26-May-2017 26-May-2017 In the interest of disclosure 3 4 The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

26 may 2017 26 may 2017
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

26-May-2017 26-May-2017 In the interest of disclosure 3 4 The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

26-May-2017 26-May-2017 In the interest of disclosure 3 4 The Vision Standardised Pathology Information Improved healthcare & wellbeing Record, Communicate, Decide & Analyse 26-May-2017 Why standardise? 26 May, 2017


slide-1
SLIDE 1

26-May-2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

26-May-2017

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

In the interest of disclosure…

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

26-May-2017

The Vision

Standardised Pathology Information Record, Communicate, Decide & Analyse

Improved healthcare & wellbeing

slide-6
SLIDE 6

26 May, 2017

Why standardise?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

This stuff matters

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Much harm is done

  • It is unacceptable to continue to do so much

harm

  • Post-mortem examination shows diagnostic errors

contribute to ~10% of patient deaths

  • In Australia that means 7 times the road toll!

35/100k/yr VS road toll of 5/100k/yr

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Errors are mostly outside the lab

10

  • Much greater likelihood that an error occurs

at the interfaces

  • Most pathology errors are pre-lab or post-lab.
  • There is no reason to believe this is not true of

radiology

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Why standardise?

26-May-2017

Standardisation of test requesting and reporting for the electronic health record Clinica Chimica Acta 15 May 2014 Volume 432

Michael Legg

School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, High St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia Pathology Informatics Advisory Committee, Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, 207 Albion Street, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia Michael Legg & Associates, 12 Dianella Street, Caringbah, NSW 2229, Australia

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Standards for interoperability

  • Transmission of data
  • Identification policies
  • Information structures
  • Common terminology
  • Common understanding
  • Behavioural agreement

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Status: Completed in 2014

26-May-2017

slide-14
SLIDE 14

26-May-2017

Project summary

  • Standardise pathology information, terminology and

units for safety and quality

  • 14 sub-projects led by the profession
  • Around 70 pathologists, GPs, specialists and other

clinicians, scientists, informaticians and consumers volunteered

  • Standards development work from June 2013 to June

2014

  • More than 400 others responded to surveys and other

consultation

slide-15
SLIDE 15

26-May-2017

slide-16
SLIDE 16

26-May-2017

Pathology requesting

  • Additional 261 terms added to the Requesting Pathology

Terminology Reference set

  • A total of 488 request tests linked to a SNOMED-CT-AU

code

SNOMED-CT-AU for requesting

slide-17
SLIDE 17

26-May-2017

slide-18
SLIDE 18

26-May-2017

Pathology reporting

  • Engaged key stakeholder experts
  • Assessment of safety and quality concerns
  • Survey to identify common practice and variation in

reporting

  • Survey of requestors and report recipients for

preferences and reasons

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Common practice and variation?

26-May-2017

  • Lab Survey focusing on cumulative reporting
  • Targeted Chemical Pathology, Haematology and

Coagulation departments

  • 114 responses to survey
  • 35 example reports received
  • Wide selection of features on a cumulative report

identified

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Report features preferences?

26-May-2017

  • Survey of general practitioners, physicians and other

clinicians, pathologists, and health informaticians

  • 438 responses received
  • Participants provided:

– Preferences in how cumulative pathology reports are presented – Reasons for each preference they selected

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Rendered report features

26-May-2017

Time Direction Header and bolding Box Latest results indictor Result flag “L” or “H”

slide-22
SLIDE 22

26-May-2017

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Adult Reference Intervals

26-May-2017

Australasian Adult Reference Intervals - Chemical Pathology

Analyte Age

Reference

I nterpretation of age ( days) I nterpretation of reference ( units) Sodium (LN-RCPA: 2951-2) Potassium (LN-RCPA: 2823-3) See note 1 Chloride (LN-RCPA: 2075-0) Bicarbonate (LN-RCPA: 1963-8) Creatinine (LN-RCPA: 14682-9)

19y to <60y

(60–110) umol/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 60 ≤ x ≤ 110 umol/L

See note 2

19y to <60y

(45–90) umol/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 45 ≤ x ≤ 90 umol/L

Calcium (LN-RCPA: 2000-8) Calcium corrected for albumin (LN-RCPA: 29265-6) Phosphate (LN-RCPA: 14879-1) Magnesium (LN-RCPA: 2601-3) Lactate dehydrogenase (LN-RCPA: 14804-9) See note 3 Alkaline phosphatase (LN-RCPA: 6768-6) Total Protein

(LN-RCPA: 2885-2)

18y to <120y

(60–80) g/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 60 ≤ x ≤ 80 g/L 18y to <120y

(22–32) mmol/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 22 ≤ x ≤ 32 mmol/L 22y to <120y

(30–110) U/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 30 ≤ x ≤ 110 U/L 20y to <120y

(0.75–1.50) mmol/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 0.75 ≤ x ≤ 1.50 mmol/L 18y to <120y

(0.70–1.10) mmol/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 0.70 ≤ x ≤ 1.10 mmol/L 18y to <120y 18y to <120y

(95–110) mmol/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 135 ≤ x ≤ 145 mmol/L 95 ≤ x ≤ 110 mmol/L 18y to <120y

(135–145) mmol/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 3.5 ≤ x ≤ 5.2 mmol/L 6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829

(3.5–5.2) mmol/L

Male

Female

18y to <120y

(120–250) U/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 120 ≤ x ≤ 250 U/L 18y to <120y

(2.10–2.60) mmol/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 2.10 ≤ x ≤ 2.60 mmol/L 18y to <120y

(2.10–2.60) mmol/L

6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 2.10 ≤ x ≤ 2.60 mmol/L

  • Harmonised adult

reference limits for 11 analytes

  • Developed by AACB

Harmonisation Committee

  • Agreed by the

pathologists and scientists attending the AACB Harmonisation workshop on 29-30 April 2014

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Paediatric Reference Intervals

26 May, 2017

  • Harmonised paediatric

reference limits for 9 analytes

  • Developed by AACB

Paediatric Biochemistry SIG group

  • Agreed by the

pathologists and scientists attending the AACB Harmonisation workshop on 29-30 April 2014

