2018 2018 Opinion Survey 1 ., Project Management a Sarasota - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2018
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2018 2018 Opinion Survey 1 ., Project Management a Sarasota - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

~1 Sarasota County Citizen 2018 2018 Opinion Survey 1 ., Project Management a Sarasota County Communications Department a ch St rn t gy l i\r a k ti ng Re Project Liaison to Data Collection, Project Direction & Sarasota County


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2018

~1

Sarasota County

2018

.,

Citizen Opinion Survey

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

a

Sarasota County

Re a ch Strnt gy li\ra k ti ng

Project Management

Communications Department

Project Direction & Questionnaire Input Project Liaison to Sarasota County Data Collection, Analysis, Reporting & Presentation in Conjunction with FIOG

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purpose

Support data-driven decision-making Gauge “temperature” of constituents Track changes

  • ver time in

citizen sentiments Incorporate new

  • r timely topics
  • f relevance

Big p pict cture re: : Provide benchmarks and trending data

  • n how citizens perceive the job Sarasota County is doing

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methodology

  • Random telephonic survey of Saras

asota C County ty r residents ts

  • 800 c

0 complet eted i ed interview ews s of residents age 18+

  • Conducted between Jun

une 25 t e 25 to

  • Jul

uly 17, 17, 201 2018 8

  • Margin of error: ±3.5%

5%

  • Average completion time: 9.8 m

8 minut utes es

  • Repres

esen entative s e sampl ple b based o ed on n demographi phics cs a and g d geographi phic l location n

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2018

Quality of Life County Engagement

Survey Topics

Sarasota in the Future County Budget

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Study Additions

  • When rating the level of trust between Sarasota County residents and the government,

the option of “your c r city g governm rnment t leade ders” was added.

  • Rather than asking why one contacted the County, in 2018 the question asked what

dep epartment or

  • r of
  • ffic

ice w e was s specif ific icall lly c con

  • ntacted.
  • New items that affect their quality of life in Sarasota County: road &

d & inf nfrastruc ructur ure e maintenance, , traffic ic f flow, s ser ervices s for

  • r a

aging p pop

  • pula

lation, a and d ser ervices f for

  • r the h

e hom

  • meless.
  • New option for the single biggest thing that can contribute to the growth of Sarasota

County’s economy: wor

  • rkforce

e train ining or

  • r re-traini

ning ng.

  • Awareness that “rainy day” general fund res

eserves a are e bein eing s spen ent t to

  • maintain

in s ser ervice e lev evel els.

  • Respondents were posed a solution to replenishing that fund (a mini

nimal pr prope perty y tax x increase—$20 on average).

  • Respondents unwilling to support could offer feedback as to what should happen and to

pr provide ide s spe pecific ic example ples s of what could be done to create new revenue sources or to reduce service levels.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Quality of Life Content

  • Overall Satisfaction with Quality of Life
  • Satisfaction Trend Over Time
  • Most Important Issues Facing the

County

  • Biggest Stress on Household Finances
  • Important Issues for the County to

Work On

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Overall Quality of Life

How Would You Rate the Overall Quality of Life in Sarasota County?

60%

52% 0% 3% 45%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Poor Fair Good Excellent

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Trending Quality of Life

How Would You Rate the Overall Quality of Life in Sarasota County?

100% 90% 80% 70%

52% 45%

40% 50% 60% 30% 20%

0% 3%

0% 10% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

DK/NA/Refused Poor Fair Good Excellent

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Most Important Issue Facing County

In Your Opinion, What is the Most Important Issue Facing Sarasota County Today?

Population Growth/New Development Crime Traffic/Transportation Economy/Jobs Government and Elected Officials Stormwater/Drainage/Flooding Health Care Affordable Housing Public Schools Homelessness Water Taxes Diversity Government Overregulation (Environmental Standards, Zoning) Ethics of Public Officials Negative Business Climate (Permitting, Licensing) Drugs/Substance Abuse Government Contracting Senior Services Quality of our Waterways Racial Concerns Neighborhood Deterioration Energy Cost (Gas, Electric) Climate Change/Global Warming Election Hurricanes Youth Services Insurance There are No Serious Problems DK/NA/Refused Other

24% 10% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 19% 2% 0% 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Most Important Issue Facing County (cont’d)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Population Growth/New Population Growth/New Population Growth/New Population Growth/New Population Growth/New Development Development Development Development Development (21%) (27%) (28%) (23%) (24%) Traffic/ Transportation (12%) Homelessness (10%) Economy/Jobs (7%) Taxes (8%) Crime (10%) Public Schools (11%) Economy/Jobs (6%) Homelessness (6%) Crime (5%) Traffic/Transportation (5%) Economy/Jobs Economy/Jobs (7%) Traffic/ Transportation (6%) Traffic/ Transportation (6%) (5%) Economy/Jobs (4%) Homelessness (5%) There are No Serious Problems (16%) There are No Serious Problems (17%) There are No Serious Problems (13%) There are No Serious Problems (15%) There are No Serious Problems (19%) 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • I
  • Biggest Stress on Household Finances

What Would You Say is Putting the Greatest Stress on Your Own Household’s Finances Right Now?

Household Finances Health Care Costs Home Insurance Personal Debt (Loan Repayments, Mortgage, Credit Cards, etc. Child-Rasing Costs (Day Care, Tuition, Clothes, etc.) Property Taxes Rising Rental Rates Taxes in General Gas Prices Prescription Drugs Home Foreclosure (Possibility of; Already Happened) Elder Care Costs Employment/Jobs Investment Portfolio Shrinkage Alimony; Child Support Car Payments None of the Above -- No Stresses Being Felt DK/NA Other 6% 6% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 18% 36% 1% 1%

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Biggest Stress on Household Finances (cont’d)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Property Taxes (8%) Household Finances (11%) Household Finances (19%) Household Finances (15%) Household Finances (18%) Gas Prices (8%) Personal Debt (loans, mortgages, etc.) (7%) Property Taxes (7%) Property Taxes (12%) Property Taxes (10%) Health Care Costs (6%) Taxes in General 7%) Home Insurance (6%) Employment/Jobs Personal Debt (loans, mortgages, etc.) Taxes in General Health Care Costs Child-Raising Costs (5%) (6%) (5%) (7%) (8%) Personal Debt (5%) Employment/Jobs Property Taxes (4%) (4%) Home Insurance (5%) Gas Prices (4%) Health Care Costs (5%) Taxes in General (7%) Rising Rental Rates (4%) Home Insurance Taxes in General (4%) (4%) No Stresses Being Felt No Stresses Being Felt No Stresses Being Felt No Stresses Being Felt No Stresses Being Felt (36%) (48%) (34%) (31%) (36%) 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Important Issues for County

Issues Affecting Quality of Life in Sarasota County

Services for Aging Population Availability of Good-Paying Jobs Public Safety Services for the Homeless 28% 21% 26% 30% 25% 34% 30% 29% 46% 45% 44% 42% Availability of Affordable Workforce Housing Traffic Flow Effective Growth Management Policies Efficient Energy Consumption Environmental Quality Such as Air and Water Road & Infrastructure Maintenance 22% 37% 41% 22% 44% 35% 24% 47% 29% 29% 51% 20% 30% 55% 15% 27% 59% 14%

Less Important Important Most Important

Transportation Parks & Recreation 26% 63% 11% 49% 45% 5% Arts & Cultural Diversity 58% 38% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Important Issues for County (cont’d)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Availability of Good-Paying Jobs (61%) Availability of Good-Paying Jobs (65%) Availability of Good-Paying Jobs (76%) Effective Growth Management Policies (54%) Services for Aging Population (46%) Public Safety (59%) Public Safety (57%) Public Safety (65%) Environmental Quality Such as Air and Water (50%) Availability of Good-Paying Jobs (45%) Environmental Quality Such as Air and Water (55%) Availability of Affordable Housing (53%) Effective Growth Management Policies (64%) Efficient Energy Consumption (46%) Public Safety (44%) Availability of Affordable Housing (47%) Environmental Quality Such as Air and Water (49%) Availability of Affordable Workforce Housing (62%) Availability of Good-Paying Jobs (45%) Services for the Homeless (42%) Efficient Energy Consumption (46%) Effective Growth Management Policies (45%) Transportation (61%) Availability of Affordable Workforce Housing (43%) Availability of Affordable Workforce Housing (41%) 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ffl

+

......

