25 th Annual Credit Suisse Energy Summit March 2, 2020 Cautionary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
25 th Annual Credit Suisse Energy Summit March 2, 2020 Cautionary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
25 th Annual Credit Suisse Energy Summit March 2, 2020 Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements : The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is
N Y S E : D N R 2
Forward-Looking Statements: The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, financial forecasts, future hydrocarbon prices and their volatility, current or future liquidity sources or their adequacy to support our anticipated future activities, our ability to refinance or extend the maturities of our long-term indebtedness which matures in 2021 and 2022, possible future write-downs of oil and natural gas reserves, together with assumptions based on current and projected production levels, oil and gas prices and oilfield costs, current or future expectations or estimations of our cash flows or the impact of changes in commodity prices
- n cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, price and availability of advantageous commodity derivative contracts or the predicted cash flow benefits therefrom, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity or
methods, including the timing and location thereof, the nature of any future asset purchases or sales or the timing or proceeds thereof, estimated timing of commencement of CO2 flooding of particular fields or areas, including Cedar Creek Anticline (“CCA”), or the availability of capital for CCA pipeline construction, or its ultimate cost or date of completion, timing of CO2 injections and initial production responses in tertiary flooding projects, development activities, finding costs, anticipated future cost savings, capital budgets, interpretation or prediction of formation details, production rates and volumes or forecasts thereof, hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO2 reserves and supply and their availability, potential reserves, barrels or percentages of recoverable original oil in place, levels of tariffs or other trade restrictions, the likelihood, timing and impact of increased interest rates, the impact of regulatory rulings or changes, outcomes of pending litigation, prospective legislation affecting the oil and gas industry, environmental regulations, mark-to-market values, the actual or anticipated future drop in oil demand in China due to the COVID-19 coronavirus, competition, rates of return, estimated costs, changes in costs, future capital expenditures and overall economics, worldwide economic conditions, the likelihood and extent of an economic slowdown, and other variables surrounding operations and future plans. Such forward-looking statements generally are accompanied by words such as “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “predict,” “forecast,” “to our knowledge,” “anticipate,” “projected,” “preliminary,” “should,” “assume,” “believe,” “may” or other words that convey, or are intended to convey, the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such forward-looking information is based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, and assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly and adversely affect current plans, anticipated actions, the timing of such actions and our financial condition and results of operations. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from expectations, estimates or assumptions expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by us or on
- ur behalf. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are fluctuations in worldwide oil prices or in U.S. oil prices and consequently in the prices received or demand for our oil and natural gas; evolving
political and military tensions in the Middle East; decisions as to production levels and/or pricing by OPEC or production levels by U.S. shale producers in future periods; levels of future capital expenditures; trade disputes and resulting tariffs or international economic sanctions; effects and maturity dates of our indebtedness; success of our risk management techniques; accuracy of our cost estimates; access to and or terms of credit in the commercial banking or
- ther debt markets; fluctuations in the prices of goods and services; the uncertainty of drilling results and reserve estimates; operating hazards and remediation costs; disruption of operations and damages from well incidents,
hurricanes, tropical storms, forest fires, or other natural occurrences; acquisition risks; requirements for capital or its availability; conditions in the worldwide financial, trade and credit markets; general economic conditions; competition; government regulations, including changes in tax or environmental laws or regulations; and unexpected delays, as well as the risks and uncertainties inherent in oil and gas drilling and production activities or that are
- therwise discussed in this presentation, including, without limitation, the portions referenced above, and the uncertainties set forth from time to time in our other public reports, filings and public statements.
Statement Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures: This presentation also contains certain non-GAAP financial measures including free cash flows, adjusted cash flows from operations, adjusted EBITDAX, and PV-10. Any non-GAAP measure included herein is accompanied by a reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure along with a statement on why the Company believes the measure is beneficial to investors, which statements are included at the end of this presentation. Note to U.S. Investors: Current SEC rules regarding oil and gas reserves information allow oil and gas companies to disclose in filings with the SEC not only proved reserves, but also probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions of such terms. We disclose only proved reserves in our filings with the SEC. Denbury’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019 were estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent petroleum engineering firm. In this presentation, we may make reference to probable and possible reserves, some of which have been estimated by our independent engineers and some of which have been estimated by Denbury’s internal staff of engineers. In this presentation, we also may refer to one or more of estimates of original oil in place, resource or reserves “potential,” barrels recoverable, “risked” and “unrisked” resource potential, estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) or other descriptions of volumes potentially recoverable, which in addition to reserves generally classifiable as probable and possible (2P and 3P reserves), include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards for possible reserves, and which SEC guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates, as well as the estimates of probable and possible reserves, are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and are subject to greater uncertainties, and accordingly the likelihood of recovering those reserves is subject to substantially greater risk.
Cautionary Statements
N Y S E : D N R 3
Uncommon Company, Extraordinary Potential
- Favorable crude quality & premium pricing
- Industry leading oil weighting
- Top quartile operating margins
Extreme Oil Gearing CO2 EOR: A Sustainable Business Model
- Vertically integrated EOR infrastructure
- Cost structure independent from industry
- Operating in unconstrained basins
Strategically Advantaged Operations
- >400 MMBbl EOR potential at CCA
- Inventory of EOR development opportunities
- Short-cycle exploitation opportunities
Significant Organic Growth Potential Financial Discipline
- Generating significant free cash flow
- Strong liquidity and improving leverage profile
- Quality asset base provides capital flexibility
- We achieve net negative carbon
emissions through associated storage
- f industrial-sourced CO2
- Aligned with international CO2
emission reduction efforts
- Assets and expertise well-suited for
future carbon capture
N Y S E : D N R 4 Pl Plan ano HQ HQ
CO2 Sources Denbury Owned Fields Planned CO2 Pipelines Current CO2 Pipelines
A Unique Energy Business
- ~65% of production via CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
- Vertically integrated CO2 supply and distribution
- Cost structure largely independent from industry
Industry Leader in Reducing CO2 Emissions
- Annually injecting >3 million metric tons of industrial-
sourced CO2 into our reservoirs
- Potential to reach full carbon neutrality this decade with
CCUS, including downstream Scope 3 emissions
Fundamentally Geared to Crude Oil
- 97% oil, high exposure to Gulf Coast premium pricing
- Superior crude quality (Mid-30’s API gravity, low sulfur)
Relentless Focus on Execution and Results
- Highly economic project portfolio at $50 oil
- Significant debt reduction and cost structure improvements
since 2014
- Track record of spending within cash flow
Value Sustaining with Organic Growth Upside
- Over 1 billion BOE proved + EOR and exploitation potential
Denbury – What We Are
Gulf Coast Region Rocky Mountain Region
4Q19 Production
57,511 BOE/d
YE19 Proved O&G Reserves
230 MMBOE $2.6B PV-10 Value
YE19 Proved CO2 Reserves
5.9 Tcf
N Y S E : D N R 5
An Industry Leader in Reducing CO2 Emissions
Combined Scope 1 & 2 Emissions
1.8 million metric tons
Captured Industrial Sourced CO2
3.3 million metric tons – 1.5 million metric tons
Net Negative CO2 Emissions
– =
Full Company Net Negative in 2018 - Combined Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2 Emissions
~30% of our CO2
is in
indu dustrial trial sourced ced
The only U.S. public company of scale where injecting CO2 into the ground to produce oil is our primary business
Environment
N Y S E : D N R 6
Sustainably Leveraging the Denbury Difference
Social
0.5 1 1.5 2 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR)
Consistent sustainability reporting (2014-2018) in accordance with GRI Standards
Our most recent Corporate Responsibility Report can be accessed on our website at: csr.denbury.com
GOVERNANCE
ISS
RATING “1”
We maintain a long-standing commitment to the highest standards for the safety and development of our employees, contractors and local communities
- Achieved our best Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) in 2019
- Safety targets explicitly tied to executive compensation
- Comprehensive training and development program including safety,
leadership, and diversity training
- Matched >$250,000 employee charitable donations over last 5 years
- Chaired 2019 Dallas Heart Walk for the American Heart Association
Governance
- 7 out of 8 directors are independent, including independent
Chairman of the Board
- Long-standing female board representation since 2012
- ISS Governance Rating of “1” (Best Possible)
- Code of Conduct and Ethics Rated “A” by NYSE Governance Services
(Top 1%)
Strong corporate governance is essential to fulfilling our
- bligations to our stakeholders and to operating as a
responsible corporate citizen
N Y S E : D N R 7
Differentiated Oil Quality & Market Access
✓ Mid-30’s API Gravity ✓ Low Sulfur Content (< 0.5%) ✓ Ideal for U.S. Refineries ✓ Highly Sought After for Blending with Ultra Light Crude ✓ Outside Constrained Basins ✓ ~60% of Production Receives Gulf Coast Premium Pricing ✓ Established Pipeline Takeaway Infrastructure ✓ Access to Diverse Markets
Premium Quality Geographically Advantaged
N Y S E : D N R 8
2020 Outlook & Objectives
Operations and Development Business Performance
Progress CCA EOR Development
- Install CCA CO2 pipeline
- Begin facility and well work
Drive Organic EOR Growth
- Oyster Bayou A2
- Cranfield Phase 8
- Soso Rodessa
Operate Safely and Responsibly
- Continue to build on improvements in health,
safety and environmental performance
Expand Exploitation Opportunity Set
- Brookhaven Case Sand
- CCA Mission Canyon
- Gulf Coast JV, anticipated to close in March 2020
Sustained focus and progress on improving
- perational and business performance
Strengthen Balance Sheet
$
- Address near-term maturities
- Continue to prioritize debt reduction
Disciplined Capital Management
- Base capital budget designed to deliver
significant free cash flow at $50 oil
- Defer decision on contingent CCA EOR
development capital until 2Q20
$
N Y S E : D N R 9 61% 65% 62% 62% 47% 69% 51% 59% 33% 64% 49% 37% 37% 56%
DNR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J Peer K Peer L Peer M Peer N
Peer Average
Industry-Leading Oil Weighting
Source: Company filings for the fourth quarter ended 12/31/2019. Peers include CLR, CRC, CXO, DVN, LPI, MRO, MUR, NBL, OAS, PDCE, PXD, SM, WLL, and WPX. 1) NGL production is not reported separately for this entity.
NGL Production Oil Production
(1) (1) (1)
54% Oil 68% Liquids
(1)
98% Oil
Peer Average
4Q19 % Liquids Production
N Y S E : D N R 10
Source: Company filings for the fourth quarter ended 12/31/2019. 1) Operating margin calculated as revenues less lifting costs. Lifting costs calculated as lease operating expenses, marketing/transportation expenses and production and ad valorem taxes. 2) Revenues exclude gain/loss on derivative settlements.
Leading Revenue and Operating Margin per BOE
$5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 4Q19 Operating Margin per BOE(1) 4Q19 Revenue per BOE(2)
DNR
Higher Revenue per BOE Higher Operating Margin per BOE
Peers include CLR, CRC, CXO, DVN, LPI, MRO, MUR, NBL, OAS, OXY, PDCE, PXD, SM, WLL, and WPX.
Denbury’s EOR-focused
- perations generate the
highest revenue per BOE among peers, driving a best- in-class operating margin
N Y S E : D N R 11
56% 20% 17% 39% 9% 5% 11% 11%
Capex LOE G&A
- Prod. Taxes & Transp.
Average of Peers(1)
FY19 Operating & Capital Spend as % of Oil & Gas Revenue
Lowest Spend Among Peers as a Percent of Revenue
75% 93%
Spend as % of Revenue
1) Source: results from Company filings for the twelve months ended 12/31/2019. Peers include CLR, CRC, CXO, LPI, MUR, MTDR, OAS, PDCE, PE, PXD, SM, WLL, and WPX. 2) G&A spend adjusted for approximately $18.6 million in severance-related expense associated with the Company’s voluntary separation program. See Appendix slide 36 for a detailed list of peers and selected operating and capital costs as a percentage of revenue.
Denbury’s differentiated, EOR-driven model drives the lowest spend as % of revenue across peers Denbury’s high oil weighting & premium pricing exposure deliver highest revenue per BOE among peers
- Spend versus revenue is more effective metric than per-BOE
comparisons given low natural gas and NGL pricing environment
- Metric directly drives free cash flow
Combined LOE & Capex lowest among peers
- EOR business model results in higher LOE but allows for superior
flexibility in capital spend
- Combination of LOE and Capex ~20% lower than peer average
G&A spend ~44% below peer average(2)
- Sustained focus on efficiencies and cost reductions
N Y S E : D N R 12
2020 Base Capital Budget 25% lower than 2019
Tertiary Oyster Bayou A2 Development Expansion 1Q-3Q Cranfield Phase 8 Expansion Pattern 2Q-3Q Soso Rodessa Development 2Q-3Q Non-Tertiary Brookhaven Case Sand Exploitation 2Q CCA Mission Canyon Exploitation 3Q Contingent CCA EOR Development CCA Pipeline, Facilities & Well Work 2Q-4Q
Significant 2020 Capital Projects Development Capital Budget(1)
1) Amounts presented exclude $40 - $45 million of capitalized interest. 2) Includes capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre-production tertiary startup costs. 3) Total CCA EOR development capital for the year is estimated to be $155 million, of which $145 million is subject to Board approval, anticipated to occur in second quarter 2020.
In millions
$10 $40 $55 $75
CO Pipeline & Other Other Capitalized Items Non-Tertiary Tertiary
2
(2)
$27 $46 $71 $93
2019 Actual $237 Million 2020 Base Budget $175 - $185 Million
$145
CCA EOR Development
2020 Contingent CCA EOR Budget $140 - $150 Million(3) (25%)
N Y S E : D N R 13
2020 Guidance
Development Capital Budget(1)
1) Amounts presented exclude $40 - $45 million of capitalized interest. 2) Total CCA EOR development capital for the year is estimated to be $155 million, of which $145 million is subject to Board approval, anticipated to occur in 2Q20. 3) Includes capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre- production tertiary startup costs.
Production (BOE/d)
2
(3)
53 53,00 ,000 0 – 56 56,000 ,000 25% reduction in 2020 capital spend results in minor production decline 56 56,9 ,914
2020E
2019
Adjusted Continuing Production(4)
4) 2019 Adjusted Continuing Production excludes 1,085 net BOE/d of non-tertiary production related to the sale of half of our nearly 100% working interests in Webster, Thompson, Manvel, and East Hastings fields, which is expected to close in March 2020 and 214 net BOE/d of non-tertiary production related to the sale of Citronelle Field, sold July 1, 2019.
Cash Flow @ $50 oil(5)
- Anticipate upwards of $100
million of free cash flow if only base capital budget is executed
5) Currently estimated ranges based upon forecasts and assumptions as of February 25, 2020. 6) Other cash resources includes $40 million of estimated proceeds from the Gulf Coast JV, anticipated to close in March 2020.
- Spending expected to be
approximately neutral with cash flow and other cash resources(6) if contingent CCA EOR development capital budget is approved
In millions
$10 $40 $55 $75
CO Pipeline & Other Other Capitalized Items Non-Tertiary Tertiary
2020 Base Budget $175 - $185 Million
$145
CCA EOR Development
2020 Contingent CCA EOR Budget $140 - $150 Million(3)
N Y S E : D N R 14
$2,852 $826 $346 $246 $246 $246 $1,521 $1,623 $1,623 $324 $185 $171 $167 $395 $50 12/31/1 /14 12/31/1 /18 9/30/19 12/31/1 /19
Continuing to Improve Debt Profile
(In millions)
$553 $246 $51 $615 $58 $456 $136 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
- Sr. Subordinated Notes
- Sr. Secured 2nd Lien Notes
Convertible Sr. Notes
$666 $799 $136 $514
- Sr. Secured Credit Facility
$3,571
Pipeline / Capital Lease Debt
$2,532
$1.3B debt reduction since 2014
$2,282
Debt Principal – 12/31/19 Maturity Window – 12/31/19
(In millions)
$528 million of Bank Line Availability at 12/31/19 after $87 million of LCs
$2,436
$250MM debt reduction in 2019
N Y S E : D N R 15
12 12/31 31/19 12 12/31 31/18 Trailing 12 months Trailing 12 months Adjusted EBITDAX(1) (millions) $607 $584 Net Debt Principal(2) (millions) 2,271 2,481 Net Deb Debt/Adjusted EBI EBITDAX(1) 3.7x 3.7x 4.2x 4.2x Average Realized Oil Price ($/Bbl) $59.40 $57.91
Improved Leverage Metrics
Leverage Ratio
1) A non-GAAP measure. See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed February 25, 2020 for additional information, as well as slide 42 indicating why the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful for investors. 2) Net of cash & cash equivalents and debt issuance costs, and excludes future interest payable and unamortized debt discounts.
Half turn leverage ratio reduction in 2019
N Y S E : D N R 16
Hedge Positions – as of February 24, 2020
1) Averages are volume weighted. 2) If oil prices were to average less than the sold put price, receipts on settlement would be limited to the difference between the floor price and sold put price.
Downside Protection with Significant Upside Potential 2020 2020
1H 2H FY
Fixed Pr Price ce Swaps WT WTI NYM YMEX Vo Volumes es He Hedged (Bbls/d) 2,000 2,000 2,000 Swap Price(1) $60.59 $60.59 $60.59 Ar Argu gus LLS Vo Volumes es He Hedged (Bbls/d) 4,500 4,500 4,500 Swap Price(1) $62.29 $62.29 $62.29 3-Way Coll
- llars
WTI WTI NYM NYMEX(3) Vo Volumes es He Hedged (Bbls/d) 23,000 21,000 21,995 Sold Put Price(1)(2) $48.25 $48.26 $48.25 Floor Price(1) $56.95 $56.85 $56.90 Ceiling Price(1) $62.83 $62.68 $62.76 Ar Argu gus LLS Vo Volumes es He Hedged (Bbls/d) 10,000 8,000 8,995 Sold Put Price(1)(2) $52.85 $52.75 $52.81 Floor Price(1) $61.52 $61.08 $61.32 Ceiling Price(1) $68.21 $68.39 $68.29 Tota
- tal Vol
Volumes He Hedged 39,500 35,500 37,490 % % of
- f FY20E Pr
Prod
- duct
ction Mid Midpoint (BO BOE/d) 72% 72% 65% 65% 69% 69% We Weighted Av Average Floor Pr Price ces WT WTI NYM YMEX $57.24 $57.17 $57.21 Ar Argu gus LLS $61.75 $61.52 $61.64
N Y S E : D N R 17
Gulf Coast Region
Reserves Summary(1) (MMBOE)
Prov
- ved +
+ Tertia tiary y Pot
- tenti
tial Tertia iary y Reserves Proved 118 Potential 285 No Non-Tertia iary y Reserves Proved 21 Tot
- tal MMBOE(2)
(2)
424 424 Prov
- ved +
+ Tertia tiary y Pot
- tenti
tial l by by Field ld(3
(3)
Mature Area 25 Conroe 130 Delhi 25 Hastings 30 – 65 Heidelberg 25 Manvel 10 Oyster Bayou 20 Tinsley 25 Thompson 20 – 40 Webster 40 – 75
- W. Yellow Creek
5 – 10
Denbury Operated Pipelines Denbury Planned Pipelines Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Potential CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates Industrial CO2 Sources Naturally-Occurring CO2 Source
Note:
- te: See “Slide Notes” on slide 25 in the appendix to this presentation for footnote explanations.
N Y S E : D N R 18
Rocky Mountain Region
Reserves Summary(1) (MMBOE)
Prov
- ved +
+ Tertia tiary y Pot
- tenti
tial Tertia iary y Reserves Proved 21 Potential 539 No Non-Tertia iary y Reserves Proved 71 Tot
- tal MMBOE(2)
(2)
631 631 Prov
- ved +
+ Tertia tiary y Pot
- tenti
tial l by by Field ld(3
(3)
Bell Creek 20 – 40 Cedar Creek Anticline Area 400 – 500 Gas Draw 10 Grieve 5 Hartzog Draw 30 – 40 Salt Creek 25 – 35
Denbury Operated Pipelines Denbury Planned Pipelines Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Potential CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates CO2 Resources Owned or Contracted Pipelines Owned by Others
Note:
- te: See “Slide Notes” on slide 25 in the appendix to this presentation for footnote explanations.
N Y S E : D N R 19
CCA EOR – A Carbon Negative Development
Project Update
- Prepare to complete CO2 pipeline installation in
2020, subject to 2Q20 contingent funding approval
– Planned activities include installation of CO2 pipeline, facility infrastructure construction and well work – $155 million total spend anticipated in 2020, assuming approval of contingent funding
- 100% planned use of industrial CO2 results in a
development that is carbon negative, including downstream (Scope 3) CO2 emissions
- Evaluating further enhancements to project based
- n potential availability of additional CO2
- Continuing to evaluate both self-funding and JV
- ptions for the CO2 pipeline construction
$140 - $150 Million Contingent funding decision planned for 2Q20 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040
~7,500 - 12,500 net Bbls/d for Phase 1
- Est. Incremental EOR Production
Future EOR Potential Planned Phase 2 Phase 1
N Y S E : D N R 20
Phase 5
- Initial phase response in 2018
- 2019 average production of ~2,300 net Bbl/d
Phase 6
- Commenced CO2 injection in April 2019
- Expect results similar to Phase 5
- First production response in 1Q20
Phases 1-4 Ongoing Exploitation
- High resolution seismic imaging identified multiple
stranded areas of unswept oil – Successful first well online in 1Q19
- IP30 ~600 Bbl/d
– Second well results expected in 1Q20 – Additional well planned for 3Q20
Continuing Field Development
Best rock quality in Phases 5 and 6 leads to greater production response
Phase 5 Phase 4 Phase 3 Phase 2 Phase 1
Bell Creek Production
(Net Bbl/d)
3Q1 3Q19 CO2 sou source mai aintenance turnaround
Bell Creek Update
N Y S E : D N R 21
Heidelberg Christmas Horizon Redevelopment
Targets Yellow and Brown Christmas sands
- Dedicated injector-producer patterns
- Repeating proven Heidelberg down-dip
injection/up-dip production configuration
- ~3 MMBbl recoverable resource potential
- Total capital spend $28 million
Project milestones
- Commenced CO2 injection in December 2018
- First production 2Q19
- All wells online at the end of 2Q19
- Production response in line with forecast; current
performance ~950 net Bbl/d
Redevelopment Overview
10 New Drill Wells 12 Workovers 7 Existing Wells
Heidelberg Formations
40’ 40’ 50’ 60’
Existing Development Existing Development Future Development
N Y S E : D N R 22
Successful Brookhaven Case Sand Exploitation
First Well Location
Targeting Case Sand in Brookhaven Field
- Seismically identified channel within producing area
- Estimated drilling and completion cost ~$3MM/well
- ~1.3 MMBbl recoverable resource potential
Successful first well
- Drilled in late 4Q19, first production early 1Q20
- IP30 ~400 Bbl/d, >95% oil cut
Path forward
- Drill and complete 2 new wells in 2020
- Evaluate seismic data in other fields for similar
potential
Brookhaven Case Sand
Initial Well IP30: 400 BOPD Brookhaven Field
2020 Locations Pilot Sand Case Sand Upper Smith Sand Lower Smith Sand
BrookhavenField Type Log Brookhaven Case Sand
Case Sand Channel
N Y S E : D N R 23
Texas Conventional Oil Fields Farm-Down
Overview
- Contracted to sell half of our ~100% working interest
in Webster, Thompson, Manvel, and East Hastings Conventional Fields
- Expect to receive ~$40 million in cash, after closing
adjustments
- 100% capital carry to drill and complete initial 10
horizontal wells
– Overriding royalty interest of 6.25% for the first 10 wells retained until payout; 50% working interest after payout – Potential future additional wells to be drilled and completed on a pro-rata working interest basis
Project milestones
- Closing expected in March 2020
- First well to be spud within 6 months of closing, all ten
carried wells to be completed within 18 months
Transaction Details
Accelerates conventional exploitation with a capital carry on first 10 wells Sale proceeds provide flexibility for debt reduction and capital program
Transaction Benefits
Houston
Manvel Thompson East Hastings Webster
24
N Y S E : D N R 24
Appendix
N Y S E : D N R 25
Slide Notes
Sli Slide 17 17 – Gul ulf Coa
- ast
st Regi Region
1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/19 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/18, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. See slide 2, “Cautionary Statements” for additional information. 2) Total reserves in the table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to non-tertiary exploitation opportunities. 3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves.
Sli Slide 18 18 – Roc Rocky Mountain Regi Region
1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/19 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/18, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. See slide 2, “Cautionary Statements” for additional information. 2) Total reserves in the table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to non-tertiary exploitation opportunities. 3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves. 4) Timing of CCA CO2 pipeline installation is contingent on Board approval, which is currently anticipated to occur in 2Q20.
N Y S E : D N R 26
CO CO2 EO EOR can can pro produce abo about as as much oi
- il
l as as pr prim imary or
- r seco
secondary rec recovery(1)
CO2 EOR Process
17% 18% 20%
Recovery of Original Oil in Place (“OOIP”)
CO2 EOR
(Tertiary)
Secondary
(Waterfloods)
Primary
1) Based on OOIP at Denbury’s Little Creek Field
~ ~ ~
CO2 moves through formation mixing with oil, expanding and moving it toward producing wells CO2 Pipeline CO2 Injection Well Production Well
Oil Oil For Formation
N Y S E : D N R 27
CO2 EOR is a Proven Process
Jackson Dome Bravo Dome LaBarge Lost Cabin DGC McElmo Dome Naturally Occurring CO2 Source Industrial-Sourced CO2 Air Products Nutrien Sheep Mountain
1) Source: Advanced Resources International for data through 2014; state EOR data 2015-2018.
Si Signific icant CO2 Su Supply by y Reg egion Gu Gulf Coa
- ast
t Region » Jackson Dome, MS (Denbury Resources) » Air Products (Denbury Resources) » Nutrien (Denbury Resources) » Petra Nova (Hilcorp) Per ermian Bas asin in Region » Bravo Dome, NM (Kinder Morgan, Occidental) » McElmo Dome, CO (ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan) » Sheep Mountain, CO (ExxonMobil, Occidental) Rocky Mountain Region » LaBarge, WY (ExxonMobil, Denbury Resources) » Lost Cabin, WY (ConocoPhillips) Cana anada » Dakota Gasification (Whitecap, Apache) Si Signific icant CO2 EOR Op Operators by y Region Gu Gulf Coa
- ast
t Region » Denbury Resources » Hilcorp Per ermian Bas asin in Region » Occidental » Kinder Morgan Rocky Mountain Region » Denbury Resources » Devon » FDL » Chevron Cana anada » Whitecap » Apache
Petra Nova
50 100 150 200 250 300
1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
MBb MBbls/d Gulf Coast/Other Mid-Continent Rocky Mountains Permian Basin
CO CO2 EOR OR Oi Oil Prod
- duction by
y Regi egion(1
(1)
N Y S E : D N R 28
Significant Running Room with CO2 EOR
1) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR. 2) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO2 EOR. 3) Using approximate mid-points of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors.
33 33-83 Billi llion of f Technic icall lly y Recoverable le Oil(1
(1,2) )
(am amounts ts in n bi billi llions of f bar barrels ls) Permia ian 9-21 21 Eas ast & & Central l Texas 6-15 15 Mid-Contin inent 6-13 13 Cali alifornia 3-7 South Eas ast Gulf ulf Coa
- ast
3-7 Roc
- ckie
ies 2-6 Other 0-5 Michig igan/I /Illi llinois 2-4 Wi Willi lliston 1-3 App ppala lachia ia 1-2
Up to 83 Billion Barrels of Technically Recoverable Oil – U.S Lower 48(1)(2)
Denbury’s fields represent ~1 ~10% of
- f tota
total pote
- tenti
tial(3
(3)
LA
3.7 .7 to
to 9.1
.1
Bi Bill llion Barre Barrels
Gulf ulf Coa
- ast Regio
ion(2
(2)
2.8 .8 to
to 6.6
.6
Bi Bill llion Barre Barrels
Roc
- cky
ky Mountain in Regio ion(2
(2)
MT ND WY TX MS
CO2 Source Owned or Contracted Existing Denbury CO2 Pipelines Planned Denbury CO2 Pipeline Denbury owned oil fields CO2 Pipeline owned by Others
N Y S E : D N R 29
Jackson Dome
– Proved CO2 reserves as of 12/31/19: ~4.8 Tcf(1) – Additional probable CO2 reserves as of 12/31/19: ~0.9 Tcf
Industrial-Sourced CO2
Current Sources – Air Products (hydrogen plant): ~45 MMcf/d – Nutrien (ammonia products): ~20 MMcf/d Future Potential Sources – Lake Charles Methanol (methanol plant)(2)
Abundant CO2 Supply & No Significant Capital Required for Several Years
LaBarge Area
– Estimated field size: 750 square miles – Estimated recoverable CO2: 100 Tcf Shute Creek – ExxonMobil Operated
- Proved reserves as of 12/31/19: ~1.1 Tcf
- Denbury has a 1/3 overriding royalty interest and
could receive up to ~115 MMcf/d of CO2 by 2021 at current plant capacity
Lost Cabin – ConocoPhillips Operated
– Denbury estimated to receive up to 40 MMcf/d of CO2
Gulf Coast CO2 Supply Rocky Mountain CO2 Supply
1) Reported on a gross (8/8th’s) basis. 2) Planned but not currently under construction. Estimated CO2 capture date could be as early as 2023, with estimated potential CO2 volumes >200 MMcf/d.
N Y S E : D N R 30
EOR Potential >400 MMBbl at Cedar Creek Anticline
Development Summary
- Phase
Phase 1 1 – Red d Riv iver formatio ion n de develo lopm pment at Eas ast Lookout But Butte and and Ce Ceda dar Hills Hills So South uth – Targeting 30 MMBbls of recoverable oil; expected online 2H’22/1Q’23, with peak production 2024-25 – $150 MM development capital (excl. CO2 pipeline) to initial tertiary production; $400 MM total capital over 15-years – Requires $150 MM CO2 pipeline to service entire CCA EOR development; represents <$0.50/Bbl across total project – Will evaluate external capital sources for pipeline
- Phase
Phase 2 2 - Ca Cabin bin Cr Creek de develo lopment in in Interla rlake, St Ston
- ny Mo
Moun untain in and and Red d Riv iver r for
- rmatio
ions – Targets 100 MMBbls of recoverable oil, est. development start 2024 –
- Est. total capex of $500 – $600 MM over multiple decades; fully funded from
Phase 1 cash flow
- Fut
Futur ure Phase Phases – Remain inde der of
- f CC
CCA – >300 MMBbl EOR potential in multiple formations
~1 ~105 05 mi.
- i. CO2 Pip
ipeline fr from Bell Creek Phas hase 2 2 EOR R Tar arget
~100 MMBbls oil
Phas hase 1 1 EOR R Tar arget
~30 MMBbls oil
~1 ~175 75,00 000 ne net acr acres Es
- Est. 5
5 Bil illion Bbl bls s OOIP
Note: 2020+ amounts and timing contingent on Board approval, which is currently anticipated to occur in 2Q20.
N Y S E : D N R 31
(500)
- 500
1,000 1,500 2,000
2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042
CCA – Decades of Sustainable Production and Free Cash Flow
CCA Project Highlights
- Phase 1 and 2 estimated incremental tertiary production
- f 7,500 – 12,500 Bbls/d
– Potential to significantly increase production over time subject to CO2 availability and other factors
- Phase 1 investment, including full CO2 pipeline, attractive
at $50 oil – Initial pipeline investment benefits all incremental development
- Phase 1 payout expected within 2 years after first
production at $60 oil; future phases funded from project cash flow
- Potential to generate ~$3 billion of cumulative free cash
flow from Phases 1 and 2 at $60 oil
- Expect tertiary LOE to average $10-$15/Bbl
~7,500 - 12,500 net Bbls/d for Phase 1
- Est. Incremental EOR Production
$ in millions
~$3 billion ~$3 billion @ $60, ~$4 billion @ $70
- Est. Cumulative Net Cash Flow @ $60 oil
Future EOR Potential Planned Phase 2 Phase 1
Note: 2020+ amounts and timing contingent on Board approval, which is currently anticipated to occur in 2Q20.
N Y S E : D N R 32
CO2 EOR Development at CCA
EOR OR Form
- rmatio
ion De Detail ils
Initial Formations Targeted Red River Interlake Stony Mountain Field Discovery Timeframe (Oil) 1930’s (Discovery) 1950’s (Development) Formation Type Carbonate Depth 7,000 – 9,000 ft Original Reservoir Pressure 3,600 – 4,140 psi CO2 Flood Type Miscible API Gravity 29-38 Average Perm 5 md Average Porosity 11.4% OOIP ~5 Billion Barrels Oil Recovered to Date ~700 Million Barrels
- Est. Tertiary Recovery Factor
8 – 15%
Cedar Creek Anticline Overview
CCA Formations
1) Timing of CCA CO2 pipeline installation is contingent on Board approval, which is currently anticipated to occur in 2Q20.
N Y S E : D N R 33
Continued Mission Canyon & Charles B Success
Mission Canyon
- Drilled 12 wells to date with total program economics >90% ROR
– 9 successful wells drilled and completed 2017-2019, average IP30 ~700 Bbl/d
- Up to 12 remaining well locations after 2019 program
- 2020 plan to drill and complete 1-2 new wells
Charles B
- First well online early 1Q19; IP30 >200 BOPD; Sustained high oil
cut (~80%)
- Strong potential for waterflood & EOR
- Multiple productive Charles B benches identified
– 3Q19 successful delineation of upper and lower Charles B benches – ~4.5 MMBOE waterflood recoverable resource potential – ~12 MMBOE CO2 EOR recoverable resource potential
CCA Exploitation Program
Ced Cedar Cre Creek Ant Antic iclin ine
IP30: 842 BOPD IP30: 206 BOPD IP30: 330 BOPD IP30: 1,001 BOPD IP30: 1,234 BOPD IP30: 761 BOPD IP30: 527 BOPD IP30: 726 BOPD
Mission Canyon Horizontal 2020 Mission Canyon Horizontal Charles B Horizontal Future Charles B Horizontal
CCA Formations
IP30: 214 BOPD IP30: 739 BOPD
N Y S E : D N R 34
- $52 million closed or under contract as of February 2020
– $6 million closed in 2018 – $14 million closed in 2019 – $32 million under contract
- Expect proceeds to be received in phases beginning as
early as 2H20 and concluding by mid-2022
- $30 - $50 million estimated value in remaining acreage
Houston Surface Acreage Land Sale Update
Highlights ~800 surface acres consisting of 11 commercial parcels Multiple parcels along I-45 frontage road ~3,400 surface acres consisting of 7 parcels for commercial and residential development Webster Conroe
N Y S E : D N R 35
2019 Proved Reserves
Oil il (M (MMBbl) Gas as (B (Bcf cf) Tot
- tal
(M (MMBOE) PV PV-10 10 Valu alue(2) (B (Bil illion) SE SEC Oil il Pric icing(1) Proved reserves(1) at December 31, 2018 255 43 262 $4.0 $65.56 2019 production (21) (3) (21) (0.6) Revisions due to price changes (13) (7) (14) (1.0) Other revisions 6 (9) 4 (0.2) Improved recovery 1 — 1 — Sales of minerals in place (2) — (2) — Accretion of discount — — — 0.4 Proved reserves(1) at December 31, 2019 226 24 230 $2.6 $55.69 PDP 182 79% PDNP 25 11% PUD 23 10% Total MMBOE 230 100%
No Note: e: See “Slide Notes” on slide 43 of this presentation for footnote explanations.
N Y S E : D N R 36
Lowest Spend Among Peers as a Percent of Revenue
20% 54% 24% 43% 60% 50% 50% 53% 57% 62% 70% 67% 65% 65% 75% 39% 10% 39% 16% 18% 21% 17% 22% 17% 11% 9% 13% 16% 14% 13% 5% 4% 13% 10% 7% 8% 9% 8% 9% 12% 8% 8% 7% 8% 9% 11% 13% 7% 17% 6% 11% 16% 8% 11% 10% 9% 9% 10% 17% 10%
75% 81% 83% 87% 90% 90% 91% 92% 93% 95% 96% 97% 98% 105% 108% DNR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer Avg Peer H Peer I Peer J Peer K Peer L Peer M
FY19 Operating & Capital Spend as % of Oil & Gas Revenue Spend as % of Revenue
Source: Company filings for the year to date fourth quarter ended 12/31/2019. Peers include CLR, CRC, CRZO, CXO, LPI, MUR, MTDR, OAS, PDCE, PE, PXD, SM, WLL, and WPX. *Amounts may not foot due to rounding.
Capex LOE G&A
- Prod. Taxes & Transp.
N Y S E : D N R 37
Commitments & borrowing base
▪ Borrowing Base / Commitment level: $615 million ▪ Lender group comprised of 14 banks with largest individual commitment representing
~11% of the total Scheduled redeterminations
▪ Semiannually – May 1st and November 1st
Maturity date
▪ December 9, 2021, subject to springing maturities beginning in February 2021
Permitted subordinated debt repurchases
▪ Up to $89 million of subordinated debt repurchases –
~$12 million of repurchases permitted as of 2/28/19
–
Additional ~$77 million of repurchases permitted when deleveraging or when total leverage ratio is below 4x after giving effect to such repurchases Junior lien debt
▪ Up to $1.65 billion of junior lien debt (subject to customary requirements) (~$27 million
remaining as of 2/28/20) Anti-hoarding provisions
▪ If > $250 million borrowed, unrestricted cash held in accounts is limited to $225 million
Pricing grid
Covenants
▪ Total Debt / EBITDAX: < 5.25x with step down to < 4.5x at 3/31/2021 ▪ Senior Secured Debt(1) / EBITDAX: < 2.50x ▪ Interest Coverage Ratio: > 1.25x ▪ Current Ratio: > 1.00x
1) Based solely on bank debt.
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Info
Level Borrowing Base Utilization Libor margin (bps) ABR margin (bps) Undrawn pricing (bps) V > 90.0% 375.0 275.0 50.0 IV < 90.0% 350.0 250.0 50.0 III < 75.0% 325.0 225.0 50.0 II < 50.0% 300.0 200.0 50.0 I < 25.0% 275.0 175.0 50.0
N Y S E : D N R 38
Production by Area
Field 2017 2017 2018 2018 1Q 1Q19 19 2Q 2Q19 19 3Q 3Q19 19 4Q 4Q19 19 2019 2019 Delhi 4,869 4,368 4,474 4,486 4,256 4,085 4,324 Hastings 4,830 5,596 5,539 5,466 5,513 5,097 5,403 Heidelberg 4,851 4,355 3,987 4,082 4,297 4,409 4,195 Oyster Bayou 5,007 4,843 4,740 4,394 3,995 4,261 4,345 Tinsley 6,430 5,530 4,659 4,891 4,541 4,343 4,608 Bell Creek 3,313 4,113 4,650 5,951 4,686 5,618 5,228 Salt Creek 1,115 2,109 2,057 2,078 2,213 2,223 2,143 West Yellow Creek 13 205 436 586 728 807 640 Mature area(1) and other 7,078 6,709 6,531 6,489 6,473 6,407 6,475 Total tertiary production 37,506 37,828 37,073 38,423 36,702 37,250 37,361 Gulf Coast non-tertiary(2) 5,555 5,519 5,389 5,274 5,147 5,339 5,286 Cedar Creek Anticline 14,754 14,837 14,987 14,311 13,354 13,730 14,090 Other Rockies non-tertiary 1,537 1,431 1,313 1,305 1,238 1,192 1,262 Total non-tertiary production 21,846 21,787 21,689 20,890 19,739 20,261 20,638 Total continuing production 59,352 59,615 58,762 59,313 56,441 57,511 57,999 Property divestitures(3) 946 726 456 406 — — 214 Total production 60,298 60,341 59,218 59,719 56,441 57,511 58,213
1) Mature area includes Brookhaven, Cranfield, Eucutta, Little Creek, Mallalieu, Martinville, McComb, and Soso fields. 2) Includes non-tertiary production related to the sale of half of our nearly 100% working interests in Webster, Thompson, Manvel, and East Hastings fields, which is expected to close in March 2020 and averaged 1,170 BOE/d and 1,085 BOE/d for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019. 3) Includes production from Citronelle Field sold in July 2019 and Lockhart Crossing Field sold in the third quarter of 2018.
Average Daily Production (BOE/d)
N Y S E : D N R 39
NYMEX Oil Differential Summary
Crude Oil Differentials
$ per barrel 2017 2018 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 2019 Tertiary Oil Fields Gulf Coast Region $0.06 $2.73 $4.07 $4.66 $2.88 $0.60 $3.07 Rocky Mountain Region (0.96) (1.81) (2.01) (1.36) (2.78) (3.05) (2.18) Gulf Coast Non-Tertiary 1.26 4.28 5.45 6.06 4.69 2.79 4.77 Cedar Creek Anticline (1.43) (1.30) (2.69) (1.43) (0.91) (1.98) (1.78) Other Rockies Non-Tertiary (2.72) (2.87) (4.80) (3.48) (3.92) (5.30) (4.35) De Denbury tot
- tals
ls ($0 ($0.32) $1.30 $1.63 $2.35 $1.30 ($0 ($0.44) $1.23
During 4Q19, ~60% of our crude oil was exposed to Gulf Coast premium pricing
N Y S E : D N R 40
Analysis of Total Operating Costs
$ per BOE 2017 2018 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 2019 CO2 Costs $2.86 $3.07 $3.90 $2.81 $2.51 $2.98 $3.05 Power & Fuel 5.97 6.32 6.70 6.11 6.25 6.32 6.34 Labor & Overhead 6.32 6.61 6.71 6.95 7.57 7.22 7.11 Repairs & Maintenance 0.84 0.91 1.00 1.06 1.04 0.86 0.99 Chemicals 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.04 1.12 0.92 1.04 Workovers 2.44 2.96 2.94 2.43 2.71 2.17 2.57 Other 1.06 1.31 1.20 1.30 1.50 1.46 1.36 Total Normalized LOE(1) $20.53 $22.24 $23.53 $21.70 $22.70 $21.93 $22.46 Special or Unusual Items(2) (0.18) — — — — — — Total LOE $20.35 $22.24 $23.53 $21.70 $22.70 $21.93 $22.46 Oil Pricing NYMEX Oil Price $50.96 $64.81 $54.87 $59.87 $56.34 $57.02 $57.03 Realized Oil Price(3) $50.64 $66.11 $56.50 $62.22 $57.64 $56.58 $58.26
1) Normalized LOE excludes special
- r unusual items (see footnote 2
below). 2) Special or unusual items consist
- f cleanup and repair costs
associated with Hurricane Harvey ($3MM) offset by an adjustment for pricing related to
- ne of our industrial CO2 sources
($7MM) in 2017. 3) Excludes derivative settlements.
