A new approach to understanding the pressure gradients in the brain - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a new approach to understanding the pressure gradients in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A new approach to understanding the pressure gradients in the brain - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A new approach to understanding the pressure gradients in the brain that cause hydrocephalus


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A new approach to understanding the pressure gradients in the brain that cause hydrocephalus

  • !!"!

!!"! !#$!% !#$!%

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Causes of hydrocephalus

n

Injury (trauma, intracranial hemorrhage etc)

n

NPH and ageing

n

Cytokine concepts

n

Pulsatility

n

40 mutants and 9 genes have been identified in animal models. Most of the gene products are the cytokines and growth factors involved in brain development

n

In humans, only one HC gene has been identified (X-linked) encoding for the cell adhesion molecule L1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Hydrocephalus definition

$ &%!' (

  • )#$

!* +,,-./01/23-4/5

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ventricular Volume

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 2 4 6 8 10

! 6

Olfactory Turbinate Tracer Enrichment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Saline Kaolin

Tracer Enrichment

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

! 6

*

*+,,7

#

Lymphatic CSF absorption is impaired in a rat kaolin hydrocephalus model

#

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CSF absorption deficit (outflow resistance) correlation with ventricular volumes

  • ((

(+ 8,*59: 1;,*,,,/2

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • <===>4
  • ? 1@2
  • $

@ @

<=

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Levine DN. Intracranial pressure and ventricular expansion in hydrocephalus.

Have we been asking the wrong question? J Neurol Sci 269: 1-11, 2008. q >%!'( q @1;/$2( * %!'(%!' %!'* q ?AB*> ((CB *%

  • *

%?(

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Problems with the ‘classical’ concept

n

In communicating HC, how would pressure gradients form?

n

Levine’s postulated small pressure gradients have never been verified directly.

n

While hydrocephalus is associated with elevations in CSF outflow resistance, the

  • pposite is not necessarily true as elevations in CSF outflow resistance do not always

correlate with hydrocephalus (pseudotumor cerebri)

n

In previous studies from our group, it was clear that a lymphatic CSF absorption deficit occurred in ageing rats and yet no hydrocephalus was present in these animals

n

In 3 sheep, we sealed the cribriform plate and even though that this procedure elevates intracranial pressure and CSF outflow resistance in this species, we did not

  • bserve any ventricular expansion over 3 months (unpublished observations)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

It is not apparent whether an impediment to CSF drainage represents a pivotal event in hydrocephalus development or whether it is a ‘co-conspirator’ in the pathogenesis of ventricular enlargement with some other factor denoting the definitive cause

Other possibilities ?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Extracellular fluid in the brain is unusual (two compartments)

Weed, 1923

CSF absorption CSF

Parenchymal Interstitial fluid

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Two independent lines of evidence from the literature Two independent lines of evidence from the literature suggest that interstitial pressures may decrease suggest that interstitial pressures may decrease Reed Reed’ ’s group in Norway s group in Norway Pickard Pickard’ ’s group in the UK s group in the UK

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Work of Professor Reed and colleagues: Interstitial matrix actively contributes to regulation

  • f interstitial fluid pressure

n

*@+553$/,0-/-99

n

))@+0,3$/-95/--/

n

6)*@7+35:/--+

n

)*%)7/3-79/--+

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Starling Forces

Q = K (Pmv-Pi) – δ(πmv-πi)

capillary

Problem – in inflammation, the measured accumulation of interstitial water was often much greater than that estimated from calculated values based on steady-state data

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • >

%

%( * (( 1212*

DAA12(# DAA12(#

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Impact of full thickness burn injury on P(i) in rat skin

Circulatory arrest Intact circulation

***

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Integrin Integrin -

  • Matrix interactions

Matrix interactions

% A' >

slide-17
SLIDE 17

! !

  • 4>

@/

%@

slide-18
SLIDE 18

)

  • #

A A ( (* > #

  • (
  • ((
  • >

" " " "

Q = K (Pmv-Pi) – δ(πmv-πi)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

" " # #

)

  • (

4 1@2 * EE)(( %!'

A

! ! ?

  • "
  • %

%!'A

  • Peña A, Harris NG, Bolton MD, Czosnyka M and Pickard JD*%

3* @ ! 9/35-40:+,,+*

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Β1-integrin expression in brain

  • associated with astrocytes
  • blood vessel walls
  • periventricular region and ependyma
  • choroid plexus
  • grey matter
  • cerebral cortex

Can a similar phenomenon occur in the brain? Are there integrins in the brain?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Do antibodies against the beta Do antibodies against the beta-

  • 1 integrins induce

1 integrins induce hydrocephalus ? hydrocephalus ?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Impact of anti Impact of anti integrin antibodies (assessed 2 weeks integrin antibodies (assessed 2 weeks post injection): chronic experiments post injection): chronic experiments

@4α+β/ 1>2 )> $> @4β/1>2 @4β/1>2

50 50-

  • l

l 50 50-

  • l

l 100 100-

  • l

l 50 50-

  • l

l 50 50-

  • l

l 50 50-

  • l

l

21 of 29 21 of 29 animals (72%) animals (72%) receiving receiving antibodies to antibodies to beta integrins beta integrins developed developed hydrocephalus hydrocephalus No animal receiving the isotype controls developed hydrocephalus No animal receiving the isotype controls developed hydrocephalus 6

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Do antibodies against the beta Do antibodies against the beta-

  • 1 integrins

1 integrins

A) reduce parenchymal interstitial fluid pressure ? A) reduce parenchymal interstitial fluid pressure ? B) induce ventricular to parenchymal pressure gradients ? B) induce ventricular to parenchymal pressure gradients ?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

$# $# $# $# $# $# $# $#! ! ! ! ! ! ! !$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Resistance Null Resistance Null Balance Feedback Balance Feedback @& @&

  • F

0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00

380.00 381.00 382.00 383.00 384.00 385.00 386.00 387.00 388.00 389.00 390.00

Time (sec) Pressure (cmH2O)

*

Anterior Horn of Lateral Ventricle Olfactory Bulb

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Examples of pressure traces:

?

>4β/ >

Pressure (cm H2O)

  • >4β/

>

Time (seconds)

>4β/

slide-26
SLIDE 26

>

8*,07 Parenchymal pressure

% % )% 12

Parenchymal pressure Parenchymal pressure Ventricular pressure

β/ > β/

;*,,,/ 8*,:9

)% 12

>β/>

Ventricular pressures

@4/ CB

  • (G4 5

$+H*

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Matrix hypothesis

In order for pressure to equal in the ventricles and SAS but low in the parenchyma, some removal of fluid must occur from the tissues

n

Would this water removal be governed by hydrostatic or osmotic forces?

n

Molecular mechanism ?

Arciero J, Begg R, and Wilkie K., http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~kpwilkie/OCCAM_Hydrocephalus_Report.pdf 2009.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Water absorption - hydrostatic gradients

Interstitium Capillaries ???

Hydrostatic pressure gradients force fluid into the capillary network

I Interstitial fluid pressure would have to greater than that in the capillary (would capillaries collapse?) I Interstitial solutes would be held up at the capillary membrane because of the blood brain barrier (BBB). This would increase the concentration of solutes at this location and increase the pericapillary osmotic pressure, which would limit further water absorption (osmotic buffering2

1>2 J 12

slide-29
SLIDE 29

(%!'

  • (#

? DA

># ( &

*** A concentration difference of 1.0 mOsm for an impermeable solute generates an equivalent hydrostatic driving pressure of 19.3 mmHg

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Do we have evidence that parenchymal water removal Do we have evidence that parenchymal water removal in the matrix contributes to the drop in tissue pressure ? in the matrix contributes to the drop in tissue pressure ?

> %

6%

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Time (seconds)

1000 2000 3000 4000

Relative Pressure Change (% preinjection)

1 2 3 4 5

6%K @/ 6%K > >K @/ 85

< ( =

slide-32
SLIDE 32

!! ?

  • %

Summary of concept

@&

slide-33
SLIDE 33

>4A CB (

slide-34
SLIDE 34

%!'

slide-35
SLIDE 35

( (*

  • *
  • A

1!@!2 1?281!@!2 1?2 @LG

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Aquaporins

Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) is the predominant water channel in the brain and is expressed on endothelial cells and astrocytic foot processes that surround capillary endothelial cells. These proteins appear to function as bi-directional channels that facilitate water movement driven by hydrostatic or osmotic forces

)A @4/

slide-37
SLIDE 37

L

4 < (A = A

AMM

4 <A= 1@L/%!'=2 >

  • (AA ===
slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • Saline

A

  • Whole Blood

B ? Whole Blood C

Is the matrix concept relevant to human Hydrocephalus ?

>(

slide-39
SLIDE 39

"4/>K A

  • "4/>K A
  • >

%# $

%A4A=

>4

  • $

%!'

  • ==
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Importance of matrix concept Importance of matrix concept

Provides a new conceptual foundation for hydrocephalus research - NO obstruction to CSF flow is necessary We can ‘uncouple’ ventricular and interstitial fluid pressure in the brain Anti-inflammatory drug α-trinositol inhibits lowering of P(i) that was induced by anti β1 integrin antibodies. Aquaporins can be blocked with drugs or RNAi technology

Therefore, potential may exist for pharmacological strategies to certain forms of hydrocephalus. @&",/: 4 @L/@LG @ "

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • !

6

@#(

*$6 $6 *>@

slide-42
SLIDE 42