2012 Full Year Results
27 February 2013
Casino, Ile de France
2012 Full Year Results 27 February 2013 Casino, Ile de France - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2012 Full Year Results 27 February 2013 Casino, Ile de France Headlines A year of considerable progress Strategic portfolio reshaping ahead of plan Strong operational performance Net debt significantly reduced Well
Casino, Ile de France
1
DB Schenker, Heathrow
3
P&L 2012 2011 Change % EPRA PBT (£m) 144.9 138.5 4.6 EPRA EPS (pence) 19.3 18.4 4.9 Dividend per share (pence) 14.8 14.8 Balance sheet 2012 2011 Change % EPRA NAV per share¹ (pence) 294 340 (13.5) Net borrowings (£m) 2,090.3 2,303.4 (9.3) LTV – including JVs at share (%) 51 / 502 49
1 EPRA NAV per share excludes fair value of interest rate derivatives and deferred tax provisions but includes trading property uplifts 2 Pro forma for £152m of disposals completed post year end
4
2012 £m 2011 £m Gross rental income 305.4 326.1 Property operating expenses (50.6) (54.9) Net rental income 254.8 271.2 Joint venture management fee income 7.4 5.9 Share of joint ventures’ EPRA profit1 20.2 16.6 Administration expenses (27.9) (32.1) EPRA operating profit 254.5 261.6 EPRA net finance costs (109.6) (123.1) EPRA profit before tax 144.9 138.5 Tax on EPRA profit (1.9) (1.9)
1 Net property rental income less administrative expenses, net interest expenses and taxation
£271.2m £254.8m
£3.9m £8.1m £5.7m £(23.2)m £(4.6)m £(6.3)m 2011 Like for like net rental income Developments Acquisitions Disposals Surrender premiums & related rent lost Currency translation 2012
5
2011 2012
1 Net of rental income from properties taken back for re-development 1
6
Net rental income £m Vacancy rate % Full Year 2012 255 8.2 Annualised incremental impact of: Disposals since Jan-121 (25) 0.3 Developments completed and let in 2012 7
7
(12) 1.1 Pro forma FY 2012 232 9.6
1 Including disposals completed post year end
7 1 Total costs as a percentage of gross rental income. Total costs include property operating expenses (net of service charge income and management fees) and recurring administration expenses
2012 £m 2011 £m Change % Property operating expenses 50.6 54.9 (7.8) Administrative expenses 27.9 32.1 (13.1) Total 78.5 87.0 (9.8) Total cost ratio1 (%) 30.4% 29.9% 28.1% 24.5% 22.9% 15 20 25 30 35 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
340p 294p
19.3p (14.8)p (47.7)p (2.0)p (0.8)p EPRA EPS Dividend Realised and unrealised valuation movements Early close-out
bank debt Other
8
Core (7.5)p Non-core (40.2)p EPRA NAV per share as at 31 December 2011 EPRA NAV per share as at 31 December 2012
9 1 Valuation including joint ventures at share (including land and development) 2 In relation to the completed properties only 3 Net true equivalent yield 4 Including disposals completed post year end 5 Excluding Neckermann
Value1 £m Movement2 % Yield2,3 % Core portfolio (excluding offices) 3,553.5 (1.2) 7.7 Suburban offices 376.9 (15.9) 8.4 Large non-strategic assets4 304.8 (29.5) 8.65 Smaller non-core assets 420.1 (10.6) 8.9 Total4 4,655.3 (5.9) 7.9
10
Group level1 2012 2011 Net borrowings (£m) 2,090.3 2,303.4 Available funds - cash & undrawn facilities (£m) 449 456 Gearing (%) 93 89 Loan to value - including JVs at share (%) 51 / 502 49 Weighted average cost of debt3 (%) 4.6 4.8 Average duration of debt (years) 8.3 8.8 Interest cover4 (x) 2.3 2.2 Net debt / EBITDA 8.1 8.7
1 All metrics, except LTV, at Group level excluding JVs 2 Pro forma for £152m of disposals completed post year end 3 Excluding commitment fees and amortised costs 4 Net property rental income / net interest before capitalisation
11
12 1 Adjusted for post year end disposals and Neckermann takeback
Core £m Non-core £m Total £m Annualised gross passing rent1 250 46 296 Rent free on let properties 36 3 39 ERV of vacant/short let space 27 14 41 Reversion to ERV of occupied properties (12) (6) (18) Current development projects 7 4 11 Potential gross passing rent 308 61 369
13
La Courneuve, Ile de France
Divesting non-core assets Improving utilisation of core assets (land & vacant assets)
15
existing portfolio Generating attractive returns by building a high quality, modern portfolio with critical mass in target markets; achieved through both development and acquisitions
growth by reinvesting Reducing net debt and leverage over time Partnering with third party capital where appropriate
and introduce 3rd party capital Greater customer focus and market knowledge Capitalise on favourable growth drivers Efficiency improvements and cost reductions
performance across the business
16
Leasing, Customer and Asset Management Development Operational Efficiency
17
Thales, UK IQ Farnborough, UK MPM, Munich 24 further disposals in the UK and CE
18
UK logistics portfolio
Midlands and South
Sainsbury’s, Royal Mail, DHL, GKN, and Booker
French logistics portfolio
Lyon
Saint-Gobain
19
21 Completed development projects
14 Current development projects
DB Schenker, Heathrow
Karl Storz, Slough Trading Estate
20
31% 69%
30 June 2011
Core Non-core
13% 87%
31 December 20121
Split of total portfolio by core and non-core assets
Stabilised (vacancy <10%) Opportunity (built; vacancy >10%) Opportunity (land & development)
6% 64% Split of core portfolio by stabilised and opportunity assets 30% 8% 43% 49%
1 Pro forma for £152m of disposals completed post year end
100%
Target
75% 20% 5%
Infinity, Slough Trading Estate
22
Larger logistics warehouses
£1.1bn portfolio; 2.1m sq m
Smaller warehouses & light industrial buildings
£2.2bn portfolio; 2.7m sq m
Data Centres
£0.3bn portfolio; 0.2m sq m
3 6 9 5 years 10 years 30 years Retail Offices London Industrial Distribution
23
IPD UK Average Income Return
(%)
Source: IPD
3 6 9 12 5 years 10 years 30 years Retail Offices London Industrial Distribution
IPD UK Average Total Return
(%)
24
UK new warehouses available (2007 – 2012) (>100,000 sq ft) UK internet sales (2007 – 2012) 25
26
Parcel delivery & 3PLs Data centre providers Retailers ‘Hi-tech’ engineering and production
27
Potential development projects
£176m (296 ha)
Current projects
£58m (39 ha)
Residual land bank
£100m (239 ha)
Current land holdings by value
(as at 31 December 2012) Potential development projects
Largest sites Hectares Value (£m) Slough, UK 12.0 19.9 Park Royal, UK 8.5 35.1 Düsseldorf, Germany 20.9 20.6 Berlin, Germany 23.4 11.5 Amsterdam, Neth. 11.2 13.3 Warsaw, Poland 12.9 3.8 Poznan, Poland 25.4 7.6 Gdansk, Poland 29.6 7.5 Gliwice, Poland 13.3 4.9 Prague, Czech Rep. 38.7 7.9
1 Total Development Costs
50 60 70 80 90 100 Dec-02 Dec-04 Dec-06 Dec-08 Dec-10 Dec-12 London Industrials All Industrials
28
IPD UK Industrial Capital Value Index
(June 2007 = 100)
90 95 100 105 Dec-02 Dec-04 Dec-06 Dec-08 Dec-10 Dec-12 London Industrials All Industrials
IPD UK Industrial Rental Value Index
(June 2007 = 100)
Source: IPD Quarterly Index Q4 2012
29
30
32
0.0%
2.6% (7.5)% (5.0)% (2.5)% 0.0% 2.5% 5.0% 7.5% Heathrow Park Royal Slough Trading Estate Logistics Property Partnership Rest of Greater London Germany France Poland IPD UK Industrial Index (-3.8%)
Valuation movement (including joint ventures at share)1
(%)
1 In relation to the completed properties only
33
1 Including our share of joint venture assets and excluding assets disposed of in Jan/Feb 2013 2 Income based on headline rental income (after the expiry of rent free periods) and excluding any income from assets disposed of in Jan/Feb 2013 3 Excluding any income in respect of Neckermann
At 31 December 20121 Valuation Income2 UK £m Europe £m Total £m Total £m ‘Big 3’ assets
177 143 Other industrial assets 163 190 353 35 Other land holdings 6 47 53
169 414 583 49 Targeting £300m to £500m of disposals in 2013 (including £152m already completed in Jan/Feb)
34
Month Portfolio/Asset Acquirer Sale proceeds (£m) Net initial yield (%) 2012: February Four regional UK estates Ignis 71.2 6.3 / 7.01 April IQ Farnborough Harbert 92.1 6.4 / 6.81 May Four regional UK estates Harbert 204.5 6.7 / 7.41 July 10 regional UK estates UK institution 111.0 8.4 / 8.91 Various Other UK non-core assets Various 43.6 10.9 / 11.51 Various Other CE non-core assets Various 25.7 7.7 / 7.7 548.1 2013: January Thales in Crawley L&G Property 80.0 5.9 / 5.9 February MPM in Munich Private investor 56.0 7.9 / 7.9 Various Other non-core assets Various 16.3 7.7 / 7.7 Total 700.4 7.2 / 7.71
1 Including the benefit of top-ups
35
At 31 December 20121 Core Industrial2 Offices (core) Large non- strategic3 Other non-core3 Group Portfolio value (£m) (completed properties) 3,297.3 376.8 154.3 352.6 4,181.0 Land & developments (£m) 256.3
53.4 332.3 Net initial yield (%) 6.2 7.3 10.84 7.5 6.8 Net true equivalent yield (%) 7.7 8.4 9.64 8.9 7.9 Valuation movement (%) (completed properties) (1.2) (15.9) (40.8) (10.7) (5.9)
1 Including JVs at share 2 Warehouses, Light Industrial and Data Centres 3 Adjusted for disposals completed post year end 4 Excluding Neckermann
36
Key information:
and bespoke distribution facilities for the German retailer, Neckermann
Neckermann
2012, fully vacated the site in January 2013
leased to BLG Logistics
space to new occupiers
and/or outright disposal under review
37
Key information:
suburban office park located 8km east
the international airport
December 2012
Bombardier, Stanley Black & Decker, Cisco, Sunguard
38
Key information:
located approximately 20km north-east
re-development opportunity
completed in 2009; 100% occupied (SAP principal tenant)
completed in 2012 (80% let)
construction for delivery in early 2014
span multiple years
December 2012, will increase significantly with new developments
40
2012 2011 Group £m JVs £m Total £m Group £m JVs £m Total £m Gross rental income 305.4 40.0 345.4 326.1 33.0 359.1 Property operating expenses (50.6) (1.9) (52.5) (54.9) (2.8) (57.7) Net rental income 254.8 38.1 292.9 271.2 30.2 301.4 Joint venture management fee income 7.4 (4.6) 2.8 5.9 (3.3) 2.6 Administration expenses (27.9)
(32.1)
EPRA operating profit 234.3 33.5 267.8 245.0 26.9 271.9 EPRA net finance costs (109.6) (13.3) (122.9) (123.1) (10.5) (133.6) EPRA profit before tax 124.7 20.2 144.9 121.9 16.4 138.3 Tax on EPRA profit (1.9)
(2.1) 0.2 (1.9) EPRA profit after tax 122.8 20.2 143.0 119.8 16.6 136.4
41
2012 £m 2011 £m Opening net debt (2,303.4) (2,203.2) Cash flow from operations 205.1 239.0 Finance costs (net) (103.9) (120.3) Dividends received (net) 18.7 10.4 Tax paid (net) (12.8) (4.9) Free cash flow 107.1 124.2 Dividends paid (109.7) (107.4) Acquisitions and development of investment properties (277.9) (187.1) Investment property sales (including joint ventures) 494.2 79.9 Net settlement of foreign exchange derivatives 56.0 (8.1) Net investment in joint ventures (51.8) (15.9) Other items (15.2) 7.9 Net funds flow 202.7 (106.5) Non-cash movements (5.3) (5.3) Exchange rate movements 15.7 (11.6) Closing net debt (2,090.3) (2,303.4)
£138.5m £144.9m
£13.5m £4.2m £1.5m £3.6m £(16.4)m 2011 Net interest Admin expenses JV management fees EPRA JV PAT Net rental income 2012