Total Operating Costs
N Y S E : D N R 41
CO2 Cost & NYMEX Oil Price
1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 Industrial-Sourced CO2 % 18% 22% 22% 23% 23% 25% 22% 22% 26% 24% 25% 28% 29% 34% 29% 28% 26% 25% 23% 25% Tax 0.025 0.038 0.045 0.040 0.047 0.053 0.052 0.048 0.045 0.040 0.041 0.042 0.043 0.046 0.047 0.041 0.041 0.045 0.05 0.04 Purchases 0.171 0.183 0.169 0.161 0.163 0.233 0.215 0.184 0.222 0.200 0.207 0.073 0.185 0.216 0.190 0.172 0.179 0.153 0.19 0.18 OPEX 0.120 0.148 0.131 0.185 0.124 0.144 0.138 0.160 0.142 0.140 0.209 0.166 0.167 0.183 0.171 0.210 0.171 0.132 0.12 0.12 NYMEX Crude Oil 48.83 57.99 46.70 42.15 33.73 45.56 45.02 49.25 51.95 48.32 48.12 55.48 62.96 67.85 69.60 58.81 54.87 59.87 56.34 57.02
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 $0.50 NYM YMEX Crude Oil il Pric ice / Bbl CO CO2 Cos
- sts / Mcf
cf (1)
1) Excludes DD&A on CO2 wells and facilities; includes Gulf Coast & Rocky Mountain industrial-source CO2 costs. 2) CO2 costs include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome in 3Q17 and 4Q15 of $3 million ($0.08 per Mcf) and $3 million ($0.05 per Mcf), respectively, and a downward adjustment in 4Q17 for pricing related to one of our industrial CO2 sources of $7 million ($0.12 per Mcf).
OPEX Purchases Tax NYMEX Crude Oil Price Industrial-Sourced CO2 %
(2) (2) (2)
N Y S E : D N R 42
Rec econciliation of
- f ne
net inc income (loss (loss) (GA (GAAP mea easure) to
- adj
adjusted EBI EBITDAX (no (non-GAAP meas asure)
Adjusted EBITDAX is a non-GAAP financial measure which management uses and is calculated based upon (but not identical to) a financial covenant related to “Consolidated EBITDAX” in the Company’s senior secured bank credit facility, which excludes certain items that are included in net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial
- measure. Items excluded include interest, income taxes, depletion, depreciation, and amortization, and items that the Company believes affect the comparability of operating
results such as items whose timing and/or amount cannot be reasonably estimated or are non-recurring. Management believes Adjusted EBITDAX may be helpful to investors in
- rder to assess the Company’s operating performance as compared to that of other companies in its industry, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical
costs basis. It is also commonly used by third parties to assess leverage and the Company’s ability to incur and service debt and fund capital expenditures. Adjusted EBITDAX should not be considered in isolation, as a substitute for, or more meaningful than, net income, cash flow from operations, or any other measure reported in accordance with
- GAAP. Adjusted EBITDAX may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of another company because all companies may not calculate Adjusted EBITDAX, EBITDAX or EBITDA
in the same manner. 2018 2018 2019 2019 In millions Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q4 Q4 FY FY Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q4 Q4 FY FY Net Net inc ncom
- me (los
- ss) (GAAP me
meas asure) $40 $40 $30 $30 $78 $78 $174 $174 $323 $323 $( $(26) $147 $147 $73 $73 $23 $23 $217 $217 Adjustments to reconcile to Adjusted EBITDAX Interest expense 17 16 19 18 70 17 20 23 21 82 Income tax expense (benefit) 14 9 16 48 87 (11) 65 37 13 104 Depletion, depreciation, and amortization 52 53 51 60 216 57 58 55 63 234 Noncash fair value losses (gains) on commodity derivatives 15 41 (17) (236) (196) 92 (26) (35) 64 94 Stock-based compensation 3 3 4 3 12 3 4 3 3 12 Litigation accrual and loan receivable impairment — — — 67 67 — — Gain on debt extinguishment — — — — — — (100) (6) (50) (156) Severance-related expense — — — — — — — — 19 19 Noncash, non-recurring and other 1 1 (3) 7 5 6 1 (5) (1) 1 Adju djusted EB EBITDAX (non
- n-GAAP me
meas asure) $142 $142 $153 $153 $148 $148 $141 $141 $584 $584 $138 $138 $169 $169 $145 $145 $155 $155 $607 $607
Non-GAAP Measures (Cont.)
N Y S E : D N R 43
Non-GAAP Measures (Cont.)
Rec econciliation of
- f the stan
andardized mea easu sure of
- f disc
discounted es estimated futu future ne net cas ash flo flows s aft fter inc income taxes (GA (GAAP mea easu sure) to PV PV-10 10 Valu alue (no (non-GAAP mea easu sure)
PV-10 Value is a non-GAAP measure and is different from the Standardized Measure in that PV-10 Value is a pre-tax number and the Standardized Measure is an after-tax number. Denbury’s 2019 and 2018 year-end estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves and proved CO2 reserves quantities were prepared by the independent reservoir engineering firm of DeGolyer and MacNaughton. The information used to calculate PV-10 Value is derived directly from data determined in accordance with FASC Topic 932. Management believes PV-10 Value is a useful supplemental disclosure to the Standardized Measure because the Standardized Measure can be impacted by a company’s unique tax situation, and it is not practical to calculate the Standardized Measure on a property-by-property
- basis. Because of this, PV-10 Value is a widely used measure within the industry and is commonly used by securities analysts, banks and credit rating agencies to
evaluate the estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves on a comparative basis across companies or specific properties. PV-10 Value is commonly used by management and others in the industry to evaluate properties that are bought and sold, to assess the potential return on investment in the Company’s oil and natural gas properties, and to perform impairment testing of oil and natural gas properties. PV-10 Value is not a measure of financial or operating performance under GAAP, nor should it be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the Standardized Measure. PV-10 Value and the preliminary Standardized Measure do not purport to represent the fair value of the Company’s oil and natural gas reserves. December 31 31, In millions 2018 2018 2019 2019 Standardiz ized Meas asure (GAAP Meas asure) $3 $3,351 $2 $2,261 Discounted estimated future income tax 674 355 PV PV-10 Valu alue (Non
- n-GAAP Meas
asure) $4 $4,025 $2 $2,616