2016 Annual Report on Market Issues and Performance Gabe Murtaugh - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2016 annual report on market issues and performance
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2016 Annual Report on Market Issues and Performance Gabe Murtaugh - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2016 Annual Report on Market Issues and Performance Gabe Murtaugh Senior Analyst, Monitoring and Reporting Department of Market Monitoring California ISO Web Conference May 24, 2017 Presentation outline Annual report highlights


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2016 Annual Report on Market Issues and Performance

Gabe Murtaugh – Senior Analyst, Monitoring and Reporting Department of Market Monitoring California ISO Web Conference May 24, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Annual report highlights

– Demand and supply conditions – Wholesale market performance – EIM Performance

  • Key recommendations

Page 2

Presentation outline

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The peak load in 2016 was moderate and did not reach the 1-in-2 year forecast.

Page 3

42,000 43,000 44,000 45,000 46,000 47,000 48,000 49,000 50,000 51,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 System peak load (MW) 1-in-10 year peak forecast 1-in-2 year peak forecast Actual peak

slide-4
SLIDE 4

In-state hydro-electric generation and snowpack improved from previous recent years.

Page 4

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Annual hydro production (GWh) May 1 Snowpack (% of normal) 2016 59% 2015 3% 2014 18% 2013 17% 2012 39% 2011 190%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Solar generation increased by about 30 percent and continues to be the largest source of renewable generation connected to the ISO.

Page 5

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Solar Wind Geothermal Biogas/Biomass GWh 2013 2014 2015 2016

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Solar capacity made up more than 80 percent of total new summer capacity in 2016.

Page 6

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Megawatts Other Natural gas Solar

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Natural gas prices decreased by about 9 percent in 2016.

Page 7

$0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov 2013 2014 2015 2016 Gas price ($/MMBtu) Henry Hub PG&E Cityate SoCal Citygate Hub 2016 2015 2014 2013 PG&E Citygate $2.70 $2.99 $4.84 $3.97 SoCal Citygate $2.55 $2.78 $4.67 $3.95

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Total market costs were down by about 4 percent after accounting for natural gas and greenhouse gas price changes.

Page 8

$0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Average annual gas price ($/MMBtu) Average annual cost ($/MWh) Average cost (nominal) Average cost normalized to gas price, including greenhouse gas adjustment Average daily gas price, including greenhouse gas adjustments ($/MMBtu)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Markets continued to perform close to competitive benchmarks.

Page 9

$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Average price ($/MWh) Competitive baseline ($/MWh) Average load-weighted day-ahead price Average load-weighted 15-minute price Average load-weighted 5-minute price

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Page 10

Day-ahead prices continued to be higher than real- time prices for much of the year.

$15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2015 2016 Price ($/MWh) Day-ahead 15-Minute 5-Minute

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Page 11

Prices followed the net load curve and were higher in the 5-minute market than in the day-ahead market during ramping hours.

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Average net system load (MW) Price ($/MWh) Day-ahead 15-minute 5-minute Average net load

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Page 12

Price spikes in the 5-minute market continued to be relatively infrequent in 2016.

0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2015 2016 Percent of real-time intervals $250 to $500 $501 to $750 $751 to $1000 > $1000

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Page 13

The frequency of negative prices continued to grow in 2016 and were most frequent in the second quarter.

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Percent of 5-minute intervals Below -$145

  • $145 to -$50
  • $50 to $0
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Page 14

The profile of when negative prices occur has changed with the net load curve.

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Percent of 5-minute intervals 2012 2014 2016

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Renewable resources primarily bid into the real-time market at negative prices in 2016.

Page 15

  • 1,500
  • 1,000
  • 500

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 below -$50

  • $50 to -$25
  • $25 to $0

$0 to $25 $25 to $50 above $50 Average hourly MW Natural Gas Hydro Geothermal Wind Solar Other

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Most natural gas resources provided economic bids in the real-time market.

Page 16

75% 49% 36% 24% 15% 9% 5% 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Percent of economic bids Average hourly MW Not Bid Bid Downward Flexibility

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Revenues for a hypothetical combustion turbine were significantly below $177/kW-yr fixed cost estimates.

  • DMM updated assumptions in our net-revenue analysis
  • Analysis showed that a hypothetical combustion turbine

would have earned net revenues between $5/kW-year and $17/kW-year – The CEC estimates fixed costs at $177/kW-year

  • A combined cycle plant would have earned revenues

between $11/KW-year and $22/kW-year – The CEC estimates fixed costs at $166/kW-year

Page 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Historically, ratepayers have received less than half of the value of auctioned off congestion revenue rights. This trend continued in 2016.

Page 18

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Percent of auctioned payments $ million Auction revenues received by ratepayers Payments to auctioned CRRs Auction revenues as percent of payments Average percent 2012-2016

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Regulation requirements and costs increased in 2016 to address variable renewable output.

Page 19

$0.00 $0.20 $0.40 $0.60 $0.80 $1.00 $1.20 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2015 2016 Cost per MWh of load served ($/MWh) Total cost ($ million) Regulation down Regulation up Spin Non-spin Mileage Cost per MWh of load

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The flexible ramping product replaced the flexible ramping capacity mechinism in November.

Page 20

$0.00 $0.02 $0.04 $0.06 $0.08 $0.10 $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 2016 Payments per MWh load ($/MWh) Total payments ($ million) California ISO PacifiCorp East PacifiCorp West NV Energy Puget Sound Energy Arizona Public Service Payments per MWh of load

Flexible ramping product implementation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Average limits in the energy imbalance market

Page 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Transfers tended to flow into NV energy from the ISO in the midday hours.

Page 22

  • 500
  • 400
  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

100 200 300 400 500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Imports into NV Energy (MW) PacifiCorp East to NV Energy California ISO to NV Energy Average transfer

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Arizona transferred energy in from PacifiCorp East and out to the ISO.

Page 23

  • 500
  • 400
  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

100 200 300 400 500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Imports to Arizona Public Service (MW) PacifiCorp East to Arizona California ISO to Arizona Average transfer

slide-24
SLIDE 24

PacifiCorp West sent transfer energy to Puget during midday hours.

Page 24

  • 200
  • 100

100 200 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Imports into PacifiCorp West (MW) ISO to PacifiCorp West PacifiCorp East to West Puget to PacifiCorp West Average transfer

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Key recommendations

  • Congestion revenue rights
  • Gas prices used for bid caps
  • Opportunity cost adders
  • Bidding limits for EIM participants

Page 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Impact of 1-day lag in next day gas prices used in day-ahead market.

Page 26

60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Percent of traded volume Trade price as percent of next-day index price from prior day

110% 125%

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Next-day trade prices available at 8:30 am tend to be very close to next-day average prices.

Page 27

60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% Percent of traded volume Trade price as percent of average at 8:30 am

110% 125%