A. INSE RT NOF NOT E : T he list above doe s not inc lude - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NOT E : Se e the c omple te e ligibility r e quir e me nts at INSE RT NOF A.

NOT E : T he list above doe s not inc lude all c omplianc e and/ or gove r ning dir e c tive s and is subje c t to c hange .

 Sa la rie s & Be ne fits  T

ra ve l/ T ra ining Co sts

 Mile a g e  Po sta g e  Offic e Supplie s  Curric ulum/ Supplie s  T

ra ining Ma te ria ls

 T

ra ining Supplie s

 Co ntra c tua l Se rvic e s  Cla ssro o m

E q uipme nt/ Supplie s

 Co nsulta nts



Co mpe nsa tio n a nd/ o r tra ve l fo r fe de ra l e mplo ye e s



Ho no ra ria



I ndire c t c o sts o f c o nfe re nc e s, sympo sia , a nd wo rksho ps inc luding e nte rta inme nt, spo rts, visa s, pa sspo rt c ha rg e s, tips, b a r c ha rg e s, b e ve ra g e s, pe rso na l te le pho ne c a lls, o r la undry c ha rg e s



Bo nuse s o r c o mmissio ns



Ove rhe a d/ a dministra tive c o sts



Ce rta in me a ls



Purc ha se o f la nd o r c o nstruc tio n



Co nsulta nts ra te s e xc e e ding $650/ da y



Da ily sub siste nc e within the

• ffic ia l do mic ile



E nte rta inme nt e xpe nse s a nd b a r c ha rg e s



F ina nc e fe e s fo r de linq ue nt pa yme nts



F irst c la ss tra ve l



I ndire c t Co sts



L

• b b ying o r fundra ising



Milita ry type e q uipme nt



Pe rso na l inc e ntive s fo r e mplo yme nt



Pre -pa id g a s o r pho ne c a rds



Ve hic le s



F ire a rms o r se rvic e we a po ns

NOT E : T

his is no t a c o mple te list a nd is sub je c t to c ha ng e .



• St. L
• uis County (21st)—

T yme sha Buc kne r-Do b yne s

tyme sha .b uc kne r_do b yne s@ c o urts.mo .g o v



• St. L
• uis City (22nd)—

Ra lph Jo ne s

ra lph.jo ne s@ c o urts.mo .g o v



Gr e e ne (31st)—

Da mo n Yo ung

da mo n.yo ung @ c o urts.mo .g o v



Cape Gir ar de au (32nd)—

Wa ymo n Ca mpb e ll

wa ymo n.c a mpb e ll@ c o urts.mo .g o v



• St. Char

le s (11th)—

Je nnife r Phillips

je nnife r.phillips@ c o urts.mo .g o v 

Boone (13th)—

Co urtne y Pulle y

c o urtne y.pulle y@ c o urts.mo .g o v 

Jac kson (16th)—

Ro se E dig e r

ro se .e d ig a r@ c o urts.mo .g o v 

Cole (19th)—

Mic ha e l Co uty

mic ha e l@ c o urts.mo .g o v

City Gov’t County Gov’t Not- for

• Pr
• fit

Age nc y L aw E nfor c e me nt Autho rize d Offic ia l City Ma yo r o r City Administra to r Co unty Co mmissio ne r/ Administra to r Bo a rd Pre side nt/ Cha ir o r pe rso n who c a n le g a lly b ind the a g e nc y City Ma yo r o r City Administra to r/ Co unty Co mmissio ne r Dire c to r Pe rso n

• ve rse e ing

pro je c t Pe rso n

• ve rse e ing

pro je c t Pe rso n o ve rse e ing pro je c t Chie f o r She riff F isc a l Offic e r City T re a sure r

• r

Co mptro lle r Co unty T re a sure r o r Co mptro lle r Bo a rd T re a sure r o r CF O City/ Co unty T re a sure r o r Co mptro lle r

Pro vide a b rie f summary o f the pro po se d pro je c t and a g e ne ral o ve rvie w o f the e xpe c te d

• utc o me (s) o f the pro po se d pro je c t.

I nfo rmatio n inc lude d in this summary sho uld pro vide the g e ne ral pub lic and re vie we rs with a snapsho t o f the pro je c t. T his info rmatio n may also b e use d fo r pub lic distrib utio n, inc luding OJJDP, the Misso uri L e g islature and me dia o utle ts. Applic ants are e xpe c te d to use g o o d g rammar, punc tuatio n and re frain fro m using ac ro nyms.

A sta te me nt ide ntifying wha t the pro b le m(s) yo u a re trying to a ddre ss. T he sta te me nt sho uld a nswe r:



What is the proble m?



Why is it a proble m?



Why is it a proble m he re ?



How doe s data support/ indic ate the proble m?



How doe s the proble m sc ale in c omparison to re gional, state or national data?



F unding is be ing re que ste d to addre ss the proble m(s) be c ause _______.

