adversarial training
play

Adversarial Training Attacks on Deep Networks and Generative - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

images from Geris Game (Pixar, 1997) Adversarial Training Attacks on Deep Networks and Generative Adversarial Networks Erkut Erdem Aykut Erdem Levent Karacan Computer Vision Lab, Hacettepe University Outline Part 1: Attacks on


  1. images from Geri’s Game (Pixar, 1997) Adversarial Training Attacks on Deep Networks and Generative Adversarial Networks Erkut Erdem � Aykut Erdem � Levent Karacan Computer Vision Lab, Hacettepe University

  2. Outline • Part 1: Attacks on Deep Networks • Part 2: Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 10 Minutes Break • Part 3: Image Editing with GANs 2

  3. John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982) Part 1 – Attacks on Deep Networks Erkut Erdem Computer Vision Lab, Hacettepe University

  4. Deep Convolutional Networks in 10 mins 4

  5. 1 st Era (1940’s-1960’s): Invention • Connectionism (Hebb 1940’s) : complex behaviors arise from interconnected networks of simple units • Artificial neurons (Hebb, McCulloch and Pitts 1940’s-1950’s) • Perceptron (Rosenblatt 1950’s) : Single layer with learning rule linear 
 weighting non-linear 
 1 b accumulation activation w 1 x 1 w 2 Σ S P( y = 1 | x , w , b) x 2 w D ⁞ x D 5 Slide adapted from Rob Fergus

  6. 2 nd Era (1980’s-1990’s): Multi-layered Networks • Back-propagation (Rumelhart, Hinton and Williams 1986 +others) : effective way to train multi-layered networks • Convolutional networks (LeCun et al. 1989) : architecture adapted for images (inspired by Hubel and Wiesel’s simple/complex cells) C3: f. maps 16@10x10 C1: feature maps S4: f. maps 16@5x5 INPUT 6@28x28 32x32 S2: f. maps C5: layer OUTPUT F6: layer 6@14x14 120 10 84 Gaussian connections Full connection Subsampling Subsampling Full connection Convolutions Convolutions 6 Slide adapted from Rob Fergus

  7. The Deep Learning Era (2011-present) • Big gains in performance on perceptual tasks: • Vision • Speech understanding • Natural language processing • Three ingredients: 1. Deep neural network models (supervised training) 2. Big labeled datasets 3. Fast GPU computation 7 Slide credit: Rob Fergus

  8. Powerful Hardware • Deep neural nets highly amenable to implementation on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) • Matrix multiplication • 2D convolution • Latest generation nVidia GPUs (Pascal) deliver 10 Tflops • Faster than fastest computer in the world in 2000 • 10 million times faster than 1980’s Sun workstation 8 Slide adapted from Rob Fergus

  9. AlexNet: The Model That Changed The History • Krizhevsky, Sutskever and Hinton (2012) − 8 layer Convolutional network model [LeCun et al. 1989] − 7 hidden layers, 650,000 neurons, ~60,000,000 parameters − Trained on 1.2 million ImageNet images (with labels) − GPU implementation (50x speedup over CPU) − Training time: 1 week on pair of GPUs 9 [AlexNet by Krizhevsky et al. 2012]

  10. Supervised Learning: Image Classification “Cat” Joshua Drewe 10

  11. Supervised Learning: Image Classification “Cat” Model [parameters θ] Training: Adjust model parameters θ so predicted labels match true labels across training set Joshua Drewe 11

  12. Modern Convolutional Nets [AlexNet by Krizhevsky et al. 2012] [AlexNet by Krizhevsky et al. 2012] Excellent performance in most image Millions of parameters learned from data understanding tasks The “ meaning ” of the representation is Learn a sequence of general-purpose unclear representations 12 Slide credit: Andrea Vedaldi

  13. 
 Convolutions with Filters • Each filter acts on multiple input channels F − Convolution is local Filters look locally Σ Parameter sharing − Translation invariant x y Filters act the same everywhere 1 lattice 
 multiple 
 b structure feature channels f 1 x 1 f 2 Σ S x 2 F q Σ F q Σ f D ⁞ x D 13 Slide credit: Andrea Vedaldi

  14. Convolution • Convolution = Spatial filtering • Different filters (weights) reveal a different characteristics of the input. 1 0 0 1/8 ∗ 4 1 1 0 1 0 14

  15. Convolution • Convolution = Spatial filtering • Different filters (weights) reveal a different characteristics of the input. -1 0 0 ∗ 4 -1 -1 0 -1 0 15

  16. Convolution • Convolution = Spatial filtering • Different filters (weights) reveal a different characteristics of the input. 0 -1 1 ∗ 0 2 -2 1 0 -1 16

  17. Convolutional Layer • Multiple filters produce multiple output channels • For example, if we had 6 5x5 filters, we’ll get 6 separate activation maps: activation maps 32 28 Convolutional Layer 28 32 3 6 We stack these up to get an output of size 28x28x6. 17 Slide credit: Alex Karpathy

  18. Pooling Layer • makes the representations smaller and more manageable • operates over each activation map independently: • Max pooling, average pooling, etc. Single depth slice x 1 1 2 4 max pool with 2x2 5 6 7 8 filters and stride 2 6 8 3 2 1 0 3 4 1 2 3 4 y 18 Slide adapted from Alex Karpathy

  19. Fully Connected Layer • contains neurons that connect to the entire input volume, as in ordinary Neural Networks 19 20 Slide credit: Alex Karpathy

  20. Feature Learning • Hierarchical layer structure allows to learn hierarchical filters (features). 20 Slide credit: Yann LeCun

  21. Visualizing The Representation t-SNE visualization (van der Maaten & Hinton) • Embed high-dimensional points so that locally, pairwise distances are conserved • i.e. similar things end up in similar places. dissimilar things end up wherever • Right : Example embedding of MNIST digits (0-9) in 2D 21 Slide credit: Alex Karpathy

  22. Three Years of Progress • • • AlexNet, 8 layers • rs 3x3 conv, 64 11x11 conv, 96, /4, pool/2 GoogLeNet, VGG, 19 layers softmax2 Soft maxActivat ion • 5x5 conv, 256, pool/2 3x3 conv, 64, pool/2 22 layers FC (ILSVRC 2012) AveragePool • 7x7+ 1(V) (ILSVRC 2014) s 3x3 conv, 384 3x3 conv, 128 DepthConcat Conv Conv Conv Conv • (ILSVRC 2014) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3 conv, 384 3x3 conv, 128, pool/2 Conv Conv MaxPool 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) • DepthConcat Conv Conv Conv Conv 3x3 conv, 256, pool/2 3x3 conv, 256 softmax1 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) Conv Conv MaxPool SoftmaxActivation 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) • fc, 4096 3x3 conv, 256 MaxPool FC 3x3+ 2(S) DepthConcat FC • fc, 4096 3x3 conv, 256 Conv Conv Conv Conv Conv 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) Conv Conv MaxPool AveragePool 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) • 5x5+ 3(V) fc, 1000 3x3 conv, 256, pool/2 DepthConcat • Conv Conv Conv Conv 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3 conv, 512 Conv Conv MaxPool 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) • DepthConcat softmax0 3x3 conv, 512 Conv Conv Conv Conv • SoftmaxActivation 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) Conv Conv MaxPool FC 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 3x3 conv, 512 DepthConcat FC Conv Conv Conv Conv Conv 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 1(S) • 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3 conv, 512, pool/2 Conv Conv MaxPool AveragePool 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 3(V) • DepthConcat 3x3 conv, 512 Conv Conv Conv Conv 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) • Conv Conv MaxPool 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 3x3 conv, 512 • Very deep • Branching MaxPool 3x3+ 2(S) • DepthConcat 3x3 conv, 512 Conv Conv Conv Conv • 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) p g Conv Conv MaxPool 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) • Simply deep • Bottleneck 3x3 conv, 512, pool/2 DepthConcat ck Conv Conv Conv Conv 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) 5x5+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) fc, 4096 Conv Conv MaxPool 1x1+ 1(S) 1x1+ 1(S) 3x3+ 1(S) MaxPool nnection 3x3+ 2(S) • Skip connection fc, 4096 LocalRespNorm Conv 3x3+ 1(S) fc, 1000 Conv 1x1+ 1(V) , Shaoqing Ren, & Jian S LocalRespNorm MaxPool 3x3+ 2(S) 22 Conv 7x7+ 2(S) input Image Recognition”. CVP

  23. Training Deep Neural Networks • The network is trained by stochastic gradient descent. • Backpropagation is used similarly as in a fully connected network. • Pass gradients through element-wise activation function. • We also need to pass gradients through the convolution operation and the pooling operation. 23

  24. Object Detection Networks ImageNet detection data data backbone classification detection structure network network pre-train features fine-tune R-CNN • AlexNet • Fast R-CNN • VGG-16 • Faster R-CNN • GoogleNet • MultiBox • ResNet-101 • SSD • … • … • independently independently “plug-in” “plug-in” “plug-in” developed developed detectors feature detectors features feature 24 Slide credit: Kaiming He

  25. ResNet’s Object Detection Results on COCO Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, & Jian Sun. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. CVPR 2016. Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, & Jian Sun. Faster R- CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. NIPS 2015. 26 Slide credit: Kaiming He

  26. ResNet’s Object Detection Results on COCO Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, & Jian Sun. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. CVPR 2016. Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, & Jian Sun. Faster R- CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. NIPS 2015. 27 Slide credit: Kaiming He *the ori

  27. Story isn't over yet! 27

  28. Story isn't over yet! … we have reached the point where ML works, but let’s see how it can be easily fooled. 28

  29. Adversarial Examples 29

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend