7 November 2012 Safe Harbor Statement Matters discussed in this - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

7 november 2012 safe harbor statement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

7 November 2012 Safe Harbor Statement Matters discussed in this - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation of Q3 2012 results 7 November 2012 Safe Harbor Statement Matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect TORM's current expectations and are subject to certain risks and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presentation of Q3 2012 results 7 November 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Safe Harbor Statement

Matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect TORM's current expectations and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could negatively impact TORM's business. To understand these risks and uncertainties, please read TORM's announcements and filings with The US Securities and Exchange Commission. The presentation may include statements and illustrations concerning risks, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts. The forward-looking statements in this presentation are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, TORM's examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. As many of these factors are subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, TORM makes no warranties or representations about accuracy, sequence, timeliness or completeness of the content of this presentation.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Highlights for Q3 2012

Results Tanker Bulk Guidance

  • Q3 loss before tax of USD 63m before special items of USD -15m
  • Both main segments remained challenging in Q3 2012
  • Results negatively impacted by TORM’s financial situation
  • LR2 and LR1 benefitted in Q3 2012 from distillate arbitrage and e.g. jet fuel cargoes from the Middle

East to Brazil

  • MR freight rates in the West were negatively affected by refinery maintenance and limited arbitrage,

whereas imbalances in Asia Pacific positively impacted freight rates in the East

  • EBIT of USD -42m in Q3 2012, despite beating commercial spot benchmarks again
  • Maintain forecasted loss before tax of USD 350-380m for the financial year 2012 excluding accounting

effects of the execution of the restructuring, further vessel sales and potential impairment charges

  • Bulk market suffered in Q3 2012 due to the US grain season affected by drought
  • EBIT of USD -4m in Q3 2012 – Beating commercial benchmarks

Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

Restructuring

  • Restructuring with banks and time charter partners completed 5 November 2012

– New working capital (USD 100m) for two years – Amendment of debt maturities until 31 December 2016 – Significant savings from time charter contracts being realigned to market level or terminated

  • The bank group and time charter partner have become majority shareholders
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

TORM has completed the restructuring with banks and time charter partners

Banks Maturities for all debt amended to 31 December 2016 *** Majority owners of the Company New capital USD 100m in working capital over two years Newbuilding program Elimination of newbuilding program completed TORM Cost and cash initiatives with a cumulative effect of at least USD100m over three years *** Cost program office in place and identified initiatives under implementation T/C-in partners T/C-rates adjusted to market level or contracts terminated *** Co-owners of the Company Compre- hensive finance solution for TORM

Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Third quarter of 2012 proved to be challenging

Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

Financial highlights for Q3 2012

  • Q3 2012 loss before tax of USD
  • 79m (USD -70m in Q3 2011)
  • Q3 2012 result driven by

– Challenging freight rate environment and seasonality – Adverse effects from TORM’s financial situation – Extraordinary advisory costs of USD 15m

  • Financing cash flow of USD -2m,

which was positively affected by de facto standstill with the bank group

USD million Q3 2012 Q3 2011 2011 2010 2009 P&L Gross profit 3 2 81 180 243 Sale of vessels

  • -53

2 33 EBITDA

  • 11
  • 17
  • 44

97 203 Profit before tax

  • 79
  • 70
  • 451
  • 136
  • 19

Balance Equity 358 958 644 1,115 1,247 NIBD 1,858 1,836 1,787 1,875 1,683 Cash and cash equivalents 13 96 86 120 122 Cash flow statement Operating cash flow 6

  • 21
  • 75
  • 1

116 Investment cash flow

  • 8

10 168

  • 187
  • 199

Financing cash flow

  • 2
  • 41
  • 128

186 37

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

LR2 (TC1)

2007-2011 range 2012 2011

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

LR1 (TC5)

2007-2011 range 2012 2011

10 20 30 40 50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

MR (TC2)

2007 - 2011 range 2012 2011

Product tanker freight rates have been under pressure and especially the MR segment was weak due to continued subdued demand in Western hemisphere

Source: Clarksons, 2 Nov 2012. Spot earnings: LR2: TC1 (Ras Tanura-> Chiba), LR1: TC5 (Ras Tanura-> Chiba) and MRT: C2 (Rotterdam->NY)

LR2 and LR1

  • Positive effects:

– Middle distillate arbitrage from the Middle East to Europe open – Naptha arbitrage from the West to the Far East

  • pen

– East Africa imports have re-started – Increased long-haul volumes to Brazil and the US from the AG and India

  • Negative effects:

– Reduced imports to the AG from Europe resulting in increased ballast MR

  • Positive effects:

– Continued Brazilian imports – Increased African imports substituting LR1 – Intra-Asia activity has increased especially to Australia due to closing of refineries

  • Negative effects:

– Refinery maintenance in Europe – High refinery utilization in the US – US exports limited due to supply constraints

Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

Freight rates in USDt/day

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

TORM spot rates consistently exceed benchmarks

  • TORM’s financial position continued

to pose a challenge in Q3 2012

  • Nevertheless, TORM still outper-

formed on all segments due to – East Africa business (LR2) – Optimization through DPP employment (LR1) – Relative large presence in the Arabian Gulf and Far East (MR) – Utilization of triangulation 5,000 10,000 15,000 +93% +6% +2% MR LR1 LR2 Benchmark TORM spot rate TORM spot vs. benchmark Q3 2012 (USD/day)

  • Consistent spot rates that exceed

benchmarks due to – Large and high quality fleet – Demonstrating organizational strengths (end-to-end processes) 5,000 10,000 15,000 +32% +49% +51% MR LR1 LR2 TORM spot vs. benchmark last 4 quarters (USD/day)

Source: Clarksons, 31 Oct 2012. Spot earnings: LR2: TC1 (Ras Tanura-> Chiba), LR1: TC5 (Ras Tanura-> Chiba) and MRT: C2 (Rotterdam -> NY)

Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Refinery expansions favors long-haul product trades and is expected to outweigh slow oil demand growth

Source: IEA Oil Market Report 12 Oct 2012. Poten & Partners 12 Oct 2012

  • 2013 will likely show modest

expansion in oil product consumption due to a continued subdued global economic growth

  • Longer-haul product movements

are favored by: – India and Middle East increasing their export

  • riented refining capacity

– Expected closure of non- competitive refining capacity in Europe and the Atlantic Basin 88 86

Q4 13 Q3 13 Q2 13 Q1 13 Q4 12 Q3 12 Q2 12 Q1 12 Q4 11 Q3 11 Q2 11 Q1 11 Q4 10 Q3 10

92 1 2 90 4 3 84

Q2 10 Q1 10

Global oil demand Y-O-Y change Refinery expansions favoring tonne-mile Slow growth in world oil demand

Y-O-Y % Mbbl/day

Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

2016 2020 2015 2017 2018 2019 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2,0 1,0 1,5 0,0 0,5 2,5 2014 Other Atlantic Basin China India & other Asia Middle East Gross distillation capacity additions, mbbl/day

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Modest supply outlook for the product tanker fleet

Note: Calculated basis dwt. Number of vessels beginning of 2012: LR2 203, LR1 339, MR 958, Handy 552 Note: Net fleet growth: Gross order book adjusted for expected scrapping Source: SSY, 19 October 2012

1% 6% 6% 16% 2% 2% 6% 6% 7% 4% 6% 9%

  • 1%
  • 2%
  • 1%
  • 4%

2010 2013E 2012E 2011 Handysize MR LR1 LR2 Net fleet growth y-o-y in % of total fleet (DWT)

Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

  • Net fleet growth is expected to

gradually decline to manageable levels in 2012-2014

  • Scrapping will mostly impact

Handysize leading to a negative fleet growth

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Product tanker vessel prices continues at low levels with limited S&P activity

  • Newbuilding orders continues to

be mainly for MRs (2014 delivery)

  • Difficult for buyers to get

financing

  • Ample second hand tonnage

marketed, but sales processes are protracted

  • Price pressure especially on
  • lder units
  • T/C rates and second-hand

prices are well correlated

Source: Clarksons, 31 Oct 2012

60 50 40 30 20 10 Jan 13 Jul12 Jan 12 Jul 11 Jan 11 Jul 10 Jan 10 Jul 09 Jan 09 Jul 08 Jan 08 USDm MR - 5 yr. Second-Hand MR - Newbuilding Jan 09 Jul 08 Jan 08 Jul 10 Jul 09 Jan 10 50 40 30 20 10 Jan 13 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jul 11 Jul 12 USDm 60 MR - 5 yr. Second-Hand USDt 25 20 15 10 5 MR 1 yr. T/C

Vessel price development

Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Dry bulk market continues at low levels

Source: RS Platou, Clarksons

  • Freight rates affected by

– Drought in US grain season – Indonesia export ban on raw materials except coal – Continued high fleet growth

  • Chinese import volume remains

strong – Coal import seasonally down – Stable iron ore import up – Chinas reliance on coal import becoming evident Chinese iron ore and coal import (mt/day) Panamax freight rate development (USDt/day) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Jan11 Jan10 Jan09 Jan08 Jan07 Jan06 Jan12 Jan13

Chinese coal import Chinese iron ore imports

Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2007 - 2011 range 2012 2011

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Bulk division beat commercial benchmarks in Q3 2012

Note: Benchmark against BPI market indices Source: Baltic Exchange, TORM

TORM bulk average earnings vs. benchmark (USD/day)

  • Taking benefit from cover in

challenging market conditions

  • TORM bulk has a fully covered

book for 2012

  • Earnings also affected by

TORM’s financial situation 15,000 10,000 5,000 +17% +17% Panamax last 4 quarters Panamax Q3 2012

Benchmark TORM avg. Earning Highlights Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

High influx of dry bulk tonnage affecting vessel prices

* Number of vessels primo 2012: Cape 1,292; P-PMX 372; PMX 1,545, SMX 2,647; Handy 3,293. Source: RS Platou, Clarksons (BDI).

  • Scheduled deliveries

sizeable during 2012

  • Scrapping and cancellation

is expected to continue at high levels in 2012

  • Net fleet growth y-o-y 2013

expected at 4-5% (including ~5% scrapping)

Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market Highlights

Panamax newbuilding and second-hand prices (USDm) Net fleet growth y-o-y as percent of exiting fleet* 50 40 30 20 10 Jan13 Jul12 Jan12 Jul11 Jan11 Jul10 Jan10 Jul09 Jan09

Panamax 76K bulk carrier 5 Year Old Secondhand Prices 75-77,000 DWT Panamax bulk carrier Newbuilding Prices

  • Increased number of

second-hand vessels available for sale

  • Further softening of

second-hand prices (up to 10%) during Q3 2012

3% 11% 15% 21% 5% 29% 49% 52% 4% 8% 2% 11% 12% 15% 0% 2% 6%

  • 1%

2013E 2012E 10% 2011 11% 2010

Handy SMX PMX P-PMX Cape

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Continued efficiency focus on OPEX and admin cost

Administrative expenses (quarterly avg. in USDm) Development in operating cost (USDt/day) 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000

  • 31%
  • 11%
  • 14%
  • 23%
  • 20%

Panamax Handysize MR LR1 LR2 2012 Q1-Q3 2011 2010 2009 2008 20 25 15 10 5

  • 29%

2012 Q1-Q3 2011 2010 2009 2008

Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market Highlights

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

TORM’s financial position by November 2012

Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market Highlights

Newbuilding CAPEX

  • Order book eliminated as part of TORM’s general plan to preserve liquidity and

reduce debt

  • Annual maintenance CAPEX normally at USD 10-20m

Debt situation

  • TORM has net debt of USD 1.91bn incl. drawn part of working capital facility
  • As of 30 September 2012, TORM was in breach of its financial covenants (equity

ratio and cash). Accordingly, loans were classified as current liabilities

  • Following the restructuring, TORM has restructured the debt and introduced a new

minimum instalment schedule (Cash sweep mechanisms in place) USD bn, as of Nov. 2012 Cash position

  • Cash totaled USD 13m at the end of the third quarter of 2012
  • Cash totaled USD 65m as per 6 November 2012

2013 0.11 2014* 0.10 2015 1.70 2016 Total 1.91 0.00 2012 0.00

* incl. repayment of drawn part of working capital facility

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

TORM’s forecast for 2012

Finance Tanker market Dry bulk market Highlights

2012 forecast Earnings sensitivity for 2012 Coverage per 30.9.2012 Forecasted loss before tax of USD 350-380 million maintained for the financial year 2012 excluding accounting effects of the execution of the restructuring, further vessel sales and potential impairment charges 2% 6% 15% 27% 57% 103% 2012 2013 2014

Tanker Division Bulk Division

Rates (USD/day) 13,944 10,694 15,063 14,621 16,292 16,831 USDm Change in freight rates (USD/day) Segment

  • 2,000
  • 1,000

1,000 2,000 Tankers

  • 12
  • 6

6 12 Bulk

Total

  • 12
  • 6

6 12

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Appendix

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Seafarers: ~2,900

  • 250 Danish seafarers
  • 100 Croatian seafarers
  • 1,400 Indian seafarers
  • 1,150 Filipinos seafarers

TORM Offices: ~300 A world leading product tanker company

  • A leading product tanker owner
  • Presence in dry bulk as
  • perator
  • 123 years of history