Australasian Paediatric Reference Intervals - Chemical Pathology

Analyte Age Reference I nterpretation of age ( days) I nterpretation of reference ( units) Sodium 0d t o < 1w (132–147) mmol/ L 0 ≤ d ≤ 6 132 ≤ x ≤ 147 mmol/L (LN-RCPA: 2951-2) 1w t o < 18y (133–144) mmol/ L 7 ≤ d ≤ 6573 133 ≤ x ≤ 144 mmol/L 18y t o < 120y (135–145) mmol/ L 6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 135 ≤ x ≤ 145 mmol/L Potassium 0d t o < 1w (3.8–6.5) mmol/ L 0 ≤ d ≤ 6 3.8 ≤ x ≤ 6.5 mmol/L (LN-RCPA: 2823-3) 1w t o < 26w (4.2–6.7) mmol/ L 7 ≤ d ≤ 181 4.2 ≤ x ≤ 6.7 mmol/L See not e 1 26w t o < 2y (3.9–5.6) mmol/ L 182 ≤ d ≤ 729 3.9 ≤ x ≤ 5.6 mmol/L 2y t o < 18y (3.6–5.3) mmol/ L 730 ≤ d ≤ 6573 3.6 ≤ x ≤ 5.3 mmol/L 18y t o < 120y (3.5–5.2) mmol/ L 6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 3.5 ≤ x ≤ 5.2 mmol/L Chloride 0d t o < 1w (98–115) mmol/ L 0 ≤ d ≤ 6 98 ≤ x ≤ 115 mmol/L (LN-RCPA: 2075-0) 1w t o < 18y (97–110) mmol/ L 7 ≤ d ≤ 6573 97 ≤ x ≤ 110 mmol/L 18y t o < 120y (95–110) mmol/ L 6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 95 ≤ x ≤ 110 mmol/L Bicarbonate 0d t o < 1w (15–28) mmol/ L 0 ≤ d ≤ 6 15 ≤ x ≤ 28 mmol/L (LN-RCPA: 1963-8) 1w t o < 2y (16–29) mmol/ L 7 ≤ d ≤ 729 16 ≤ x ≤ 29 mmol/L 2y t o < 10y (17–30) mmol/ L 730 ≤ d ≤ 3651 17 ≤ x ≤ 30 mmol/L 10y t o < 18y (20–32) mmol/ L 3652 ≤ d ≤ 6573 20 ≤ x ≤ 32 mmol/L 18y t o < 120y (22–32) mmol/ L 6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 22 ≤ x ≤ 32 mmol/L Creatinine 0d t o < 1w (22–93) umol/ L 0 ≤ d ≤ 6 22 ≤ x ≤ 93 umol/L (LN-RCPA: 14682-9) 1w t o < 4w (17–50) umol/ L 7 ≤ d ≤ 27 17 ≤ x ≤ 50 umol/L See not e 2 and 3 4w t o < 2y (11–36) umol/ L 28 ≤ d ≤ 729 11 ≤ x ≤ 36 umol/L 2y t o < 6y (20–44) umol/ L 730 ≤ d ≤ 2190 20 ≤ x ≤ 44 umol/L 6y t o < 12y (27–58) umol/ L 2191 ≤ d ≤ 4382 27 ≤ x ≤ 58 umol/L 12y t o < 15y (35–83) umol/ L 4383 ≤ d ≤ 5477 35 ≤ x ≤ 83 umol/L 15y t o < 19y (50–100) umol/ L 5478 ≤ d ≤ 6938 50 ≤ x ≤ 100 umol/L 19y t o < 60y (60–110) umol/ L 6939 ≤ d ≤ 21914 60 ≤ x ≤ 110 umol/L 12y t o < 15y (35–74) umol/ L 4383 ≤ d ≤ 5477 35 ≤ x ≤ 74 umol/L 15y t o < 19y (38–82) umol/ L 5478 ≤ d ≤ 6938 38 ≤ x ≤ 82 umol/L 19y t o < 60y (45–90) umol/ L 6939 ≤ d ≤ 21914 45 ≤ x ≤ 90 umol/L Calcium 0d t o < 1w (1.85–2.80) mmol/ L 0 ≤ d ≤ 6 1.85 ≤ x ≤ 2.80 mmol/L (LN-RCPA: 2000-8) 1w t o < 26w (2.20–2.80) mmol/ L 7 ≤ d ≤ 181 2.20 ≤ x ≤ 2.80 mmol/L 26w t o < 2y (2.20–2.70) mmol/ L 182 ≤ d ≤ 729 2.20 ≤ x ≤ 2.70 mmol/L 2y t o < 18y (2.20–2.65) mmol/ L 730 ≤ d ≤ 6573 2.20 ≤ x ≤ 2.65 mmol/L 18y t o < 120y (2.10–2.60) mmol/ L 6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 2.10 ≤ x ≤ 2.60 mmol/L Phosphate 0d t o < 1w (1.25–2.85) mmol/ L 0 ≤ d ≤ 6 1.25 ≤ x ≤ 2.85 mmol/L (LN-RCPA: 14879-1) 1w t o < 4w (1.50–2.75) mmol/ L 7 ≤ d ≤ 27 1.50 ≤ x ≤ 2.75 mmol/L 4w t o < 26w (1.45–2.50) mmol/ L 28 ≤ d ≤ 181 1.45 ≤ x ≤ 2.50 mmol/L 26w t o < 1y (1.30–2.30) mmol/ L 182 ≤ d ≤ 364 1.30 ≤ x ≤ 2.30 mmol/L 1y t o < 4y (1.10–2.20) mmol/ L 365 ≤ d ≤ 1460 1.10 ≤ x ≤ 2.20 mmol/L 4y t o < 15y (0.90–2.00) mmol/ L 1461 ≤ d ≤ 5477 0.90 ≤ x ≤ 2.00 mmol/L 15y t o < 18y (0.80–1.85) mmol/ L 5478 ≤ d ≤ 6573 0.80 ≤ x ≤ 1.85 mmol/L 18y t o < 20y (0.75–1.65) mmol/ L 6574 ≤ d ≤ 7304 0.75 ≤ x ≤ 1.65 mmol/L 20y t o < 120y (0.75–1.50) mmol/ L 7305 ≤ d ≤ 43829 0.75 ≤ x ≤ 1.50 mmol/L Magnesium 0d t o < 1w (0.60–1.00) mmol/ L 0 ≤ d ≤ 6 0.60 ≤ x ≤ 1.00 mmol/L (LN-RCPA: 2601-3) 1w t o < 18y (0.65–1.10) mmol/ L 7 ≤ d ≤ 6573 0.65 ≤ x ≤ 1.10 mmol/L 18y t o < 120y (0.70–1.10) mmol/ L 6574 ≤ d ≤ 43829 0.70 ≤ x ≤ 1.10 mmol/L Alkaline phosphatase 0d t o < 1w (80–380) U/ L 0 ≤ d ≤ 6 80 ≤ x ≤ 380 U/L (LN-RCPA: 6768-6) 1w t o < 4w (120–550) U/ L 7 ≤ d ≤ 27 120 ≤ x ≤ 550 U/L 4w t o < 26w (120–650) U/ L 28 ≤ d ≤ 181 120 ≤ x ≤ 650 U/L 26w t o < 2y (120–450) U/ L 182 ≤ d ≤ 729 120 ≤ x ≤ 450 U/L 2y t o < 6y (120–370) U/ L 730 ≤ d ≤ 2190 120 ≤ x ≤ 370 U/L 6y t o < 10y (120–440) U/ L 2191 ≤ d ≤ 3651 120 ≤ x ≤ 440 U/L 10y t o < 14y (130–530) U/ L 3652 ≤ d ≤ 5112 130 ≤ x ≤ 530 U/L 14y t o < 15y (105–480) U/ L 5113 ≤ d ≤ 5477 105 ≤ x ≤ 480 U/L 15y t o < 17y (80 - 380) U/ L 5478 ≤ d ≤ 6208 80 ≤ x ≤ 380 U/L 17y t o < 19y (50–220) U/ L 6209 ≤ d ≤ 6938 50 ≤ x ≤ 220 U/L 19y t o < 22y (45–150) U/ L 6939 ≤ d ≤ 8034 45 ≤ x ≤ 150 U/L 22y t o < 120y (30–110) U/ L 8035 ≤ d ≤ 43829 30 ≤ x ≤ 110 U/L 10y t o < 13y (100–460) U/ L 3652 ≤ d ≤ 4747 100 ≤ x ≤ 460 U/L 13y t o < 14y (70–330) U/ L 4748 ≤ d ≤ 5112 70 ≤ x ≤ 330 U/L 14y t o < 15y (50–280) U/ L 5113 ≤ d ≤ 5477 50 ≤ x ≤ 280 U/L 15y t o < 16y (45–170) U/ L 5478 ≤ d ≤ 5843 45 ≤ x ≤ 170 U/L 16y t o < 22y (35–140) U/ L 5844 ≤ d ≤ 8034 35 ≤ x ≤ 140 U/L 22y t o < 120y (30–110) U/ L 8035 ≤ d ≤ 43829 30 ≤ x ≤ 110 U/L Male Male Female Female

slide-25
SLIDE 25

26-May-2017

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Draft Information Models

26-May-2017

  • Salmonella Infection
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Thyroid Cytology
slide-27
SLIDE 27

LOINC codes for reporting

slide-28
SLIDE 28

26-May-2017

slide-29
SLIDE 29

26-May-2017

slide-30
SLIDE 30

26-May-2017

slide-31
SLIDE 31

wgSC Steering Committee

26-May-2017

  • Governance of the project
  • Promotion of standardisation
slide-32
SLIDE 32

26-May-2017

slide-33
SLIDE 33

wg1 Standards Development and Publishing

  • Develop an Implementation Guide for standardised

HL7v2 messaging with HL7.au

Status: Published, HL7.au Orders and Observations working group developed ‘Australian Pathology Messaging - Localisation

  • f HL7 Version 2.4’.

Go to: http://confluence.hl7australia.com/display/OO/Australian+Patholo gy+Messaging+-+Localisation+of+HL7+Version+2.4

  • Publishing of standards, models and terminology with

Australian Digital Health Agency (ADHA) and HL7.au

Status: Stage 1 - completed with RCPA - Pathology Terminology and Information Models v1.0 available on the ADHA website. Stage 2 – Linked maintenance and FHIR representation now part

  • f next PITUS

26-May-2017

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Standards and Guidelines

26-May-2017

https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/implementation-resources/ehealth-foundations/EP- 2353-2016

slide-35
SLIDE 35

wg2 Safety in Pathology Reporting

  • Review chemical tests for combination safety

Status: Completed but more to do

  • Develop an implementation checklist for best practice

in the use of clinical information systems

Status: Completed – 2 new chapters on safety in requesting and reporting

  • Develop harmonised reference ranges (where

possible)

Status: Completed – additional ranges added but more to do

26-May-2017

slide-36
SLIDE 36

wg3 Request and Report Terminology

  • Expand terms in APUTS reference set to increase test

coverage

  • Review feedback from trials and use and revise

terminologies

  • Advocate for additions to reference terminologies as

required

  • Assist with publishing terms

Status: Completed – >400 Pathology request terms added linking each to a SNOMED-CT-AU code – updates to SNOMED made to reference set Reporting terminology for each discipline reviewed and terms added and modified with changes to LOINC.

26-May-2017

slide-37
SLIDE 37

wg4 Request Modelling

  • Develop and finalise an information model and

associated terminology for genetic test requesting

Status: Genomics alliances not ready for consensus on requesting but all have undertaken to work on this in the next PITUS

26-May-2017

slide-38
SLIDE 38

wg5 Report Modelling

  • Develop draft standards for safe atomic reporting to

registries

  • Progress the implementation of these reporting

standards by partnering with Cancer Institute NSW

  • This trial will leverage the work undertaken within the

Structured Cancer Reporting Protocols Project [developed under separate DoH funded project]

Status: Completed - Information model terminology done for 2 cancers Colon and Prostate; FHIR standards and framework in done for a document to be included in a V2 message

26-May-2017

slide-39
SLIDE 39

26-May-2017

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Reporting to registries

26-May-2017

Now

  • Significant variation between jurisdictions and

between the different types of registries that laboratories are required to report to

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Reporting to registries

26-May-2017

If standardised

  • Registries and researchers would be able to learn more from higher

quality standardised information, allowing direct comparison between different jurisdictions

  • Increased completeness and timeliness of information would be

improved which is of particular benefit to public health and bio-threat response

  • e-Pathology report standardisation and national e-health policy

would be guided to a more clinically valuable approach

  • Risk of non-compliance with legal reporting requirements by

laboratories would be reduced

  • There would be a significant reduction in the cost to pathology of

interfaces to registries

  • There would be improved recognition of the knowledge-work and

contribution of pathology

  • It would ultimately lead to improvement in health outcomes
slide-42
SLIDE 42

wg6 Informatics Quality Assurance

  • Develop and trial a quality assurance protocol that can

be used by accrediting bodies to assist with compliance, by partnering with RCPA QAP Status: Completed.

26-May-2017

slide-43
SLIDE 43

wg6 Informatics Quality Assurance

26-May-2017

slide-44
SLIDE 44

26-May-2017

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Standards and Guidelines

26-May-2017

http://www.rcpa.edu.au/Library/Practising-Pathology/PTIS/APUTS-Downloads

slide-46
SLIDE 46

26-May-2017

slide-47
SLIDE 47

26-May-2017

slide-48
SLIDE 48

26-May-2017