T he g o al(s) and o b je c tive s sho uld b e de fine d in re latio n to T itle I I Pro g ram Are a(s) that are b e ing applie d fo r .

 T

he g o a l(s) is the ultima te impa c t o r

• utc o me yo u a re pro po sing to a c hie ve .

 Ob je c tive s a re the ste ps/ a c tio ns tha t will

b e utilize d to a c c o mplish the g o a l.

T he Me tho do lo g y sho uld c le a rly de sc rib e the me tho d(s) to b e use d to a c hie ve the g o a ls(s) a nd o b je c tive s. T he Me tho do lo g y sho uld:

 b e dire c tly tie d to the pro po se d g o a ls, o b je c tive s a nd

sta te me nt o f the pro b le m

 linke d to the re so urc e s b e ing re q ue ste d in the b udg e t  e xpla in why the me tho d(s) we re c ho se n b y inc luding

re se a rc h, e xpe rie nc e , a ne c do ta l o pinio n, a nd e xpe rt

• pinio n

 c a re fully de sc rib e the struc ture d a c tivitie s tha t will mo ve

the pro je c t to the de sire d o utc o me s

 inc lude info rma tio n a b o ut who m the pro je c t will se rve  ide ntify ke y sta ke ho lde rs a nd c o lla b o ra tive pa rtne rs

Submit a time line o f e ve nts/ ac tivitie s, tr ainings, pr e se ntatio ns, me e tings, e tc . r e late d to the pr

• po se d pr
• je c t.

De sc rib e the applic ants E xpe rie nc e and Re liab ility:

 Suppo rt the ag e nc y's ab ility and

c apac ity to pro vide the pro po se d se rvic e s

 Who a re o the r se rvic e pro vide rs in the c o mmunity?  Ho w will the a pplic a nt a g e nc y a vo id se rvic e

duplic a tio n?

 Ho w will re fe rra ls b e o b ta ine d a nd sha re d?  Do e s the a pplic a nt a g e nc y ha ve fo rma l a g re e me nts

in pla c e with the se o the r se rvic e s pro vide rs?

 Will the a pplic a nt a g e nc y se t up fo rma l a g re e me nts

with the o the r se rvic e s pro vide rs?

De sc rib e ho w the pro po se d pro je c t will b e e vlua te d fo r e ffe c tive ne ss?

 Wha t type (s) o f da ta will b e c o lle c te d?  Ho w o fte n (o r a t wha t inte rva ls) will the

c o lle c te d da ta b e e va lua te d?

 Who will e va lua te the c o lle c te d da ta ?

T itle I I g rant awards are de fine d b y OJJDP as "se e d mo ne y" fo r ne w and inno vative pro g rams at the state , re g io nal, and lo c al le ve ls. Ne w applic ants must de ve lo p a sustainab ility plan that inc lude s no mo re than up to thre e ye ars o f fe de ral funding . At the c o nc lusio n o f fe de ral funding , it is e xpe c te d that sub -re c ipie nts will c o ntinue the T itle I I pro g ramming e ve n if it is o nly at a re duc e d le ve l. Applic a nt must e xplain what ste ps will b e take n to sustain this pro g ram b e yo nd the thre e -ye ar c yc le o f the g rant.

E a c h Budg e t F

• rm ha s two pa rts:

 L

ine I te m Re q ue st(s)

 Budg e t Justific a tio n

T he se se c tio ns a re whe re the individua l line ite ms a re e nte re d.

 Ca re fully la b e l the line s, this is ho w the y

will a ppe a r in the a ppro ve d b udg e t.

 E

a c h individua l Pe rso nne l re q ue st must b e e nte re d a s a n individua l line

 Be ne fits must b e ite mize d  Pro pe rly la b e l e a c h line ite ms  I

f a n inc re a se is e xpe c te d during the pro je c t pe rio d, e nte r 1 line with the sta rting ra te a nd time fra me ; the n a no the r with the inc re a se d ra te a nd e ffe c tive da te —like wise with e a c h b e ne fit

 T

a ke c a re to CL

E ARL Y justify e a c h e xpe nse .

 Adhe re to a ll c urre nt pe r die m/ mile a g e

ra te s.

 NOT

E : Co mpa re yo ur a g e nc y po lic y to

the DPS T ra ve l Guide line s; a nd fo llo w whic he ve r is le ss…it’ s RE

QUIRE D!

 ASK YOURSE

L F ! I

s the re q ue st ne c e ssa ry? I s it c o st-e ffe c tive ? I s it a llo wa b le ? I s the re q ue st DIRE

CT L Y re la te d to the

pro je c t/ pro g ra m? E

XPL AIN!