Listings

  • NASDAQ OMX Copenhagen
  • NASDAQ in New York

Key facts Global footprint based on regional power and presence TORM employees:

TORM at a glance

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Product tankers have coated tanks and have specially designed cargo systems with flexibility to transport a wide range of different products

11

Oil product supply chain Exploration Transportation Refining Transportation Storage/distribution

Crude

  • ils

~14% Fuel oils ~12% Diesels ~7% Gas oils / Gas-

  • lines

~38% Karo- senes / Jet fuel ~9% Clean conden- sates ~3% Naph- thas ~15% MTBEs ~0%

  • Veg. oils

~1% Biofuel ~0% Ethanol ~0% ”Dirty products” Less refined ”clean products” More refined ”clean products”

Percentages = TORM volumes for 12 months period

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Management team with an international outlook and many years of shipping experience

Executive management Jacob Meldgaard

CEO of TORM since April 2010

Previously Executive Vice President of the Danish shipping company NORDEN where he was in charge of the company’s dry cargo division

Prior to that he held various positions with J. Lauritzen and A.P. Møller-Mærsk

More than 20 years of shipping experience Roland M. Andersen

CFO of TORM since May 2008

Previously CFO of the Danish mobile and broadband operator Sonofon and prior to that CFO of the private-equity-owned Cybercity

Prior to that he held various positions with A.P. Møller-Mærsk, latest one as CFO of A.P. Møller- Mærsk Singapore

More than 10 years of shipping experience Tina Revsbech

Head of Tanker Division Alex Christiansen

Head of Bulk Division Claus U. Jensen

Head of Technical Division Jan Nørgaard Lauridsen

Regional Managing Director Asia-Pacific Christian Riber

Head of Human Resources Lars Christensen

Head of Sale & Purchase Division Executive Management Senior Management

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

21

The TORM share

Listings

  • On NASDAQ OMX Copenhagen, ticker TORM
  • ADR program on NASDAQ, (USA) ticker

“TRMD” Shares

  • One class of shares, each carrying one vote
  • Share capital of 728m shares of DKK 0.01 each

For further company information, visit TORM at www.torm.com

Share information Ownership structure (5 November 2012)

51.8% 5.5% 6.2% 11.3% 11.5% 13.7%

Other DBS Bank Deutsche Bank Nordea Bank Danske Bank HSH Nordbank

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

22

Industry cooperation and transparency is central to TORM’s Corporate Social Responsibility

Set climate targets:

  • 20% reduction of CO2 emissions pr. vessel by 2020

(2008 = index 100)

  • 25% reduction of CO2 emissions from offices per

employee by 2020 (2008 = index 100)

  • TORM has published Environmental / CSR reports since
  • 2008. As of 2011, our reporting is purely online

See: http://csr.torm.com/ Next reporting is March 2013 Transparency is central…

  • Danish Shipowners’ Association -

As part of DSA,TORM is pushing for international regulation and standards on e.g. emissions through the International Maritime Organisation

  • Maritime Anti Corruption Network –

TORM is founding member of a global business network working towards a maritime industry free of corruption that enables fair trade

  • UN Global Compact –

TORM became signatory to the UNGC in 2009 as the first Danish shipping company

  • For optimal comparability

and transparency, TORM reports on emissions as part

  • f the Carbon Disclosure

Project TORM is actively participating in…

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Detailed key figures overview

23

Key figures overview

USD million Q1-Q3 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Revenue 839 1,305 856 862 1,184 774 EBITDA (41) (44) 97 203 572 288 Profit/(loss) before tax (289) (451) (136) (19) Balance Total assets 2,507 2,779 3,286 3,227 3,317 2,959 Equity 358 644 1,115 1,247 1,279 1,081 NIBD 1,858 1,787 1,875 1,683 1,550 1,548 Cash and cash equivalents 13 86 120 122 168 105 Cash flow statement Operating cash flow (71) (75) (1) 116 385 188 Investment cash flow 3 168 (187) (199) (262) (357) Financing cash flow (6) (128) 186 37 (59) 242 Financial related key figures EBITDA margin

  • 5%
  • 3%

11% 24% 48% 37% Equity ratio 14% 23% 34% 39% 39% 37% Return on invested capital (ROIC)

  • 11%
  • 14%
  • 3%

2% 16% 10%

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Large and modern fleet

Note: The contract duration is defined based on the contractual period and does not include optional periods.

