Panhandle Regional Water Plan
1 Modeling Committee Meeting December 5, 2017 202 202 Panhandle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
1 Modeling Committee Meeting December 5, 2017 202 202 Panhandle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
202 202 Panhandle Regional Water Plan 1 Modeling Committee Meeting December 5, 2017 202 202 Panhandle Regional Water Plan 1 Outline Evaluation of GAM RUN 16-031 MAG Seymour and Blaine Evaluation of GAM RUN 16-029 MAG
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Outline
- Evaluation of GAM RUN 16-031 MAG
- Seymour and Blaine
- Evaluation of GAM RUN 16-029 MAG
- Ogallala and Dockum
- Allocation of Availability
2
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Evaluation of GAM RUN 16-031 MAG
Seymour and Blaine
3
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Seymour and Bla lain ine MAGs: 2012 and 2017
2012 MAGs
Cou
- unty
Aq Aquif uifer 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 Chil hildress Seymour 732 717 712 712 712 712 Coll
- llingsworth
th Seymour 16,010 14,250 13,348 11,329 10,241 10,241 Ha Hall Seymour 12,020 11,462 10,866 11,085 11,172 11,172 Chil hildress Blaine 15,206 15,206 15,206 15,206 15,206 15,206 Coll
- llingsworth
th Blaine 185,376 185,376 185,376 185,376 185,376 185,376 Ha Hall Blaine 11,509 11,509 11,509 11,509 11,509 11,509
2017 MAGs
Cou
- unty
Aq Aquif uifer 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 Chil hildress Seymour 2,961 3,246 3,317 3,308 3,317 3,297 Coll
- llingsworth
th Seymour 41,345 31,492 28,657 27,165 22,395 22,769 Ha Hall Seymour 15,446 16,751 19,666 22,861 25,861 24,595 Chil hildress Blaine 23,575 23,510 23,575 23,510 23,575 23,510 Coll
- llingsworth
th Blaine 2,060 2,054 2,060 2,054 2,060 2,054 Ha Hall Blaine 5,856 5,840 5,856 5,840 5,856 5,840
4
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
5
- 5,000
10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
Modeled Available Groundwater Estimates (Acre-Feet per Year)
Childress County Seymour and Blaine MAG Comparison
2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
Blaine Seymour
2012 2017 2012 2017
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
6
- 20,000
40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000
Modeled Available Groundwater Estimates (Acre-Feet per Year)
Collingsworth County Seymour and Blaine MAG Comparison
2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
Blaine Seymour
2012 2017 2012 2017
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
7
- 5,000
10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
Modeled Available Groundwater Estimates (Acre-Feet per Year)
Hall County Seymour and Blaine MAG Comparison
2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
Blaine Seymour
2012 2017 2012 2017
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Summary: Seymour and Blaine
- MAG volumes decrease significantly from 2012 to
2017 for the Blaine Aquifer in Collingsworth and Hall Counties
- MAG volumes increase for the Blaine Aquifer in
Childress County from 2012 to 2017
- Seymour Aquifer MAG volumes increase for all
three counties from 2012 to 2017
8
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
9
500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000
2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Modeled Available Groundwater Estimates (Acre Feet per Year)
Region A All Aquifers MAG Comparison 2017 and 2012
2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Ogallala Ogallala Ogallala Ogallala Ogallala Dockum Dockum Dockum Dockum Dockum
Blaine Blaine Seymour Seymour
2012 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2012 2012 2012 2012
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Evaluation of GAM RUN 16-029 MAG
Ogallala and Dockum
10
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
GAM RUN 16-029 MAG
- MODFLOW-NWT reduces pumping when saturated
thickness reaches 30 feet
- How does pumping (and thus availability) change
through time?
- Where do cutbacks occur?
- What is the Ogallala saturated thickness through time?
- If and how might this affect availability through planning
period and for different WUGs?
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Total Requested Pumping per Year
Entire Model Area
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Total Requested Pumping per Year
GMA 1 Area
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Total Requested Pumping per Year
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Pumping Reductions in in HPAS GAM
- The MODFLOW-NWT model
assumes well production decreases when saturated thickness reaches 30 feet
- Cutbacks occur only in the
Ogallala in MAG run
- Most cutbacks are in western
counties of GMA 1
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Total Actual Pumpin ing (after cutbacks)
Entire Model Area
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Total Actual Pumpin ing (after cutbacks)
GMA 1 Area
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Annual l Pumpin ing per r Co County (a (aft fter cutb tbacks)
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Pumping Defi ficiency
Entire Model Area
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Pumping Defi ficiency
GMA 1 Area
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Pumping Defi ficiency per County
21
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Projected Ogallala Saturated Thic ickness
- Ogallala saturated thickness declining throughout
model run from 2020 to 2070
- Max decline of 270 feet thickness in 2070
- Largest saturated thickness decline effects
- bserved in the western Region A counties
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
2020 Projected Ogallala Aquifer Thic ickness
23
Gray zones are less than 30 feet saturated thickness
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
2030 Projected Ogallala Aquifer Thic ickness
24
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
25
2040 Projected Ogallala Aquifer Thickness
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
26
2050 Projected Ogallala Aquifer Thickness
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
27
2060 Projected Ogallala Aquifer Thickness
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
28
2070 Projected Ogallala Aquifer Thickness
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
29
Ogallala Thic ickness Less than 30 feet
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
30
Percent Ogallala Thic ickness Less than 30 feet
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Supply All llocations – Ogallala Aquifer
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Considerations
- Constrained geographically?
- Decadal decline considerations?
- Rate of decline?
- MAG limitation
- Competition for limited supplies?
32
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Approach fr from Last Round
- 1. Modified modeling approach
a. Put a well in every gridblock b. Perform “annual” modeling to match DFC locally c. Yielded a “supply” for every gridblock
- 2. Allocate supply geographically
a. Designate IRR and MUN b. Add buffers to account for lateral flow
33
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
2020 Ogallala Thickness Le Less th than 30 ft ft
34
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
2030 Ogallala Thickness Le Less th than 30 ft ft
35
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
36
2040 Ogallala Thickness Le Less th than 30 ft ft
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
37
2050 Ogallala Thickness Le Less th than 30 ft ft
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
38
2060 Ogallala Thickness Le Less th than 30 ft ft
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
39
2070 Ogallala Thickness Le Less th than 30 ft ft
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
40
Example: Ogallala Availability by Type
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
41
Example: Ogallala Availability by Type
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
42
Example: Ogallala Availability by Type
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
43
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
44
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Recommendations
- Use the GAM RUN 16-029 MAG as is
- Allocate irrigation and municipal availability
according to distribution used in previous round of planning
45
Panhandle Regional Water Plan
202 202 1
Questions?
46