A Multidisciplinary Approach to Investigating Foodborne Illness - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a multidisciplinary approach to investigating foodborne
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Investigating Foodborne Illness - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Investigating Foodborne Illness Outbreaks June 26, 2019 Overview Seattle-King Countys Approach to Foodborne Illness Investigation Q&A Session Housekeeping Items Throughout the presentation,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Investigating Foodborne Illness Outbreaks

June 26, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • Seattle-King County’s

Approach to Foodborne Illness Investigation

  • Q&A Session
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Housekeeping Items

Throughout the presentation, please use the Q&A box to ask questions and the chat box to share your experiences. The facilitator will pose your questions to the presenters.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Recordingg

A link to the recorded webinar will be emailed to all participants. This recording and past food safety sharing sessions can also be found the NACCHO website: https://www.naccho.org/programs/envir

  • nmental-health/hazards/food-safety/
slide-5
SLIDE 5

PUBLIC HEALTH – SEATTLE & KING COUNTY FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM June 26, 2019 NACCHO Sharing Session

FOODBORNE ILLNESS OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION OVERVIEW

Doug Dyer, MS, RS Elysia Gonzales, RN, MPH

slide-6
SLIDE 6

KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SEATTLE

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Environmental Health Food Program: 65 staff Communicable Disease Epidemiology: 40 staff Communications: 8 staff

STAFF – BY THE NUMBERS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PREVIOUS SYSTEM

E P I E H C O M M S E P I E H C O M M S

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TEAM APPROACH

slide-11
SLIDE 11

EH Members in Training EH Experienced Members EH Food Program Leads

FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM (FIIT)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

EH Members in Training: 7 staff EH Experienced Members: 10 staff EH Food Program Leads: 12 staff

Responsibilities

FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM (FIIT)

Provide technical advice and support Partner with restaurant investigator in the field Back-up to experienced members

slide-13
SLIDE 13

EH Members in Training: 7 staff EH Experienced Members: 10 staff

FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM (FIIT)

Epi Food Program Leads: 12 staff

slide-14
SLIDE 14

EH Members in Training EH Experienced Members EH Food Program Leads

Comms Foodborne Lead Epi Foodborne Liaison Lead Senior Foodborne Technical Lead

Lead Roles

FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM (FIIT)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Small group with expertise Increases investigation consistency & effectiveness Clear roles/responsibilities FIIT members are:

  • Capable to perform many roles as needed
  • Ready to deploy
  • Mentors

WHY HAVE A FIIT?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION PROCESS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Reports received Plan Approach Investigation request Team prep call Field investigation Team field call Team disclosure meeting Public disclosure Follow-up steps After action

INVESTIGATION PROCESS

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 1. RECEIVE REPORTS

Salmonella

Epi

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 2. PLAN APPROACH

Epi EH Comms Lab

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 2. TEAM PREP

Fie ield in ld investig igatio ion t team am

EH Restaurant Investigator EH FIIT Investigator Epi Investigator (as needed) Comms

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS

 Planning checklist

  • Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)
slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS

 Planning checklist

  • Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)

 Organism-specific resource guide

  • Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens
slide-23
SLIDE 23

ORGANISM-SPECIFIC RESOURCE GUIDE

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS

 Planning checklist

  • Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)

 Organism-specific resource guide

  • Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens

 Resources for operators

  • Includes chlorine concentrations for noro; FDA illness policy forms
slide-25
SLIDE 25

VOMITING AND DIARRHEA CLEANUP

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS

 Planning checklist

  • Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)

 Organism-specific resource guide

  • Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens

 Resources for operators

  • Includes chlorine concentrations for noro; FDA illness policy forms

 Employee illness screening forms

  • Self-report form in multiple languages
slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS

 Planning checklist

  • Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)

 Organism-specific resource guide

  • Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens

 Resources for operators

  • Includes chlorine concentrations for noro; FDA illness policy forms

 Employee illness screening forms

  • Self-report form in multiple languages

 Environmental Assessment (EA) Form

  • WA’s modified version of the CDC NEARS form
slide-28
SLIDE 28

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS

 Planning checklist

  • Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)

 Organism-specific resource guide

  • Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens

 Resources for operators

  • Includes chlorine concentrations for noro; FDA illness policy forms

 Employee illness screening forms

  • Self-report form in multiple languages

 Environmental Assessment (EA) Form

  • WA’s modified version of the CDC NEARS form

 Sampling kits

  • Specimen kits and cooler for use if indicated
slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • 3. FIELD INVESTIGATION REQUEST

EH Submits standardized request form Epi

slide-31
SLIDE 31

INVESTIGATION REQUEST FORM

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • 4. TEAM PREP CALL

Epi EH

Field team included

EH Restaurant Investigator EH FIIT Investigator Epi Investigator

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • 5. FIELD INVESTIGATION

SAM & ELLA'S DINER

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • 5. FIELD INVESTIGATION ROLES
  • Explains process

to person in charge at restaurant

  • NEARS form data
  • Diffuses tension
  • Collects samples

(if indicated)

