3D MHD simulation of cloud fragmentation (a short comment) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3d mhd simulation of cloud fragmentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

3D MHD simulation of cloud fragmentation (a short comment) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1/11 Nov. 18, 2005: MHD workshop (Chiba Univ.) 3D MHD simulation of cloud fragmentation (a short comment) Takahiro Kudoh (NAOJ) Collaborators: Shantanu Basu (UWO), Yoichi Ogata (TIT), Takashi Yabe (TIT) 2/11 Interstellar molecular clouds are


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1/11

3D MHD simulation of cloud fragmentation

(a short comment) Takahiro Kudoh (NAOJ)

  • Nov. 18, 2005: MHD workshop (Chiba Univ.)

Collaborators: Shantanu Basu (UWO), Yoichi Ogata (TIT), Takashi Yabe (TIT)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2/11

Interstellar molecular clouds are the sites of star formation.

Taurus (Nagoya 4m) radio (13CO)

~10pc

A simple model: They are self-gravitating gas clouds with magnetic field and turbulence.

star

Stars are forming at and .

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3/11

Cloud contraction with magnetic field

Magnetic force prevent the gas moving across the magnetic field. The cloud is expected to be flat perpendicular to the magnetic field.

magnetic force gravity magnetic force gravity

The flat cloud is fragmented and cores are formed in the cloud. There is an evidence of large-scale magnetic fields in the cloud. We are going to study this process.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4/11

Magnetic field line

Model: Gravitationally Stratified Cloud

Most of the previous 3D MHD simulations picks up the local region.

Periodic boundary box; Uniform density

Low density and hot gas Molecular cloud

We pick up a gravitationally stratified flat cloud as an initial condition.

Magnetic field

X y z

g

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5/11

Gravitational instability of plate-shaped gas.

grav mag

E E <

  • Weak magnetic field

gravitationally unstable ambipolar diffusion (magnetic diffusion) gravitationally unstable (Mouschovias 1978) (supercritical)

  • Strong magnetic field

grav mag

E E >

gravitationally stable (subcritical)

Nakano & Nakamura 1978

) ( 4

unstable most

  • B

H

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6/11

Magnetic field line

2D-MHD simulation with ambipolar diffusion

Molecular cloud

2D approximation : Structure of the z-direction is integrated into the plane.

2D simulation box

Basu & Ciolek (2004) Li & Nakamura (2004)

Dense cloud

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7/11

Magnetic field line Molecular cloud We input large random perturbation (Vmax=10Cs) perpendicular to magnetic field at t=0.

3D-MHD simulation with ambipolar diffusion (this study)

Low density and hot gas dense sheet Low density and hot gas Magnetic field 3D simulation box

X y z

3D-MHD with ambipolar diffusion Isothermal

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8/11

top view slice side view slice

Density Weak magnetic field (Emag<Egrav) Mass-to-flux ratio=2 Strong magnetic field (Emag>Egrav) Mass-to-flux ratio=0.7 ~2.5pc ~2.5pc

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9/11

  • Fast gravitational collapse

~ 7 x105 year

  • Infall velocity is nearly

super-sonic.

  • Vz is also nearly supersonic.
  • Slow gravitational collapse

~ 5 x106 year

  • Infall velocity is subsonic.
  • Vz is also subsonic.

Weak magnetic field (Emag<Egrav) Strong magnetic field (Emag>Egrav)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/11

Weak magnetic field Strong magnetic field density plasma β =Pgas/Pmag

B 0.5

β const lower β core higher β core

6 .

  • B

3 .

  • B

Magnetic flux

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11/11

Summary

  • Time scale of the gravitational collapse

Fast collapse ~ 7 x105 year:Emag<Egrav (supercritical) Slow collapse ~ 5 x106 year: Emag>Egrav (subcritical)

  • Infall velocity

supersonic: Emag<Egrav (supercritical) subsonic: Emag>Egrav (subcritical)

  • Magnetic flux

(lower beta cores): Emag<Egrav (supercritical)

(higher beta cores): Emag>Egrav (subcritical)

6 .

  • B

3 .

  • B