2 24 2012
play

2/24/2012 Future Local MCH Funding Webinar Overview Presentation - PDF document

2/24/2012 Future Local MCH Funding Webinar Overview Presentation and Discussion: Part II February 2012 Funding sources Reasons for changes CO L O R A D O M A T E R N A L A N D CH I L D H E A L T H ( M CH ) P R O G R A M P R E V E


  1. 2/24/2012 Future Local MCH Funding Webinar Overview Presentation and Discussion: Part II February 2012  Funding sources  Reasons for changes CO L O R A D O M A T E R N A L A N D CH I L D H E A L T H ( M CH ) P R O G R A M P R E V E N T I O N S E R V I CE S D I V I S I O N  Stakeholder engagement process  New funding model components Webinar Overview Source and Amount of MCH Funding MCH: Title V Federal Block Grant, MCH Bureau (MCHB) at the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration,  Funding model results U.S. DHHS.  Administration, Support, and Contract Expectations , pp , p  Colorado for FY12 will receive $7 178 335  Colorado for FY12 will receive $7,178,335 .  Agencies receiving <$50,000 annually  Agencies receiving >$50,000 annually  Total MCH block grant dollars to LPHAs in FY12 for prenatal, child, adolescent programs and services = $2,117,988  Ongoing efforts and next steps  Total MCH block grant dollars to LPHAs in FY12 for HCP programs and services = $1,393,522 Source and Amount of HCP Funding Purpose of MCH/ HCP Block Grant Funding HCP: Colorado State General Fund  State and local MCH is accountable to MCHB at U.S. DHHS for Title V funding.  CDPHE will receive $2,526,083 in FY12 for serving CSHCN  Total HCP General Fund dollars to LPHAs in FY12 for HCP  Required by funding to address 18 national and 10 = $1,815,262 state performance measures, and 6 national outcome measures. Total to LPHAs for FY12 for HCP = $3,20 8 ,78 4  State performance measures linked to nine MCH priorities and overlapping CDPHE winnable battles GRAND TOTAL to LPHAs for FY12 for MCH/ HCP program s and services=$5,326,772 1

  2. 2/24/2012 Purpose of HCP State General Fund Reasons for Change Colorado Revised Statue 25-1.5-101: To operate and  Need to align local MCH funding with the maintain a program for children with disabilities to restructuring of local public health agencies in provide and expedite provision of health care Colorado, as a result of 2008 Public Health Act; services to children who have congenital birth defects or who are the victims of burns or trauma or defects or who are the victims of burns or trauma or  Critical assessment of HCP program in 2010-11 – children who have acquired disabilities; need to align funding with new care coordination model and local systems-building. Reasons for Change Stakeholder Engagement  Need to align local MCH funding with:  October webinars: 112 LPHA staff participated; 20 staff responded to the follow-up survey.  Nine new MCH priorities  Six regional meetings: 65 local public health staff  CDPHE Winnable Battles CDPHE Wi bl B l participated representing 33 out of the 55 LPHAs in CO.  Community priorities Stakeholder Engagement New Funding Model Basics  Two LPHA workgroups (8-12 participants each) met  All 55 LPHAs will receive funding according to the from December/ January through February to same formula for MCH/ HCP funding. provide input regarding program operations and contract expectations.  MCH/ HCP funding will be distributed using the funding formula of MCH population x poverty --  Many individual meetings and conversations along the same formula federal Maternal and Child Health the way! Bureau uses to allocate states’ MCH and HCP funding. 2

  3. 2/24/2012 New Funding Model Basics Results  The same amount of funding is being allocated to LPHAs,  Agencies receive notification one year prior to yet distributed differently. implementation of funding changes.  43 out of the 55 LPHAs throughout Colorado will receive  A three-year mitigation plan will be implemented to an increase in MCH/ HCP funding. / g support agencies through the transition from FY13 - FY16 .  2 agencies will receive less than 2% decrease in funding. These agencies are Denver and Jefferson County who receive significant funding levels.  Funding for specialty clinics will be allocated to clinic host sites in addition to the funding formula.  10 agencies will receive significant decreases in funding. Results Regional Partnerships  HCP Regional Offices will no longer be funded for FY13.  LPHAs are encouraged to work together regionally. Funding being redistributed across all counties with MCH funding formula.  State MCH/ HCP and OPP will support regional partnerships as requested.  State HCP nursing consultants will provide  State HCP nursing consultants will provide TA/ consultation and training for LPHA.  Partnership examples may include service provision, shared community health assessment, or combined funding. LPHAs Receiving Less Than $50,000 Annually Questions? A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A N D CO N T R A C T E X P E CT A T I O N S 3

  4. 2/24/2012 Administration Overlap of Contracts – July 1 – Sept. 30  LPHAs still accountable for FY12 HCP and MCH contracts; Will receive FY12 funding as planned through  Administered by the Office of Planning and Sept. 30, 2012; Partnership (OPP);  MCH/ HCP SOW will be built into per capita contract / p p beginning July 1, but agency will begin new SOW  Distributed through LPHAs’ per capita contracts; identified in OPP contract October 1;  A scope of work specific to MCH and HCP work and  New funding levels will begin October 1 st and continue through June 30 th (9 months of FY13 funding); funding will be included in the per capita contract. Contract Expectations Support Agencies Receiving $1500-$15,000 Annually  The state MCH/ HCP Programs will partner with OPP to  Must choose from the following options: provide technical assistance and consultation related to MCH/ HCP.  MCH priorities by implementing part or all of a state-  LPHAs will receive support from OPP Nursing Consultants developed local action plan related to an MCH priority;  Program expertise also available from MCH state staff  HCP Model of Care Coordination with data entry in including HCP Nurse Consultants and the MCH CYSHCN Data System; Implementation Teams;  Community health assessment process and public health  MCH Conference to learn about state and national improvement planning process; MCH/ HCP, MCH data, and local evidence-based strategies. Contract Expectations Agencies Receiving $15,001-$50,000 Annually Questions?  Required: HCP Care Coordination Model including data entry into CYSHCN Data System  In addition, agencies may choose from the following: I dditi i h f th f ll i  MCH priorities by implementing part or all of a state- developed local action plan related to an MCH priority;  Community health assessment process and public health improvement planning process; 4

  5. 2/24/2012 Administration and Support LPHAs Receiving More Than $50,000 Annually  Administered by the state MCH Program in partnership with the HCP Program; A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A N D CO N T R A C T  Agencies will participate in the MCH planning, E X P E CT A T I O N S implementation and reporting process;  Support provided by MCH Generalist Consultants; Support Contract Expectations  Program expertise is also available from state staff  Required to implement the HCP Care Coordination including: HCP Nurse Consultants; the PSD Model including data entry in the CYSHCN Data Epidemiology, Planning and Evaluation Branch; and the System; MCH Implementation Teams.  Required to implement the local action plan related  Will develop one-year plans (with longer term goals/ obj.) for the next three years as agencies’ MCH/ HCP funding to the medical home priority levels transition;  LPHAs determine percent of funding allocated to  Required to attend MCH conference on March 7,8, and 9 th to learn about local action plans, contract HCP care coordination and medical home priority expectations, and much more! meet these requirements. Contract Expectations Illustration of FY13 LPHA MCH/ HCP Funding  Percent of total MCH/ HCP funds must focus on FY13 LPHA MCH/ HCP implementing MCH-priority action plans, including the Funding Expectations medical home priority. HCP Care Coordination Other MCH Priorities and Action Plans Includes costs  FY13 - At least 10 % of total MCH/ HCP funds associated with 10% Medical Home Priority One exam ple of what HCP care l f h coordination costs may be.  FY14 – At least 20 % of total MCH/ HCP funds 40% The parameters of the "Other" work are similar to MCH funding parameters now.  FY15 and FY16 - At least 30 % of total MCH/ HCP HCP Specialty Efforts are determined by Clinic Funding LPHA. 50%  These percentages will be reassessed prior to the start of each fiscal year. 5

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend