a new window on primordial non gaussianity
play

A new window on primordial non-Gaussianity based on 1201.5375 with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A new window on primordial non-Gaussianity based on 1201.5375 with M. Zaldarriaga Enrico Pajer Princeton University 2.0 R k 2 10 9 1.5 CMB LSS 1.0 10 4 0.01 1 100 10 4 k Mpc Summary We know little about


  1. A new window on primordial non-Gaussianity based on 1201.5375 with M. Zaldarriaga Enrico Pajer Princeton University 2.0 � R � k � 2 � 10 9 1.5 Μ CMB � LSS 1.0 10 � 4 0.01 1 100 10 4 k Mpc

  2. Summary We know little about primordial perturbations outside the range 10 − 4 � k Mpc � 1 µ -type spectral distortion of the CMB is a unique probe of small scales 50 � k Mpc � 10 4 [Sunyaev, Zel’dovich, Silk, Peebles, Hu, Danese, de Zotti, Chluba, . . . ] The monopole � µ (ˆ n ) � probes the small-scale power spectrum µT cross correlation probes the primordial bispectrum in the squeezed limit f loc NL Fisher forecast with current technology ∆ f loc NL � 10 3 Beat cosmic variance with an enormous number of modes Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 2 / 26

  3. Outline 1 Motivations 2 Review of µ -distortion 3 A new window on primordial non-Gaussianity 4 Remarks Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 3 / 26

  4. The golden age of cosmology We are living in the golden age of observational cosmology: COBE goes to Stockholm, WMAP, ACT & SPT measured the CMB with 1% accuracy. now Planck and a horde of ground and ballon based experiments Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 4 / 26

  5. Primordial perturbations 1 H ? radiation matter dark E Log a Primordial superhorizon perturbations seed the structures in our universe They teach us about the earlier stage Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 5 / 26

  6. The non-linear regime of structure formation Small superhorizon primordial perturbations → linear evolution Homogeneous background → no mix of different scales Perturbations re-enter the horizon → grow with time Large perturbations evolve in a complicated non-linear way → erase primordial information Linear regime: Large scale structures k < O (Mpc − 1 ) or look back in time Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 6 / 26

  7. The cosmic microwave background A snapshot of the universe at 370 , 000 years, z ≃ 1100 Small perturbations δρ/ρ ∼ 10 − 5 → linearly related to primordial perturbations For l � 2000 or k > O (0 . 2 Mpc − 1 ) erased by diffusing damping! Can we access smaller scales? Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 7 / 26

  8. The CMB/LSS window 2.00 1.00 0.50 outside CMB � LSS � R � k � 2 � 10 9 0.20 ? horizon Gaussian 0.10 0.05 Scale � inv 0.02 10 � 7 10 � 5 0.001 0.1 10 1000 k Mpc k � 10 − 4 Mpc − 1 are still outside our horizon k � 0 . 2 Mpc − 1 ( l � 2000) have been erased by Silk damping k � O (1) Mpc − 1 are now contaminated by gravitational non-linearities Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 8 / 26

  9. Outline 1 Motivations 2 Review of µ -distortion 3 A new window on primordial non-Gaussianity 4 Remarks Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 9 / 26

  10. The µ -era Before z i ≃ 2 × 10 6 double Compton scattering ( e − + γ → e − + 2 γ ) is very efficient. Perfect thermodynamical equilibrium, Planck spectrum n ( ν ) = ( e ν/k B T − 1) − 1 Between z i and z f ∼ 5 × 10 4 only elastic Compton scattering ( e − + γ → e − + γ ) is efficient. Photon number (almost) conserved. Bose-Einstein spectrum with chemical potential µ 1 n ( ν ) = e ν/k B T + µ − 1 After z f also elastic Compton scattering is not efficient, e.g. y -type distortion. Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 10 / 26

  11. µ -distorted spectrum For µ > 0 the spectrum ν 2 n ( ν ) = e ν/k B T + µ − 1 looks like n � Ν � Ν � kT 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0 Distinctive ν dependence. Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 11 / 26

  12. Perturbations during the µ -era Perturbations during the µ -era 5 × 10 4 � z � 2 × 10 6 Dissipation of acoustic modes due to diffusion damping [Silk ’72] . Scale invariant power spectrum n s ∼ 1 µ ≃ 2 . 4 × 10 − 8 Adiabatic cooling → Bose-Eistein condensation [Khatri, Chluba Sunyaev ’11,’12] µ BE ≃ − 3 × 10 − 9 Non-standard physics e.g. decays of massive particles, . . . Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 12 / 26

  13. Dissipation of acoustic modes Perturbations of the adiabatic mode R re-enter the horizon, oscillate and dissipate δ γ ∼ R k cos( kt ) e − k 2 /k 2 D Shear viscosity and heat conduction damp the oscillations [Silk, Kaiser, Weinberg] k D ≃ z 3 / 2 4 × 10 − 6 Mpc − 1 Now we can only see � R � k � 2 � 10 9 k < k D ( z L ) ≃ 0 . 2 × Mpc − 1 z L z f 1 z i 1 µ -distortion can see 50 < k Mpc − 1 < 10 4 10 � 4 0.01 1 100 10 4 k Mpc Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 13 / 26

  14. Power dissipated in the µ era Analytical estimate of µ [Hu et al. 94’, Khatri Chluba & Sunyaev ’11] Energy in acoustic waves with relativistic correction i c 2 � s � δ 2 � δE ∼ ρ γ � � 1 + c 2 � s f Bose-Einstein spectrum with E → E + δE and fixed N µ ≃ 1 . 4 δE > 0 Linear integral probe of the z i � R � k � 2 � 10 9 power spectrum z L z f 1 1 Μ � d log k ∆ 2 µ ∝ R ( k ) 10 � 4 0.01 1 100 10 4 k Mpc Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 14 / 26

  15. � µ (ˆ n ) � constraints the small-scale power spectrum The averaged µ -distortion over the whole sky (monopole) [Hu et al. ’94, Khatri Chluba Sunyaev ’11’12] � µ ( x ) � ≃ 9 � � i � e − 2 k 2 /k 2 d log k ∆ 2 R ( k ) f , D 4 Integral measure of the power spectrum at small scales For n s = 1 µ ∼ 2 × 10 − 8 Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 15 / 26

  16. Relating µ to R 2 at small scales Dissipation is smeared over a volume k − 3 s Nature takes the average for us Small cosmic variance! [EP & Zaldarriaga ’12] Final analytical estimate � d 3 k 1 d 3 k 2 9 � k + � k 2 ) e i� R ( � k 1 ) R ( � k + · � x W µ ( x ) ≃ (2 π ) 6 2 k s � i � e − ( k 2 1 + k 2 2 ) /k 2 ×� cos ( k 1 t ) cos ( k 2 t ) � p D f Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 16 / 26

  17. Outline 1 Motivations 2 Review of µ -distortion 3 A new window on primordial non-Gaussianity 4 Remarks Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 17 / 26

  18. Primordial non-Gaussianity For a Gaussian random variable � δ 2 n +1 � = 0 , � δ 2 n � ∝ � δ 2 � n Using rotational and translational invariance �R 3 � ≡ (2 π ) 3 f NL F ( k 1 , k 2 , k 3 ) δ 3 ( k 1 + k 2 + k 3 ) Scale invariance: only k 1 /k 3 and k 2 /k 3 f NL gives the size F ( k 1 , k 2 , k 3 ) (normalized) gives the shape. Out[1320]= Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 18 / 26

  19. Squeezed limit Squeezed limit k 3 ≪ k 1 ∼ k 2 . Short-scale power modulated by long scales � � 1 � � > 3 � 3 , 2 � k S � k S � k S k L ≪ k S �R ( k S ) 2 R ( k L ) � ∼ 1 lim A + B + C k 6 k L k L k L S Microphysical inflationary models: A � = 0 ⇒ instability B � = 0 ⇒ multi-field (more than one clock), e.g. curvaton, quasi-single-field, local template [Maldacena ’02, Creminelli Zaldarriaga ’04] C � = 0 ⇒ single or multi-field, e.g. small speed of sound, equilateral template Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 19 / 26

  20. Local non-Gaussianity Local model peaks in the squeezed limit k 3 ≪ k 1 ∼ k 2 Distinguishes between broad classes of models �R ( k 1 ) R ( k 2 ) R ( k 3 ) � ∼ ∆ 2 ∆ 2 R R + 2perm ′ s k 3 k 3 1 2 Local in position space, e.g. [Komatsu Spergel ’01] R G ( x ) 2 − �R G ( x ) 2 � R ( x ) = R G ( x ) + f loc � � NL Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 20 / 26

  21. µT cross correlation Μ � y � Μ � x � µ ∼ R 2 and T ∼ R µT ∼ R 3 ⇒ µT probe the primordial bispectrum in the squeezed limit f loc NL Straightforward computation 50 ∆ 4 NL b ≃ 3 × 10 − 16 R ( k p ) � µT � ∼ C µT l ( l + 1) f loc l ( l + 1) f loc ≃ NL b l b ∼ ∆ 2 R ( k D ) / ∆ 2 R ( k p ), if scale invariant b ∼ 1. Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 21 / 26

  22. µµ Gaussian self correlation µµ ∼ R 4 receives both a Gaussian and a non-Gaussian contributions. The Gaussian is k s r − 2 6 × 10 − 17 ∆ 4 R ( k D,f ) C µµ L ∼ l, Gauss ∆ 4 k 3 R ( k p ) D,f 1 . 5 × 10 − 28 � µ fluctuations are uncorrelated at distances ∆ x ≫ 1 /k s White noise, l -independent Very small cosmic variance! Suppressed by N − 1 / 2 modes with k 3 D,f ∼ 10 12 N modes ∼ k s r − 2 L Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 22 / 26

  23. Fisher matrix forecast NL from C µT Signal to noise for f loc l � S C µT C µT � 2 � l l = C µµ,N 1 N 2 l +1 C TT l l l A figure of merit PIXIE [Chuss et al. ’11] � √ � � 4 π × 10 − 8 S log l max 10 − 3 b f loc ≃ 80 . NL w − 1 / 2 N µ NL � 10 3 with current technology i.e. ∆ f loc It probes different scales than those of T anisotropy Enrico Pajer (Princeton) New window on primordial NG UPenn March 2012 23 / 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend