- ACS - CK Naber, P Urban, PJ Ong, M Valdes-Chavarri, A Abizaid, SJ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

acs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

- ACS - CK Naber, P Urban, PJ Ong, M Valdes-Chavarri, A Abizaid, SJ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LEADERS FREE - ACS - CK Naber, P Urban, PJ Ong, M Valdes-Chavarri, A Abizaid, SJ Pocock, F Fabbiocchi, C Dubois, S Copt, S Greene and MC Morice for the LEADERS FREE Investigators Conflicts of Interest EuroPCR 2016 Christoph K Naber is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

LEADERS FREE

  • ACS -

CK Naber, P Urban, PJ Ong, M Valdes-Chavarri, A Abizaid, SJ Pocock, F Fabbiocchi, C Dubois, S Copt, S Greene and MC Morice for the LEADERS FREE Investigators

slide-2
SLIDE 2

EuroPCR 2016

Conflicts of Interest

Christoph K Naber is shareholder of CERC, the CRO responsible for this trial

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

LEADERS FREE ACS

  • For ACS patients undergoing PCI current guidelines

recommend in general 12 months DAPT

  • High bleeding risk patients presenting with ACS

undergoing PCI have never been systematically studied.

  • Current guidelines recommend for these patients:
  • I. Implantation of a DES with 3-6 months DAPT
  • II. Implantation of a BMS with 1-month DAPT

Roffi et al. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:267-315 / Levine et al. JACC 2016 (epub ahead of print)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Objectives

LEADERS FREE ACS

187: RESET: Kim BK et al, JACC 2012; 60: 1340 E-ZES 3 months DAPT 188: OPTIMIZE: Feres F et al, JAMA 2013; 310: 2510 E-ZES 3 months DAPT 189: EXCELLENT: Gwon HC et al, Circ 2012; 125: 505 DES 6 months DAPT 192: ISAR-SAFE: Schulz-Schupke S et al, EHJ 2015; 36: 1252 DES 6 months DAPT

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Objectives

LEADERS FREE ACS

The aim of this prespecified substudy was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the BioFreedom™ BA9 DCS followed by 1 month DAPT in high bleeding risk patients presenting with an ACS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Drug Coated Stent (DCS)

BioFreedom™

Potential Advantages:

  • Avoid any possible polymer-related adverse effects
  • Rapid drug transfer to vessel wall (98% within one month2)
  • Safe to shorten DAPT in High Bleeding Risk patients

1. Data on file at Biosensors Intl 2. Tada et al., Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3;174-183

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Trial Design

LEADERS FREE

Prospective, double-blind randomized (1:1) trial 2466 high bleeding risk (HBR) PCI patients

vs.

DAPT mandated for 1 month only, followed by long-term SAPT BioFreedom™ DCS Gazelle™ BMS

  • Primary efficacy endpoint:

Clinically-driven TLR at 1 year (superiority)

  • Primary safety endpoint:

Composite of cardiac death, MI, definite / probable stent thrombosis at 1 year (non-inferiority then superiority)

Urban P et al. Am Heart J 2013; 165: 704-9

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Primary Endpoints

LEADERS FREE

Urban P et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2038-47

Efficacy (clinically driven TLR) Safety (cardiac death, MI, ST)

BMS DCS BMS DCS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Study Flow

LEADERS FREE ACS

1 did not undergo PCI 2 did not undergo PCI 331 were assigned to BMS 331 were assigned to DCS 330 are include in the analysis* 329 are include in the analysis* 662 ACS patients underwent randomized 323 (97.8%) completed 12-month visit or died 320 (97.2%) completed 12-month visit or died

*N=659 (554 NSTEMI and 105 STEMI)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Study Population

LEADERS FREE ACS

Parameter DCS (N=330) BMS (N=329) Total (N=659) p-value

Age (mean±SD) 76.9±10.0 76.5±9.0 76.7±9.5 n.s. Female N(%) 122 (37.0) 110 (33.4) 232 (35.3) n.s. NSTEMI N(%) 273 (82.8) 281 (85.5) 554 (84.1) n.s. STEMI N(%) 57 (17.2) 48 (14.5) 105 (15.9) n.s. Diabetes N(%) 111 (33.8) 108 (32.8) 219 (33.3) n.s. Renal Impairment N(%) 66 (20.1) 81 (24.8) 147 (22.4) n.s. Previous Stroke N(%) 46 (14.1) 26 (7.9) 72 (11.0) 0.01* Atrial Fibrillation N(%) 84 (25.5) 109 (33.1) 193 (29.3) 0.03* Previous MI N (%) 63 (19.1) 82 (24.9) 145 (22.0) n.s. Previous CABG N(%) 24 (7.3) 23 (7) 47 (7.1) n.s. Previous PCI N(%) 55 (16.7) 67 (20.4) 122 (18.5) n.s. *=Cox proportional hazard models displayed no influence on outcomes at FU

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Criteria for High Risk of Bleeding*

LEADERS FREE ACS

* There were no significant differences (P<0.05) between the two groups * n=1.8 per patient

2,1 1,2 1,6 1,8 3,6 5,8 4,6 11,2 10,9 24 24,3 30,7 69,6 2,1 1,2 1,8 1,2 4,2 5,5 7 10,6 11,5 22,1 18,8 23,9 70,6

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Prior intracerebral bleed Severe chronic liver disease Stroke < 1 yr Thrombocytopenia* Glucocorticoids or NSAID ‡ Nonadherence to > 30d DAPT In hospital for bleeding < 1 year Cancer in previous 3 years Major surgery in the next year Hb < 11g/dl or TF < 4 weeks

  • Creat. Clearance < 40 ml/min

Oral anticoagulation after PCI Age ≥ 75

DCS (N=330)2 BMS (N=329)

(%)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Procedural Data

LEADERS FREE ACS

Parameter DCS (N=330) BMS (N=329) Total (N=659) p-value

Lesion Length mm (mean±SD) 18.3±11.3 17.6±8.9 17.9±10.1 n.s. Lesion Length ≥30 mm N(%) 33 (6.7) 40 (7.2) 73 (7.0) n.s. RVD mm (mean±SD) 3.0±0.5 3.0±0.5 3.0±0.5 n.s. RVD ≤2.75 mm (mean±SD) 166 (33.9) 167 (30.0) 333 (31.8) n.s. ACC-Class B2&C* N (%) 244 (30.6) 266 (29.5) 500 (30.0) n.s. LAD N/(%) 192 (58.2) 174 (52.9) 366 (55.5) n.s. Stent Length per patient (mm) (mean±SD) 33.4±23.3 36.5±26.5 35.0±25.0 n.s. Overlapping Stent N(%) 49 (14.8) 62 (18.9) 111 (16.9) n.s. Procedural Success N(%)** 326 (95.0) 341 (94.7) 667 (94.9) n.s. * Lesion Level; LL=Lesion Length; RVD=Reference Vessel Diameter; LAD=Left Anterior Descending; SD = Standard Deviation; **: includes all procedures (index and staged)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization - 12 Month FU

LEADERS FREE ACS

9,0 3,9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Cumulative Incidence (%) Months

329 321 316 302 292 284 282 279 277 275 272 266 260 255 330 324 318 317 313 310 307 302 299 297 294 291 287 283

Primary Efficacy Endpoint HR 0.41: 95% Cl 0.21 to 0.82; p=0.009

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cardiac Death, MI, or Def / Prob ST- 12 Month FU

LEADERS FREE ACS

18,5 9,3

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Cumulative Incidence (%) Months

329 312 307 295 283 274 272 269 265 260 258 254 247 245 330 319 310 308 303 299 294 288 285 284 284 281 279 275

Primary Safety Endpoint HR 0.48: 95% Cl 0.31 to 0.75; p=0.001

slide-15
SLIDE 15

12 Month Follow-up

LEADERS FREE ACS

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Death Cardiac death Myocardial infarction ST (Def/Prob) Bleeding (BARC 3-5)

DCS BMS

n.s. n.s. p=0.048 p=0.005 0.099

slide-16
SLIDE 16

12 Month Follow-up by Subgroup

LEADERS FREE ACS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusions

LEADERS FREE ACS

In ACS patients with high bleeding risk a polymer-free BA9- DCS combined with 1-month DAPT displays significantly better efficacy and safety than a BMS, the latter driven by significantly lower cardiac mortality and MI. Current guidelines should be reconsidered for high bleeding risk patients presenting with ACS: → BMS can no longer be recommended → Data on DES with shortened DAPT are scarce → BioFreedom™ BA9-DCS has strongest evidence in these patients.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LEADERS FREE ACS

Christoph K. Naber1, Philip Urban2, Paul J. Ong3, Mariano Valdes-Chavarri4, Alexandre

  • A. Abizaid5, Stuart J. Pocock6, Franco Fabbiocchi7, Christophe Dubois8, Samuel Copt9,

Samantha Greene9, and Marie-Claude Morice10, for the LEADERS FREE Investigators

slide-19
SLIDE 19

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME

slide-20
SLIDE 20

BACKUP SLIDES

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Medication

LEADERS FREE ACS

Parameter DCS (N=330) BMS (N=329) p-value

UFH 282 (82.2) 280 (77.6) 0.12 LMWH 28 (8.2) 34 (9.4) 0.56 Bivalirudin 7 (2) 16 (4.4) 0.07 GPIIbIIIa antagonist 7 (2) 5 (1.4) 0.50 DAPT at day 23 317 (97.8) 311 (95.7) 0.18 DAPT at day 37 28 (8.7) 49 (15.2) 0.01* In LEADERS FREE 659/2466 patients had an ACS (554 NSTEMI and 105 STEMI) *=Cox proportional hazard models displayed no influence on outcomes at FU

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Stratification of MI at 12-Month Follow-up

LEADERS FREE ACS

Given that many patients di not undergo control angiography when readmitted during follow-up, a definite distinction between Types I, 4b and 4c was sometimes difficult to establish.

slide-23
SLIDE 23