2019 LOCAL GREEN POWER ADVISORY COMMITTEE February 22, 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2019 local green power advisory committee
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2019 LOCAL GREEN POWER ADVISORY COMMITTEE February 22, 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2019 LOCAL GREEN POWER ADVISORY COMMITTEE February 22, 2019 MEETING AGENDA 9:00: Welcome, S afety Message & Introductions 9:25: Overall Advisory Committee Goals 9:40: Local Green Power (LGP)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

2019 LOCAL GREEN POWER ADVISORY COMMITTEE

February 22, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

MEETING AGENDA

9:00: Welcome, S afety Message & Introductions 9:25: Overall Advisory Committee Goals 9:40: Local Green Power (LGP) Advisory Committee 2016 & 2017 Recap 10:10: Break 10:25: Update to S

  • lar Economic Model

10:55: Design Factors Worksheet 11:25: Next S teps

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

SAFETY MESSAGE

  • Evacuat ion and S

evere Weat her Procedures

  • Wint er S

afet y Tips – S now S hoveling

  • Warm up
  • Push rather than lift
  • Choose your shovel wisely
  • Hit the pause button
  • Consider multiple trips
  • Keep up with the snowfall
  • Wear layers
  • S

tay hydrated

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

MEET DAN FAHRNER

Big Tempo, LLC Roles:

  • Guide discussion
  • Facilitate exercises
  • Encourage sharing
  • Maintain meeting flow

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

INTRODUCTIONS

  • Name
  • Organization

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OVERALL GOALS OF THE ADVISOR Y COMMITTEE

Cause # 45029 IURC Order:

Community Solar. IPL agrees to reconvene t he Local Green Power Advisory Committee for a minimum of two meetings within six months of receiving a Final Order in Cause No 45029 approving this S ettlement Agreement and will work in good faith with this Committee to develop a community solar pilot proposal within one year. The meetings with the Local Green Power Advisory Committee will be open to all interest ed stakeholders.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

OVERALL GOALS OF THE ADVISOR Y COMMITTEE

  • Leverage work from 2016 & 2017 LGP AC
  • Gather input from Advisory Committee
  • Develop goals and desired outcomes for a community solar

pilot proposal

  • Determine key parameters of community solar pilot proposal

Today:

  • Recap 2016 & 2017 Advisory Committee efforts
  • Gather input to develop draft pilot proposal options
  • Establish next steps

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ADVISOR Y COMMITTEE ROADMAP

Meeting #1

February 2019

  • Int roduct ions
  • AC Goals
  • 2016 & 2017 AC recap
  • Economic Model

Updat e

  • Input from AC

Meeting #2

April 2019

  • Review design fact ors

worksheet submissions from AC members

  • Review ot her

communit y solar programs

  • Discuss draft pilot

proposal opt ions

Meeting #3

TBD

Pilot proposal

End of November 2019 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LOCAL GREEN POWER (LGP) ADVISOR Y COMMITTEE 2016 & 2017 RECAP

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

LGP COMMITTEE –2016 & 2017 RECAP P ACKET

  • Please reference “ 2016-2017 LGP AC Recap Packet”

for further information on previous LGP AC work with IPL and stakeholders.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SHARED SOLAR SIMPL Y STA TED

S

  • urce: S
  • lar Elect ric Power Associat ion (S

EPA), Communit y S

  • lar Program Design Models

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

IPL ’S 2016 & 2017 LGP IDEAS

  • Local renewable resource
  • Volunt ary offering for all

cust omer classes

  • S

elf-sust aining subscript ion- based

  • IPL owned and operat ed –

compet it ively sourced

  • 1 MW proj ect size

(7 t o 10 acres per MW)

  • Cust omer t ransact ion based on

energy produced

  • May include “ anchor” corporat e

subscribers

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SOLAR LGP PROVIDES SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS

Customer Benefits

  • Addit ional cust omer

choice

  • Overcomes barrier t hat

many homes are not conducive for rooft op PV

  • All cust omers, not j ust

homeowners, may part icipat e

  • Lower capit al cost t han

dispersed small scale renewables (i.e. rooft op)

  • S
  • lar product ion is
  • pt imized

Utility Benefits

  • Proact ive approach t o

market disrupt ions

  • Posit ive cust omer and

communit y engagement

  • Cont rol power qualit y
  • Pot ent ial t o mit igat e

impact of fut ure CO2 regulat ions

  • Eases grid int egrat ion

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

REVIEW OF 2016 LGP AC MEETINGS

  • Focused on education of renewable costs,

benefits, challenges led to solar as likely option

  • Discussed Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
  • S

takeholders ranked top 5 KPIs:

Financial – cost of proj ect

Access & equity – affordable for all customers

Displacement of fossil fuels/ emission reductions

Number of subscribers

Customer satisfaction

  • Costs were prohibitive to move forward

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SEP A TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR MARKET RESEARCH

  • IPL successfully secured $20,000 of Community S
  • lar

Technical Assistance funding from S EP A* to support market research

  • The US

Department of Energy provides the funds to S EP A to administer

  • S

EP A supported:

Cust omer surveys for resident ial cust omers and small Commercial & Indust rial (C&I) cust omers

Three focus groups:

  • Residential customers who rent their homes
  • Residential homeowners
  • S

mall C&I customers

*S mart Electric Power Alliance

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

REVIEW OF 2017 LGP AC MEETINGS

16

  • Engaged LGP AC stakeholder group to collaborate on

market research – S

takeholders assisted with survey question development and participated in the viewing of customer focus groups

– IPL conducted interviews with C&I customers

  • IPL updated the illustrative solar economic model
  • Concluded with discussion on ideas to consider for

further details on important program design elements and research questions

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SEP A COMMUNITY SOLAR RESEARCH (1 OF 3)

  • (1) Online S

urveys

S ent electronically via S urvey Monkey to 84,000 customers

4,000 Residential Customers Completed the S urvey

37 S mall Business Customers Completed the S urvey

  • Key Findings

Interest: Customers have strong interest

Premium: Customers are less willing to pay a premium

Term: Commitment term is a barrier customers ranked

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SURVEY RESULTS

CUSTOMER INTEREST

How interested are you in learning more about participating in an IPL community solar program?

RESIDENTIAL SMALL BUSINESS

57% 20% 49% 15% 33% 4% 40% 4% 6% 76% 11% 81% 3% 0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % interested % interested & willing to pay premium % interested % interested & willing to pay premium Very Interested S

  • mewhat

Interested Not Interested Uncertain

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

SURVEY RESUL TS

KEY BARRIERS

RESIDENTIAL SMALL BUSINESS 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% May be located out of sight May require a long-t erm commit ment May not offer a long-term financial benefit May cost t oo much No effect S

  • mewhat discourage

Greatly discourage 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% May be located out of sight May require a long-t erm commit ment May not offer a long-term financial benefit May cost t oo much No effect S

  • mewhat discourage

Greatly discourage

How much would each of the following potential issues discourage you from participating in an IPL community solar program?

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

SURVEY RESUL TS

PREMIUM AMOUNT

Assuming your bill mirrors the average IPL residential customer bill of $100 a month, what is the highest additional amount you would be willing to pay to power your home with solar energy?

0% 10% 20% 30% $1 to $5 more $5 to $10 more $10 to $15 more $15 to $20 more $20 to $25 more More than $25 Not willing to pay more

RESIDENTIAL

Sample Average Bill $115 Sample Median Bill $100 Sample Range $20 to $400

SMALL BUSINESS

Sample Average Bill $1,180 Sample Median Bill $500 Sample Range $50 to $20,000

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% $1 t o $20 more $20 to $40 more $40 to $60 more $60 to $80 more $80 to $100 more Not willing t o pay more

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SURVEY RESULTS

CONTRACT LENGTH

RESIDENTIAL SMALL BUSINESS

… … what is the maximum length of time to which you would be willing to commit?

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SEP A COMMUNITY SOLAR RESEARCH (2 OF 3)

  • (2) Focus Groups

Group 1: 10 S mall Businesses

Group 2: 12 Homeowners

Group 3: 12 Renters

  • Key Findings

Interest: Interest in solar is primarily driven by saving money, followed at a distance by environmental concerns.

Premium: Customers were fairly split between interest in paying more and locking in a rate vs paying a bit less.

Term: Two to three year program terms were deal breakers for many of the participants.

Location: For the most part, customers were not concerned where the solar facility would be located.

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

SEP A COMMUNITY SOLAR RESEARCH (3 OF 3)

  • (3) C&I Customer Interviews

Completed five (5) interviews

IPL customers from across different industries

  • Key Findings

Interest: Most interviewed customers have explored investing in on-site solar energy in the past, but did not proceed due to cost.

Premium: Paying a premium can be a non-starter... Unless the

  • rganization has a history or value of investing in sustainability.

Drivers: Beyond cost, achieving sustainability goals and Public Relations value are the main drivers in solar adoption.

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

BIG TAKEA WA YS FROM RECAP

  • Interest across all customer classes
  • Location & visibility
  • Willingness to pay barrier

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

15 MINUTE BREAK

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

UPDA TE TO SOLAR ECONOMIC MODEL

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

ECONOMIC ANAL YSIS OVERVIEW

  • Update 2017 model with current data
  • Understand maj or drivers on local green

power premium rate

  • Gain a high level understanding of the model
  • Gather feedback on economic analysis

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

UPDA TED MODEL ASSUMPTIONS

28

ITEM PROJECT COSTS Size of Solar PV System 1 MW 1 MW Capacity Factor 18 % 18 % Capital Cost of Solar $1.91 $/W - AC $1.60 $/W - AC Useful Life (Depreciation) 25 Years 25 Years Development Capital Costs 10 % 10 % Federal Tax Credit 30 % 30 % IPL WACC & PV Discount Rate 6.41 % 6.59 % Annual O&M $0.02 per watt $0.02 per watt O&M Escalation 2.46 % 2.00 % Annual Degradation 0.5 % 0.5 % PROJECT CREDITS Avoided Energy Cost (Fuel) $0.03150 $/kWh $0.03290 $/kWh Avoided Energy Cost (Non-Fuel) $0.00150 $/kWh $0.00183 $/kWh Avoided Capacity Cost (Reserve Margin) 7 % 7.9 % Avoided Capacity Cost Ranging from ~$96 in 2020 to ~$125 in 2029 $/kW-yr Ranging from ~$38 in 2020 to ~$108 in 2029 $/kW-yr Avoided Capacity Credit (Peak Reduction) 47 % 50 % Avoided Long-Term Distribution Capital Costs $0.001 $/kWh $0.001 $/kWh Avoided T&D Losses 1.80 % 1.80 % 2019 2017

slide-29
SLIDE 29

COST OF SOLAR CONTINUES TO DECLINE

29

Commercial-Scale (300 kW) Utility-Scale (100 MW) Model Assumption

slide-30
SLIDE 30

UPDA TED POTENTIAL SOLAR COSTS & CREDITS

$12 $10 $8 $6 $5 $4 $3 $3 $2 $1 $17 $19 $21 $23 $24 $25 $26 $26 $27 $28 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

Cost of Proj ect Lowered by Avoided Costs Premium estimated to be $1-12/ month

Net Cost to Customer Avoided Costs (Production-Based Bill Credit ) 30

**The analysis presented is a snapshot in time and is for discussion purposes ONLY and not intended for a regulatory filing.

Levelized 25-year cost is ~ $29/ mont h for a 2.5 kW block subscript ion

slide-31
SLIDE 31

UPDA TED POTENTIAL SOLAR COSTS & CREDITS

Proj ect Cost 2020 Avoided Cost s (Bill Credit ) 2029 Avoided Cost s (Bill Credit )

Cost of Proj ect Lowered by Avoided Costs Premium estimated to be $1-12/ month

Depreciation Return

Long-Term Dist ribut ion Capit al Cost Energy Cost : Non-Fuel Energy Cost : Fuel Capacit y Cost : Reserve Margin Energy Cost : Fuel

31

**The analysis presented is a snapshot in time and is for discussion purposes ONLY and not intended for a regulatory filing. $29/ month $(17/ month) $(28/ month) O&M

Dist ribut ion Losses Capacit y Cost : Peak Reduct ion Capacit y Cost : Peak Reduct ion

slide-32
SLIDE 32

DESIGN FACTORS WORKSHEET

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

COMMUNITY SOLAR DESIGN FACTORS

Design Factor Description S ubscription How subscribers participate in the program.

  • Customers subscribe to a portion of the facility based on a

fixed monthly ($/ block/ month) or variable ($/ kWh) payment

  • Most appropriate block size (2.5 kW)

Customer Monthly Credit Credits that are generated for the solar energy produced by a subscriber’s assigned portion of the solar facility each month.

  • Net result is that the credits lower the community solar

premium

  • What credits should be included?
  • How often are credits updated to reflect actual costs?

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

COMMUNITY SOLAR DESIGN FACTORS

34

Design Factor Description Eligible Customers Criteria to be a subscriber in the program.

  • Open to all customer classes?

Customer Participation Limit The amount of a customer’s average usage that can be subscribed through the program.

  • 10%

, 25% , 50%

  • r 100%
  • f average usage
  • Participating limits are implemented to ensure that multiple

subscribers can benefit from the program Minimum Term Identifies a minimum contract length for the subscriber.

  • S

hort vs long term contracts S ubscription Transfers S ubscription management if a customer moves out of the service territory.

  • Utility management or customer responsibility
  • How best to manage unsubscribed blocks
slide-35
SLIDE 35

COMMUNITY SOLAR DESIGN FACTORS

35

Design Factor Description Unsubscribed Blocks Treatment of unsubscribed blocks in the program.

  • Who covers the costs?

Ownership Who will own the solar facility?

  • Utility, Third-Party, S

hared Ownership S ystem S ize How large of a facility to build for a pilot proj ect?

  • S

ize to fully subscribe Location of S

  • lar Array

Where should the S

  • lar Facility be located?
  • Criteria may include visibility, brownfield revitalization, existing

utility land, lowest cost, expansion ability, etc. Program Length The amount of time a subscriber can receive benefits from the program.

  • This is a commitment by the proj ect administrator to the

subscriber, not the other way around.

  • Based on asset life (25 years)
slide-36
SLIDE 36

NEXT STEPS

  • Review and complet e Design Fact ors Worksheet

– Responses can be sent t o ipl.csp@

aes.com

– Due by March 8th

  • Next meet ing: April 22nd

– Review AC responses – Review other community solar programs – Discuss draft pilot proposal options

Questions

36