a linear programming model to optimize diets in
play

A linear programming model to optimize diets in environmental policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A linear programming model to optimize diets in environmental policy scenarios Paper by: L.E. Moraes, J.E. Wilen, P.H. Robinson, J.G Fadel (2012) Presented by: Dan Jensen Advanced Quantitative Methods in Herd Management 12/09 2018


  1. A linear programming model to optimize diets in environmental policy scenarios Paper by: L.E. Moraes, J.E. Wilen, P.H. Robinson, J.G Fadel (2012) Presented by: Dan Jensen Advanced Quantitative Methods in Herd Management – 12/09 2018

  2. Introduction • Problem: (Dairy)-farming is messy! • Agriculture: 6.3 % total US GHG emissions (2009) • Enteric fermentation ( �� � ): 20 % of US human GHG • Also nitrogen, phosphor, etc. • Goal: Tool for optimizing dairy cattle diet • Effect of emission taxes • Forced (assumed) reduction • Status of this research: Preliminary! • Sensitive to constraints. E.g. feed prices Dias 2

  3. Methods General Background • Linear Programming Model (LPM) • Reminder - an LPM is: • Method to achieve best outcome given certain constraints • Constraints are represented by linear relationships Dias 3

  4. Methods The models • Three scenarios – three models: • BASEM: Cheapest possible feed (baseline) • TAXM: what if there was an emission tax? • … of 5 $ per tonne? • … of 17 $ per tonne? • … of 250 $ per tonne? • REDM: what if you were forced to reduce emissions? Dias 4

  5. Methods The models, Assumptions 1 � � − � � Dias 5

  6. Methods The models, Assumptions 2 � � − � �� � � − � �� � � − � �� kg/kg DM $/kg DM Locally collected Dias 6

  7. Methods The models, Assumptions 2.1 Dias 7

  8. Methods The models, specifics • BASEM/REDM: Remember: j = feed c = cost of feed a = animal class Dias 8

  9. Methods The models, specifics • TAXM: Remember: j = feed c = cost of feed a = cow category �� � Notice: e = expected emission (tonnes) p = tax price per tonne �� � Dias 9

  10. Methods The models, Outputs • How big is the mess? 55.65 MJ/kg Feed composition – absorbstion � Excrete composition Dias 10

  11. 5 minute break

  12. Methods The models, Constraints 1 Other Limits, 1 Diet. Feed Limits Nutrient req . DMI Diet. Barley Limits Other Limits, 2 Diet. Forage Proportions Methane Restrictions Dias 12

  13. Methods The models, Constraints 2 7 x 14 = 98 eq. Nutrient req . Amount Requirement Nutrient content Remember: j = feed a = cow category (7 kinds) i = nutrient (14 kinds) Dias 13

  14. Methods The models, Constraints 3 Diet. Feed Limits 7 x 10 = 70 eq. �� � �� ≤ � �� ∙ � � �� ��� Remember: j = feed a = cow category (7 kinds) l = limit (for 10 kinds of j ) Dias 14

  15. Methods The models, Constraints 4 Methane Restrictions (REDM) Total feed Max. (all cows, all feed) Emission 1-Reduction Total NDF Total ME Methane BASEM prediction emission Dias 15

  16. Results Neutral Detergent Fiber consumption given Metabolisable energy Methane reduction • REDM: proportion given Crude protein consumption Methane reduction given Methane reduction Dias 16

  17. Results • REDM: ↓ �� � → ↓ ���� ! ∴ ↓ �� � → ↑ $�%�! Dias 17

  18. Results • REDM: Consumption Excretion Dias 18

  19. Results • Shadow prices, Feed stuff: �%&!� �'( )��*!%' )�%�!+: -.)��*!'* /�� �-0� �!(1�*%�'+ Dias 19

  20. Results • Shadow prices, Methane emissions: Dias 20

  21. Conclusions • Cost of low emission diet exceeds cost of taxes � TAXM ~ BASEM • Reduction of �� � emissions yields increase in Nitrogen-excretion • Further studies are needed! Dias 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend