Achieving Leg Length Equality in THA
Achieving Leg Length Equality in THA Darwin Chen, MD Assistant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Achieving Leg Length Equality in THA Darwin Chen, MD Assistant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Achieving Leg Length Equality in THA Darwin Chen, MD Assistant Professor Mount Sinai Medical Center Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Disclosures Monogram Orthopedics Consultant Conformis Medical advisory board, consultant
Disclosures
Leg Length Inequality
▶ One of the most vexing problems in THA ▶ Hard to define – Less than 1mm, 5mm,10mm? – Patient perception? ▶ Prevalence unknown ▶ 32-44% patients perceive LLD postop – Shortening < 10mm – Lengthening > 6mm Ranawat, J Arthroplasty 2001 Woolson, J Arthroplasty 1999 Hoffman, Orthpedics 2000 McGrory, JBJS 1995Why is Leg Length Inequality Important?
▶ Abnormal gait ▶ LBP, knee pain
▶ Nerve palsy ▶ Shoe wear ▶ Dissatisfaction ▶ Most common reason for litigation after THA! Clark, JAAOS 2006Today’s Routine, Primary THA Should Be “Perfect”
▶ “…patients very soon become adjusted to 1cm of over-lengthening.”
▶ A pain free THA isn’t good enough anymore ▶ Happy patient = – No pain- Well fixed implants
- Stability
Preoperative History and Physical Exam
▶ Do your legs feel equal? ▶ PMHx – Spinal deformity/fusion – Prior trauma – Neuromuscular disorder – DDH ▶ Exam – Pelvic obliquity – Flexion contracture – Shoe modificationPreoperative History and Physical Exam
▶ True leg length – ASIS to medial malleolus ▶ Apparent leg length – umbilicus to medialmalleolus
*Preop* *Postop*Templating is the Key to THA Success
▶ Goal – restore hip center of rotation, recreate offset, correct LLD ▶ Determine – Neck cut level – Acetabular position – Stem size and offsetTemplating is the Key to THA Success
▶ Proper AP femur – 15º IR ▶ Proper marker ball placement 15º IR “Ball on ball” sign Improper marker ball placementTemplating is the Key to THA Success
Intraoperative Instability
▶ Don’t let intraoperative instability make you lengthen theleg…look for other sources!
Posterior Approach – LLD Assessment
▶ Knee/heel assessment – Subjective, dependent on leg shape, pelvic position – Feel before neck cut, compare with template – Compare with trials ▶ “Shuck” test – Unreliable – Dependent on relaxation, soft tissue quality/contracturesPosterior Approach – LLD Assessment
▶ “L to C” - lesser trochanter to center of femoral headPosterior Approach – LLD Assessment
▶ Bent Steinmann pin Mcgee, Scott, CORR 1985Posterior Approach – LLD Assessment
▶ Calipers/toolsDirect Anterior Approach – Improved Leg Lengths?
▶ Trans-ischial or trans-teardrop lineDirect Anterior Approach – Improved Leg Lengths?
▶ Off-table, direct assessment K BerendDirect Anterior Approach – Improved Leg Lengths?
▶ Overlay method J MattaDoes Advanced Technology Help?
$$$
Does Advanced Technology Help?
June 2015 “Robot-assisted posterior THA, fluoroscopy-guided anterior THA, and conventional posterior THA did not differ in obtaining minimal LLD. All three techniques are effective in achieving accuracy in LLD.”Conclusions
▶ Preoperative templating is critical to restoring leg length and offset ▶ Posterior – lesser to center, calipers, pins, knee/heel ▶ Anterior – fluoroscopy, overlay, direct supine assessment ▶ A robotic/navigation system can help but is unnecessary and addsexcessive cost
Thank You
Darwin Chen, MD Assistant Professor Mount Sinai Medical Center Department of Orthopaedic Surgery