11 4 colorability of subcubic triangle free graphs
play

11/4-colorability of subcubic triangle-free graphs Zden ek Dvo r - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

11/4-colorability of subcubic triangle-free graphs Zden ek Dvo r ak Bernard Lidick y Luke Postle AMS October 10, 2020 Motivation Theorem (4CT - Appel, Haken (1976)) Every planar graph is 4 -colorable. Also Robertson, Sanders,


  1. 11/4-colorability of subcubic triangle-free graphs Zdenˇ ek Dvoˇ r´ ak Bernard Lidick´ y Luke Postle AMS October 10, 2020

  2. Motivation Theorem (4CT - Appel, Haken (1976)) Every planar graph is 4 -colorable. Also Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, Thomas (1997) 2

  3. Motivation Theorem (4CT - Appel, Haken (1976)) Every planar graph is 4 -colorable. Also Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, Thomas (1997) 4CT implies α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 Show without 4CT α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 (Erd˝ os-Vizing conj.) 2

  4. Motivation Theorem (4CT - Appel, Haken (1976)) 2 2 Every planar graph is 4 -colorable. 2 2 2 Also Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, Thomas (1997) 3 4 4 3 1 4CT implies α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 2 2 Show without 4CT α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 (Erd˝ os-Vizing conj.) Assign weights to V ( G ). 4CT implies independent set with ≥ 1 / 4 of the weight. Is it true without 4CT? 2

  5. Motivation Theorem (4CT - Appel, Haken (1976)) 1 1 Every planar graph is 4 -colorable. 1 1 1 Also Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, Thomas (1997) 1 1 1 1 1 4CT implies α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 1 1 Show without 4CT α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 (Erd˝ os-Vizing conj.) Assign weights to V ( G ). 4CT implies independent set with ≥ 1 / 4 of the weight. Is it true without 4CT? 2

  6. Motivation Theorem (4CT - Appel, Haken (1976)) 1 1 Every planar graph is 4 -colorable. 1 1 1 Also Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, Thomas (1997) 1 1 1 1 1 4CT implies α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 1 1 Show without 4CT α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 (Erd˝ os-Vizing conj.) Assign weights to V ( G ). 4CT implies independent set with ≥ 1 / 4 of the weight. Is it true without 4CT? Without 4CT α ( G ) ≥ 3 n 13 ≈ 0 . 23076 (Cranston and Rabern (2016)) 2

  7. Motivation Theorem (4CT - Appel, Haken (1976)) 2 2 Every planar graph is 4 -colorable. 2 2 2 Also Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, Thomas (1997) 3 4 4 3 1 4CT implies α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 2 2 Show without 4CT α ( G ) ≥ n / 4 (Erd˝ os-Vizing conj.) Assign weights to V ( G ). 4CT implies independent set with ≥ 1 / 4 of the weight. Is it true without 4CT? Without 4CT α ( G ) ≥ 3 n 13 ≈ 0 . 23076 (Cranston and Rabern (2016)) Weighted independent set leads to fractional coloring. 2

  8. Fractional coloring using linear programming I ( G ) are all independent sets v 5 coloring v 1 v 4  minimize � I ∈I ( G ) x ( I )   P � ∀ v subject to I ∋ v x ( I ) = 1  x ∈ { 0 , 1 } I ( G )  v 2 v 3 |I ( C 5 ) | = 11 3

  9. Fractional coloring using linear programming I ( G ) are all independent sets v 5 coloring v 1 v 4  minimize � I ∈I ( G ) x ( I )   P � ∀ v subject to I ∋ v x ( I ) = 1  x ∈ { 0 , 1 } I ( G )  v 2 v 3 |I ( C 5 ) | = 11 • x (1 , 3) = x (2 , 4) = x (5) = 1 χ ( G ) = 3 3

  10. Fractional coloring using linear programming I ( G ) are all independent sets v 5 fractional coloring v 1 v 4  minimize � I ∈I ( G ) x ( I )   LP � ∀ v subject to I ∋ v x ( I ) = 1  x ∈ { 0 , 1 } I ( G )  x ∈ [0 , 1] I ( G ) v 2 v 3 |I ( C 5 ) | = 11 • x (1 , 3) = x (2 , 4) = x (5) = 1 χ ( G ) = 3 3

  11. Fractional coloring using linear programming I ( G ) are all independent sets v 5 fractional coloring v 1 v 4  minimize � I ∈I ( G ) x ( I )   LP � ∀ v subject to I ∋ v x ( I ) = 1  x ∈ { 0 , 1 } I ( G )  x ∈ [0 , 1] I ( G ) v 2 v 3 |I ( C 5 ) | = 11 • x (1 , 3) = x (2 , 4) = x (5) = 1 χ ( G ) = 3 • x (1 , 3) = x (2 , 4) = x (3 , 5) = x (1 , 4) = x (2 , 5) = 1 / 2 χ f ( G ) = 2 . 5 3

  12. Fractional coloring using linear programming I ( G ) are all independent sets v 5 fractional coloring v 1 v 4  minimize � I ∈I ( G ) x ( I )   LP � ∀ v subject to I ∋ v x ( I ) = 1  x ∈ { 0 , 1 } I ( G )  x ∈ [0 , 1] I ( G ) v 2 v 3 |I ( C 5 ) | = 11 • x (1 , 3) = x (2 , 4) = x (5) = 1 χ ( G ) = 3 • x (1 , 3) = x (2 , 4) = x (3 , 5) = x (1 , 4) = x (2 , 5) = 1 / 2 χ f ( G ) = 2 . 5 • χ ( G ) ≥ χ f ( G ) ≥ | V ( G ) | /α ( G ) 3

  13. Equivalent definitions for fractional coloring v 5 G is fractionally k -colorable if exists ϕ • ϕ ( v ) ⊂ [0 , k ) with | ϕ ( v ) | = 1 v 1 v 4 χ f ( G ) = 5 2 and ϕ ( u ) ∩ ϕ ( v ) = ∅ for uv ∈ E ( G ) v 2 v 3 1 5 0 2 4

  14. Equivalent definitions for fractional coloring v 5 G is fractionally k -colorable if exists ϕ • ϕ ( v ) ⊂ [0 , k ) with | ϕ ( v ) | = 1 v 1 v 4 • ∃ a b = k , ϕ ( v ) ⊂ { 1 , . . . , a } , | ϕ ( v ) | = b χ f ( G ) = 5 2 and ϕ ( u ) ∩ ϕ ( v ) = ∅ for uv ∈ E ( G ) v 2 v 3 1 2 3 4 5 4

  15. Equivalent definitions for fractional coloring v 5 G is fractionally k -colorable if exists ϕ • ϕ ( v ) ⊂ [0 , k ) with | ϕ ( v ) | = 1 v 1 v 4 • ∃ a b = k , ϕ ( v ) ⊂ { 1 , . . . , a } , | ϕ ( v ) | = b χ f ( G ) = 5 • ϕ ( v ) ⊂ [0 , a ) with | ϕ ( v ) | = b , a 2 b = k and ϕ ( u ) ∩ ϕ ( v ) = ∅ for uv ∈ E ( G ) v 2 v 3 2 0 5 4

  16. Equivalent definitions for fractional coloring v 5 G is fractionally k -colorable if exists ϕ • ϕ ( v ) ⊂ [0 , k ) with | ϕ ( v ) | = 1 v 1 v 4 • ∃ a b = k , ϕ ( v ) ⊂ { 1 , . . . , a } , | ϕ ( v ) | = b χ f ( G ) = 5 • ϕ ( v ) ⊂ [0 , a ) with | ϕ ( v ) | = b , a 2 b = k and ϕ ( u ) ∩ ϕ ( v ) = ∅ for uv ∈ E ( G ) v 2 v 3 Theorem (Hilton, Rado, Scott (1973)) χ f ( G ) < 5 for any planar G. (But no c < 5 with χ f ( G ) < c for all planar graphs G.) 2 0 5 Theorem (Cranston and Rabern (2017)) Planar graphs are 9 2 -colorable. (Without using 4CT.) 4

  17. Planar triangle-free graphs Theorem (Gr¨ otzsch (1959)) Every triangle-free planar graph G is 3 -colorable. α ( G ) ≥ n / 3 5

  18. Planar triangle-free graphs Theorem (Gr¨ otzsch (1959)) Every triangle-free planar graph G is 3 -colorable. α ( G ) ≥ n / 3 α ( G ) ≥ n / 3 + 1 Steinberg and Tovey (1993) ∃ G : α ( G ) ≤ n / 3 + 1 (and ∆( G ) = 4) Jones (1990) 5

  19. Planar triangle-free graphs Theorem (Gr¨ otzsch (1959)) Every triangle-free planar graph G is 3 -colorable. α ( G ) ≥ n / 3 α ( G ) ≥ n / 3 + 1 Steinberg and Tovey (1993) α = 9 = 3 8 · 24 ∃ G : α ( G ) ≤ n / 3 + 1 (and ∆( G ) = 4) Jones (1990) Question (Albertson, Bollob´ as, Tucker (1976)) � 1 3 , 3 � Find s ∈ s.t. every subcubic triangle-free planar graph G has α ( G ) ≥ sn? 8 5

  20. Planar triangle-free graphs Theorem (Gr¨ otzsch (1959)) Every triangle-free planar graph G is 3 -colorable. α ( G ) ≥ n / 3 α ( G ) ≥ n / 3 + 1 Steinberg and Tovey (1993) α = 9 = 3 8 · 24 ∃ G : α ( G ) ≤ n / 3 + 1 (and ∆( G ) = 4) Jones (1990) Question (Albertson, Bollob´ as, Tucker (1976)) � 1 3 , 3 � Find s ∈ s.t. every subcubic triangle-free planar graph G has α ( G ) ≥ sn? 8 • s = 5 14 ≈ 0 . 35714 Staton (1979) No planarity condition! • s = 3 8 = 0 . 375 Heckman and Thomas (2006) 5

  21. Subcubic triangle-free graphs If G is a subcubic triangle-free graph α = 5 n • α ( G ) ≥ 5 n 14 ≈ 0 . 35714 n Staton (1979) 14 • α ( G ) ≥ 11 n − 4 ≈ 0 . 3666 n Fraughaugh and Locke (1995) 30 • α ( G ) ≥ 3 n 8 = 0 . 375 n Cames van Batenburg, Goedgebeur, Joret (2020) if G is avoids 6 exceptional graphs. All non-planar, containing 5-cycles. (Infinitely many 3-connected tight examples.) 6

  22. From α to χ f If G is fractionally 1 s -colorable, it has α ( G ) ≥ sn . α ( C 5 ) = 2 χ f ( C 5 ) = 5 5 n 2 If α ( G ) = sn , is G fractionally 1 s -colorable? Conjecture (Heckman and Thomas (2001)) Every subcubic triangle-free graph is fractionally 14 / 5 -colorable. Conjecture (Heckman and Thomas (2006)) Every subcubic triangle-free planar graph is fractionally 8 / 3 -colorable. 7

  23. Conjecture (Heckman and Thomas (2001)) Every subcubic triangle-free graph is fractionally 14 / 5 -colorable. χ f ( F (1) 14 ) = χ f ( F (1) 14 ) = 14 / 5 F (1) F (2) 14 14 8

  24. Conjecture (Heckman and Thomas (2001)) Every subcubic triangle-free graph is fractionally 14 / 5 -colorable. χ f ( F (1) 14 ) = χ f ( F (1) 14 ) = 14 / 5 • 3 − 3 64 ≈ 2 . 953 Hatami, Zhu (2009) • 3 − 3 43 ≈ 2 . 930 Lu, Peng (2012) 32 • 11 ≈ 2 . 909 Furgeson, Kaiser, Kr´ al’ (2014) 43 • 15 ≈ 2 . 867 Chun-Hung Liu (2014) 14 • 5 = 2 . 8 Dvoˇ r´ ak, Sereni, Volec (2014) F (1) F (2) 14 14 8

  25. Conjecture (Heckman and Thomas (2001)) Every subcubic triangle-free graph is fractionally 14 / 5 -colorable. χ f ( F (1) 14 ) = χ f ( F (1) 14 ) = 14 / 5 • 3 − 3 64 ≈ 2 . 953 Hatami, Zhu (2009) • 3 − 3 43 ≈ 2 . 930 Lu, Peng (2012) 32 • 11 ≈ 2 . 909 Furgeson, Kaiser, Kr´ al’ (2014) 43 • 15 ≈ 2 . 867 Chun-Hung Liu (2014) 14 • 5 = 2 . 8 Dvoˇ r´ ak, Sereni, Volec (2014) F (1) F (2) 14 14 11 • 4 = 2 . 75 Dvoˇ r´ ak, L., Postle, if not → Theorem (Dvoˇ r´ ak, L., Postle (2020+)) Every subcubic triangle-free graph avoiding F (1) 14 and F (1) 14 is fractionally 11 / 4 -colorable. 8

  26. Theorem (Dvoˇ r´ ak, L., Postle (2020+)) Every subcubic triangle-free graph avoiding F (1) 14 and F (1) 14 is fractionally 11 / 4 -colorable. 3 1 2 2 1 3 F (1) F (2) F 11 F 22 14 14 χ f ( F (1) 14 ) = χ f ( F (2) 14 ) = 14 / 5 χ f ( F 22 ) = χ f ( F 11 ) = 11 / 4 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend