Abating CO 2 in Energy Intensive Industries Katharina Grave - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Abating CO 2 in Energy Intensive Industries Katharina Grave - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Abating CO 2 in Energy Intensive Industries Katharina Grave Institute of Energy Economics Cologne, Germany Agenda 1. Aim 2. Theoretical Approach 3. Quantifying Abatement Potentials 3. Quantifying Abatement Potentials 4. Implementation 5.
Agenda
- 1. Aim
- 2. Theoretical Approach
- 3. Quantifying Abatement Potentials
- 3. Quantifying Abatement Potentials
- 4. Implementation
- 5. First Results
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*)
Aim
Analyse the structure of the “other half“
- f the emissions covered by the
European Emission Trading System and quantify CO -abatement potentials quantify CO2-abatement potentials
- utside the energy sector
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) +
1
Theoretical Approach: Analysing CITL
Combustion [1] Refineries [2] Iron & Steel [3;4;5] Cement [6] Glass [7] Ceramics [8] Pulp & Paper [9]
The main category: Combustion
Verified Emissions 2009
Pulp & Paper [9] Other [99]
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) ,
2
Theoretical Approach: Analysing CITL
Combustion [1] Refineries [2] Iron & Steel [3;4;5] Cement [6] Glass [7] Ceramics [8] Pulp & Paper [9]
main industrial emitters: iron and steel, cement, and refining
Verified Emissions 2009
Pulp & Paper [9] Other [99]
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*)
- 2
Theoretical Approach: Analysing CITL
Combustion [1] Refineries [2] Iron & Steel [3;4;5] Cement [6] Glass [7] Ceramics [8] Pulp & Paper [9]
main industrial emitters: iron and steel, cement, and refining
Verified Emissions 2009
Pulp & Paper [9] Other [99]
Problem: Combustion is also a main process in the industrial sector
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) .
2
Theoretical Approach: Analysing CITL
Combustion [1] Refineries [2] Iron & Steel [3;4;5] Cement [6] Glass [7] Ceramics [8] Pulp & Paper [9]
Verified Emissions 2009
Pulp & Paper [9] Other [99]
What part of it belongs to the industrial sector?
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) /
2
Theoretical Approach: Analysing CITL
Combustion Cogeneration/Heat Industrial Combustion Refineries [2] Iron & Steel [3;4;5] Cement [6]
Trotignon/Delsbosc: 15% is emitted in cogeneration plants
Cement [6] Glass [7] Ceramics [8] Pulp & Paper [9] Other [99]
10% are industrial emissions
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*)
2
Quantifying Abatement Potentials: Collecting Data
- Industrial studies
(specific and general)
- Institutes
- Institutes
- Stakeholder-Interviews
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*)
- 3
1) Specific abatement
- Electric arc furnaces instead of integrated steel mills
- Clinker substitution
Quantifying Abatement Potentials: Classification
2) Fuel-switching 3) Carbon capture and storage (CCS) 4) Carbon leakage
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) *)
3
- Production (covered by ETS)
- Average emissions per tonne
- Process emissions
- emissions from combustion
Quantifying Abatement Potentials: Variables
- emissions from combustion
- Electricity demand
- Costs of abatement per tonne
- Exogenous limits of applicability
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) **
3
- Production (covered by ETS)
- Average emissions per tonne
- Process emissions
- Emissions from combustion
For each state +
Quantifying Abatement Potentials: Variables
- Emissions from combustion
- Electricity demand
- Costs of abatement per tonne
- Exogenous limits of applicability
+ For each industry
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) *
3
Clinker Production Costs
25 30 35 40 45 st (€/t) Depreciation Maintenance
Example: Cement
5 10 15 20 AT BG CZ DK- W FI DE HU IT LT MLT PL RO SI SE NO State Cost G&A Elektricity Combustibles Labour Raw material
Electricity: 60 kWh/t Heat: 3.4 – 4 GJ/t
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) *+
3
Example: Cement
Process-Emissions: 0.525 tCO2/t clinker Process-Emissions: 0.525 tCO2/t clinker Combustion Emissions: 0.33 tCO2/t clinker
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) *,
3
Merit Order of Abatement
40 50 60
(in €)
10 20 30 1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 169 175 181 187 193 199 205 211 217 223 229 235 241 247 253 259 265 271 277 283 289 295 301 307 313 319
Cost (in Abatement Potential
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) *-
40 50 60
(in €)
Merit Order of Abatement
10 20 30 1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 169 175 181 187 193 199 205 211 217 223 229 235 241 247 253 259 265 271 277 283 289 295 301 307 313 319
Cost (in Abatement Potential
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) *.
40 50 60
ts (in €)
Merit Order of Abatement
10 20 30 1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 169 175 181 187 193 199 205 211 217 223 229 235 241 247 253 259 265 271 277 283 289 295 301 307 313 319
Abatement Potential (in t)
Carbon leakage Germany Carbon Leakage Spain
Costs
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) */
Implementation
DIME
- Linear optimisation model
- Calculation to 2050
- Aim:
Minimisation of the total costs of
- Aim:
Minimisation of the total costs of electricity generation
- constraint:
Limited emission of CO2
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) *0
4
Implementation
Objective function: C[…] min C[…] min New constraint: Σ Ee(y) = B(y) + Ag(y)
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) *
4
Abatement: Ag(y) = Σ Ai (r,m,y)
Implementation
Limited potential: Ai max * (1+gi (r,m)^j)> Ai
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) )
4
Implementation
Industrial abatement costs: ACg = Σ (Ai * Ci (r,m,y)) Additional demand for electricity: Lg (r,y,s,d,h) = l (r,y,s,d,h) + Ai * f (r,m)
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) *
4
First Results
15 20 25 30 Scenario I
UA (in €)
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*)
- 5
5 10 15 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Scenario I Scenario II
Price of EUA
First Results
60000000 80000000 100000000 120000000 Scenario I
s from industrial sector
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) +
5
20000000 40000000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Scenario I Scenario II
Required EUAs fro
Further Research
- Similar costs of production
- Missing data
- Production covered by ETS in glass and ceramics sector
- Production costs outside carbon constraint
- Production costs outside carbon constraint
- Limited application of abatement potentials
- Estimations for carbon leakage
- Assumptions about technical progress
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) ,
5
Thank you for your attention!
Katharina Grave Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universität zu Köln Vogelsanger Str. 321 50827 Köln Tel.: 0221-27729-306 katharina.grave@uni-koeln.de
Backup: Main Studies
- McKinsey für BDI (2007): Kosten und
Potentiale der Vermeidung von Treibhausgasemissionen in Deutschland
- IEA (2005): Industrial Competitiveness
under the European Union Emissions
- IEA (2005): Industrial Competitiveness
under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme
- BREF Reports
- Sektorenspezifische Studien
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) .
Backup: Experts
CEPI: Marco Mensink (Energy&Environment Director) FEVE: Adeline Farrelly Cembureau: Nina Sparacio (Assistent of Claude Lorea, Technical Director) VdZ:
- Dr. Volker Hoenig; Dr. Stefan Schäfer, Stefan Woywadt
(Energy and Production Engineering)
HVG DGG: Karlheinz Gitzhofer (Environmental Protection) FEHS:
- Dr. Dirk Mudersbach, Anja Garbach
FEHS:
- Dr. Dirk Mudersbach, Anja Garbach (Building Materials)
IMA/EuLA: Bert d‘Hooge (Scientific Advisor) BMU: Franzjosef Schafhausen (Director Environment and Energy) McKinsey:
- Dr. Phillip Beckmann (research for BDI)
IEHK Aachen:
- Dr. Stephan Geimer (CO2-topics)
Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl: Roderick Hömann (Energy Economics and Techical Design); Achim Beerheide (supply and logistics) VDEh:
- Dr. Bodo Lüngen (production)
BdF: Jörg Schulze (environment and security)
- !" #$"!
%"&'(&)*) /