A First Look at the 2015 Program for International Student - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a first look at the 2015 program for international
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A First Look at the 2015 Program for International Student - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A First Look at the 2015 Program for International Student Assessment Financial Literacy Results Peggy G. Carr, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A First Look at the 2015 Program for International Student Assessment Financial Literacy Results

Peggy G. Carr, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education May 24, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Roughly 1 in 5 U.S. 15-year-

  • lds don’t understand basic

financial concepts.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

45% of students in higher income schools were top performers, compared to just 3% of students in lower income schools.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Financial literacy is:

the knowledge and understanding of financial concepts and risks, and the skills, motivation, and confidence to apply such knowledge and understanding.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why assess financial literacy at age 15?

Many young people already face complex financial decisions, and are consumers 15-year-olds are beginning to consider continuing education, and how to pay for it

5

Will soon perform more financial operations and activities

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Content

Money and transactions Planning and managing finances Risk and reward Financial landscape

Processes

Identify financial information Analyze information in a financial context Evaluate financial issues Apply financial knowledge and understanding

Contexts

Education and work Home and family Individual Societal

PISA FINANCIAL LITERACY ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK

NCES.ED.GOV

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Overview of U.S. Results

slide-8
SLIDE 8

U.S. AVERAGE SCORE

8

No measurable change in U.S. score since 2012

492

NCES.ED.GOV

487 2012 2015

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PISA LEVELS OF PROFICIENCY

9 Identify common financial products and terms and interpret information relating to basic financial concepts. Make simple decisions on everyday spending.

1

Apply knowledge of common products, terms and concepts. Make financial decisions in contexts that are immediately relevant to them. Recognize value of a simple budget and interpret features of everyday financial documents.

2

Apply understanding

  • f common products,

terms and concepts. Begin to consider the consequences of financial decisions and make simple financial plans in familiar contexts.

3

Apply understanding

  • f a wide range of

financial terms and concepts to contexts that may only become relevant to their lives in the long

  • term. Analyze

complex financial products and take into account significant but not immediately evident features of financial documents (e.g., transaction costs). Apply understanding

  • f less common

financial concepts and terms to contexts that will be relevant to them as they move towards adulthood, such as bank account management and compound interest in saving products.

4 5

NCES.ED.GOV

Low Performers Top Performers

400 475 550 625 1000 Scale Score 326

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PISA LEVELS OF PROFICIENCY

10

Identify common financial products and terms and interpret information relating to basic financial concepts. Make simple decisions on everyday spending.

1

NCES.ED.GOV

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PISA LEVELS OF PROFICIENCY

11

Apply understanding of a wide range of financial terms and concepts to contexts that may only become relevant to their lives in the long term. Analyze complex financial products and take into account significant but not immediately evident features of financial documents (e.g., transaction costs).

5

NCES.ED.GOV

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SAMPLE PISA FINANCIAL LITERACY LEVEL 1 ITEM: AT THE MARKET

12

You are at the market. You can buy tomatoes by the kilogram or by the box.

NCES.ED.GOV

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SAMPLE PISA FINANCIAL LITERACY LEVEL 1 ITEM: AT THE MARKET

13

Give a reason to support this statement:

Sample full credit response:

  • It is 2.75 zeds per kg for the loose tomatoes but only 2.20 zeds per kg

for the boxed tomatoes. Sample no credit response:

  • The box is always better value.

NCES.ED.GOV

slide-14
SLIDE 14

SAMPLE PISA FINANCIAL LITERACY LEVEL 5 ITEM: BANK ERROR

14

David banks with ZedBank. He receives this e-mail message:

Dear ZedBank member, There has been an error on the ZedBank server and your Internet login details have been lost. As a result, you have no access to Internet banking. Most importantly your account is no longer secure. Please click on the link below and follow the instructions to restore access. You will be asked to provide your Internet banking details. https://ZedBank.com

NCES.ED.GOV

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SAMPLE PISA FINANCIAL LITERACY LEVEL 5 ITEM: BANK ERROR

15

Which of these statements would be good advice for David? Circle “Yes” or “No” for each statement.

