A. INSE RT NOF NOT E : T he list above doe s not inc lude - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NOT E : Se e the c omple te e ligibility r e quir e me nts at A. INSE RT NOF

NOT E : T he list above doe s not inc lude all c omplianc e and/ or gove r ning dir e c tive s and is subje c t to c hange .

 Sa la rie s & Be ne fits  Co ntra c tua l Se rvic e s  T ra ve l/ T ra ining Co sts  Cla ssro o m E q uipme nt/ Supplie s  Mile a g e  Co nsulta nts  Po sta g e  Offic e Supplie s  Curric ulum/ Supplie s  T ra ining Ma te ria ls  T ra ining Supplie s

Co mpe nsa tio n a nd/ o r tra ve l Da ily sub siste nc e within the   fo r fe de ra l e mplo ye e s o ffic ia l do mic ile Ho no ra ria E nte rta inme nt e xpe nse s a nd   b a r c ha rg e s I ndire c t c o sts o f c o nfe re nc e s,  sympo sia , a nd wo rksho ps F ina nc e fe e s fo r de linq ue nt  inc luding e nte rta inme nt, pa yme nts spo rts, visa s, pa sspo rt c ha rg e s, F irst c la ss tra ve l  tips, b a r c ha rg e s, b e ve ra g e s, I ndire c t Co sts  pe rso na l te le pho ne c a lls, o r L o b b ying o r fundra ising  la undry c ha rg e s Milita ry type e q uipme nt  Bo nuse s o r c o mmissio ns  Pe rso na l inc e ntive s fo r  Ove rhe a d/ a dministra tive  e mplo yme nt c o sts Pre -pa id g a s o r pho ne c a rds  Ce rta in me a ls  Ve hic le s  Purc ha se o f la nd o r  c o nstruc tio n F ire a rms o r se rvic e we a po ns  Co nsulta nts ra te s e xc e e ding  $650/ da y : T his is no t a c o mple te list a nd is sub je c t to c ha ng e . NOT E

le s (11 th )— ouis County (21 st )—   St. Char St. L Je nnife r Phillips T yme sha Buc kne r-Do b yne s tyme sha .b uc kne r_do b yne s@ c o urts.mo .g o v je nnife r.phillips@ c o urts.mo .g o v  ouis City (22 nd )— Boone (13th)—  St. L Co urtne y Pulle y Ra lph Jo ne s c o urtne y.pulle y@ c o urts.mo .g o v ra lph.jo ne s@ c o urts.mo .g o v  Jac kson (16th)— e e ne (31 st )—  Gr Ro se E dig e r Da mo n Yo ung ro se .e d ig a r@ c o urts.mo .g o v da mo n.yo ung @ c o urts.mo .g o v  Cole (19th)— de au (32 nd )—  Cape Gir ar Mic ha e l Co uty Wa ymo n Ca mpb e ll mic ha e l@ c o urts.mo .g o v wa ymo n.c a mpb e ll@ c o urts.mo .g o v

City Gov’t County Gov’t Not- for - Pr ofit L aw Age nc y E nfor c e me nt Autho rize d City Ma yo r o r Co unty Bo a rd City Ma yo r o r Offic ia l City Co mmissio ne r/ Pre side nt/ Cha ir o r City Administra to r Administra to r pe rso n who c a n Administra to r/ le g a lly b ind the Co unty a g e nc y Co mmissio ne r Dire c to r Pe rso n Pe rso n Pe rso n o ve rse e ing Chie f o r She riff o ve rse e ing o ve rse e ing pro je c t pro je c t pro je c t F isc a l City T re a sure r Co unty Bo a rd T re a sure r o r City/ Co unty Offic e r o r T re a sure r o r CF O T re a sure r o r Co mptro lle r Co mptro lle r Co mptro lle r

Pro vide a b rie f summary o f the pro po se d pro je c t and a g e ne ral o ve rvie w o f the e xpe c te d o utc o me (s) o f the pro po se d pro je c t. I nfo rmatio n inc lude d in this summary sho uld pro vide the g e ne ral pub lic and re vie we rs with a snapsho t o f the pro je c t. T his info rmatio n may also b e use d fo r pub lic distrib utio n, inc luding OJJDP, e g islature and me dia o utle ts. the Misso uri L Applic ants are e xpe c te d to use g o o d g rammar, punc tuatio n and re frain fro m using ac ro nyms.

A sta te me nt ide ntifying wha t the pro b le m(s) yo u a re trying to a ddre ss. T he sta te me nt sho uld a nswe r:  What is the proble m?  Why is it a proble m?  Why is it a proble m he re ?  How doe s data support/ indic ate the proble m?  How doe s the proble m sc ale in c omparison to re gional, state or national data?  F unding is be ing re que ste d to addre ss the proble m(s) be c ause _______.

T he g o al(s) and o b je c tive s sho uld b e de fine d in re latio n to T itle I I Pro g ram Are a(s) that are b e ing applie d fo r .  T he g o a l(s) is the ultima te impa c t o r o utc o me yo u a re pro po sing to a c hie ve .  Ob je c tive s a re the ste ps/ a c tio ns tha t will b e utilize d to a c c o mplish the g o a l.

T he Me tho do lo g y sho uld c le a rly de sc rib e the me tho d(s) to b e use d to a c hie ve the g o a ls(s) a nd o b je c tive s. T he Me tho do lo g y sho uld:  b e dire c tly tie d to the pro po se d g o a ls, o b je c tive s a nd sta te me nt o f the pro b le m  linke d to the re so urc e s b e ing re q ue ste d in the b udg e t  e xpla in why the me tho d(s) we re c ho se n b y inc luding re se a rc h, e xpe rie nc e , a ne c do ta l o pinio n, a nd e xpe rt o pinio n  c a re fully de sc rib e the struc ture d a c tivitie s tha t will mo ve the pro je c t to the de sire d o utc o me s  inc lude info rma tio n a b o ut who m the pro je c t will se rve  ide ntify ke y sta ke ho lde rs a nd c o lla b o ra tive pa rtne rs

Submit a time line o f e ve nts/ ac tivitie s, tr ainings, pr e se ntatio ns, me e tings, e tc . r e late d to the pr o po se d pr o je c t.

De sc rib e the applic ants E xpe rie nc e and Re liab ility:  Suppo rt the ag e nc y's ab ility and c apac ity to pro vide the pro po se d se rvic e s

 Who a re o the r se rvic e pro vide rs in the c o mmunity?  Ho w will the a pplic a nt a g e nc y a vo id se rvic e duplic a tio n?  Ho w will re fe rra ls b e o b ta ine d a nd sha re d?  Do e s the a pplic a nt a g e nc y ha ve fo rma l a g re e me nts in pla c e with the se o the r se rvic e s pro vide rs?  Will the a pplic a nt a g e nc y se t up fo rma l a g re e me nts with the o the r se rvic e s pro vide rs?

De sc rib e ho w the pro po se d pro je c t will b e e vlua te d fo r e ffe c tive ne ss?  Wha t type (s) o f da ta will b e c o lle c te d?  Ho w o fte n (o r a t wha t inte rva ls) will the c o lle c te d da ta b e e va lua te d?  Who will e va lua te the c o lle c te d da ta ?

T itle I I g rant awards are de fine d b y OJJDP as "se e d mo ne y" fo r ne w and inno vative pro g rams at the state , re g io nal, and lo c al le ve ls. Ne w applic ants must de ve lo p a sustainab ility plan that inc lude s no mo re than up to thre e ye ars o f fe de ral funding . At the c o nc lusio n o f fe de ral funding , it is e xpe c te d that sub -re c ipie nts will c o ntinue the T itle I I pro g ramming e ve n if it is o nly at a re duc e d le ve l. Applic a nt must e xplain what ste ps will b e take n to sustain this pro g ram b e yo nd the thre e -ye ar c yc le o f the g rant.

E a c h Budg e t F o rm ha s two pa rts:  L ine I te m Re q ue st(s)  Budg e t Justific a tio n

T he se se c tio ns a re whe re the individua l line ite ms a re e nte re d.  Ca re fully la b e l the line s, this is ho w the y will a ppe a r in the a ppro ve d b udg e t.

 E a c h individua l Pe rso nne l re q ue st must b e e nte re d a s a n individua l line  Be ne fits must b e ite mize d  Pro pe rly la b e l e a c h line ite ms  I f a n inc re a se is e xpe c te d during the pro je c t pe rio d, e nte r 1 line with the sta rting ra te a nd time fra me ; the n a no the r with the inc re a se d ra te a nd e ffe c tive da te —like wise with e a c h b e ne fit  T a ke c a re to CL Y justify e a c h e xpe nse . E ARL

 Adhe re to a ll c urre nt pe r die m/ mile a g e ra te s. : Co mpa re yo ur a g e nc y po lic y to  NOT E the DPS T ra ve l Guide line s; a nd fo llo w whic he ve r is le ss…it’ s RE QUIRE D! ! I s the re q ue st ne c e ssa ry?  ASK YOURSE L F I s it c o st-e ffe c tive ? I s it a llo wa b le ? I s the re q ue st DIRE Y re la te d to the CT L pro je c t/ pro g ra m? E XPL AIN!

 De fine d a s ta ng ib le pe rso na l pro pe rty (inc luding info rma tio n te c hno lo g y syste ms) ha ving a use ful life o f mo re tha n o ne ye a r a nd a pe r-unit a c q uisitio n c o st whic h e q ua ls o r e xc e e ds the le sse r o f the c a pita liza tio n le ve l e sta b lishe d b y the no n-F e de ra l e ntity fo r fina nc ia l sta te me nt purpo se s, o r $1,000 ! I s the re q ue st ne c e ssa ry? I s it  ASK YOURSE L F c o st-e ffe c tive ? I s it a llo wa b le ? I s the re q ue st Y re la te d to the pro je c t/ pro g ra m? DIRE CT L E XPL AIN!