Advanced Nano-Composite Lithium-Metal-Oxide Electrodes for High - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

advanced nano composite lithium metal oxide electrodes
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Advanced Nano-Composite Lithium-Metal-Oxide Electrodes for High - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Advanced Nano-Composite Lithium-Metal-Oxide Electrodes for High Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries Sun Ho Kang Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 The 7 th US-Korea Forum on Nanotechnology:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Advanced Nano-Composite Lithium-Metal-Oxide Electrodes for High Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries

Sun– Ho Kang

Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439

The 7th US-Korea Forum on Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials and Systems for Nano Energy Seoul, Korea, April 5-6, 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Diverse Applications of Li-ion Batteries

e g SoCalEdison A123 e.g.,SoCalEdison-A123 32 MWh LIB

Li i B tt i

Consumer Electronics

Hearing devices Neuro-stimulator Pacemaker

Military Applications

Li-ion Batteries as power sources

Insulin pump Bone growth stimulator

Smart Grid (Utility-scale energy storage) Medical Devices

Beagle 2

Spaceships and Satellites Transportation Miscellaneous (power tools, backup power, etc.)

e.g.,HEV, PHEV, EV, E-Bike

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why Li-ion Batteries?

/ l) 400 350

aller

/ l) 400 350

aller

Secondary batteries sales (US)

Density (Wh/ 300 250

sma

Lithium Batteries (LIB, LPB…) Density (Wh/ 300 250

sma

Lithium Batteries (LIB, LPB…) ric Energy D 200 150 Ni-MH Ni Zn ric Energy D 200 150 Ni-MH Ni Zn Volumet 100 50

lighter

Ni-Zn Ni-Cd Lead-Acid Volumet 100 50

lighter

Ni-Zn Ni-Cd Lead-Acid 0 40 80 120 160 200 Gravimetric Energy Density (Wh/ kg) 0 40 80 120 160 200 Gravimetric Energy Density (Wh/ kg)

Li‐ion battery is the battery chemistry of choice for future generations of energy storage systems for portable electronics, power tools, and electric vehicles. LIB storage systems for portable electronics, power tools, and electric vehicles. LIB is also one of the candidates for utility‐scale electric energy storage systems.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LIB as Energy/Power Source for Transportation Plug‐in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV)

A h b id hi l i h b i h b h d b i – A hybrid vehicle with batteries that can be recharged by connecting a plug to an electric power source (or by ICE, if necessary): all electric range of 10+ miles (current target: 40+ miles) g ( g ) – Impact on Energy, Economy, and Environmental Issues

  • About half the gasoline consumed in the U.S. is consumed in the first 20 miles of

daily travel of an automobile.

  • Therefore, PHEV can significantly reduce foreign oil dependence as well as toxic and

greenhouse gas emission

  • President Obama’s speech to congress (24 Feb 2009): “We know the country that

harnesses the power of clean, renewable energy will lead the 21st century. … New plug‐in hybrids roll off our assembly lines, but they will run on batteries made in Korea.”

  • Significant, nation‐wide investment is being made by US (federal and state)

government and commercial sectors for R&D activity as well as for establishing manufacturing industry (job creation)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

DOE Targets for Energy Storage Systems for HEVs, PHEVs, and EVs and EVs

DOE Energy Storage Goals HEV(2010) PHEV(2015) EV(2020) h Characteristics Unit Equivalent Electric Range miles N/A 10‐40 200‐300 Discharge Pulse Power kW 25‐40 for 10 sec 38‐50 80 l ( d ) k Regen Pulse Power (10 seconds) kW 20‐25 25‐30 40 Recharge Rate kW N/A 1.4‐2.8 5‐10 Cold Cranking Power @ ‐30 ºC (2 seconds) kW 5‐7 7 N/A Available Energy kWh 0.3‐0.5 3.5‐11.6 30‐40 Available Energy kWh 0.3 0.5 3.5 11.6 30 40 Calendar Life Year 15 10+ 10 Cycle Life Cycles 300k, shallow 3,000‐5,000, deep discharge 750, deep discharge Maximum System Weight kg 40‐60 60‐120 300 Maximum System Volume l 32‐45 40‐80 133 Operating Temperature Range ºC ‐30 to 52 ‐30 to 52 ‐40 to 85 Selling Price @ 100k units/year $ 500‐800 1 700‐3 400 4 000 Selling Price @ 100k units/year $ 500 800 1,700 3,400 4,000

No commercially available chemistries (cathode, anode, electrolyte, etc.) meet the DOE targets for PHEVs and EVs with 40+ electric range targets for PHEVs and EVs with 40+ electric range.

