Adaptive metabolic strategies: an (apparently) simple and effective - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

adaptive metabolic strategies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Adaptive metabolic strategies: an (apparently) simple and effective - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Adaptive metabolic strategies: an (apparently) simple and effective answer to many challenging problems in ecology and microbiology The physics of complex systems IV: from Padova to the rest of the world and back Leonardo Pacciani Mori


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Adaptive metabolic strategies:

an (apparently) simple and effective answer to many challenging problems in ecology and microbiology

The physics of complex systems IV: from Padova to the rest of the world and back

Leonardo Pacciani Mori leonardo.pacciani@phd.unipd.it December 20th, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction: theoretical ecology

1 of 11

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction: theoretical ecology

Fairly recent discipline (born in 1972 from an article by Robert May)

1 of 11

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction: theoretical ecology

Fairly recent discipline (born in 1972 from an article by Robert May) Many open problems

1 of 11

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction: theoretical ecology

Fairly recent discipline (born in 1972 from an article by Robert May) Many open problems

– “Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting

species in an ecosystem is limited by the number of available resources.

1 of 11

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction: theoretical ecology

Fairly recent discipline (born in 1972 from an article by Robert May) Many open problems

– “Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting

species in an ecosystem is limited by the number of available resources.

species Sm>p . . . species Sp . . . species S2 species S1 resource Rp . . . resource R1 . . .

1 of 11

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction: theoretical ecology

Fairly recent discipline (born in 1972 from an article by Robert May) Many open problems

– “Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting

species in an ecosystem is limited by the number of available resources.

species Sm>p . . . species Sn≤p . . . species S2 species S1 resource Rp . . . resource R1 . . .

1 of 11

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction: experimental ecology

2 of 11

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction: experimental ecology

From an experimental point of view, the situation is very complicated:

2 of 11

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction: experimental ecology

From an experimental point of view, the situation is very complicated:

1 It is very difficult to monitor whole ecosystems in the field

We may not be able to detect all the species in it Some species may enter or exit during the experiment

2 of 11

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction: experimental ecology

From an experimental point of view, the situation is very complicated:

1 It is very difficult to monitor whole ecosystems in the field

We may not be able to detect all the species in it Some species may enter or exit during the experiment

2 There are a lot of factors that cannot be controlled

Immigrant or emigrant species Climate and weather Interaction between species

2 of 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction: experimental ecology

From an experimental point of view, the situation is very complicated:

1 It is very difficult to monitor whole ecosystems in the field

We may not be able to detect all the species in it Some species may enter or exit during the experiment

2 There are a lot of factors that cannot be controlled

Immigrant or emigrant species Climate and weather Interaction between species

In the last decades microbial ecosystems are increasingly being used as a testing ground for ecolgical models:

2 of 11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction: experimental ecology

From an experimental point of view, the situation is very complicated:

1 It is very difficult to monitor whole ecosystems in the field

We may not be able to detect all the species in it Some species may enter or exit during the experiment

2 There are a lot of factors that cannot be controlled

Immigrant or emigrant species Climate and weather Interaction between species

In the last decades microbial ecosystems are increasingly being used as a testing ground for ecolgical models:

1 They are easier (but not necessarily easy per se) to manage in the lab 2 of 11

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction: experimental ecology

From an experimental point of view, the situation is very complicated:

1 It is very difficult to monitor whole ecosystems in the field

We may not be able to detect all the species in it Some species may enter or exit during the experiment

2 There are a lot of factors that cannot be controlled

Immigrant or emigrant species Climate and weather Interaction between species

In the last decades microbial ecosystems are increasingly being used as a testing ground for ecolgical models:

1 They are easier (but not necessarily easy per se) to manage in the lab 2 Their understanding has very important applications 2 of 11

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The context of our work

3 of 11

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The context of our work

“Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): there are many known cases in nature where this principle is clearly violated.

3 of 11

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The context of our work

“Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): there are many known cases in nature where this principle is clearly violated.

1 Bacterial community culture experiments

From Goldford et al. 2018

3 of 11

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The context of our work

“Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): there are many known cases in nature where this principle is clearly violated.

1 Bacterial community culture experiments

From Goldford et al. 2018

2 Direct bacterial competition experiments

From Friedman et al. 2017

3 of 11

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Modeling ecological competition

4 of 11

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Modeling ecological competition

Since the ’70s, the main mathematical tool used to model competitive ecosystems has been MacArthur’s consumer-resource model.

4 of 11

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Modeling ecological competition

Since the ’70s, the main mathematical tool used to model competitive ecosystems has been MacArthur’s consumer-resource model. species Sm>p . . . species Sp . . . species S2 species S1 resource Rp . . . resource R1 . . . ασi

4 of 11

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Modeling ecological competition

Since the ’70s, the main mathematical tool used to model competitive ecosystems has been MacArthur’s consumer-resource model. species Sm>p . . . species Sn≤p . . . species S2 species S1 resource Rp . . . resource R1 . . . ασi

As it is, the model reproduces the CEP. In order to violate it, very special assumptions or parameter fine-tunings are necessary (Posfai et al. 2017).

4 of 11

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Our work

5 of 11

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Our work

In the literature of consumer-resource models ασi are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time.

5 of 11

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Our work

In the literature of consumer-resource models ασi are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time.

Problem

In many experiments diauxic shifts have been observed (Monod 1949)!

2 4 6 8 10 12 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.50 1.00 Time (hours) Cell concentration (g/l)

Growth of Klebsiella oxytoca on glucose and lactose. Data taken from Kompala et al. 1986, figure 11.

5 of 11

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Our work

In the literature of consumer-resource models ασi are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time.

Our work in one sentence

We have modified MacArthur’s consumer-resource model so that the metabolic strategies evolve over time.

5 of 11

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Our work

In the literature of consumer-resource models ασi are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time.

Our work in one sentence

We have modified MacArthur’s consumer-resource model so that the metabolic strategies evolve over time.

How?

Adaptive framework: each species changes its metabolic strategies in order to increase its own growth rate; adaptation velocity is measured by a parameter d.

5 of 11

slide-28
SLIDE 28

What we have found

6 of 11

slide-29
SLIDE 29

What we have found

Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally

  • bserved phenomena, that span from the single species to the whole community!

6 of 11

slide-30
SLIDE 30

What we have found

Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally

  • bserved phenomena, that span from the single species to the whole community!

1/4) With one species and two resources, the model reproduces diauxic shifts:

6 of 11

slide-31
SLIDE 31

What we have found

Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally

  • bserved phenomena, that span from the single species to the whole community!

1/4) With one species and two resources, the model reproduces diauxic shifts:

6 of 11

slide-32
SLIDE 32

What we have found

Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally

  • bserved phenomena, that span from the single species to the whole community!

1/4) With one species and two resources, the model reproduces diauxic shifts:

Notice

We can explain the existence of diauxic shifts with a completely general model, neglecting the particular molecular mechanisms of the species’ metabolism.

6 of 11

slide-33
SLIDE 33

What we have found

2/4) When multiple species and resources are considered, the model naturally violates the Competitive Exclusion Principle:

7 of 11

slide-34
SLIDE 34

What we have found

2/4) When multiple species and resources are considered, the model naturally violates the Competitive Exclusion Principle:

50 100 150 200 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6

Fixed metabolic strategies

7 of 11

slide-35
SLIDE 35

What we have found

2/4) When multiple species and resources are considered, the model naturally violates the Competitive Exclusion Principle:

50 100 150 200 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6

Adaptive metabolic strategies

7 of 11

slide-36
SLIDE 36

What we have found

3/4) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:

8 of 11

slide-37
SLIDE 37

What we have found

3/4) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:

100 200 300 400 500 100 10-3 10-6 10-9

Fixed metabolic strategies, τin = τout = 20

8 of 11

slide-38
SLIDE 38

What we have found

3/4) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:

100 200 300 400 500 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6

Adaptive metabolic strategies, τin = τout = 20

8 of 11

slide-39
SLIDE 39

What we have found

3/4) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:

100 200 300 400 500 101 10-1 10-3 10-5 10-7 10-9

Fixed metabolic strategies, τin = 20, τout = 5

8 of 11

slide-40
SLIDE 40

What we have found

3/4) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:

100 200 300 400 500 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6

Adaptive metabolic strategies, τin = 20, τout = 5

8 of 11

slide-41
SLIDE 41

What we have found

Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model.

9 of 11

slide-42
SLIDE 42

What we have found

Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 4/4) If adaptation is sufficiently slow there can be extinction and the Competitive Exclusion Principle can be recovered.

9 of 11

slide-43
SLIDE 43

What we have found

Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 4/4) If adaptation is sufficiently slow there can be extinction and the Competitive Exclusion Principle can be recovered.

20 species, 3 resources

9 of 11

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Conclusions and future developments

10 of 11

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Conclusions and future developments

Conclusions

Using adaptive metabolic strategies in consumer-resource models allows us to explain lots of different experimentally observed phenomena.

10 of 11

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Conclusions and future developments

Conclusions

Using adaptive metabolic strategies in consumer-resource models allows us to explain lots of different experimentally observed phenomena.

Future developments

10 of 11

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Conclusions and future developments

Conclusions

Using adaptive metabolic strategies in consumer-resource models allows us to explain lots of different experimentally observed phenomena.

Future developments

Understand more deeply the role of adaptation velocity d: could it be the key element to predict competition outcome?

10 of 11

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Conclusions and future developments

Conclusions

Using adaptive metabolic strategies in consumer-resource models allows us to explain lots of different experimentally observed phenomena.

Future developments

Understand more deeply the role of adaptation velocity d: could it be the key element to predict competition outcome? Design and perform experiments to verify the predictions

10 of 11

slide-49
SLIDE 49

References

Friedman, Jonathan et al. (2017). “Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms”. In: Nature Ecology and Evolution 1.5, pp. 1–7. Goldford, Joshua E. et al. (2018). “Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly”. In: Science 361.6401, pp. 469–474. Kompala, Dhinakar S. et al. (1986). “Investigation of bacterial growth on mixed substrates: Experimental evaluation of cybernetic models”. In: Biotechnology and Bioengineering 28.7, pp. 1044–1055. Monod, Jacques (1949). “The Growth of Bacterial Cultures”. In: Annual Review

  • f Microbiology 3.1, pp. 371–394.

Posfai, Anna et al. (2017). “Metabolic Trade-Offs Promote Diversity in a Model Ecosystem”. In: Physical Review Letters 118.2, p. 28103.

11 of 11

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Backup slides

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Details of the model

1 of 3

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Details of the model

The equations that define MacArthur’s consumer-resource model are the following:

1 of 3

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Details of the model

The equations that define MacArthur’s consumer-resource model are the following: ˙ nσ = nσ p

  • i=1

viασiri(ci) − δσ

  • (1a)

˙ ci = si −

m

  • σ=1

nσασiri(ci) − µici (1b)

1 of 3

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Details of the model

The equations that define MacArthur’s consumer-resource model are the following: ˙ nσ = nσ p

  • i=1

viασiri(ci) − δσ

  • (1a)

˙ ci = si −

m

  • σ=1

nσασiri(ci) − µici (1b)

1 of 3 “metabolic strategies” “resource values” death rate resource uptake rate, e.g. ri(ci) = ci/(Ki + ci) resource supply rate species’ populations resources’ concentrations resource degradation rate

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Details of the model

We can require that ασi evolves so that gσ = p

i=1 viασiri(ci) is maximized by

means of a simple “gradient ascent” equation:

2 of 3

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Details of the model

We can require that ασi evolves so that gσ = p

i=1 viασiri(ci) is maximized by

means of a simple “gradient ascent” equation: ˙ ασi = 1 τσ · ∂gσ ∂ασi = dδσviri where 1 τσ = dδσ (2)

2 of 3

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Details of the model

We can require that ασi evolves so that gσ = p

i=1 viασiri(ci) is maximized by

means of a simple “gradient ascent” equation: ˙ ασi = 1 τσ · ∂gσ ∂ασi = dδσviri where 1 τσ = dδσ (2)

Problem

As it is, eq (2) does not prevent ασi from growing indefinitely!

2 of 3

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Details of the model

We can require that ασi evolves so that gσ = p

i=1 viασiri(ci) is maximized by

means of a simple “gradient ascent” equation: ˙ ασi = 1 τσ · ∂gσ ∂ασi = dδσviri where 1 τσ = dδσ (2)

Problem

As it is, eq (2) does not prevent ασi from growing indefinitely!

Solution

We must introduce some constraint in the resource uptake: the metabolic strategies ασi must be somehow limited.

2 of 3

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Details of the model

Our choice:

p

  • i=1

wiασi := Eσ(t) ≤ Qδσ (3)

3 of 3 “resource costs”

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Details of the model

Our choice:

p

  • i=1

wiασi := Eσ(t) ≤ Qδσ (3) Final equation (after some work): ˙ ασi = ασidδσ

  • viri − Θ

p

  • i=1

wiασi − Qδσ

  • wi

p

k=1 w 2 k ασk p

  • j=1

vjrjwjασj

  • (4)

3 of 3 “resource costs”

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Details of the model

Our choice:

p

  • i=1

wiασi := Eσ(t) ≤ Qδσ (3) Final equation (after some work): ˙ ασi = ασidδσ

  • viri − Θ

p

  • i=1

wiασi − Qδσ

  • wi

p

k=1 w 2 k ασk p

  • j=1

vjrjwjασj

  • (4)

Attention

We have also made sure that ασi(t) ≥ 0 ∀t.

3 of 3 “resource costs”