A New Day: Accreditation for Dialysis Facilities Presented By Curt - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a new day accreditation for dialysis facilities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A New Day: Accreditation for Dialysis Facilities Presented By Curt - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A New Day: Accreditation for Dialysis Facilities Presented By Curt Anliker, CEO To Florida Renal Association 2019 Annual Educational Conference July 18-19, 2019 Todays Topics Accreditation by an Accreditation Organization (AO) vs.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A New Day: Accreditation for Dialysis Facilities

Presented By Curt Anliker, CEO To

Florida Renal Association

2019 Annual Educational Conference · July 18-19, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Today’s Topics

Accreditation by an Accreditation Organization (AO) vs. Certification by the state agency

Overview of NDAC’s team and service commitment

Value of accreditation

Future predictions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What’s the Difference in Accreditation and Certification?

Accreditation is awarded to a facility that meets the standards of the AO

CMS awards certification based on the successful completion of an initial survey

  • By a state agency, or
  • By an AO with deemed status

Certification allows for payment for care of Medicare beneficiaries

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Are AOs CMS Contractors?

► No - All AOs are private companies ► If an AO chooses to offer “deemed status”

for a provider type, they must apply for and be approved by CMS

► AOs seeking deemed status must follow

CMS direction

  • AO Standards must be equal or more stringent
  • AO Survey process must be equal or more stringent
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Currently Two AOs Have “Deemed Status” for ESRD

► NDAC - Approved January 4, 2019 ► Accreditation Commission for Health Care

  • Approved April 11, 2019
slide-6
SLIDE 6

How Does the Accreditation Process Differ from a State Survey?

► A facility or provider company chooses to contract

with an AO and pay for a survey under the AO standards

► The AO standards must be equivalent to the CMS

regulations

  • May be similar to ESRD Conditions for Coverage
  • May include additional requirements
  • May be written in a different way

► AO surveys are expected to be unannounced

slide-7
SLIDE 7

How Does Accreditation Differ from a State Survey?

► AO survey process: May differ from state survey

process, but must be equivalent

► Survey team size:

  • State teams vary from 1 to 4+;
  • AO teams may vary from 1 to several surveyors

► Successful AO survey = recommend accreditation

and deemed status for certification

► Successful state survey = recommend certification

slide-8
SLIDE 8

How Does Accreditation Differ from a State Survey?

► AO survey process: May differ from state survey

process, but must be equivalent

► Survey team size:

  • State teams vary from 1 to 4+;
  • AO teams may vary from 1 to several surveyors

► Successful AO survey = recommend accreditation

and deemed status for certification

► Successful state survey = recommend certification

Only CMS Awards Certification!

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What About Findings and Corrective Action?

► AOs develop statements of findings much like

the state reports

► Corrective action is required within similar

timelines as the state survey

► If serious findings are identified, one or more

revisits may be required to verify correction

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What About Complaints?

► The AO will investigate any complaints it

receives directly and referrals from the state, CMS or the Network

► CMS must authorize the state to do

federal complaint investigations in dialysis facilities with deemed status

► The state will investigate complaints

received by the state or CMS if the allegations indicate a serious threat to patient health and safety

slide-11
SLIDE 11

AO Services Provided

Geographic coverage includes entire U.S. and its territories

Maximum accreditation period = 3 years

Re-survey required to continue accreditation

  • Initial / DeNovo
  • Re-Surveys & Expansion
  • Life Safety Code
  • Complaint Response
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Expansion of Service Surveys

August 2018 CMS Guidance Letter revised some processes:

► Allows relocations, adding stations and

some services to be done by “desk” review (by state or AO)

► On-site survey required to add home

training or to add in-center dialysis to a home only facility

  • Not included in the law or the memo
  • 90 Day rule does not apply….. Survey may be

delayed in some states

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What About Resurveys? Why Stay with an AO?

► Predictable re-survey window in 33-36 months

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What About Resurveys? Why Stay with an AO?

► Predictable re-survey window in 33-36 months ► An AO is customer-focused: prompt response to

questions and clear communication

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What About Resurveys? Why Stay with an AO?

► Predictable re-survey window in 33-36 months ► An AO is customer-focused: prompt response to

questions and clear communication

► Standardization and centralized review of every

survey

  • Thwarts “rogue citations”
  • Ensures consistency across the country (not

just within a state)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What About Resurveys? Why Stay with an AO?

► Predictable re-survey window in 33-36 months ► An AO is customer-focused: prompt response to

questions and clear communication

► Standardization and centralized review of every

survey

  • Thwarts “rogue citations”
  • Ensures consistency across the country (not

just within a state)

► Surveyors experienced in ESRD ► Focus on what is important for patient safety

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Meet NDAC

► NDAC management and surveyors

have dialysis experience

► Survey process similar to the CMS

survey process

► NDAC standards closely mirror the

Conditions for Coverage

  • Exception: cultures and endotoxin

levels reflect current AAMI standards

slide-18
SLIDE 18

NDAC Executive Team

► Glenda Payne:

Chief Compliance Officer

40+ years in nephrology with regulatory and compliance expertise

► Jennifer Vavrinchik:

Chief Operating Officer 30+

years in nephrology with clinical

  • perations expertise

► Curt Anliker:

Chief Executive Officer

~ 20 years as a dialysis provider

slide-19
SLIDE 19

NDAC Advisory Board

  • Interdisciplinary Team
  • Patient
  • Physician
  • Nurses
  • Bio-Medical
  • Dietitian
  • Social Worker

Every voice is heard!

slide-20
SLIDE 20

NDAC Commitment

► Surveyors who know dialysis ► Focus on what’s important

  • Identify serious issues
  • Educate to our standards

► Identify non-compliance and require

correction

► Prompt response and turn-around

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Is a $14,500 Accreditation Fee Worth It?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Is a $14,500 Accreditation Fee Worth It?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Is a $14,500 Accreditation Fee Worth It?

TIME = $$

78 Days (2.6 Months) Average Time Savings =

  • Reduced fixed costs: Rent, utilities, insurance, capital carry costs, Med Dir fee, etc.
  • Reduced variable costs: Staffing + benefits, treatment supplies/drugs, labs, EMR,

water and machine maintenance, social worker/dietitian

  • Faster Medicare reimbursement: (2.6 mo) x (12 tx/mo) x ($240/tx) = $7,500

($7,500) x # patients = $$ INCREMENTAL REVENUE

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The Future of Accreditation

► Two AOs are approved to offer this service;

  • thers may apply

► Provider interest is high ► Uptake of AO services partially depends on

CMS and states’ ability to meet the mandate for prompt initial surveys

► Long-term: likely to be widely adopted ► Likely adoption/integration by payor

community as accredited clinics grow

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Thank you! For more information

www.ndacommission.com

Questions?