  • Key issues: Energy, Life, Safety, and Cost
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Approach

  • Multi‐institution team assembled to design synthesize characterize and model

Multi institution team assembled to design, synthesize, characterize, and model

  • xide structures for next‐generation electrode materials

Vehicle Technology Vehicle Technology DOE

Materials design and synthesis and synthesis (CSE, Argonne) Electrochemistry (CSE, Argonne) Structure Models (CSE, Argonne) X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (APS, Argonne) Electron Microscopy (UIUC) Solid-State NMR (Stony Brook) ( , g ) (Brookhaven) ( ) (MIT)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What happens in a Li-ion cell?

charge e-

charger

C

discharge e-

LiCoO2 Graphite

  • llector

Cu curr

Ch i Discharging

rent co rent col

electrolyte

Charging Li Li+ + e- Requires Energy Discharging Li+ + e- Li Supplies Energy

Al curr llector

(+) (-)

separator

Process reversibility should be ~100% for good cycle life

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Active material in cathode is the source of lithium ions

LiMPO4

(M=Fe, Ni, Co)

LiMn2O4 LiMO2

(M=Ni, Co, Mn, Li)

1D 2D 3D 1D 2D 3D

Pros: Pros: Pros:

  • Fast Li motion through 3D

Li channel

  • Low cost (Mn-based)

Cons:

  • High theoretical capacity (~

280 mAh/g)

Cons:

St t l d t bili ti t

  • Excellent safety
  • Cost advantage (Fe)

Cons: Cons:

  • Low theoretical capacity (

~150 mAh/g)

  • Capacity fading (Mn
  • Structural destabilization at

high SOC

  • Highly oxidizing/unstable

Ni4+ and Co4+ poor thermal safety

  • Poor conductivity
  • Low theoretical capacity

(~170 mAh/g) y g ( dissolution, Jahn-Teller distortion) thermal safety

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Limitations of layered lithium metal oxides

LiMO2 (M=Ni,Co,Mn) Li(Li1/3Mn2/3)O2 (≡Li2MnO3)

TM plane TM plane

Similar structure to LiMO2

  • One-third of M is replaced with Li

St d i b t Li+ d M

4+

For last two decades, layered LiMO2 (mostly LiCoO2) has been the positive electrode chemistry of choice for the LIBs for portable

  • Strong ordering between Li+ and Mn4+

Electrochemistry

  • at <4.4 V vs. Li+/Li, Li2MnO3 is

l t h i ll i ti

y p electronics. Limitations

Hi h t f C d Ni electrochemically inactive

  • At >4.4 V vs. Li+/Li, lithium can be extracted

together with oxygen: Li2Mn4+O3 → Li2O + Mn4+O2 (460 mAh/g)

  • High cost of Co and Ni
  • Low practical conductivity (~150 mAh/g vs. ~280

theoretical capacity of LiCoO2) due to the structural instability at low Li content (Li/M<0.5) Li2Mn O3 → Li2O + Mn O2 (460 mAh/g)

  • However, the activated electrode tends to

convert to spinel with cycling (same issue as LiMnO2)

  • Conversion to spinel during cycling (LiMnO2)
  • Highly unstable and oxidizing Ni4+ and Co4+ at

charged state: thermal safety issues Not a good electrode material for high energy Li-ion batteries with longevity! Not a good electrode material for high energy Li- ion batteries with intrinsic thermal safety!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Nano-composite among Li2MnO3, LiMO2, and LiM’ 2O4

  • A unique approach of integrating lithium metal oxides with structural compatibility in nano‐

composite structures:

(1) ‘layered‐layered’ electrodes with layered Li2MnO3 and LiMO2 components (1) layered layered electrodes with layered Li2MnO3 and LiMO2 components (2) ‘layered‐layered‐spinel’ electrodes comprised of layered Li2MnO3, layered LiMO2 and spinel LiM’2O4 components.

