neuronal differentiation and cell to cell communication

KEY ASSUMPTION: aECMs with tunable surfaces and added components will

  • utperform simple platforms that currently exists for differentiating neural cells in vitro

( increased neuron number, viability, physiology). GOALS for Year II:

  • Year 2 Objective 1: Purchase, install and provide training on major equipment
  • Year 2 Objective 2: Develop aECM that promote differentiation into specific cell types
  • Year 2 Objective 3 Determine morphology of aECM and optimal structural interactions of

tunable nanostructures with biological cells

  • Year 2 Objective 4: Fabricate and test 2D fiber and protein aECMs
  • Year 2 Objective 5: Develop contacts with Arkansas industry to promote commercialization
  • f research
  • Year 2 Objective 6: Integrate research with education to increase next generation of

scientists:

4

A

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Two major questions are being addressed:

Griffin Sequencing &Gene expression Reyna Borrelli Srivatsan Allen Biris Biris, Zou Ghosh Servoss

APPROACH and TEAM: Using innovative surfaces to improve neuronal differentiation and viability/functionality: extracellular matrix and cell-cell communication are critical aspects

  • 2. Other sources (molecules, cells, organelles etc.) for

stem cell crosstalk/support of differentiation and function

5

A

  • 1. Neuronal Differentiation

from stem cells

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A

AECM TEAM CORE FACULTY

Malathi Srivatsan Team Co-Lead Antiño Allen Michael Borrelli Nathan Reyna

A A A A A

Rob Griffin Team Co-Lead Shannon Servoss

T

M

C

Min Zou

Alexandru S. Biris Anindya Ghosh

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CHANGES TO TEAM ACTIVITIES

Experimental Approach: No major changes Personnel: Shiguang Yu (research faculty), replaced by postdoc at Arkansas State University. Robert J. Griffin (group leader), replaces Michael Borrelli as co-group leader with Dr. Srivatsan.

7

A

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MILESTONES AND OBJECTIVES-Yr II

8

A

Objectives Milestones Status Purchase, install and provide training on major equipment Cell culture (UAMS) in yr 2 for aECM Milestone met Develop aECM that promote differentiation into specific cell types. Quantify proportion of CNS ECM proteins that must be incorporated into aECMs Matrigel was identified to mimic natural CNS ECM. Some of its properties were incorporated into first generation of aECM. Gold nanorod first generation surfaces tested. Optimizing multi-component surfaces with varying topography and efforts are continuing Determine morphology of aECM and

  • ptimal structural interactions of tunable

nanostructures with biological cells; develop simulation models for further

  • ptimization

Morphological and structural interactions measured using microscopy (confocal, EM) and image analysis. Milestone being met and efforts are continuing Fabricate and test 2D fiber and protein aECMs Most productive structural compositions identified To obtain most productive surface (surface that results in maximal neuronal differentiation), incorporation/addition of peptoids, exosomes, topographies, various protein coupling efforts are underway. Omics analysis platform established for exosomes or cells. Evaluations of the effectiveness of topographies, peptoids and exosomes are underway. Working groups for each curriculum kit will develop the curriculum and supply lists for assigned kits Curriculum kits planned and one of each style being constructed. Develop contacts with Arkansas industry to promote commercialization of research Industry visits to give insight on successful startup in Arkansas and the iCorp program Developing collaboration with Carbon Nano onion, LLC Integrate research with education to increase next generation of scientists Create courses, incorporate research related topics in existing courses Met milestone and moving forward

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Obj.2 Develop aECM that promote differentiation into specific cell types- Control surfaces: Rat NPCs Differentiate well on Matrigel

and laminin, two natural ECM Materials used as control surfaces: Srivatsan et al.

Polylysine+Laminin (Low Magnification) Matrigel (High Magnification)

Neuron = Beta 3 Tubulin Astroglia = GFAP Nuclei of all cells =DAPI

9

A

10 20 30 40 50 60 Astrocytes Neurons % Cell I differentiation Different Surfaces

Matrigel substratum promotes more neuronal differentiation compared to Poly-D-Lysine & Laminin

** Extracellular Matrix significantly increases neuronal differentiation

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Obj. 2 Develop aECM that promote differentiation into specific cell types-

Control surface: Rat NPCs Differentiate well on Matrigel into

Oligodendrocytes: Srivatsan et al.

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0

PDL Matrigel % of cells

ODC Astrocytes Undifferentiated

** ** Sequential addition of biomolecules along with the ECM surface significantly increase differentiation of ODCs at a faster rate.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cartoon diagram of ~30 nm gold plasmonic nanorod double layer with incorporated carboxy (red dots) and amino (blue dots) groups Electron Micrograph of Gold nanorod surface

Obj.2 Develop aECM that promote differentiation into specific cell types-

1ST GEN SURFACE: Biris et al.

11

A

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Obj.3 Determine morphology of aECM and optimal structural interactions- Density and composition of gold matters:

Rat Neural Stem Cells (18 Days) Grown on Gold Nanorods Coated with Laminin: Borrelli et al

Blue: Nuclei Green: Neurons Red: Astrocytes

12

First generation surface promising; stimulating design of second generation with added components

A

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Obj. 3 Determine aECM morphology, interactions with & effects on

NSCs-

Gold Nanorod surface and Neuronal Differentiation: Srivatsan & Biris et al.

  • Found to be not toxic

to cells

  • Cells attach very well

without any coating

  • Cells differentiate

either into neurons or into astrocytes

  • Does not significantly

increase neuronal differentiation

  • May need to be

coupled to other materials to improve results

13

A

AuNR surface is biocompatible, provides excellent adhesion and encourages differentiation of neurons as well as astrocytes

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Obj. 3 Determine aECM morphology, interactions with & effects on NSCs- Surfaces made from

barium titanate crystals promoted growth and differentiation of NSCs without the need for any coating with laminin: Borrelli et al.

150 µM

Blue: Nuclei – Hoechst Dye Green: Neurons - Anti-Beta Tubulin III Red: Astrocytes – Anti-GFAP

  • The real potential for the barium titanate surfaces is

that they can be polarized readily in a constant or time-varying manner. Activating the barium titanate with time-varying waveforms will produce ultrasonic waves parallel (surface waves) or normal to the surface

  • Using barium titanate surfaces alone, or in

combination with the other types of aECM surfaces

  • ffers the potential to use electrically- or pulsed

laser-induced ultrasound into the aECM surfaces to stimulate NSC differentiation into neurons and increase Neuronal plasticity

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Obj.4 Fabricate and test 2D fiber and protein aECMs

Nano Cellulose surface for Neuronal Differentiation:

Srivatsan & Ghosh et al.

  • Found to be not toxic

to cells

  • Cells attach well
  • Cells differentiate

mostly into neurons or

  • May be very suitable

to be coupled to other materials to improve results

15

A

Nano cellulose was coupled to Lysine to provide + charged surface

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Obj. 3 Determine aECM morphology, interactions with & effects on NSC

differentiations-

Comparative efficacy of the different surfaces tested for NSC differentiation: Srivatsan, Biris & Ghosh et al.

10 20 30 40 50 60 Astrocytes Neurons % differentiation Different Surfaces

Matrigel substratum promotes more neuronal differentiation compared to Poly-D-Lysine & Laminin

Matrigel Poly-D-lysine + Laminin

10 20 30 40 50 60 Astrocytes Neurons

% differentiation

Different Surfaces

AuNR Surface Nanocellulose

Neuronal differentiation on AuNR surface was slightly higher compared to nanocellulose, however astrocyte differentiation was significantly lower on Nanocellulose

* ** * ** Matrigel, Nanocellulose and gold nanorod surfaces all promote neuronal differentiation between 44 to 50%

  • f total progenitor cell population
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Exosomes: 100 nm, thousands/day

(Gupta and Pulliam Journal of Neuroinflammation 2014, 11:68)

17

A

Exosomes are an important aspect of extracellular matrix and may influence neural differentiation. Our approach: use exosomes from varying cell types to affect positive change, and incorporate exosomes into growth matrix. Challenge: isolation of exosomes from primary cultures; initial work with serum-derived or transformed cell line exosomes.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Exosomes from glioma cells exposed to cytokine or hypoxia induce/maintain neuronal differentiation

Day 5 Day 8 Day 5 Day 8

Obj.4 Fabricate and test 2D fiber and protein aECMs Exosomes from malignant cells exposed to varying stresses; Basis for adding to 2nd generation surfaces: Kore, Griffin et al.