PER 30.9.2012

  • No. of vessels

Q2 2012 Changes Q3 2012 2012 2013 2014 Owned vessels LR2 9.0

  • 9.0

LR1 7.0

  • 7.0

MR 39.0

  • 39.0

Handysize 11.0

  • 11.0

Tanker Division 66.0

  • 66.0
  • Panamax

2.0

  • 2.0

Handymax

  • Bulk Division

2.0

  • 2.0
  • Total

68.0

  • 68.0
  • T/C-in vessels with contract period >= 12 months

LR2 2.0

  • 2.0

LR1 13.0

  • 2.0

11.0 MR 10.0

  • 6.0

4.0 Handysize

  • Tanker Division

25.0

  • 8.0

17.0

  • Panamax

9.0

  • 2.0

7.0 1.0 Handymax 2.0

  • 2.0

Bulk Division 11.0

  • 2.0

9.0 1.0

  • Total

36.0

  • 10.0

26.0 1.0

  • T/C-in vessels with contract period < 12 months

LR2 LR1 MR Handysize Tanker Division

  • Panamax

3.0

  • 2.0

1.0 Handymax 2.0 5.0 7.0 Bulk Division 5.0 3.0 8.0 Total 5.0 3.0 8.0 Pools/commecial management 18.0 2.0 20.0 Total fleet 127.0

  • 5.0

122.0 Current fleet New buildings and T/C-in deliveries with a period >= 12 months

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Earning days, T/C cost and coverage for 2012, 2013 and 2014

Owned days PER 30.9.2012

2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 Ow ned days LR2 799 2,824 2,904 LR1 637 2,509 2,509 MR 3,427 14,037 14,075 Handysize 1,001 3,975 3,944 Tanker Division 5,864 23,344 23,432 Panamax 180 726 694 Handymax

  • Bulk Division

180 726 694 Total 6,044 24,070 24,126 T/C-in days at fixed rate T/C-in costs, USD/day LR2

  • LR1

785 75

  • 17,914

11,000

  • MR

242 1,049 726 13,188 14,046 15,145 Handysize

  • Tanker Division

1,027 1,124 726 16,800 13,843 15,145 Panamax 573 1,964 1,817 14,216 12,880 12,386 Handymax 339

  • 12,509
  • Bulk Division

912 1,964 1,817 13,581 12,880 12,386 Total 1,939 3,088 2,543 15,286 13,230 13,174 T/C-in days at floating rate LR2 182 726 725 LR1

  • MR

91 363 363 Handysize

  • Tanker Division

273 1,089 1,088 Panamax 91 726 411 Handymax 147 363 363 Bulk Division 238 1,089 774 Total 511 2,178 1,862 Total physical days Covered days LR2 981 3,550 3,629 176 391 337 LR1 1,422 2,584 2,509 236 365 175 MR 3,760 15,449 15,164 634 743

  • Handysize

1,001 3,975 3,944 30

  • Tanker Division

7,164 25,557 25,246 1,076 1,499 512 Panamax 844 3,416 2,922 1,007 990 25 Handymax 486 363 363 365 1,167 869 Bulk Division 1,330 3,779 3,285 1,372 2,157 895 Total 8,494 29,336 28,531 2,448 3,656 1,407 Coverage rates, USD/day LR2 18% 11% 9% 15,687 16,650 16,617 LR1 17% 14% 7% 14,228 15,666 15,666 MR 17% 5% 0% 13,759 13,932

  • Handysize

3% 0% 0% 5,378

  • Tanker Division

15% 6% 2% 13,944 15,063 16,292 Panamax 119% 29% 1% 11,387 15,380 20,436 Handymax 75% 321% 240% 8,781 13,978 16,725 Bulk Division 103% 57% 27% 10,694 14,621 16,831 Total 29% 12% 5% 12,122 14,803 16,634 Fair value of freight rate contracts that are mark-to-market in the income statement (USD m): Contracts not included above 0.0 Contracts included above 6.5 Covered, %

T/C-in days at fixed rate T/C-in days at floating rate Total physical days Coverage

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Tanker demand will outgrow supply in 2012 – 2014e

Demand and supply development 2012 – 2014e

(1) All effects are recalculated into MR equivalents – to enable comparison based on their volume relative to MR

Swing factors:

  • Order book delays
  • Delays in refineries
  • Floating storage
  • Slow steaming
  • Changes in transport patterns
  • Embargoes & strikes
  • Blockages - water ways/ports
  • Refinery disruptions
  • Hurricanes

PER 1.1.2012

slide-27
SLIDE 27