  • Motivation

Motivation

– Enhancing structural stability: integration of Li2MnO3 as a structural stabilizing agent in LiMO2 matrix to prevent structure collapse of the layered structure at low Li content – Increasing capacity: activation of Li2MnO3 at high voltages Increasing capacity: activation of Li2MnO3 at high voltages An example of layered-layered nano-composite structure LiMO2 region Li2MnO3 region Li2MnO3 region LiMO2 region

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Structural compatibility of Li2MnO3 and LiMO2: Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2

3)

XRD pattern Electron diffraction

ary unit)

(003 (104) m

ty (arbitra

01) ) 8) 10) 020) C2/m 10) C2/m 1) C2/m

Intensi

(10 (006) (012) (015) (107) (018 (11 (113) (0 (1 (11-

Li2MnO3

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Mostly LiMO2-like (rhombohedral, R-3m) feature with Li2MnO3- like (monoclinic, C2/m) characters (cation ordering peaks and diffuse streaks) Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2 ≡ 0.5Li2MnO3•0.5LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Structural compatibility of Li2MnO3, LiMO2, and LiM’ 2O4: Li Ni Mn O (y~1 88)

X-ray diffraction patterns

Li0.96Ni0.2Mn0.6Oy (y~1.88)

unit)

h

Li0.96Ni0.2Mn06Oy

LiMO2 (layered) +

arbitrary

h h h

calcined at 900 °C

S S S S

co + Li2MnO3 (layered with cation

ensity (a

800 °C 700 °C

(layered with cation

  • rdering)

+

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Inte

700 C

LiM’2O4 (spinel)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

2θCuKα

  • Three‐component integrated structure

h: X-ray sample holder

co, cation ordering; s, spinel

Three component integrated structure

  • Li0.96Ni0.2Mn0.6Oy ≡ 0.3LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4•0.7Li2MnO3•0.7LiMO2 (M=Ni0.5Mn0.5)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nano-composite feature of Li0.96Ni0.2Mn0.6Oy: 0.3LiNi0 5Mn1 5O4• 0.7Li2MnO3• 0.7LiMO2 (M=Ni0 5Mn0 5)

0.5 1.5 4 2 3 2 ( 0.5 0.5)

HR TEM image

This HR TEM image demonstrates the structural integration of spinel (Fd 3m) This HR TEM image demonstrates the structural integration of spinel (Fd‐3m) and layered (C2/m).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Nano-composite feature of Li1.2Co0.4Mn0.4O2: 0 5Li MnO •0 5LiMO (M=Co) 0.5Li2MnO3•0.5LiMO2 (M=Co)

Z contrast STEM image

View of transition metal planes along [001]M View of transition metal planes along [001]M TM columns: bright-spots in image Li columns: dark. Honeycomb regions (hollow core = Li column) are Li2MnO3-like. Hexagonal regions (filled core TM l ) LiC O lik N h = TM column) are LiCoO2-like. No sharp boundaries between honeycomb and hexagonal regions.

Li2MnO3 Li2MnO3

slide-15
SLIDE 15

X-ray absorption spectroscopy of 0.5Li2MnO3• 0.5LiCoO2

Co EXAFS

Co-O Co-TM

0.5Li2MnO3•0.5LiCoO2

Co-O bond distance ~ 1.91 Å Co O bond distance 1.91 Å (same as in LiCoO2) Co-TM data coordination is 5 4 +/- Co TM data coordination is 5.4 +/ 0.5 (6 in LiCoO2) Exact phase matching of peaks in 4- Exact phase matching of peaks in 4- 6 Å range (data not shown)

Co environment in 0.5Li2MnO3•0.5LiCoO2 appears very similar to LiCoO2 environment up to 7 Å.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

X-ray absorption spectroscopy of 0.5Li2MnO3• 0.5LiCoO2

Mn EXAFS

Mn-O

0.5Li2MnO3•0.5LiCoO2

Mn-O bond distance ~ 1.89 Å

Mn-TM

Mn O bond distance 1.89 Å (same as in Li2MnO3) Mn-TM data coordination is 4 2 +/- Mn TM data coordination is 4.2 +/ 0.5 (3 in Li2MnO3) Exact phase matching of peaks in 4- Exact phase matching of peaks in 4- 6 Å range (data not shown)

Mn environment in 0.5Li2MnO3•0.5LiCoO2 appears similar to Li2MnO3 environment up to 7 Å.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Model for atomic arrangement in TM plane of 0.5Li2MnO3• 0.5LiMO2