42
2,031
470 1,112 125 Other Euro liabilities Euro currency swaps Euro debt Euro gross assets
124 80
Euro income Euro costs (inc. €66m interest)
43
Balance Sheet (as at 31 December 2012) Income Statement (year ended 31 December 2012) €m €m
+ 5% (€1.29) = -c.£14m (c.1.9p per share)
+ 5% (€1.29) = LTV -0.4%
+ 5% (€1.29) = -c.£1.7m (c.0.2p per share)
1 Including JVs at share
1,707
Food 5% Engineering 15% Finance & media 4% Comms & technology 13% Retail 14% Transport & distribution 25% Utilities 8% Other 16%
44
SEGRO has over 1,300 customers across eight countries and multiple sectors Headline rent by customer type
UK 61% Germany 11% France 13% Poland & Czech Republic 8% Other 7%
Headline rent by customer geography
45
Customer Type 1 Deutsche Post (DHL) Transport & distribution 2 Telefonica (O2) Communications & technology 3 IAG (BA/BMI) Transport & distribution 4 Infinity Communications & technology 5 Royal Mail Transport & distribution 6 Mars Chocolate Food 7 Sainsbury’s Retail 8 Alcatel-Lucent Communications & technology 9 UCB SA Chemicals & Commodities 10 Tesco Retail Customer Type 11 Jacobs Engineering Engineering & electrical 12 Equinix Communications & technology 13 DAHER International Transport & distribution 14 FedEx Transport & distribution 15 Antalis Timber, paper & printing 16 Savvis UK Limited Communications & technology 17 Ducros Express Transport & distribution 18 Lonza Biologics Chemicals & commodities 19 Barclays Bank Financial 20 Booker Belmont Wholesale Retail
1 Excluding Neckermann (lease surrender in January 2013) and post year end disposals
46
2009 2010 2011 2012 Portfolio vacancy rate 13.5% 12.0% 9.1% 8.2% Weighted average lease length 7.7 years 8.3 years 8.2 years 8.4 years
£0m £100m £200m £300m £400m £500m £600m 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024+ Bonds and Notes Bank debt drawn Cash Undrawn Facilities
48
Average maturity of gross borrowings 8.3 years (2011: 8.8 years)
50
Project Customer Space to be built (sq m) UK Pre-let projects under construction Montrose & Perth Avenue, STE Karl Storz (63%)/spec 4,100 Contracted projects Tudor Estate, Park Royal Warmup (28%)/spec 3,200 Southern Approach, Feltham (joint venture) Freight Forwarder (62%)/spec 8,000 Speculative developments Cambridge Avenue, STE Spec 3,300 Advent Way, Edmonton Spec 7,800 Total 22,400* Project Customer Space to be built (sq m) CONTINENTAL EUROPE Pre-let projects under construction Vimercate, Italy Alcatel-Lucent 34,000 Wroclaw, Poland DPD 6,900 Lodz – Strykow, Poland Valeo, Cat 10,600 Gdansk, Poland DB Schenker 5,200 Lodz – Strykow, Poland Azymut 4,800 Nardarzyn – Warsaw, Poland Zabka 23,800 Tychy, Poland Car parts manufacturer 18,400 Speculative developments Krefeld, Germany Spec 11,900 Frankfurt, Germany Spec 17,300 Total 132,900
* Includes Southern Approach project at Group share
51 Source: Deloitte/ONS
52
This presentation may contain certain forward-looking statements with respect to SEGRO’s expectations and plans, strategy, management’s objectives, future performance, costs, revenues and other trend information. These statements and forecasts involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend upon circumstances that may occur in the future. There are a number of factors which could cause actual results or developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward looking statements and forecasts. The statements have been made with reference to forecast price changes, economic conditions and the current regulatory environment. Nothing in this presentation should be construed as a profit forecast. Past share performance cannot be relied on as a guide to future performance.