SLIDE 2 10/15/2019 2
Health Systems Division
Enrollment of Medicaid/Medicare eligible OHP clients in Medicare Advantage Plans ‐15 August 2019
Data based on the 15 August 2019 census of OHP run on 9/10/2019 6:22:25 AM CCO no MMA Plan non‐Affiliated MMA Plan Affiliated MMA Plan *1 Total Number
% no MMA Plan % Affiliated MMA Plan*2 ADVANCED HEALTH (CCOA) 1,845 66 1,911 96.5% 0.0% ALLCARE CCO‐ INC. (CCOA) 1,727 310 1,256 3,293 52.4% 80.2% CASCADE HEALTH ALLIANCE‐ LLC (CCOA) 588 59 675 1,322 44.5% 92.0% COLUMBIA PACIFIC CCO LLC (CCOA) 1,507 102 423 2,032 74.2% 80.6% EASTERN OREGON CCO‐ LLC (CCOA) 3,607 63 50 3,720 97.0% 44.2% FEE‐FOR‐SERVICE (FFS)*1 6,851 2,687 9,538 71.8% 0.0% HEALTH SHARE OF OREGON (CCOA) 10,439 2,636 13,812 26,887 38.8% 84.0% INTERCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK (CCOA) 2,477 570 1,390 4,437 55.8% 70.9% JACKSON CARE CONNECT (CCOA) 1,321 132 879 2,332 56.6% 86.9% PACIFICSOURCE COMMUNITY SOL GORGE (CCOA) 606 13 115 734 82.6% 89.8% PACIFICSOURCE COMMUNITY SOL INC (CCOA) 1,069 55 1,861 2,985 35.8% 97.1% PRIMARYHEALTH JOSEPHINE CO CCO (CCOA) 594 179 29 802 74.1% 13.9% TRILLIUM COMMUNITY HEALTH PLAN (CCOA) 4,241 1,530 2,149 7,920 53.5% 58.4% UMPQUA HEALTH ALLIANCE‐ DCIPA (CCOA) 914 86 1,190 2,190 41.7% 93.3% WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMM. HEALTH (CCOA) 2,775 1,273 3,134 7,182 38.6% 71.1% YAMHILL COMMUNITY CARE (CCOA) 1,375 492 18 1,885 72.9% 3.5% 41,936 10,253 26,981 79,170 53.0% 72.5% *1: FFS clients enrolled in an "Affiliated" MMA plan meaning in an MMA Plan affiliated with one of the OHP CCOA organizations *2: Percentage of clients Enrolled in an MMA plan who are in a plan affiliated with their CCOA plan % Affiliated MMA Plan*2 = Affiliated MMA Plan/(Affiliated MMA Plan+non‐Affiliated MMA Plan)
88% now enrolled in CCO A! (increased from 58% with Duals Passive Enrollment Initiative)
Health Systems Division
- Duals with aligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care (CCO) experienced
an improvement in health service use and quality of care between 2011 and 2014.
- When we compared duals with aligned plans to those with nonaligned Medicare
Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans; we found that while care differed minimally between these two groups at baseline, it changed in a more desirable direction over time for duals with aligned plans. (highest percent of alignment in CCOs with DSNPs).
- By the end of our study period, duals with aligned plans had lower emergency
department visit and hospitalization rates and higher primary care visit rates, compared with those with nonaligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans. They were also more likely to receive diabetes HbA1c testing and LDL cholesterol screening.
- Aligned Medicare and Medicaid programs might have a greater incentive to coordinate
care and save costs to benefit both programs over time.
Q: Why does it matter if a dual eligible has aligned Medicare and Medicaid benefits? Oregon Data
“Comparing Care for Dual‐Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon” Kim, Charlesworth, McConnell, Valentine, and Grabowski, Medical Care Research and Review, 1‐17, 2017