A new approach to understanding the pressure gradients in the brain that cause hydrocephalus
- !!"!
!!"! !#$!% !#$!%
A new approach to understanding the pressure gradients in the brain - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A new approach to understanding the pressure gradients in the brain that cause hydrocephalus
!!"! !#$!% !#$!%
n
Injury (trauma, intracranial hemorrhage etc)
n
NPH and ageing
n
Cytokine concepts
n
Pulsatility
n
40 mutants and 9 genes have been identified in animal models. Most of the gene products are the cytokines and growth factors involved in brain development
n
In humans, only one HC gene has been identified (X-linked) encoding for the cell adhesion molecule L1
$ &%!' (
!* +,,-./01/23-4/5
Ventricular Volume
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 2 4 6 8 10
! 6
Olfactory Turbinate Tracer Enrichment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Saline Kaolin
Tracer Enrichment
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
! 6
*+,,7
#
#
CSF absorption deficit (outflow resistance) correlation with ventricular volumes
(+ 8,*59: 1;,*,,,/2
@ @
<=
Levine DN. Intracranial pressure and ventricular expansion in hydrocephalus.
Have we been asking the wrong question? J Neurol Sci 269: 1-11, 2008. q >%!'( q @1;/$2( * %!'(%!' %!'* q ?AB*> ((CB *%
%?(
n
In communicating HC, how would pressure gradients form?
n
Levine’s postulated small pressure gradients have never been verified directly.
n
While hydrocephalus is associated with elevations in CSF outflow resistance, the
correlate with hydrocephalus (pseudotumor cerebri)
n
In previous studies from our group, it was clear that a lymphatic CSF absorption deficit occurred in ageing rats and yet no hydrocephalus was present in these animals
n
In 3 sheep, we sealed the cribriform plate and even though that this procedure elevates intracranial pressure and CSF outflow resistance in this species, we did not
It is not apparent whether an impediment to CSF drainage represents a pivotal event in hydrocephalus development or whether it is a ‘co-conspirator’ in the pathogenesis of ventricular enlargement with some other factor denoting the definitive cause
Weed, 1923
Parenchymal Interstitial fluid
n
*@+553$/,0-/-99
n
))@+0,3$/-95/--/
n
6)*@7+35:/--+
n
)*%)7/3-79/--+
Problem – in inflammation, the measured accumulation of interstitial water was often much greater than that estimated from calculated values based on steady-state data
%( * (( 1212*
DAA12(# DAA12(#
% A' >
@/
%@
)
A A ( (* > #
Q = K (Pmv-Pi) – δ(πmv-πi)
)
4 1@2 * EE)(( %!'
A
! ! ?
%!'A
3* @ ! 9/35-40:+,,+*
Β1-integrin expression in brain
@4α+β/ 1>2 )> $> @4β/1>2 @4β/1>2
50 50-
l 50 50-
l 100 100-
l 50 50-
l 50 50-
l 50 50-
l
21 of 29 21 of 29 animals (72%) animals (72%) receiving receiving antibodies to antibodies to beta integrins beta integrins developed developed hydrocephalus hydrocephalus No animal receiving the isotype controls developed hydrocephalus No animal receiving the isotype controls developed hydrocephalus 6
A) reduce parenchymal interstitial fluid pressure ? A) reduce parenchymal interstitial fluid pressure ? B) induce ventricular to parenchymal pressure gradients ? B) induce ventricular to parenchymal pressure gradients ?
Resistance Null Resistance Null Balance Feedback Balance Feedback @& @&
+µ
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00
380.00 381.00 382.00 383.00 384.00 385.00 386.00 387.00 388.00 389.00 390.00Time (sec) Pressure (cmH2O)
Anterior Horn of Lateral Ventricle Olfactory Bulb
Examples of pressure traces:
?
>4β/ >
Pressure (cm H2O)
>
Time (seconds)
>4β/
>
8*,07 Parenchymal pressure
% % )% 12
Parenchymal pressure Parenchymal pressure Ventricular pressure
β/ > β/
;*,,,/ 8*,:9
)% 12
>β/>
Ventricular pressures
@4/ CB
$+H*
In order for pressure to equal in the ventricles and SAS but low in the parenchyma, some removal of fluid must occur from the tissues
n
Would this water removal be governed by hydrostatic or osmotic forces?
n
Molecular mechanism ?
Arciero J, Begg R, and Wilkie K., http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~kpwilkie/OCCAM_Hydrocephalus_Report.pdf 2009.
Interstitium Capillaries ???
Hydrostatic pressure gradients force fluid into the capillary network
I Interstitial fluid pressure would have to greater than that in the capillary (would capillaries collapse?) I Interstitial solutes would be held up at the capillary membrane because of the blood brain barrier (BBB). This would increase the concentration of solutes at this location and increase the pericapillary osmotic pressure, which would limit further water absorption (osmotic buffering2
1>2 J 12
(%!'
? DA
># ( &
*** A concentration difference of 1.0 mOsm for an impermeable solute generates an equivalent hydrostatic driving pressure of 19.3 mmHg
> %
6%
Time (seconds)
1000 2000 3000 4000
Relative Pressure Change (% preinjection)
1 2 3 4 5
6%K @/ 6%K > >K @/ 85
< ( =
!! ?
@&
>4A CB (
%!'
( (*
1!@!2 1?281!@!2 1?2 @LG
Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) is the predominant water channel in the brain and is expressed on endothelial cells and astrocytic foot processes that surround capillary endothelial cells. These proteins appear to function as bi-directional channels that facilitate water movement driven by hydrostatic or osmotic forces
)A @4/
4 < (A = A
AMM
4 <A= 1@L/%!'=2 >
A
B ? Whole Blood C
>(
"4/>K A
%# $
>4
%!'
Provides a new conceptual foundation for hydrocephalus research - NO obstruction to CSF flow is necessary We can ‘uncouple’ ventricular and interstitial fluid pressure in the brain Anti-inflammatory drug α-trinositol inhibits lowering of P(i) that was induced by anti β1 integrin antibodies. Aquaporins can be blocked with drugs or RNAi technology
Therefore, potential may exist for pharmacological strategies to certain forms of hydrocephalus. @&",/: 4 @L/@LG @ "
6
@#(
*$6 $6 *>@