+

~

I·•

  • 1

II

Summary Infographic: Quality of Life

97 97%

% describe their overall quality of life as either ex

excellent ( (45%) ) or go good ( (52%) )

Most Important Issues Facing the County:

Population Growth/Development Crime Traffic Economy/Jobs

Approximately 1 in 5 (19 19%) Do Not Believe there are Serious Problems

Top Five Stressors: :

General Household Finances Health Care Costs Home Insurance Personal Debt Child-Raising Costs

36 36%

% say No Stressors

are Being Felt

Priorities for the County Expressed at Highest Levels:

Services for Aging Population Availability of Good-Paying Jobs Public Safety Services for the Homeless Availability of Affordable Workforce Housing

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

County Engagement Content

  • Overall Satisfaction With Services

Provided by County

  • Trust in Government to Do What is Right

for Sarasota County Residents

  • Federal
  • State
  • County
  • City
  • Past Year Contact with County
  • Respect, Accuracy, Timeliness of County

Interactions

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Satisfaction with Services Provided

Rate Your Level of Satisfaction with Most of the Many Services Provided by Sarasota County Government Today, Excluding the School Board.

60%

49%

50%

47%

40% 30% 20% 10%

3% 1% 0%

0%

DK/NA/Refused Very Dissatisfied Somewhat Dissatisfied Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Satisfaction with Services Provided Trend

Rate Your Level of Satisfaction with Most of the Many Services Provided by Sarasota County Government Today, Excluding the School Board.

80%

49%

47%

20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Somewhat Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied DK/NA/Refused

10%

3% 1%

0%

0%

1998 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Trust in Government

Level of Trust in Government Leaders

1% 23% 33% 40% 2% Federal Government 1% 6% 42% 47% 5% State Government 2% 3% 46% 43% 7% Sarasota County Government Your City Government* 8% 2% 43% 43% 3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

DK/NA Never Some of the Time Most of the Time Almost Always

*Base of residents living in a City within Sarasota County

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Trust in Government Trend

Trend: Trust in Sarasota County Government Leaders: 2012 - 2018

2018 2% 3% 46% 43% 7% 2017 1% 2% 39% 53% 6% 2016 4% 4% 32% 53% 7% 2015 3% 6% 40% 45% 6% 2014 5% 11% 37% 39% 8% 2013 21% 10% 38% 28% 4% 2012 17% 9% 40% 31% 4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

DK/NA Never Some of the Time Most of the Time Almost Always

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • I

County Contact

Over the Past Year, Have You Contacted any County Office or Official for Service or to Get Information?

40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15%

14%

10% 5% 0%

Base: Those who Contacted the County What Office or Department Did you Contact?

Utilities (Water) Contact Center (941-861-5000) Building Inspections Permitting Health Department Public Works Parks Libraries Human Resources Other

1% 2% 2% 5% 10% 20% 19% 13% 13% 16%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2007 2009 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Evaluation of County Contact

In Your Interactions With the County, Were You ...?

100%

93%

0% 1% 2% 7% 9% 10%

90% 89%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% DK/NA No Yes Treated with Respect Given Correct Information Helped in a Timely Fashion

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Evaluation of County Contact Trend

93% 90% 89% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Experiences in Contacting County Offices/Officials

50% 40%

Treated with Respect Given Correct Information Helped in a Timely Fashion

30% 20% 10% 0% 1998 1999 2000 2009 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

i

t

I

Summary Infographic: Engagement

96%

Satisfied Very Satisfied

40% 49%

Satisfaction with County Services Trust in Sarasota County Government Satisfaction with County Outreach 1 1 in n 10 10 Contacted County (14 14%)

93 93%

% Respectful Support

90 90%

% Accurate Support

89 89%

% Timely Support

(Almost Always/Most of the Time/Some of the Time) Almost Always

6%

%

7%

% 2018

Most of the Time 53

53%

%

43 43%

% 2018

Some of the Time 39

39%

%

46 46%

% 2018

96 96%

%

SC govt.

93 93%

%

State

86 86%

%

City

76 76%

%

Federal

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Sarasota in the Future Content

  • Single Biggest Factor to Contribute to

County’s Economic Growth

  • Single Biggest Threat to Sarasota

County’s Economy

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • I

Biggest Contributor to County’s Economic Growth

What do You Think is the Single Biggest Thing that Can Contribute to the Growth of Sarasota County’s Economy?

Workforce Training or Re-Training

21%

Manufacturing

14%

Workforce Housing

14%

Ecotourism

13%

Sports Tourism

9%

Transportation

8%

Health and Wellness

7%

Commercial Development

6%

Retail

4%

Arts and Culture

3%

Residential Construction

2%

DK

1%

Other

0%

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Biggest Contributor to Growth Trend

2015 2016 2017 2018

Ecotourism (15%) Manufacturing (18%) Manufacturing (23%) Workforce Training or Re-Training (21%) Arts and Culture (12%) Transportation (14%) Ecotourism (12%) Manufacturing (14%) Sports Tourism (12%) Commercial Development (12%) Health and Wellness (12%) Workforce Housing (14%) Commercial Development (11%) Health and Wellness (11%) Transportation (12%) Ecotourism (13%) Manufacturing (11%) Ecotourism (10%) Arts and Culture (10%) Sports Tourism (9%) Health and Wellness (9%) Workforce Housing (9%) Workforce Housing (10%) Transportation (8%) 28

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Biggest Threat to County’s Economic Growth

What do You Think is the Single Biggest Threat to Sarasota County’s Economy?

Lack of Industry and Jobs Traffic Congestion Government Waste and Inefficiency People and Industry Leaving the County Property Tax Rates Deterioration of the Environment (Water, Air) DK/NA Other 4% 12% 4% 5% 7% 13% 18% 37%

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Biggest Threat to Growth Trend

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Loss/Lack of Jobs/Industry Loss/Lack of Jobs/Industry Traffic Congestion Traffic Congestion Lack of Industry and Jobs (43%) (49%) (28%) (33%) (37%) Government Waste and Inefficiency (17%) Government Waste and Inefficiency (14%) Loss/Lack of Jobs/Industry (26%) Lack of Industry and Jobs (22%) Traffic Congestion (18%) Property Tax Rates (12%) Deterioration of the Environment (10%) Property Tax Rates (13%) Property Tax Rates (15%) Government Waste and Inefficiency (13%) Deterioration of the Environment (7%) Property Tax Rates Government Waste and Inefficiency Government Waste and Inefficiency (9%) People and Industry Leaving the County (7%) People and Industry Leaving the State (7%) (9%) (11%) People and Industry Leaving the County (9%) Other—growth & in-migration, lack of housing (6%) People and Industry Leaving the State (8%) People and Industry Leaving the County (8%) Deterioration of the Environment (7%) Property Tax Rates (5%) 30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

e)

)G

  • Oo

~-·

I

  • ~

~

  • Summary Infographic: Sarasota in the Future

7 in 10 (71%)

Consider Top Contributors for Growth

  • f SC Economy to be one of following:

Workforce Training/Retraining Manufacturing Workforce Housing Ecotourism Sports Tourism

8 in 10 (80%)

Consider Top Threats to SC Economy to be one of following:

Lack of Industry/Jobs Traffic Congestion Government Waste/Inefficiency People and Industry Leaving County

$ Property Tax Rates

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Sarasota County Budget Content

  • Spending Priorities
  • Reprioritization Perceptions
  • General Fund Awareness
  • Property Tax Proposal
  • General Fund Replenishment

Recommendations

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Spending Priorities

Which View Comes Closest to Your Own Regarding the Spending Priorities of Sarasota County Government?

47% 33% 20%

Believe Spending Priorities are About Right Believe County Needs to Reprioritize its Budget DK/NA

Base: “Reprioritize” Respondents Is the Problem that the County Spends too Much on Certain Things or Doesn’t Spend Enough on Certain Things or Both?

15% 61% 5% 19%

Spends Too Much on Certain Things Doesn't Spend Enough

  • n Certain Things

DK/NA Both

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Spending Priorities Trend

Which View Comes Closest to Your Own Regarding the Spending Priorities of Sarasota County Government?

60% 50%

47%

40%

33%

30% 20%

20%

10% 0% 2003 2004 2005 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Believe Spending Priorities are About Right Believe County Needs to Reprioritize its Budget DK/NA

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Spending Priorities Trend (cont’d)

Base: Those who Said the County Needs to Reprioritize its Budget Is the Problem That the County Spends Too Much on Certain Things or Doesn’t Spend Enough on Certain Things or Both? 80% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

15% 61% 19% 5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Spends Too Much on Certain Things Doesn't Spend Enough on Certain Things Both DK/NA 35

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • General Fund Awareness

Are You Aware That the County has Been Spending its “Rainy Day" General Fund Reserves in Order to Maintain Service Levels?

35% 65%

Yes No

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • General Fund Replenishment

To Begin Replenishing General Fund Reserves and Maintain Service at Current Level Would you be Willing to Pay a Minimal Property Tax Increase of Approximately $20 to the Average Homeowner? 70% 20% 10%

Yes No DK/NA/Refused

Base: Unsupportive of Tax Increase Which Would You Like to See the County Enact?

Introduce New Revenue Sources

35%

Reduced Service Levels

30%

Both

24%

DK/NA/Refused

11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • Resource Allocation to Services that Affect County Budget

Expenditures that Affect the County Budget

Health Care 27% 37% 37% Public Safety Economic Development Homelessness Existing Infrastructure Beaches Public Transportation/Traffic Congestion Water and Drainage Road Resurfacing Parks and Preserves 26% 38% 36% 20% 48% 32% 30% 47% 23% 27% 53% 20% 51% 30% 19% 28% 57% 16% 30% 58% 12%

Less Important Important Most Important

28% 63% 9% 55% 38% 6% Libraries 60% 36% 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Resource Allocation to Services that Affect County Budget

2015 2016 2017 2018

Homelessness (63%) Health Care (71%) Public Transportation/ Traffic Congestion (54%) Health Care (37%) Health Care (54%) Public Transportation/ Traffic Congestion (69%) Health Care (47%) Public Safety (36%) Public Safety Public Safety Economic Development Economic Development (47%) (61%) (43%) (32%) Public Transportation/ Traffic Congestion (45%) Homelessness (58%) Existing Infrastructure (36%) Homelessness (23%) Economic Development Economic Development Public Safety Existing Infrastructure (44%) (52%) (36%) (20%) 39

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • t

J

11

V

X

Summary Infographic: Budget

Spending

33% 20% 47%

61 61%

%

Not Spending Enough

15%

Spending Too Much

19%

Spending Needs to be Combination Prioritized

  • f Both

DK

5%

Spending About Right ? Don’t Know

Rainy Day Fund

Reported Being Aware County Spending

35% Reserves to Maintain Service Levels

Replenishing the General Fund

Support a Minimal Property Tax Increase to

70%

Replenish Funds

Those Unsupportive:

$ 35% Introduce New Revenue Sources

30% Reduce Service Levels

+ 24% Both

? 11% DK

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • ..
  • 36%

Summary Infographic: Budget (cont’d)

Resource Allocation of Services that Affect County Budget

Responses condensed into three categories:

1

Most Important

2

Important

3

Less Important The top three resources ranked as Most Important for the County to be reprioritizing in the budget (10 on a 10-point scale) are:

32% 37%

Health Care Public Safety Economic Development Important combines those that received a 7, 8, or 9 on a 10-point scale; those of highest importance are:

63% 58% 57%

Road Resurfacing Water and Drainage Public Transportation/Traffic Congestion If an item is “Less Important” on a 10-point scale, the responses were 1 – 6 or don’t know. The least important services are:

55% 60% 51%

Libraries Parks and Preserves Beaches

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Citizen Opinion Survey Summary

  • Quality of life satisfaction held at strong levels
  • Satisfaction with county services held at strong levels with

growth in “very satisfied”

  • An increasing share view “no serious problems” in the County
  • An increasing share feel “no stresses” on their household’s

finances

  • There were year-over decreases in trust in Federal, State and

County government

  • Priority placed on “jobs” remains high

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Citizen Opinion Survey Summary

  • Respondents hinge economic growth of the County on getting

resident proper job training/retraining more than any other topic

  • Job loss was indicated as the biggest threat to the County’s

economy

  • Respondents less concerned with property tax and show

majority support for minimal increase to replenish reserves

  • Decrease in sentiment that County budget spending priorities

are “about right”

  • Most important areas for budget reallocations were health

care, public safety and economic development

43