Statement Is this statement good advice for David? Reply to the e-mail message and provide his Internet banking details. Yes / No Contact his bank to inquire about the e-mail message. Yes / No If the link is the same as his bank’s website address, click on the link and follow the instructions. Yes / No

NCES.ED.GOV

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PISA LEVELS OF PROFICIENCY

16

1 2 3 4 5

NCES.ED.GOV

Low Performers Top Performers

10% 22%

Below

1

slide-17
SLIDE 17

U.S. PISA Financial Literacy Results in More Depth

slide-18
SLIDE 18

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0-24.9% 25-49.9% 50-74.9% 75-100%

Percentage of U.S. Top and Low Performers by Percent of Students in School Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch

Top Performers Low Performers

18

3% 13%

PISA FINANCIAL LITERACY: U.S. PERFORMANCE BY SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS

7% 38% 26% 14% 45% 16%

NCES.ED.GOV

Category 2015 Avg Score 75-100% 433 50-74.9% 470 25-49.9% 512 0-24.9% 543 U.S. Average 487 Lower Income Schools Higher Income Schools

slide-19
SLIDE 19

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Asian White Hispanic Black

Percentage of U.S. Top and Low Performers by Race/Ethnicity

Top Performers Low Performers

PISA FINANCIAL LITERACY: U.S. PERFORMANCE BY RACE/ETHNICITY

19

Category 2015 Avg Score Black Students 422 Hispanic Students 460 White Students 524 Asian Students 525 U.S. Average 487

1% 5% 16% 20% 41% 28% 12% 14%

NCES.ED.GOV

slide-20
SLIDE 20

U.S. 15-year-olds report:

88% discuss money matters with parents

Students who discuss money with parents almost every day scored 41 points higher on average vs. those who did monthly or weekly

53% have a bank account

Students with a bank account scored 42 points higher on average

  • vs. those who did not

Students with a bank account scored 42 points higher than those who did not.

67% of students in higher income schools reported having a bank account vs. 18% of students in lower income schools

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

International Comparisons

slide-22
SLIDE 22

PISA FINANCIAL LITERACY: PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES

NCES.ED.GOV

Key Participating Countries Regional Participation

NOTE: The provinces of Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Guangdong participated in China. The provinces of British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Prince Edward Island participated in Canada.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

FINANCIAL LITERACY: PISA 2015 AVERAGE SCORES

23

Note: Italics indicate non-OECD countries and education systems.

Average Score

B-S-J-G (China)

566

Belgium (Flemish Community)

541

Canadian provinces

533

Russian Federation

512

Netherlands

509

Australia

504

United States

487

Poland

485

Italy

483

Spain

469

Lithuania

449

Slovak Republic

445

Chile

432

Peru

403

Brazil

393

p<.05. Average score is higher than U.S. average score p<.05. Average score is lower than U.S. average score OECD average (489)

U.S. 15-year-old students’ average score not different than OECD average

NCES.ED.GOV

Massachusetts (523) North Carolina (496)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FINANCIAL LITERACY: PISA 2015 TOP PERFORMERS

12* 10 33* 24* 22* 17* 15* 11 8* 6* 6* 6* 4* 3* 3* 1*

10 20 30 40 50 60

OECD Average United States B-S-J-G (China Belgium (Flemish Community) Canadian Provinces Netherlands Australia Russian Federation Poland Italy Slovak Republic Spain Lithuania Chile Brazil Peru PISA 2015 Percentage of Top Performers (At Level 5)

Massachusetts North Carolina 16* 11

10 percent of U.S. 15-year-olds scored at Proficiency Level 5

B-S-J-G (China) Russian Federation Lithuania Brazil Peru

NCES.ED.GOV

* p<.05. Significantly different from U.S. percentage Note: Italics indicate non-OECD countries and education systems. Countries ranked by 2015 average score.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

22 22 9* 12* 13* 19 20 11* 20 20 35* 25 32* 38* 53* 48*

10 20 30 40 50 60

OECD Average United States B-S-J-G (China Belgium (Flemish Community) Canadian Provinces Netherlands Australia Russian Federation Poland Italy Slovak Republic Spain Lithuania Chile Brazil Peru PISA 2015 Percentage of Low Performers (Below Level 2)

FINANCIAL LITERACY: PISA 2015 LOW PERFORMERS

22 percent of U.S. 15-year-olds scored below Proficiency Level 2

* p<.05. Significantly different from U.S. percentage Note: Italics indicate non-OECD countries and education systems. Countries ranked by 2015 average score.

Massachusetts North Carolina 12* 19

B-S-J-G (China) Russian Federation Lithuania Brazil Peru

NCES.ED.GOV

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Contact: Patrick Gonzales NCES 415-920-9229 Patrick.Gonzales@ed.gov

PISA at NCES: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/

26

FOR MORE INFORMATION

NCES.ED.GOV

slide-27
SLIDE 27