2 3 2

LiMO2-like

2

Li2MnO3-like

An intimate mixture of LiMO2-like and Li2MnO3-like areas (~1-3 nm

2 2 3

size) are present in 0.5Li2MnO3•0.5LiMO2

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Electrochemistry of two-component system

Li Ni C M O Fi t l fil f lithi ll

5

V)

Li1.2Ni0.18Co0.10Mn0.52O2: First cycle profile of a lithium cell

LiMO2-like Li2MnO3-like

4 5

age (V

300

2 3

ell volta

2 0-4 6 V

100 150 200 250 300

city (mAh/g)

LiCoO2

1

Ce

2.0 4.6 V 0.1 mA/cm2 RT

10 20 30 40 50 50 100

Capa Cycle Number

100 200 300

Capacity (mAh/g)

Two step behavior during the first charge: LiMO2-like region: LiMO2 → Li+ + MO2 + e- Li2MnO3-like region: Li2MnO3 → 2Li+ + MnO2 + 1/2O2 + 2e- (O2 evolution confirmed by in situ DEMS) DEMS) Very high capacity during the subsequent discharge and excellent capacity retention

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Li Ni M O Fi t l fil f lithi ll

Electrochemistry of three-component system

5

V)

Li0.96Ni0.2Mn0.6Oy: First cycle profile of a lithium cell

spinel

4 5

age (V

Li2MnO3 activation + spinel

2 3

ell volta

2 0-4 95 V

150 200 250 300

ty (mAh/g)

1

Ce

2.0 4.95 V 0.05 A/cm2 RT

10 20 30 40 50 50 100

Capacit Cycle Number

spinel

100 200 300

Capacity (mAh/g)

Three distinctive regions: LiMO2-like region, Li2MnO3-like region (activation), and spinel signatures Very high capacity during the subsequent discharge and excellent capacity retention

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Superior electrochemical property of the nano-composite electrode material to other materials electrode material to other materials

Li1+xMn2-xO4 LiCoO 5

V)

LiCoO2 Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O2 layer-layer 4

tage (V

y y layer-layer-spinel 3

ell Volt

2

Ce

50 100 150 200 250

Capacity (mAh/g)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Capacity Retention and Rate Capability of Li1.2Ni0.25Mn0.75Oy

5

Cycling performance Rate performance

4

V)

200 250

Ah/g)

3

  • ltage (V

100 150

acity (mA

2

Vo

Li cell 2.0-4.95 V 10 mA/g 3.5C 1C

C/23

50 100

Capa

900

  • C

800

  • C

700

  • C

50 100 150 200 250 1

Capacity (mAh/g)

10 mA/g

10 20 30 40 50

Cycle Number

700 C

  • Beneficial impact of the spinel component in the structure

– Excellent cycling performance (800, 900 °C samples) in spite of the very high cut‐off voltage voltage. – Good rate capability (~200 mAh/g at 1C rate).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SUMMARY

  • A novel concept of integrating lithium metal oxides with different

structures (but compatible) in nano‐scale has been adopted to design and develop electrode materials for advanced high‐energy lithium‐ion batteries. Two component system – Two component system – Three‐component system

  • Through advanced analytic techniques the atomic arrangement features
  • Through advanced analytic techniques, the atomic arrangement features
  • f the nano‐composite materials have been demonstrated.
  • The nano‐composite material exhibited outstanding electrochemical

The nano composite material exhibited outstanding electrochemical performance.

  • Possibility of using these nano‐composite electrode materials in PHEV

y g p batteries is under investigation.

  • The Argonne’s nano‐composite cathode materials have recently been

licensed to major chemical companies and battery companies.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Acknowledgement

Argonne National Laboratory

CSE Division: M. M. Thackeary, C. S. Johnson, D. P. Abraham, J. Bareno, G. y, , , , Henriksen APS: M. Balasubramanian – XAS

UIUC

  • C. H. Lei, I. Petrov – TEM
  • C. Carlton, Y. Shao-Horn – TEM

Department of Energy

Office of Basic Energy Sciences – ‘fundamental research’ Office of FreedomCar and Vehicle Technologies – ‘exploratory (BATT) and li d (ABRT) R&D’ applied (ABRT) R&D’