Flow cytometry: Astrocytes Flow cytometry: Neurons

18

A

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Nolan J, Kore R, Griffin RJ, Zharov VP et al. Analytical Cellular Pathology, 2016

IMAGING EXOSOMES: Methods for in vitro and in vivo detection

19

A

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Obj.4 Fabricate and test 2D fiber and pro protein in aECMs

Identification of pathways and biomarkers that are stimulated in stem cells by exosomes:

Effort led by Nathan Reyna, PhD and students at Ouachita Baptist University

What is new: Meta Analysis of differentially expressed genes across all variables (TNF- alpha, IL-1Beta, Hypoxia, Exosome Enrichment) : identifying pathways and proteins that may be involved and can be exploited in next generation surfaces.

  • Venn Diagram of
  • verlapping genes by

treatment

20

A

slide-21
SLIDE 21

35 mm petri with custom glass-bottom substrate

  • 35 mm petri
  • 9.5mm through hole in petri
  • PDMS glued coverslip
  • #1.5 Borosilicate Schott D263

glass

  • Ormocomp 3D printed

structures 1 micron rectangles (1 micron tall) with varying aspect ratios of 1:1, 2:1, 4:1, 6:1, 8:1 and 10:1

  • Obj. 2 Develop aECM that promote differentiation into specific cell types

Exploring topography with Mechanical group- Patterned surfaces being ‘3D printed’ with polymer: Borrelli & Zou et al.

21

A

Combined Fluoresence Image : 10:1 Ratio NanoScribe-Printed Surface: Laminin -Coated

Cells were immunostained 17 days after the Neural Stem Cells (NSCs) were seeded onto the surface

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Obj. 2 Develop aECM that promote differentiation into specific

cell types

Neural Differentiation using 3-D printed (Nanoscribe) matrices:

Srivatsan & Zou et al.

22

A

IP-L 780 photoresist

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Obj. 2 Develop aECM that promote differentiation into specific cell types

Comparative efficacy of the different topography tested for NSC differentiation:

Srivatsan & Zou et al.

Grid +PDL

100X 200X

Grid + Gold

100X 200X

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Obj.5 Develop contacts with Arkansas industry to promote commercialization of research

Nano Onion surfaces are fabricated to test for differentiation (pl modify-this is place holder): Servoss & Griffin et al.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Modeling / CI interaction

  • To help AECM thrust decide on

improved second and third generation surfaces, image enhancement for cell/surface interaction is needed

  • CI group (Dr. Kemp and team) have

developed a toolbox to address this need

  • The tool box will help measure (a)

the mean pore diameter of the fibrous scaffold, (b)orientation of the fibers, and (c) length and diameter of fibers

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Abstract

Funding for this research was provided by the Center for Advanced Surface Engineering, under the National Science Foundation Grant No. IIA-1457888 and the Arkansas EPSCoR Program, ASSET III. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Concluding Remark

 Only a few seconds are required to find the center location of all circles that fit with in the fiber width by using the develop diameter finding toolbox, thus it is a very fast method than compare to the manual method.  The validity of the diameter finding method is tested by comparing the result with the manual method and distance transform and skeletonization method, which proves that the develop toolbox is giving more accurate result compared to the distance transform and skeletonization technique.  The result of the develop orientation finding toolboxes are validated by applying on the simulated images where the orientation distribution of the objects are known.  These results prove that the develop Fourier method is giving accurate orientation of the aligned fibers and the gradient method can be used to find the orientation distribution of the randomly oriented fibers. Figure 3: (a) SEM image of Poly(ethersulfone) (PES)) fibers [1],(b) Input image is converted to binary image by using slider, Figure 8: (a) User interface of the develop orientation finding toolbox, SEM image of PLGA fibers [2] is selected for analyzing, (b) Orientation distribution of PLGA Fibers.

(a) (b)

Introduction Toolbox for Finding the Diameter Distribution of Fibers References Acknowledgement

[1] Katti DS, Robinson KW, Ko FK, Laurencin CT, “Bioresorbable nanofiber-based systems for wound healing and drug delivery: optimization of fabrication parameters,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, Volume 70B, Issue 2, pages 286–296, 15 August 2004. [2] Croisier F., Duwezb A.-S., Jérômea C., Léonardc A.F., Werfd K.O., Dijkstrae P.J., Benninkd M.L., “Mechanical testing of Electrospun PCL Fibers,” Acta Biomaterialia, Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 218–224. [3] Chaudhuri B.B., Kundu Puluk, Sarkar Nirupam , “Detection and gradation of oriented texture,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Volume 14 Issue 2, Feb. 1993, Pages 147 – 153. Figure 2: (a) User interface of the develop diameter finding toolbox (b) Flowchart of the develop algorithm. The aim of tissue engineering is to repair or regenerate the damaged tissues instead of replacing them by developing biological substitutes that restore, maintain or improve tissue function. To achieve this aim, three dimensional porous scaffolds have been used extensively in tissue engineering to provide the appropriate environment for the regeneration of tissues and organs by mimicking the behavior and properties of natural extracellular matrix (ECM). For developing an efficient artificial ECM (aECM) or to mimic the native ECM architecture, it is very important to design a suitable scaffold where cells should be able to adhere, migrate and proliferate in order to regenerate the damaged tissues. Several studies have shown that structural properties of fibrous scaffolds such as diameter, orientation distribution of fibers have a pronounced influence on cell behavior. So, in this study, standalone image analysis toolboxes are generated to find the diameter and orientation distribution of fibers from the microscope images. Graphical user interface and deployment toolbox of Matlab software are used to generate the standalone image analysis toolboxes so that any untrained user can easily use the develop toolboxes without installing the Matlab software. The angular amplitude of FFT, 𝐵 𝜄 , is determined by summing the contribution from each pixel in the sub image: Finally, A(θ) was converted to Cartesian coordinate and eigenvalues are calculated for the following vector: Gradient Method: The image is divided into M x M sub regions. For each sub image (W), a 180 element array 𝐵𝜄

𝑋

(contained all angles between 0-179ⴰ) is defined and quantized in 1ⴰ intervals [3]. Figure 1: Basic principles of tissue engineering.

(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)

Image Analysis Toolboxes for Finding the Diameter and Orientation Distribution of Fibrous Scaffold

Samia Sanjari & Brandon A. Kemp

Figure 4: (a) Circles fit with in the fiber width to find the diameter of fibers, (b) Diameter distribution of fibers. Simulated Image Analysis: Figure 5: (a) Image generated by using f(x,y)=sin(10πx),(b) Image generated by using f(x,y)=sin(10πx) rotated by 90 degree (b) Image generated by using f(x,y)=sin[2π(10x+16y)].

(c) (a) (b) Input Image Orientation (with respect to horizontal axis) (a) 0ⴰ (b) 89.99ⴰ (c) 44.4ⴰ

Table 1: Orientation of synthetic images Figure 6: User interface of the develop orientation finding toolbox, SEM image of PCL–gelatin ultrafine fibers [2] is selected for analyzing. Real Image Analysis: Simulated Image Analysis: Figure 7: (a) Randomly oriented lines ( Simulated image generated by using paint), (b) Orientation distribution

  • f lines determined by using the gradient method.
(a) (b)

Toolbox for Finding the Orientation Distribution of Fibers

Fast Two Dimensional Fourier Analysis(FFT): Real Image Analysis:

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Obj.6 Integrate research with education to increase next generation of scientists-

Education, Diversity and Outreach-I Srivatsan etal.

  • Cell signaling (A-State, BIO 5123) included

discussions on ECM and Stem cell differentiation

  • MBS seminar series (A-State, MBS 7111)

spent one semester on presentations, webinars and discussions on career development for graduate students (Professional development)

  • K-12 outreach activities based on the

neural development and activity was provided by faculty, postdocs and grad studentsat various locations to different groups of students

  • Research was presented at the Capitol to

law makers and at NCUR

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Obj.6 Integrate research with education to increase next generation of scientists-

Education, Diversity and Outreach-II Reyna et al.

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Second generation surfaces and incorporation of

peptoids and exosome components.

  • Isolating exosomes from other sources (stem cells,

astrocytes).

  • RNAseq strategy and workflow for exosomes to be used

for freshly differentiated neurons.

  • RNAseq to determine mechanisms involved in neuronal

differentiation in response to different surfaces

  • Determining the physiological characteristics of

differentiated neurons

  • Building bridges: New interaction with carbon-nanoonion

company, Servoss printing and peptoid conjugation.

FUTURE ACTIVITIES

29

A

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • I. Data sharing

Meetings: 21+ Publications: 5+, 1 published

  • II. Additional Funding proposals

NIH COBRE, SBIRs

  • III. Training next generation of scientists

8+ graduate students, 50+ undergraduates, 3 postdocs

  • IV. Educational outreach

Neuro-electrophysiology kit progressing for implementation by Arkansas high school teachers.

  • V. Science Communication to public

Posters on the hill (Arkansas State Capitol): 3 presentations by undergraduate researchers

IMPACTS AND OUTPUTS

30

A