EH FIIT INVESTIGATOR

  • Conducts routine

inspection, with focus on contributing factors for Salmonella

EH RESTAURANT INVESTIGATOR EPI INVESTIGATOR

  • Screens staff

for illness

  • Observational

data

  • Assists EH

investigators

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • 6. TEAM FIELD CALL

Field investigation team

EH Restaurant Investigator EH FIIT Investigator Epi Investigator

EH / Epi leads

 Review field findings  Answer questions from restaurant management  Make decisions on immediate interventions  Discuss sample collection

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • 7. TEAM DISCLOSURE MEETING

Review:  Findings from Epi, EH, and Lab  Strength of evidence  Interventions and remaining steps  Need for disclosure  Need for blog

EH + Epi + Comms

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • 8. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

www.kingcounty.gov/outbreak

slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • 8. PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS FOR

TRANSPARENCY

Health officials, who investigated the outbreak, did not inform the public. "I find that completely, unequivocally wrong," said Bill Marler, a food safety litigator in Seattle. "They have a responsibility to the public."

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Investigation led by King County, and cluster was:

CONFIRM RMED: FBD outbreak with lab evidence confirming the outbreak etiology PROBA BABL BLE: FBD outbreak with observational evidence and contributing factors without lab evidence SUSPEC PECT [ [po possibl ssible] e]: Group of cases linked by time

  • r place without strong evidence linking to a

common food

  • 8. WHICH OUTBREAKS TO DISCLOSE?
slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • 8. TIMING OF DISCLOSURE

Disclose while investigation is ongoing if:

 Risk to the public still exists  Public can take action to protect their health  Severe outcomes seen  Case finding is needed  Need to prevent or interrupt misinformation  High profile concerns (media or political)  Novel vehicle identified

Otherwise, disclose once investigation is complete

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Follow-up site visit(s) by EH Work with WA DOH Lab on testing specimens Work with local, state, and federal partners Update public disclosure with final outcomes Complete report forms (NEARS/NORS)

  • 9. FOLLOW-UP STEPS
slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • 10. AFTER ACTION REVIEW

What was supposed to happen? What actually happened? What worked & what was challenging? What can be improved next time?

slide-43
SLIDE 43

BENEFITS OF TEAM APPROACH

Many perspectives More effective & efficient Delineates roles Builds expertise Increases trust Increased cultural competency

slide-44
SLIDE 44

CHALLENGES OF TEAM APPROACH

Filling absences Every investigation is unique Maintaining experience Too many cooks in the kitchen Balancing thoroughness with efficiency

slide-45
SLIDE 45

LESSONS LEARNED

Hold after action debriefs Maintain equal partnerships, not hierarchical Quarterly FIIT meetings and frequent trainings

  • Table top exercises
  • Case reviews

Disclosure process is time intensive but effective

  • PH leads by speaking first, reducing misinformation
  • Decreased media calls
slide-46
SLIDE 46

LESSONS LEARNED

Identify points-of-contact for each program Include Epi investigator in EH field visits Share data across programs Team approach requires broad engagement Make time for process improvement activities Develop consistent tools internally and externally

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Elysi sia G Gonza nzales, s, Epidemiology Foodborne Disease Program Manager elysia.gonzales@kingcounty.gov Dou Doug Dy Dyer, Environmental Health Senior Technical Lead ddyer@kingcounty.gov Ki Ki S Str traughn, ghn, Environmental Health Services Supervisor kstraughn@kingcounty.gov Kat ate C Col

  • le, Communications Specialist

kacole@kingcounty.gov

THANK YOU!

slide-48
SLIDE 48

 Counc ncil t il to Improve e Foodborne e Outbrea eak R Response ( e (CIFOR OR): www.cifor.us  FD FDA R A Retail P Progr

  • gram Standard 5

5 - Foodborne ne Il Illne ness ss and nd Food D Defense nse Prepa paredne dness a ss and nd Response nse: www.fda.gov/media/86813/download  Epi pi-Read ady T Team eam Train aining ng: www.neha.org/professional- development/education-and-training/epi-ready-team-training  CD CDC C Integra rated F Food S Safety Ce y Centers o

  • f Ex

Excellence (CO (COE): E): www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/centers/pdfs/coe-factsheet.pdf  Council of f St State and nd Territorial E Epi pidemiologist sts ( s (CSTE): www.cste.org/page/WebinarLibrary  Rapi pid R Response nse T Teams ( s (RRTs) s): www.fda.gov/federal-state-local-tribal- and-territorial-officials/national-integrated-food-safety-system-ifss- programs-and-initiatives/rapid-response-teams-rrts  USD SDA/ A/FSIS: S: www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and- public-health-alerts/audience-public-health/resources-for  National E Environme mental A Assessme ment R Reporti ting S System ( m (NEARS): www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/nears/index.htm  CDC Natio ational al Ou Outb tbreak R Rep eporti ting S System ( (NOR ORS): www.cdc.gov/nors/resources.html

RESOURCES

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Q&A Session

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Tha hank you

  • u f

for

  • r your

pa participation i in n toda day’s sh sharing se session!

For more information about NACCHO’s Food Safety and Infectious Disease Programs, contact:

  • Amy Chang(achang@naccho.org)
  • Erin Laird (elaird@naccho.org)

NACCHO Food Safety Webpage: http://www.naccho.org/programs/environmental

  • health/hazards/food-safety

NACCHO Infectious Disease Webpage: https://www.naccho.org/programs/community- health/infectious-disease