2018 Environmental Topics: Developers Application Workshop
1
2018 Environmental Topics: Developers Application Workshop 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2018 Environmental Topics: Developers Application Workshop 1 Objectives The objectives of this presentation: Brief overview of the environmental review process Site selection Overview of changes to the environmental review
1
– Brief overview of the environmental review process – Site selection – Overview of changes to the environmental review process
credits, fund balance loans, HOME funds, Risk Share Insurance, National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) and Tax Credit Assistance Program (TCAP) are required to pass an environmental review as a condition of financing. – An environmental review is the process of reviewing a project and its potential environmental impacts to determine whether it complies with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the regulations at 24 CFR part 58 and may also be subject to 24 CFR part 50. HTF also includes 24 CFR part 93.301(f)(1) and HUD Notice CPD-16-14. Please consult the HUD website.
by MHDC. This review is closely based on the 24 CFR part 58 and 50 reviews for federally funded developments.
2
addressed.
3
Airport Hazards Noise Abatement and Control Educational and Cultural Facilities Coastal Barrier Resources Sole Source Aquifers Commercial Facilities Flood Insurance Wetlands Protection Health Care and Social Services Clean Air Wild and Scenic Rivers Solid Waste Disposal / Recycling Coastal Zone Management Environmental Justice Waste Water / Sanitary Sewers Contamination and T
Substances Conformance with Plans / Compatible Land Use and Zoning / Scale and Urban Design Water Supply Endangered Species Soil Suitability / Slope / Erosion / Drainage / Storm Water Runoff Public Safety – Police, fire and Emergency Medical Explosive and Flammable Hazards Hazards and Nuisances including Site Safety and Noise Parks, Open Space and Recreation Farmlands Protection Energy Consumption Transportation and Accessibility Floodplain Management Employment and Income Patterns Unique Natural Features, Water Resources Historic Preservation Demographic Character Changes, Displacement Vegetation, Wildlife Other Factors
4
5
environmental review perspective begin with three of the biggest issues that can be associated with a site.
– Floodplain – Does a 100 year or 500 year floodplain impinge on the site or roadways around the site. – If so, this is not always an easy “fix” especially if federal funding is involved. – Consult the current FEMA Flood Maps to get an idea where floodplains are located in relation to the site.
for information.
regulations apply. – In certain circumstances MHDC may request a floodplain survey. 6
– Wetland – Is there a wetland (isolated and jurisdictional) on the site, or adjacent to the site? There are a couple of ways to approach this for different reasons.
accurate.
form that can be completed by the developer / signed by the land owner and returned to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for a response. MHDC does NOT require the use of this form. It is not needed for the purpose of due diligence for the wetland portion of the environmental review. Only in very rare circumstances would MHDC ask for this form, on approved applications only. If you choose to complete the form call the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for guidance. One of the following responses can be obtained. – Preliminary Determination – Only attempts to identify Jurisdictional Wetlands. Also, it is not a final determination. – Approved Determination - Identifies isolated and jurisdictional wetlands. A Wetland Delineation Report may be required by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, to be paid for and provided by the developer. MHDC is providing this information as a courtesy to the developer. On occasion through
Army Corp of Engineers. In some cases stiff financial penalties were incurred by the developer. 7
– Noise – Does excessive noise effect the site?
The above represent what to look for generally but does not guarantee a noise problem. MHDC uses the HUD Day and Night Noise Calculator (DNL) to evaluate noise for all
set by HUD.
Engaging an acoustical engineer is encouraged by HUD and MHDC usually for approved applications with federal funding. HUD regulations apply for determining noise levels for non-federally funded developments. HUD does not allow noise
– Other site selection considerations:
and increase truck traffic.
grocery store, post office, retail, education, gas station, and bus stop.
9
– MHDC can provide you with a general site evaluation.
are free to contact MHDC for a Desktop Review.
is conducted using various maps such as FEMA Flood Maps, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and Google Earth. There is no actual site visit, the evaluation is not all encompassing.
state and federal electronic maps. A site visit was not conducted and every environmental aspect was not considered. All conclusions are only tentative and subject to amendment. Lastly, I want to be sure that everyone is aware that this desktop review is not to be construed that MHDC will approve any specific property if an application is submitted but is just to answer your questions regarding the site. All applications submitted to MHDC will be evaluated and given equal consideration.
10
documentation pertaining to the environmental review process (including pre and post construction) for approved developments with MHDC authorized federal funds are required to be uploaded into the Department
Housing and Urban Development Environmental Review Online System (HEROS).
It covers all levels of environmental reviews for both 24 CFR part 58 and 50 developments and includes on-screen guidance for completing HUD environmental reviews.
11
changes:
Commission Approval Letter) which provides the level of review and general required submissions for each approved development.
review environmental submissions from each Developer’s Environmental Analyst.
Specifically 24 CFR part 58.14.
State, Federal and non-Federal entities and the public in the preparation of an EIS, EA or other environmental reviews undertaken under the related laws and authorities cited in 58.5 and 58.6.
Consultant review process nor the HEROS System.
12