2018 Assessment Results Mississippi Academic Assessment Program August 2018 Dr. Paula A. Vanderford Chief Accountability Officer Dr. Nathan Oakley Chief Academic Officer
Mississippi Department of Education VISION To create a world-class educational system that gives students the knowledge and skills to be successful in college and the workforce, and to flourish as parents and citizens MISSION To provide leadership through the development of policy and accountability systems so that all students are prepared to compete in the global community 2
MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS 4 5 6 3 1 2 Every Every All Every Community Student Students Child Has Every Effectively Every Graduates Proficient Access School Has Uses a School and from High and Showing to a High- Effective World-Class District is School and Growth in All Quality Early Teachers and Data System Rated “C” or is Ready for Assessed Childhood Leaders to Improve Higher College and Areas Program Student Career Outcomes
Results Overall Mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) 4
ELA and Math Overall Proficiency Comparison Percent of Students at Performance Level (PL) 4 & 5 2016 2017 2018 43.9% 39.8% 38.6% 36.7% 33.6% 33.0% Mathematics English Language Arts (ELA) Level 4 & 5 Level 4 & 5 Note: Algebra I and English II proficiency data have been updated to reflect first-time test takers only. Previous reports included retest results. Retest data have been removed to make Algebra I and English II results consistent with grades 3-8. 5
What is MAAP? • The Mississippi Academic Assessment Program (MAAP) measures students’ knowledge, skills, and academic growth from elementary through high school. • Student progress is measured in grades 3 through 8 using annual assessments in English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics and in high school using Algebra I and English II end-of-course assessments. • MAAP assessments are designed to let parents know how their child is progressing and to provide teachers with information to guide instruction. 6
MAAP Sample Sizes State of Mississippi • 253,519 students in grades 3-8 and high school participated in MAAP and had scale scores on the mathematics assessments. • 253,409 students in grades 3-8 and high school participated in MAAP and had scale scores on the English Language Arts assessments. 7
Mathematics Grades 3-8, Algebra 1 2018 Key Findings • 111,403 of all tested students scored Level 4 or higher (43.9%) in 2018, compared to 97,073 (38.6%) in 2017. • 52 districts had greater than 45.0% of all students scoring at Level 4 or higher in 2018, compared to 32 districts in 2017. • 188,292 of all tested students scored Level 3 or higher (74.3%) in 2018, compared to 181,459 (72.2%) in 2017. • 16,298 of all tested students scored Level 1 (6.4%) in 2018, compared to 15,323 (6.0%) in 2017. 8
State of Mississippi Mathematics Grades 3-8 Percent of Students at all Performance Levels 50.0% 45.0% 40.0% 32.7% Percent of Students 34.4% 35.0% 30.3% 25.8% 29.0% 30.0% 27.6% 25.5% 25.0% 22.7% 20.3% 20.0% 13.2% 15.0% 10.3% 6.6% 7.7% 10.0% 7.2% 6.6% 5.0% 0.0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 2016 2017 2018 9
State of Mississippi Algebra I Percent of Students at all Performance Levels 50.0% 45.0% 41.4% 38.7% 38.3% 40.0% 38.0% 34.9% Percent of Students 35.0% 32.9% 30.0% 25.0% 17.7% 20.0% 16.2% 13.4% 15.0% 8.2% 10.0% 7.5% 5.6% 2.7% 5.0% 2.4% 2.0% 0.0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 2016 2017 2018 10
English Language Arts Grades 3-8 & English II 2018 Key Findings • 100,748 of all tested students scored Level 4 or higher (39.8%) in 2018, compared to 93,049 (36.7%) in 2017. • 40 districts had greater than 45.0% of all students scoring at Level 4 or higher in 2018, compared to 22 districts in 2017. • 186,762 of all tested students scored Level 3 or higher (73.7%) in 2018, compared to 178,559 (70.4%) in 2017. • 17,702 of all tested students scored Level 1 (7.0%) in 2018, compared to 22,220 (8.8%) in 2017. 11
State of Mississippi ELA Grades 3-8 Percent of Students at all Performance Levels 50.0% 45.0% 34.1% 40.0% 34.3% 34.0% Percent of Students 35.0% 29.9% 25.5% 30.0% 26.0% 22.6% 25.0% 22.0% 19.7% 20.0% 15.0% 11.6% 9.3% 9.1% 8.8% 10.0% 7.0% 6.2% 5.0% 0.0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Performance Level MAAP 2016 MAAP 2017 MAAP 2018 12
State of Mississippi English II Percent of Students at all Performance Levels 50.0% 45.0% 36.1% 40.0% 32.3% 35.3% 35.0% 31.7% Percent of Students 31.2% 29.8% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 17.1% 16.4% 14.7% 14.4% 15.0% 11.7% 9.7% 7.5% 10.0% 6.7% 5.5% 5.0% 0.0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Performance Level 2016 2017 2018 13
Grade 3 MAAP Math & ELA Results PCT 4 & 5 PCT ≥ 3 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 74.7% 74.8% 72.2% 68.5% 65.4% 70.0% 64.9% Percent of Students 60.0% 46.0% 50.0% 44.7% 40.1% 36.0% 40.0% 32.7% 32.1% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 Math ELA 14
Grade 4 MAAP Math & ELA Results PCT 4 & 5 PCT ≥ 3 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 74.0% 73.4% 67.7% 65.9% 65.7% 70.0% Percent of Students 63.5% 60.0% 50.0% 45.1% 44.4% 35.8% 40.0% 32.6% 32.2% 31.3% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 Math ELA 15
Grade 5 MAAP Math & ELA Results PCT 4 & 5 PCT ≥ 3 100.0% 90.0% 77.1% 80.0% 72.8% 72.2% 71.9% 69.9% 68.3% 70.0% Percent of Students 60.0% 50.0% 37.3% 36.2% 40.0% 34.1% 33.7% 33.8% 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 Math ELA 16
Grade 6 MAAP Math & ELA Results PCT 4 & 5 PCT ≥ 3 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 73.4% 72.5% 71.0% 68.3% 67.0% 70.0% Percent of Students 59.7% 60.0% 46.4% 50.0% 40.0% 37.7% 38.0% 40.0% 32.5% 29.2% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 Math ELA 17
Grade 7 MAAP Math & ELA Results PCT 4 & 5 PCT ≥ 3 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 74.2% 72.5% Percent of Students 70.2% 69.6% 68.3% 66.9% 70.0% 60.0% 49.2% 50.0% 43.8% 40.0% 34.7% 34.2% 30.1% 29.1% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 Math ELA 18
Grade 8 MAAP Math & ELA Results PCT 4 & 5 PCT ≥ 3 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 72.6% 69.8% 69.4% 67.4% 67.4% 70.0% Percent of Students 62.7% 60.0% 50.0% 41.2% 36.6% 40.0% 35.1% 34.2% 33.3% 30.9% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 Math ELA 19
MAAP Algebra I & English II Results PCT 4 & 5 PCT ≥ 3 100.0% 90.0% 84.6% 81.1% 80.1% 79.9% 76.2% 76.1% 80.0% 70.0% Percent of Students 60.0% 47.8% 46.6% 50.0% 45.0% 44.5% 42.4% 38.5% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 English II Algebra I 20
Top 10 Districts (Mathematics) Ø Yellow indicates district is also a top performer in ELA. Districts Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 4&5 Petal School District 1.5% 4.9% 18.7% 41.5% 33.4% 74.9% Enterprise School District 0.0% 4.6% 21.6% 43.6% 30.2% 73.8% Booneville School District 2.3% 6.2% 20.3% 43.0% 28.2% 71.1% Oxford School District 3.1% 8.0% 21.6% 34.8% 32.4% 67.2% Biloxi Public School District 3.1% 9.7% 21.6% 37.0% 28.7% 65.7% Ocean Springs School District 2.2% 8.7% 23.7% 40.1% 25.2% 65.4% Clinton Public School District 2.3% 9.2% 23.3% 40.4% 24.8% 65.2% Union Public School District 3.8% 10.0% 22.5% 40.9% 22.8% 63.8% Union Co School District 2.2% 9.7% 24.9% 43.3% 19.8% 63.1% Desoto Co School District 3.3% 10.9% 24.3% 39.6% 21.9% 61.5% 21
Bottom 10 Districts (Mathematics) Ø Red indicates district is also a bottom performer in ELA. Districts Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 4&5 East Tallahatchie Consolidated Sch District 13.8% 38.1% 31.7% 14.4% 2.1% 16.5% Noxubee County School District 13.2% 40.7% 29.8% 14.4% 2.0% 16.4% Clarksdale Municipal School District 18.2% 35.0% 31.3% 13.8% 1.7% 15.5% North Bolivar Consolidated School District 12.8% 38.1% 34.7% 13.2% 1.2% 14.4% Amite Co School District 14.1% 41.0% 30.9% 12.4% 1.6% 14.1% Yazoo City Municipal School District 17.3% 36.4% 32.3% 12.5% 1.4% 14.0% Jefferson Co School District 21.2% 39.3% 28.2% 9.9% 1.4% 11.3% Humphreys Co School District 24.1% 37.8% 27.2% 10.4% 0.6% 10.9% West Bolivar Consolidated School District 22.8% 39.6% 27.5% 8.9% 1.1% 10.0% Durant Public School District 11.6% 45.5% 34.0% 8.2% 0.7% 9.0% Midtown Public Charter School* 23.4% 51.9% 21.3% 2.5% 0.8% 3.3% *Technical Note: Midtown Public Charter School falls in the bottom 10 districts but is a 5-8 th Grade only school district. 22
Recommend
More recommend
