Full-scale comparison of N 2 O emissions from N/DN SBR operation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

full scale comparison of n 2 o emissions from n dn sbr
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Full-scale comparison of N 2 O emissions from N/DN SBR operation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Full-scale comparison of N 2 O emissions from N/DN SBR operation versus one-stage deammonification MBBR treating reject water and optimization with pH set-point Linda Kanders, Mlardalen University and Purac AB PhD Student


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Full-scale comparison of N2O emissions from N/DN SBR operation versus

  • ne-stage deammonification MBBR

treating reject water – and optimization with pH set-point

Linda Kanders, Mälardalen University and Purac AB PhD Student Rejektvattenseminarium 4 - 5 December 2018 Sundets avloppsreningsverk, Växjö

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Reject water treatment, Norrköping, Sweden

2

WWTP Reject water 135 000 pe Nitrogen Load 1650 kg/d 250 kg/d 1000 m3 reactor volume

Deammonification N/DN

WWTP Reject water 135 000 pe Nitrogen Load 1650 kg/d 250 kg/d 1000 m3 reactor volume Year 2000- 2017 N/DN SBR Year 2017- Deammonification MBBR

slide-3
SLIDE 3

N/DN SBR versus DeAm in MBBR

N/DN SBR

A Continous in and outflow M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M

Length of aeration regulated by PI-regulator with pH as input

Inflow Mixng ‐ Denitrifcation

Decantation

Sedimentation

Aeration ‐ Nitrification Ethanoldosage

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8h

Deam. MBBR

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

N2O Measurements Methods

4

N2O(g) N2O(aq) Intermittant aeration EN2O Nitrogen Load (TN)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Thank You!

15

Questions?

FTN 0.14% FTN FTN 0.5-0.7% FTN 10% DeAm DeAmpH=7.6 N/DN linda.kanders@purac.se jing-jing.yang@ivl.se christian.baresel@ivl.se jesus.zambrano@mdh.se