2d triangulation
play

2D Triangulation Input 2D Boundary Output Triangle Mesh Physical - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TriWild : Robust Triangulation with Curved Constraints 1 Yixin Hu, 1 1 Teseo Schneider, 2 2 Xifeng Gao, 3 Qingnan Zhou, 3 4 Alec Jacobson, 1 4 Denis Zorin, 1 Daniele Panozzo. 2D Triangulation Input 2D Boundary Output Triangle


  1. TriWild : Robust Triangulation with Curved Constraints 1 Yixin Hu, 1 1 Teseo Schneider, 2 2 Xifeng Gao, 3 Qingnan Zhou, 3 4 Alec Jacobson, 1 4 Denis Zorin, 1 Daniele Panozzo.

  2. 2D Triangulation Input 2D Boundary Output Triangle Mesh Physical Simulation Yixin Hu, 2 9/5/19

  3. Linear Triangulation #V = 3013, #F = 4149 Want a smaller mesh? (Generated by Triangle) Yixin Hu, 3 9/5/19

  4. Linear Triangulation #V = 3013, #F = 4149 #V = 1503 #F = 304 Yixin Hu, 4 9/5/19

  5. Linear Triangulation #V = 3013, #F = 4149 #V = 1503 #F = 304 Yixin Hu, 5 9/5/19

  6. Curved Triangulation ! #V = 3013, #F = 4149 #V = 1503 Curved mesh! #F = 304 (Generated by TriWild) Yixin Hu, 6 9/5/19

  7. 2D Triangulation Coarser Faster Input 2D Boundary Output Triangle Mesh Physical Simulation Accurate Conforming Yixin Hu, 9 9/5/19

  8. Existing Methods • Curved triangle mesh is not a new concept. • Introduced in late 80s. • Haven’t been tested on large-scale dataset. • Not widely used because no robust tools. Yixin Hu, 10 9/5/19

  9. Tangled Curved Constraints Superposed Curves Yixin Hu, 11 9/5/19

  10. Tangled Curved Constraints Intersected Curves Yixin Hu, 12 9/5/19

  11. Tangled Curved Constraints Yixin Hu, 13 9/5/19

  12. Tangled Curved Constraints Yixin Hu, 14 9/5/19

  13. Input: (Generated by TriWild) Yixin Hu, 15 9/5/19

  14. Input: (Generated by TriWild) Yixin Hu, 16 9/5/19

  15. Input: (Generated by TriWild) Yixin Hu, 17 9/5/19

  16. Input: (Generated by TriWild) Yixin Hu, 18 9/5/19

  17. Why TriWild? “Cleanup” the input curves. Input High Curvature ! -separation Linear Mesh Generation Curved & Inflection Point Separation & Mesh Improvement Mesh Improvement Yixin Hu, 19 9/5/19

  18. Why TriWild? Linear mesh for easier curving. Input High Curvature ! -separation Linear Mesh Generation Curved & Inflection Point Separation & Mesh Improvement Mesh Improvement Yixin Hu, 20 9/5/19

  19. Pipeline - Input & Output • Input: Primary features • Bezier curves. (SVG standard, degree 3) Secondary features • Output: • Curved triangle mesh • Conforms to primary features. • Approximates secondary features up to " . Yixin Hu, 21 9/5/19

  20. Pipeline - Feature Preprocessing Input High Curvature & Inflection Point Separation Yixin Hu, 22 9/5/19

  21. Pipeline - Feature Preprocessing High Curvature & Inflection Point Separation Yixin Hu, 23 9/5/19

  22. Pipeline - Feature Preprocessing Input High Curvature ! -separation & Inflection Point Separation Yixin Hu, 24 9/5/19

  23. Pipeline - Feature Preprocessing ! -separation Yixin Hu, 25 9/5/19

  24. Pipeline - Curved Mesh Generation Input High Curvature ! -separation Linear Mesh Generation & Inflection Point Separation & Mesh Improvement Yixin Hu, 26 9/5/19

  25. Recap - Linear Mesh Generation (TetWild) Linear Segment Soup Triangle Mesh Stage I: Valid Mesh Generation (Rational) Yixin Hu, 27 9/5/19

  26. Recap - Linear Mesh Generation (TetWild) Stage I: Valid Mesh Generation Stage II: Mesh Improvement (Rational) (Mixed à Double) Yixin Hu, 28 9/5/19

  27. Recap - Linear Mesh Generation (TetWild) 100% success rate on 10,000 real-world models. Stage I: Valid Mesh Generation Stage II: Mesh Improvement (Rational) (Mixed à Double) Yixin Hu, 29 9/5/19

  28. Pipeline - Linear Mesh Generation Move along feature • Feature Invariant: • Feature edges’ associated curve Total curvature < % has total curvature < #. • Feature vertices can only move along feature curves. “feature” == “primary feature” Yixin Hu, 30 9/5/19

  29. Pipeline - Linear Mesh Generation • Feature Invariant: • Feature edges’ associated curve has total curvature < #. • Feature vertices can only move along feature curves. • Vertex Projection Yixin Hu, 31 9/5/19

  30. Pipeline - Linear Mesh Generation • Feature Invariant: • Feature edges’ associated curve has total curvature < #. • Feature vertices can only move along feature curves. • Vertex Projection Yixin Hu, 32 9/5/19

  31. Pipeline - Curved Mesh Generation Linear Mesh Generation & Mesh Improvement Yixin Hu, 33 9/5/19

  32. Pipeline - Curved Mesh Generation Input High Curvature ! -separation Linear Mesh Generation Curved & Inflection Point Separation & Mesh Improvement Mesh Improvement Yixin Hu, 34 9/5/19

  33. Pipeline - Curving • Curving: • All feature elements • With primary feature edges (thickened in red) Yixin Hu, 35 9/5/19

  34. Pipeline - Curved Mesh Generation • Inversion check for curved elements: Yixin Hu, 37 9/5/19

  35. Pipeline - Curved Mesh Generation Curved Mesh Improvement Yixin Hu, 41 9/5/19

  36. Pipeline - Curved Mesh Generation Input High Curvature ! -separation Linear Mesh Generation Curved & Inflection Point Separation & Mesh Improvement Mesh Improvement Yixin Hu, 42 9/5/19

  37. Parameters – Envelope Size • ! • Used in ! -separation for separating primary features and secondary features. • " (same parameter used in TetWild) • Maximum distant that secondary feature edges can deviate from input. Yixin Hu, 43 9/5/19

  38. Parameters – Envelope Size Yixin Hu, 44 9/5/19

  39. Red: primary feature edges ! Green: secondary feature edges 1e-3 " Yixin Hu, 45 9/5/19 1e-3

  40. 1e-2 Red: primary feature edges ! Green: secondary feature edges 1e-3 " Yixin Hu, 46 9/5/19 1e-3

  41. 1e-2 Red: primary feature edges ! Green: secondary feature edges 1e-3 " 1e-2 Yixin Hu, 47 9/5/19 1e-3

  42. 1e-2 Red: primary feature edges ! Green: secondary feature edges 1e-3 " 1e-2 Yixin Hu, 48 9/5/19 1e-3

  43. Parameters – Targeted Edge Length Edge_length = diag_bbox/ 5 Yixin Hu, 50 9/5/19

  44. Parameters – Targeted Edge Length Edge_length = diag_bbox/ 20 Yixin Hu, 51 9/5/19

  45. Parameters – Targeted Edge Length Edge_length = diag_bbox/ 100 Yixin Hu, 52 9/5/19

  46. MATLAB vs TriWild (Generated by MATLAB) (Generated by TriWild) Yixin Hu, 53 9/5/19

  47. MATLAB vs TriWild (Generated by MATLAB) (Generated by TriWild) Yixin Hu, 54 9/5/19

  48. MATLAB vs TriWild Original Input Failure Input Yixin Hu, 55 9/5/19

  49. GMsh vs TriWild 19 inverted elements (Generated by GMsh) (Generated by TriWild) Yixin Hu, 56 9/5/19

  50. Yixin Hu, 57 9/5/19

  51. Large-scale Test • Dataset: 19,686 real-world SVG images from openclipart.org. • Success rate: 19,685 output meshes • The only failure is due to large input size (1.5GB). Success: <6 hours <64GB memory Yixin Hu, 58 9/5/19

  52. 9/5/19 Yixin Hu, 59

  53. 9/5/19 Yixin Hu, 60

  54. 9/5/19 Yixin Hu, 61

  55. 9/5/19 Yixin Hu, 62

  56. 9/5/19 Yixin Hu, 63

  57. 9/5/19 Yixin Hu, 64

  58. 9/5/19

  59. Large-scale Test • Dataset: 19,686 real-world SVG images from openclipart.org. • Success rate: 19,685 output meshes • The only failure is due to large input size (1.5GB). 6% 4% 2% 0% 10s 1 100 10000 Timing (in seconds) Yixin Hu, 66 9/5/19

  60. Application – Diffusion Curves Yixin Hu, 67 9/5/19

  61. Application – Diffusion Curve Yixin Hu, 68 9/5/19

  62. Application – Inflation Using Curved Output Using Linear Output Curved Mesh Yixin Hu, 69 9/5/19

  63. Application – Inflation Using Linear Output Curved Mesh Using Curved Output Yixin Hu, 70 9/5/19

  64. Application – Stokes Using Curved Mesh Yixin Hu, 71 9/5/19

  65. Application – Stokes Using Linear Mesh Yixin Hu, 72 9/5/19

  66. Application – Stokes Yixin Hu, 73 9/5/19

  67. Application – Elasticity 0.09s 115s Gravity Using Curved Mesh Using Dense Linear Mesh Curved Mesh Yixin Hu, 74 9/5/19

  68. Linear Pipeline Dataset 1: Raw OpenClip20k • Piece-wise linear approximations of 19,686 SVG images. Dataset 2: Cleaned OpenClip20k • Raw dataset with duplication and degeneracy removed. Dataset 3: Snapped OpenClip20k • Raw dataset with iteratively snap rounding using " as pixel size. Yixin Hu, 75 9/5/19

  69. Success: Linear Pipeline <1 hour <16GB memory Compared with: 1) CGAL Conforming/Constrained Delaunay Triangulation 2) Triangle Conforming/Constrained Delaunay Triangulation CGAL CGAL Triangle Triangle Ours conforming constrained conforming constrained 99.97% 99.97% 99.97% 99.97% 99.80% snapped 99.66% 99.57% 81.92% 83.09% 99.84% cleaned 99.20% 9.56% 19.01 % 99.93% 34.35% raw 0 50% 100% 0 50% 100% 0 50% 100% 0 50% 100% 0 50% 100% Yixin Hu, 76 9/5/19

  70. Success: Linear Pipeline <1 hour <16GB memory 64GB Compared with: 1) CGAL Conforming/Constrained Delaunay Triangulation 2) Triangle Conforming/Constrained Delaunay Triangulation CGAL CGAL Triangle Triangle Ours conforming constrained conforming constrained 100.0% 99.80% 99.97% 99.97% 99.97% snapped 100.0% 81.92% 99.66% 83.09% 99.84% cleaned 99.20% 9.56% 19.01 % 100.0% 34.35% raw 0 50% 100% 0 50% 100% 0 50% 100% 0 50% 100% 0 50% 100% Yixin Hu, 77 9/5/19

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend