10/11/19 I have no relevant financial relationships Disclosure - - PDF document

10 11 19
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

10/11/19 I have no relevant financial relationships Disclosure - - PDF document

10/11/19 I have no relevant financial relationships Disclosure with any companies related to the content of this course. Gayle Tang, MSN, RN Communic Com ication ion Barrie iers: s: 8 th Asian Health Symposium Go Good Medicine Poorly


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10/11/19 1

Com Communic ication ion Barrie iers: s: Go Good Medicine Poorly Ex Executed!

Gayle Tang, MSN, RN

8th Asian Health Symposium University of California San Francisco Friday, October 11, 2019 Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf, San Francisco

1 Disclosure

  • I have no relevant financial relationships

with any companies related to the content of this course.

2 Objectives

Cultural & linguistic barriers and implications Language access strategies Commitment for change to promote quality, dignity, and patient safety

3 Language Access Demands

  • Changing Demographics
  • Patient Satisfaction and Health Care Quality and

Effectiveness

  • Federal and State Mandates and Accreditation

requirements

4

slide-2
SLIDE 2

10/11/19 2

Over 200 languages in CA

5

San Francisco Metro Area

  • At least 163 languages
  • 40% of the metro area

population age 5 and over speak a language other than English at home

  • Asians are now the

majority in Santa Clara, Alameda, and SF

5

CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC BARRIERS CAN RESULT IN:

  • A. Misdiagnosis, increasing cost and inefficiencies
  • B. Higher medical error rates

C.Lower patient satisfaction and lower patient comprehension D.All of the above

ARS

6

LANGUAGE BARRIERS RANKED AMONG THE TOP THREE OBSTACLES PREVENTING MINORITIES AND THE POOR FROM RECEIVING NECESSARY HEALTH CARE

¡ Fewer physician visits and lower use of preventive care ¡ Diminished comprehension of medical information, affecting the quality of health care ¡ Reduced abilities to follow provider instructions, adhere to treatments, or to comply with instructions for follow-up care ¡ Compromise the quality of care due to misdiagnosis, increasing costs and inefficiencies in the health care system due to unnecessary testing because of lack of a proper medical history ¡ Medical error rates are higher when physician and patient speak different languages ¡ Lower patient satisfaction for those with LEP ¡ 4 issues affecting their perceptions of health care: provider cultural competence; patient education; medication adherence; and difficulty communicating symptoms without language services

Source: Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice Volume 3, Number 3, Spring 2010

Linking Disparities to Service and Quality

7

Federal and State Mandates and Accreditation Requirements:

Embracing the National Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS) Standards

Federal State Local EMTALA SCHIP OCR Joint Commission DMHC CMS DHHS DHS NCQA Medicaid Others ACA MU Purchasers

CLAS

8

slide-3
SLIDE 3

10/11/19 3

My My super heroes…

9

HEALTH SYSTEMS RESPONSE

  • Increasing workforce diversity
  • Qualifying bilingual staff and clinicians
  • Dedicating personnel resources
  • Hiring dedicated interpreters and/or contracted

vendors

  • Developing or purchasing in-language materials
  • Setting policies and procedures
  • Ensuring compliance with federal and state

mandates and meeting accreditation requirements

  • Creating structures to support services
  • Dedicating fiscal resources

Aim towards creating a culturally and linguistically competent system of care

*Adapted National Center for Cultural Competence, 2011

Cultural Linguistic Competence

Policy Practices Structures Procedures Dedicated Personnel Resources Dedicated Fiscal Resources

10

Health Inequities

11

ARE THERE ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES ON THE APPROPRIATE USE OF THE DIFFERENT INTERPRETING SERVICE MODALITIES?

  • A. Yes, and followed
  • B. Yes, but NOT followed

C.No D.Don’t know

ARS

12

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/11/19 4

Ke Key Drivers: Linking Disparities to to Quality (IOM 6 Aims)

  • Safe: Minorities have more medical errors with greater

clinical consequences

  • Effective: Minorities received less evidence-based care
  • Patient-centered: Minorities less likely to provide truly

informed consent

  • Timely: Minorities more likely to wait for same procedure

(transplant)

  • Efficient: More test ordering in ED for minorities due to

poor communication

  • Equitable: Want no variation in outcomes
  • Also: Minorities have more CHF readmissions, ACS

admissions, and longer LOS

13

Top 3 Causes of Death in the U.S.

2013

14

Ke Key Drivers: Linking Disparities to to Quality (IOM 6 Aims)

  • Safe: Minorities have more medical

errors with greater clinical consequences

  • Effective: Minorities received less evidence-based care (diabetes)
  • Patient-centered: Minorities less likely to provide truly informed

consent

  • Timely: Minorities more likely to wait for same procedure

(transplant)

  • Efficient: More test ordering in ED for minorities due to poor

communication

  • Equitable: Want no variation in outcomes
  • Also: Minorities have more CHF readmissions, ACS admissions, and

longer LOS

15

Ke Key Drivers: Linking Disparities to to Quality (IOM 6 Aims)

  • Safe: Minorities have more medical

errors with greater clinical consequences

  • Effective: Minorities received less evidence-based care (diabetes)
  • Patient-centered: Minorities less likely to provide truly informed

consent

  • Timely: Minorities more likely to wait for same procedure

(transplant)

  • Efficient: More test ordering in ED for minorities due to poor

communication

  • Equitable: Want no variation in outcomes
  • Also: Minorities have more CHF readmissions, ACS admissions, and

longer LOS

16

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10/11/19 5

Key Drivers: Link nking ng Dispa parities to Qua uality (IOM 6 Aims)

  • Safe: Minorities have more medical errors with greater clinical consequences
  • Effective: Minorities received less

evidence-based care

  • Patient-centered: Minorities less likely to provide truly informed consent
  • Timely: Minorities more likely to wait for same procedure (transplant)
  • Efficient: More test ordering in ED for minorities due to poor communication
  • Equitable: Want no variation in outcomes
  • Also: Minorities have more CHF readmissions, ACS admissions, and longer LOS

17

Ke Key Drivers: Linking Disparities to to Quality (IOM 6 Aims)

  • Safe: Minorities have more medical errors with greater clinical

consequences

  • Effective: Minorities received less evidence-based care (diabetes)
  • Patient-centered: Minorities less likely

to provide truly informed consent

  • Timely: Minorities more likely to wait for same procedure

(transplant)

  • Efficient: More test ordering in ED for minorities due to poor

communication

  • Equitable: Want no variation in outcomes
  • Also: Minorities have more CHF readmissions, ACS admissions, and

longer LOS

18

Ke Key Drivers: Linking Disparities to to Quality (IOM 6 Aims)

  • Safe: Minorities have more medical errors with greater clinical

consequences

  • Effective: Minorities received less evidence-based care (diabetes)
  • Patient-centered: Minorities less likely

to provide truly informed consent

  • Timely: Minorities more likely to wait for same procedure

(transplant)

  • Efficient: More test ordering in ED for minorities due to poor

communication

  • Equitable: Want no variation in outcomes
  • Also: Minorities have more CHF readmissions, ACS admissions, and

longer LOS

19

Ke Key Drivers: Linking Disparities to to Quality (IOM 6 Aims)

  • Safe: Minorities have more medical errors with greater

clinical consequences

  • Effective: Minorities received less evidence-based care

(diabetes)

  • Patient-centered: Minorities less likely to provide truly

informed consent

  • Timely: Minorities more likely to wait for same procedure

(transplant)

  • Efficient: More test ordering in ED for minorities due to

poor communication

  • Equitable: Want no variation in outcomes
  • Also: Minorities have more CHF readmissions, ACS

admissions, and longer LOS

20

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/11/19 6

Li Linking Di Dispari rities to Se Service and Quality

  • Language barriers ranked among

the top three obstacles preventing minorities and the poor from receiving necessary health care.

Source: Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice Vol 3, No. 3, Spring 2010

21 22

COMPLIANCE WITH LANGUAGE ACCESS REQUIREMENTS

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the corresponding DHHS Guidance

“Recipients should be aware that competency requires more than self- identification as bilingual.”

National CLAS (Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services) Standards

CLAS Standard 7: “Ensure the competence

  • f individuals providing

language assistance…”

The Joint Commission accreditation standards mandate providers ensure meaningful access to health care for patients with limited English proficiency

“HR.01.06.01 Staff are competent to perform their responsibilities.”

23

Is the he pl plan n compl plianc nce dr driven n or mission n and nd value ues dr driven? n?

24

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10/11/19 7

Diversity & Inclusion

25

Why do health and healthcare disparities matter?

Social Justice

Limit overall improvement in quality for all populations

Cost

26

  • ~ $93 billion in excess medical care costs
  • ~ $42 billion in illness-related lost productivity
  • ~ $200 billion economic losses due to premature deaths

Cost of Health Disparities – substantial annual economic losses nationally

Source: NEJM Catalyst, The Costs of Racial Disparities in Health Care, February 15, 2016; Ani Turner, The Business Case for Racial Equity, A Strategy for Growth, (W .K. Kellogg Foundation and Altarum, April 2018)

27 3 Key Takeaways:

PATIENT & FAMILY CENTERED - THE VOICE OF THE CONSUMER USE APPROPRIATE TYPES OF LANGUAGE SERVICES SET EXPECTATIONS WITH THE INTERPRETER AND HELP MANAGE THE FLOW OF COMMUNICATION

28

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10/11/19 8

HOW SATISFIED ARE YOU WITH THE LANGUAGE SERVICES THAT YOUR PATIENTS RECEIVE?

  • A. Very satisfied
  • B. Satisfied

C.Not satisfied D.No experience

ARS

29

HOW COMFORTABLE ARE YOU IN USING REMOTE VIDEO INTERPRETING SERVICES?

  • A. Very comfortable
  • B. Comfortable

C.Not comfortable

ARS

30 THANK YOU!

Informed Inspired Motivated to act…towards health equity!

Gayle Tang, MSN, RN Health Equity Consultant gayletang@yahoo.com

31

RESOURCES

¡ Disparities Solutions Center ¡ https://mghdisparitiessolutions.org/lep_curriculum/ ¡ Healthcare Interpreter Certificate Training Program at CCSF ¡ https://www.ccsf.edu/en/educational-programs/school-and-departments/school-of-health-and-physical-education/health- education-and-community-health-studies0/HCIcertificate.html ¡ Qualified Interpreting for Quality Health Care (Video) ¡ https://youtu.be/HDDwLJQMgQA

32