120 cos 0 95 100 0 90 0 85 80 0 80 60 0 75 40 0 70 20 0
play

120 cos 0.95 100 0.90 0.85 80 0.80 60 0.75 40 0.70 20 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 27, 2023 •1.18k likes •2.3k views

FGD1 FGD1 CC0 CC0 : Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 : Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 1.00 120 cos 0.95 100 0.90 0.85 80 0.80 60 0.75 40 0.70 20 0.65 0.60 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

  1. ν ν π π FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CC0 CC0 µ µ Events/0.01 900 Data 800 ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h 700 ν π CC Res 1 ν π 600 CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 500 ν NC modes ν modes 400 300 200 100 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  2. ν ν π π FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CC0 CC0 µ µ Events/0.01 800 Data 700 MC 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  3. ν ν π π FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CC1 CC1 : Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 : Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 3.0 µ θ cos 0.95 2.5 0.90 2.0 0.85 1.5 0.80 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.70 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 p (MeV/c) µ

  4. ν π FGD1 anti- CC1 : Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 3.0 µ θ cos 0.95 2.5 0.90 2.0 0.85 1.5 0.80 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.70 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 p (MeV/c) µ

  5. ν ν π π FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CC1 CC1 µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 30 Data ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h 25 ν π CC Res 1 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other ν 20 NC modes ν modes 15 10 5 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 p (MeV/c) µ

  6. ν ν π π FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CC1 CC1 µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 30 Data 25 MC 20 15 10 5 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 p (MeV/c) µ

  7. ν ν π π FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CC1 CC1 µ µ Events/0.01 120 Data ν CCQE ν 100 CC 2p2h ν π CC Res 1 ν π CC Coh 1 80 ν CC Other ν NC modes 60 ν modes 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  8. ν ν π π FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CC1 CC1 µ µ 120 Events/0.01 Data 100 MC 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  9. ν ν FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CCOther: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 CCOther: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 µ θ 4.5 cos 0.95 4.0 3.5 0.90 3.0 2.5 0.85 2.0 0.80 1.5 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  10. ν FGD1 anti- CCOther: Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 µ θ 4.5 cos 0.95 4.0 3.5 0.90 3.0 2.5 0.85 2.0 0.80 1.5 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  11. ν ν FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CCOther CCOther µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 45 Data ν CCQE 40 ν CC 2p2h ν π CC Res 1 35 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other ν 30 NC modes ν modes 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  12. ν ν FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CCOther CCOther µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 45 Data 40 MC 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  13. ν ν FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CCOther CCOther µ µ Events/0.01 200 Data ν 180 CCQE ν CC 2p2h 160 ν π CC Res 1 ν π 140 CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 120 ν NC modes 100 ν modes 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  14. ν ν FGD1 anti- FGD1 anti- CCOther CCOther µ µ Events/0.01 200 Data 180 MC 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  15. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC0 CC0 : Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 : Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 µ 70 θ cos 0.95 60 50 0.90 40 0.85 30 0.80 20 0.75 10 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  16. ν π FGD2 anti- CC0 : Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 µ 70 θ cos 0.95 60 50 0.90 40 0.85 30 0.80 20 0.75 10 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  17. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC0 CC0 µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) Data 1000 ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h ν π CC Res 1 ν π 800 CC Coh 1 ν CC Other ν NC modes ν modes 600 400 200 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  18. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC0 CC0 µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 1000 Data MC 800 600 400 200 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  19. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC0 CC0 µ µ Events/0.01 900 Data 800 ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h 700 ν π CC Res 1 ν π 600 CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 500 ν NC modes ν modes 400 300 200 100 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  20. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC0 CC0 µ µ Events/0.01 800 Data 700 MC 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  21. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC1 CC1 : Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 : Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 3.0 µ θ cos 0.95 2.5 0.90 2.0 0.85 1.5 0.80 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.70 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 p (MeV/c) µ

  22. ν π FGD2 anti- CC1 : Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 3.0 µ θ cos 0.95 2.5 0.90 2.0 0.85 1.5 0.80 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.70 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 p (MeV/c) µ

  23. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC1 CC1 µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 25 Data ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h ν π CC Res 1 20 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other ν NC modes ν 15 modes 10 5 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 p (MeV/c) µ

  24. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC1 CC1 µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 25 Data MC 20 15 10 5 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 p (MeV/c) µ

  25. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC1 CC1 µ µ Events/0.01 100 Data ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h 80 ν π CC Res 1 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 60 ν NC modes ν modes 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  26. ν ν π π FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CC1 CC1 µ µ Events/0.01 100 Data MC 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  27. ν ν FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CCOther: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 CCOther: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 µ θ cos 5 0.95 4 0.90 3 0.85 2 0.80 1 0.75 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  28. ν FGD2 anti- CCOther: Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 µ θ cos 5 0.95 4 0.90 3 0.85 2 0.80 1 0.75 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  29. ν ν FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CCOther CCOther µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 45 Data ν CCQE 40 ν CC 2p2h ν π CC Res 1 35 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 30 ν NC modes ν modes 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  30. ν ν FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CCOther CCOther µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) Data 40 MC 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  31. ν ν FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CCOther CCOther µ µ Events/0.01 220 Data 200 ν CCQE 180 ν CC 2p2h ν π CC Res 1 160 ν π CC Coh 1 140 ν CC Other 120 ν NC modes ν 100 modes 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  32. ν ν FGD2 anti- FGD2 anti- CCOther CCOther µ µ Events/0.01 200 Data 180 MC 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  33. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 µ θ 8 cos 0.95 7 6 0.90 5 0.85 4 3 0.80 2 0.75 1 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  34. ν π FGD1 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode: Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 µ θ 8 cos 0.95 7 6 0.90 5 0.85 4 3 0.80 2 0.75 1 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  35. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 180 Data 160 ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h ν π 140 CC Res 1 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 120 ν NC modes ν modes 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  36. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 160 Data MC 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  37. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/0.01 500 Data ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h 400 ν π CC Res 1 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 300 ν NC modes ν modes 200 100 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  38. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/0.01 450 Data 400 MC 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  39. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC1 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 2.0 µ θ cos 1.8 0.95 1.6 1.4 0.90 1.2 0.85 1.0 0.8 0.80 0.6 0.4 0.75 0.2 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 p (MeV/c) µ

  40. ν π FGD1 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode: Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 2.0 µ θ cos 1.8 0.95 1.6 1.4 0.90 1.2 0.85 1.0 0.8 0.80 0.6 0.4 0.75 0.2 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 p (MeV/c) µ

  41. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC1 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 40 Data ν CCQE 35 ν CC 2p2h ν π CC Res 1 ν π CC Coh 1 30 ν CC Other ν NC modes 25 ν modes 20 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 p (MeV/c) µ

  42. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC1 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 40 Data 35 MC 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 p (MeV/c) µ

  43. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC1 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/0.01 180 Data ν 160 CCQE ν CC 2p2h 140 ν π CC Res 1 ν π CC Coh 1 120 ν CC Other 100 ν NC modes ν modes 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  44. ν ν π π FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CC1 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ 180 Events/0.01 Data 160 MC 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  45. ν ν FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 µ 3.0 θ cos 0.95 2.5 0.90 2.0 0.85 1.5 0.80 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  46. ν FGD1 Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode: Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 µ 3.0 θ cos 0.95 2.5 0.90 2.0 0.85 1.5 0.80 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  47. ν ν FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 30 Data ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h ν π 25 CC Res 1 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other ν 20 NC modes ν modes 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  48. ν ν FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 30 Data MC 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  49. ν ν FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/0.01 200 Data ν CCQE 180 ν CC 2p2h 160 ν π CC Res 1 ν π 140 CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 120 ν NC modes 100 ν modes 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  50. ν ν FGD1 FGD1 Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode Bkg CCOther in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/0.01 200 Data 180 MC 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  51. ν ν π π FGD2 FGD2 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 µ 9 θ cos 8 0.95 7 0.90 6 5 0.85 4 0.80 3 2 0.75 1 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  52. ν π FGD2 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode: Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 µ 9 θ cos 8 0.95 7 0.90 6 5 0.85 4 0.80 3 2 0.75 1 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  53. ν ν π π FGD2 FGD2 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 180 Data ν CCQE 160 ν CC 2p2h ν π CC Res 1 140 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 120 ν NC modes ν modes 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  54. ν ν π π FGD2 FGD2 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) Data 160 MC 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p (MeV/c) µ

  55. ν ν π π FGD2 FGD2 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/0.01 500 Data ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h 400 ν π CC Res 1 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other 300 ν NC modes ν modes 200 100 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  56. ν ν π π FGD2 FGD2 Bkg CC0 Bkg CC0 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ 500 Events/0.01 Data 400 MC 300 200 100 0 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 θ cos µ

  57. ν ν π π FGD2 FGD2 Bkg CC1 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 in AntiNu Mode: Data Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ µ 1.00 µ θ 2.0 cos 1.8 0.95 1.6 0.90 1.4 1.2 0.85 1.0 0.8 0.80 0.6 0.4 0.75 0.2 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 p (MeV/c) µ

  58. ν π FGD2 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode: Prefit Events/100 MeV/0.01 µ 1.00 µ θ 2.0 cos 1.8 0.95 1.6 0.90 1.4 1.2 0.85 1.0 0.8 0.80 0.6 0.4 0.75 0.2 0.70 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 p (MeV/c) µ

  59. ν ν π π FGD2 FGD2 Bkg CC1 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) Data 30 ν CCQE ν CC 2p2h ν π CC Res 1 25 ν π CC Coh 1 ν CC Other ν NC modes 20 ν modes 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 p (MeV/c) µ

  60. ν ν π π FGD2 FGD2 Bkg CC1 Bkg CC1 in AntiNu Mode in AntiNu Mode µ µ Events/(100 MeV/c) 30 Data MC 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 p (MeV/c) µ

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

Associative dyadic boolean functions Goals Def: A Boolean function f : { 0 , 1 } 2 { 0 , 1 }

Associative dyadic boolean functions Goals Def: A Boolean function f : { 0 , 1 } 2 { 0 , 1 }

Associative dyadic boolean functions Goals Def: A Boolean function f : { 0 , 1 } 2 { 0 , 1 } is associative if define associative Boolean functions (and classify them). Chapter 3: Trees f ( f ( 1 , 2 ) , 3 ) = f ( 1 , f ( 2 ,

61 views • 5 slides
Pei-Rong Li( ) Lanzhou University

Pei-Rong Li( ) Lanzhou University

Hadronic charm decays at Pei-Rong Li( ) Lanzhou University BESIII is at Institute of High Energy Physics(IHEP) in Beijing, China

479 views • 23 slides
Normal Forms 1 Literals Definition A literal is an atom or the negation of an atom. In the

Normal Forms 1 Literals Definition A literal is an atom or the negation of an atom. In the

Propositional Logic Normal Forms 1 Literals Definition A literal is an atom or the negation of an atom. In the former case the literal is positive, in the latter case it is negative. 2 Negation Normal Form (NNF) Definition A formula is in

256 views • 8 slides
Deep learning J er emy Fix CentraleSup elec jeremy.fix@centralesupelec.fr 2016 1 / 94

Deep learning J er emy Fix CentraleSup elec jeremy.fix@centralesupelec.fr 2016 1 / 94

Introduction Feedforward Neural Networks Deep learning J er emy Fix CentraleSup elec jeremy.fix@centralesupelec.fr 2016 1 / 94 Introduction Feedforward Neural Networks Introduction and historical perspective [Schmidhuber, 2015]

1.59k views • 144 slides
The T2K CCQE selection and prospects for CCQE, NC cross section measurements Daniel Ruterbories

The T2K CCQE selection and prospects for CCQE, NC cross section measurements Daniel Ruterbories

The T2K CCQE selection and prospects for CCQE, NC cross section measurements Daniel Ruterbories for the T2K Collaboration NuInt2012, Rio De Janeiro 1 10/25/2012 Overview T2K CCQE Results Selection Use of sample in fits for

780 views • 30 slides
CC0pi results from T2K Andy Furmanski NuFact 15 Rio

CC0pi results from T2K Andy Furmanski NuFact 15 Rio

CC0pi results from T2K Andy Furmanski NuFact 15 Rio de Janeiro Andy Furmanski 1 The T2K experiment Long-baseline neutrino oscillaFon

276 views • 23 slides
Results from T2K Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K 1 Contents T2K Overview

Results from T2K Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K 1 Contents T2K Overview

Results from T2K Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K 1 Contents T2K Overview Tokai Kamioka Neutrino Oscillations Results Muon neutrino disappearance Electron neutrino appearance Charged Current

835 views • 46 slides
Lif ife o on the n the Nu Nu F Frontie ntier Neutrinos - known and unknown Neutrino

Lif ife o on the n the Nu Nu F Frontie ntier Neutrinos - known and unknown Neutrino

Lif ife o on the n the Nu Nu F Frontie ntier Neutrinos - known and unknown Neutrino experiments Long and short baseline experiments Chooz/Double Chooz MINOS T2K No a Daya Bay Laura Kormos Future frontiers Lancaster University The

520 views • 39 slides
J-PARC neutrino experiment (T2K) 2019-July-10, Summer Student Program K.Sakashita(KEK/J-PARC) 1

J-PARC neutrino experiment (T2K) 2019-July-10, Summer Student Program K.Sakashita(KEK/J-PARC) 1

J-PARC neutrino experiment (T2K) 2019-July-10, Summer Student Program K.Sakashita(KEK/J-PARC) 1 Neutrino 2 Its special, mysterious particle.. e e e e e e e e e Abundant in Universe m /m e < 10 -6 m /m

322 views • 31 slides
NUFACT 2017 M. Lamoureux (CEA, France), on behalf of the T2K collaboration September 29,

NUFACT 2017 M. Lamoureux (CEA, France), on behalf of the T2K collaboration September 29,

Upgrade of the T2K near detector ND280: effect on oscillation and cross-section analysis NUFACT 2017 M. Lamoureux (CEA, France), on behalf of the T2K collaboration September 29, 2017 The T2K experiment 2 Off-axis beam (2 . 5 ) Two

209 views • 20 slides
Search and Rescue: logic and visualisation of biochemical networks Nicos Angelopoulos 1 , Paul

Search and Rescue: logic and visualisation of biochemical networks Nicos Angelopoulos 1 , Paul

Search and Rescue: logic and visualisation of biochemical networks Nicos Angelopoulos 1 , Paul Shannon 2 and Lodewyk Wessels 1 n.angelopoulos@nki.nl 1 Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands 2 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,

696 views • 17 slides
r..eal : Integrative statistics with R tor Santos Costa, Jo Nicos Angelopoulos, V ao

r..eal : Integrative statistics with R tor Santos Costa, Jo Nicos Angelopoulos, V ao

r..eal : Integrative statistics with R tor Santos Costa, Jo Nicos Angelopoulos, V ao Azevedo, Jan Wielemaker, Rui Camacho and Lodewyk Wessels n.angelopoulos@nki.nl Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands PADL 2013, Rome

557 views • 24 slides
Recent Results and Prospects Koichiro Nishikawa (1949-2018) Alain Blondel 1 Idea of T2K was

Recent Results and Prospects Koichiro Nishikawa (1949-2018) Alain Blondel 1 Idea of T2K was

Recent Results and Prospects Koichiro Nishikawa (1949-2018) Alain Blondel 1 Idea of T2K was born 1999-2001 hep-ex/0106019 combining: -- existing SuperKamiokande detector (50kton W.., 22.5 kton fiducial) excellent mu/e separation esp. in

821 views • 32 slides
Water-based Liquid Scintillator and Isotope Loadings Minfang Yeh Neutrino and Nuclear Chemistry,

Water-based Liquid Scintillator and Isotope Loadings Minfang Yeh Neutrino and Nuclear Chemistry,

Water-based Liquid Scintillator and Isotope Loadings Minfang Yeh Neutrino and Nuclear Chemistry, Brookhaven National Laboratory WbLS-LBNE Workshop Water-based Liquid Scintillator 12000 A cost-effective, new liquid medium Optical

579 views • 22 slides
Novel No el and E and Emer ergi ging t ng tar arge gets: : University of California

Novel No el and E and Emer ergi ging t ng tar arge gets: : University of California

11/5/19 Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, MD PhD ANCO-UCSF Precision Oncology Symposium November 8, 2019 Health Science Clinical Professor Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center Novel No el and E and Emer ergi ging t ng tar arge gets: :

369 views • 19 slides
Logic Programming for Big Data in Computational Biology Nicos Angelopoulos Wellcome Sanger

Logic Programming for Big Data in Computational Biology Nicos Angelopoulos Wellcome Sanger

Logic Programming for Big Data in Computational Biology Nicos Angelopoulos Wellcome Sanger Institute Hinxton, Cambridge nicos.angelopoulos@sanger.ac.uk 18.9.18 overview knowledge for Bayesian machine learning over model structure

661 views • 33 slides
Stochastic Model Checking Stochastic Model Checking Marta Kwiatkowska Kwiatkowska Marta

Stochastic Model Checking Stochastic Model Checking Marta Kwiatkowska Kwiatkowska Marta

Stochastic Model Checking Stochastic Model Checking Marta Kwiatkowska Kwiatkowska Marta University of Birmingham University of Birmingham www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~mzk www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~mzk st May 2007 SFM- -07:PE, 07:PE, Bertinoro Bertinoro,

1.78k views • 159 slides
A logical functional analysis pipeline Nicos Angelopoulos and Giorgos Giamas WCB, 8/9/2014

A logical functional analysis pipeline Nicos Angelopoulos and Giorgos Giamas WCB, 8/9/2014

A logical functional analysis pipeline Nicos Angelopoulos and Giorgos Giamas WCB, 8/9/2014 p.1 . . . introduction . . . it is becoming increasingly clear, that the ability to reason at the highest possible level with the available data has a

189 views • 14 slides
Palumbo Antonio, MD Research Support/P.I. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Employee

Palumbo Antonio, MD Research Support/P.I. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Employee

Disclosures for Palumbo Antonio, MD Research Support/P.I. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Employee No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Consultant Millenium, Onyx Major

625 views • 34 slides
probabilistic genotype-phenotype model Anthony Gitter Cancer Bioinformatics (BMI 826/CS 838) May

probabilistic genotype-phenotype model Anthony Gitter Cancer Bioinformatics (BMI 826/CS 838) May

Dissecting cancer heterogeneity with a probabilistic genotype-phenotype model Anthony Gitter Cancer Bioinformatics (BMI 826/CS 838) May 5, 2015 All figures from Cho2013 unless noted otherwise Class business Project presentations Thursday

451 views • 31 slides
Fixed Points and Feedback Cycles in Boolean Networks Adrien Richard Laboratoire I3S, CNRS &

Fixed Points and Feedback Cycles in Boolean Networks Adrien Richard Laboratoire I3S, CNRS &

Fixed Points and Feedback Cycles in Boolean Networks Adrien Richard Laboratoire I3S, CNRS & Universit e de Nice-Sophia Antipolis Joint work with Julio Aracena & Lilian Salinas Universidad de Concepci on, Chile Groupe de travail

1.31k views • 107 slides
Engaging Incentives: Best Practices and Latest Trends SARAH MARTIN MANAGER, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Engaging Incentives: Best Practices and Latest Trends SARAH MARTIN MANAGER, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

2010 Obesity Prevention Summit l April 14, 2010 Engaging Incentives: Best Practices and Latest Trends SARAH MARTIN MANAGER, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND MARKET RESEARCH Smarter benefits. Better health. Wellness Program Models Traditional

373 views • 19 slides
Kalamazoo Valley Community Kalamazoo Valley Community College College Employee Wellness Program

Kalamazoo Valley Community Kalamazoo Valley Community College College Employee Wellness Program

Kalamazoo Valley Community Kalamazoo Valley Community College College Employee Wellness Program Employee Wellness Program Getting started: The Getting started: The Vision Vision Health and Wellness in the new Health and Wellness in the

422 views • 23 slides
Exam Name___________________________________ MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that

Exam Name___________________________________ MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that

Exam Name___________________________________ MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) A fish appears to be 7.00 m below the surface of a pond when viewed almost directly above by

220 views • 4 slides

More recommend