2014 Investment Statement: Managing the Crowns B l Balance Sheet - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2014 Investment Statement: Managing the Crowns B l Balance Sheet - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2014 Investment Statement: Managing the Crowns B l Balance Sheet Sh t Contents Contents I t Introduction d ti O Overarching themes hi th Ri ht Right assets t Managed risks Fiscal sustainability Areas of focus Introduction
Contents Contents
I t d ti Introduction O hi th Overarching themes Ri ht t Right assets Managed risks Fiscal sustainability Areas of focus
Introduction Introduction
St t t i t Statutory requirement O t it f th T Opportunity for the Treasury Th 2014 St t t The 2014 Statement Directional not prescriptive
Overarching themes Overarching themes
Th C b l h t i l The Crown balance sheet is very large C i l t i d li Crucial to service delivery O hi h ld t b d t k li htl b t Ownership should not be undertaken lightly but done well Flexibility crucial to cope with future challenges
Overarching themes (continued) Overarching themes (continued)
A t C b l h t h l i A strong Crown balance sheet helps economic growth Good balance sheet management underpins livings standards livings standards To improve balance sheet management requires To improve balance sheet management requires better information Role for the centre
PART 2 The Balance Sheet PART 2 – The Balance Sheet by Numbers y
So what do we have? So what do we have?
A t h t Assets – what we own:
– $110 billion – property, plant & equipment $ – $61 billion – investments – $17 billion – tax receivables & student loans
Liabilities – what we owe:
– $100 billion – borrowings – $38 billion – insurance liabilities – $12 billion – retirement obligations
Assets are growing Assets are growing...
150%
300 Assets
125%
250 Assets % GDP
100%
200
GDP billion
50% 75%
100 150
% G $ b
25% 50%
50 100 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Figure 3.2
and liabilities have too recently ... and liabilities have too recently.
150%
60 Netcore Crown debt
125%
50 Net core Crown debt %GDP
100%
40
GDP billion
50% 75%
20 30
% G $ b
25%
10 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Figure 3.3
Net worth attributable to the Crown Net worth attributable to the Crown
300 150 200 250 50 100 150 n (50)
- $ billion
(200) (150) (100) Assets Liabilities (250) ( ) 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Liabilities Net worth attributable to the Crown
Fi 3 4 Figure 3.4
Functional classification Functional classification
150 Assets 100
- 50
illion
(50)
$ bi
(100) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 (150) Social Financial Commercial Liabilities
Figure 3.1
Financial assets to drive rise in net worth to 2018
100 120 80 100
- n
60 $ billio 20 40 Net Worth 2013 Social Financial Commercial Net Worth 2018
Figure 3.5
Long term financial assets projections Long-term financial assets projections
40% 45% 50% 600 700 800 ACC NZSF GDP % (RHS) 30% 35% 40% 400 500 600 DP ion 20% 25% 30% 200 300 400 % G $ bill 10% 15% 20% 100 200 10% 12/13 14/15 16/17 18/19 20/21 22/23 24/25 26/27 28/29 30/31 32/33 34/35 36/37 38/39 40/41 42/43 44/45 46/47 48/49 50/51 52/53 54/55 56/57 58/59
Figure 2.3
“Right Assets”
Balance Sheet Performance
Measuring performance Measuring performance
Vit l t ff ti t t d Vital to effective asset management and decision making. Measures fall under 3 broad areas:
– Capacity C bilit – Capability – Financial Performance
Social Asset Reporting Framework Social Asset Reporting Framework
Figure 4.1
No “One Size Fits All” solution No One Size Fits All solution
State Highways Schools Age: Not as applicable Average Age Condition: Smoothness Skid resistance Rutting 10-year cost assessment Rutting Utilisation: Vehicle kilometres Children per classroom Functionality: Road safety Modern Learning Functionality: Road safety Modern Learning Environment
M h ld t b d i i l ti Measures should not be used in isolation
So how well do we do? So how well do we do?
I t ti ll ld l d i Internationally – world leader in transparency for public sector reporting Makes it difficult to benchmark Measures are largely input based Measures are largely input based But we can still draw some conclusions
Good understanding of asset age Good understanding of asset age
50% State Houses 40% 45% State Houses Courts Schools Police Stations 25% 30% 35% 15% 20% 0% 5% 10% 0% 0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51+
Asset Age (Years)
Implications of age Implications of age
Lik l t h hi h i t t Likely to have higher maintenance costs M i dditi l it l dit May require additional capital expenditure M l b fit f May no longer be fit for purpose Could be an obsolescence risk
and asset condition
Figure 4.5 – Road condition to standard Figure 4.25 – Land under sustained control
...and asset condition
95% 96% 97% 98% 99% 100%- rk meeting standard
Figure 4.33 – Estate asset condition (Defence) Figure 4.39 – Hospital condition by region
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 50% 60% Northern Region Midland Region Central Region Southern Region 50% 60% Living accomodation Non-working accomodation Specialised facilities T i i f ilit 20% 30% 40% 50% Percentage of assets 20% 30% 40% 50% Percentage of building type Training facilites Working accomodation 10% Very good Good Average Poor Very poor 10% As new Above average Average Poor Major failure/Beyond economic repair P21
Implications of condition Implications of condition
C diti d i i t d Condition drives maintenance spend... d it l dit ...and capital expenditure A i t i ki d i i Assist in making decisions on:
- Rationalisation
- Replacement
- Maintaining
Main focus of facilities management.
Reasonable understanding of utilisation
Figure 4.13 – Property vacancy Figure 4.6 – VKT:Centre-lane index (State Highways)
Reasonable understanding of utilisation
100 125 150 index (100 = 2003) 60 80 100 120 85% 90% 95% 100% nd time (days) e of properties let 50 75 100 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 VKT:Centre-lane i Auckland Waikato Wellington Canterbury Rest of NZ 20 40 70% 75% 80% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Turnaru Percentage Percentage Let (LHS) Turnaround Time (RHS)Figure 4.17 Classroom utilisation Figure 4.44 – Prison capacity
11,000 11,500 12,000 Reserve capacity Operating capacity (incl. Buffer) Operating capacity Actual prison population 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 100% 120% n 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000 10,500 , Prisoner daily count 2013 Justice Sector forecast 20% 40% 60% 80% Classroom utilisation Urban 7,000 7,500 Jul 2011 Jan 2012 Jul 2012 Jan 2013 Jul 2013 Jan 2014 Jul 2014 0-99 100-199 200-299 300-399 400-499 500-749 750-999 1000-1249 1250-1499 1500-1749 1750-1999 2000+ Roll size Urban Rural23
Implications of utilisation Implications of utilisation
Utili ti fl t d d l Utilisation reflects demand vs supply A i t b ild b ild l d i i Assists build, rebuild, or close decisions D i d t di f b ff Drives understanding of buffers Indicator of value for money
Weaker on functionality & fit for purpose
Figure 4.19 – Meeting modern learning environment Figure 4.26 – Visitor assets meeting service standard
Weaker on functionality & fit for purpose
Pedagogy/ Curriculum 100% Core MLE Support/ Access Environment Pedagogy/ Curriculum 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% to standard 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Advance MLE Moderate MLE Primary Secondary & Composite 10% 20% 30% 40% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 % Structures (Target 95%) Huts (Target 90%) Tracks (Target 45%)Figure 4.12 – Property configuration relative to need (Social Housing) Figure 4.31 – Operational preparedness
80% 90% 100% Matches need Overcrowded Underutilised 600 700 800 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 100 200 300 400 500 Level of capability Actual 10% 20% Auckland Wellington Christchurch Rest NZ 100 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Actual Forecast DLOC upper range DLOC lower rangeImportance of functionality/fit for purpose Importance of functionality/fit for purpose
Lik l t id th l t li k t t Likely to provide the closest link to outcomes. Will b ff t d b f t Will be affected by many factors H ldi th i ht t i iti l t t d Holding the right assets is critical to meet needs... ...even where there’s no direct link to outcomes.
Financial Portfolio Financial Portfolio
Measures are largely based on returns. Portfolio is expected to grow Implications for risks, and sustainability.
Commercial Portfolio Commercial Portfolio
Smallest portfolio in the Balance Sheet. Covered off in the APR in significant detail.
Part 3 Managing Risks & Part 3 – Managing Risks & Sustainability
Managed risks Managed risks
Ri k i t d li f t Risk impacts on delivery of government
- bjectives
Mitigating risk so it does not eventuate Resilience if risks crystallise
What we found What we found
E i ti t ll k ll Existing arrangements generally work well B t t i But room to improve Fi i l t h ll Financial assets pose new challenges
Fiscal sustainability Fiscal sustainability
Th fi i f th C d t b The financing of the Crown needs to be sustainable Significant financial buffers necessary Maintaining prudent debt has wider balance sheet implications implications Saving to fund non debt liabilities (SAYGO) Saving to fund non-debt liabilities (SAYGO)
What we found What we found
R b ildi th d bt b ff i i it Rebuilding the debt buffer is a priority now R ld b t d Reserves could be augmented SAYGO th h f d i lik l t b d bl SAYGO through funds is likely to be durable
Areas of focus Areas of focus
IS hi hli ht d 11 A f f IS highlighted 11 Areas of focus C t i d 4 h di Categorise under 4 headings:
- Right Assets
M d Ri k
- Managed Risks
- Fiscal Sustainability
- General
Right Assets Right Assets
I i t t d i i ki Improve investment decision making Support asset management practice Explore how capital can be recycled Further develop and utilise metrics
Managed Risks Managed Risks
B ild b tt d t di f t C Build a better understanding of aggregate Crown risk Investigate whether efficiencies can be achieved Continue policy to manage contingent and implicit liabilities liabilities
Fiscal Sustainability Fiscal Sustainability
C ti f t th i b ff Continue focus on strengthening buffers I ti t t f ti f d Investigate arrangements for contingency funds and reserves
General General
C id f ifi f t t Consider use of specific performance targets D l h i f b tt i f ti Develop mechanism for better information collection to support decision making