 De fine d a s ta ng ib le pe rso na l pro pe rty

(inc luding info rma tio n te c hno lo g y syste ms) ha ving a use ful life o f mo re tha n o ne ye a r a nd a pe r-unit a c q uisitio n c o st whic h e q ua ls o r e xc e e ds the le sse r o f the c a pita liza tio n le ve l e sta b lishe d b y the no n-F e de ra l e ntity fo r fina nc ia l sta te me nt purpo se s, o r $1,000

 ASK YOURSE

L F ! I

s the re q ue st ne c e ssa ry? I s it c o st-e ffe c tive ? I s it a llo wa b le ? I s the re q ue st

DIRE CT L Y re la te d to the pro je c t/ pro g ra m? E XPL AIN!

 Whe n re q ue sting g e ne ra l supplie s; it is

a c c e pta b le to e nte r 1 line ite m b ut the type s

• f ite ms must b e ide ntifie d in the justific a tio n

se c tio n.

 Any printe d ite ms must a dhe re to the

a sso c ia te d g uide line s a nd must ha ve prio r DPS a ppro va l.

 ASK YOURSE

L F ! I

s the re q ue st ne c e ssa ry? I s it c o st-e ffe c tive ? I s it a llo wa b le ? I s the re q ue st

DIRE CT L Y re la te d to the pro je c t/ pro g ra m? E XPL AIN!

 All c o ntra c ts must inc lude a n o utline o f the se rvic e s to b e

pro vide d; the time fra me a nd the a sso c ia te d c o sts. All e xe c ute d c o ntra c ts must b e ma de a va ila b le to DPS.

 T

he ma ximum a llo we d fo r c o ntra c tua l se rvic e s is $650/ da y. T his do e sn’ t me a n yo u c a n’ t c o ntra c t a t a hig he r ra te . Yo u c a n o nly c la im $650/ da y.

 So me a llo wa b le ite ms inc lude e le c tro nic mo nito ring ,

c o nsulta nts, me nta l he a lth pro fe ssio na ls, e tc .



ASK YOURSE L F ! I

s the re q ue st ne c e ssa ry? I s it c o st- e ffe c tive ? I s it a llo wa b le ? I s the re q ue st DIRE

CT L Y re la te d

to the pro je c t/ pro g ra m? E

XPL AIN!

Pursua nt to Se c tio n 223(a )(22) o f the JJDP Ac t; DMC is a Co re Re q uire me nt. Whe the r DMC is the prima ry fo c us o f yo ur pro je c t o r initia tive o r no t, the re is like ly a DMC link to yo ur wo rk. DPS is inte re ste d in a ny DMC e ffo rts in yo ur c o mmunity o r ta rg e t po pula tio n.

T his wo rkshe e t is use d to re po rt de mo g ra phic da ta to OJJDP.

 T

his fo rm c e rtifie s tha t the AUT

HORIZE D OF F ICIAL

ha s re a d a nd a g re e d to the T itle I I Ce rtifie d Assura nc e s.

 T

he type d na me o f AUT

HORIZE D OF F ICIAL

, in lie u o f his/ he r sig na ture , re pre se nts the le g a lly b inding a c c e pta nc e o f the te rms o f the a pplic a tio n a nd his/ he r sta te me nt o f the ve ra c ity o f the re pre se nta tio ns ma de in the a pplic a tio n.



An a udit is re q uire d fo r the a g e nc y fisc a l ye a r, whe n ST

AT E fina nc ia l

a ssista nc e , (whic h c o nsists o f funds re c e ive d dire c tly fro m the Sta te o f Misso uri, b ut do e s no t inc lude fe de ra l pa ss-thro ug h funds), o f $250,000 o r mo re is e xpe nde d b y the a pplic a nt a g e nc y.



An a udit is re q uire d fo r the a g e nc y fisc a l ye a r, whe n F

E DE RAL

fina nc ia l a ssista nc e , (whic h c o nsists o f funds re c e ive d dire c tly fro m the F e de ra l Go ve rnme nt o r fe de ra l funds pa sse d thro ug h sta te a g e nc ie s), o f $750,000 o r mo re is e xpe nde d b y the a pplic a nt a g e nc y.



No a udit o f a ny type is re q uire d whe n ST

AT E fina nc ia l a ssista nc e o f le ss

tha n $250,000 o r F

E DE RAL

fina nc ia l a ssista nc e o f le ss tha n $750,000 is e xpe nde d. Ho we ve r, the re c ipie nt must ma inta in de ta ile d re c o rds o n g ra nt a c tivity re q uire d fo r suc h g ra nts.

 Org a niza tio na l Cha rt  2 Curre nt L

e tte rs o f Suppo rt

 Jo b De sc riptio ns  Re sume s  Me mo ra ndum’ s o f Unde rsta nding  Curre nt c o py o f 501(c ) 3 Sta tus  L

ist o f Bo a rd o f Dire c to rs with Co nta c t I nfo rma tio n

 T

his se c tio n o f the a pplic a tio n a llo ws yo u to uplo a d a ny a tta c hme nts re la te d to the re q ue st tha t a re dire c tly re la te d to a nd/ o r in suppo rt o f the re q ue st.

 T

his is o ptio na l!