1 Microbiota GI tract consists of approximately 10 15 /mL - - PDF document
1 Microbiota GI tract consists of approximately 10 15 /mL - - PDF document
Sm all I ntestinal Bacterial Overgrow th The old and the new Jack A. Di Palm a, M.D. University of South Alabam a Mobile, Alabam a The Old The New 1 Microbiota GI tract consists of approximately 10 15 /mL (Million
2
Microbiota
GI tract consists of approximately 1015 /mL (Million trillion)
30 genera and over 500 species
Quantity and characteristics of bacteria vary depend
- n anatomic site
Newborns colon colonized within 6 days Anaerobes – B. fragilis Vaginal Birth 60%; Cesarean section 9%
Commensals- No great benefit, no great harm
Bacterial Effects
Metabolism of androgens and estrogens Production of nutrients folate and Vitamin K Production of short chain fatty acids
Helps support integrity of colonic mucosa Conserves energy May play role in regulation of normal enteric flora
Degradation of protein and urea Metabolism of drugs Helps prevent colonization by pathogenic
bacteria
3
GI Bacterial Presence
Stomach < 103/ ml Jejunum < 103/ ml Ileum < 108 / ml Colon < 1010/ ml Health: Gram -positive, aerobic Overgrow th: Gram -negative, anerobic
Physiological Suppression of Overgrow th
Low gastric pH Secretory IgA Defensins/ other Paneth cell products Gastric and small bowel motility Migrating motor complex during fasting Ileocecal valve
Sm all Bow el Bacterial Overgrow th
Malabsorption due to bile acid deconjugation Low B12 Iron deficiency High folate Abnormal small bowel mucosa
4
Clinical Presentation
Steatorrhea, weight loss, malabsorption, malnutrition Metabolic bone disease Nutritional deficiencies Low B12, high folate Diarrhea, bloating cramps
Bacterial Overgrow th
Accounts for 20-43% of chronic diarrhea in diabetes Results from UGI surgery 50% of neonatal diarrhea Probably significant in the elderly and in I BS and constipation
Prevalence of SI BO*
Healthy volunteers 20% Celiac Disease 66% Neuropathic dysmotility 55%
(Including renal failure)
Diabetes with diarrhea 43% Chronic alcohol 90%
* varying by testing method used
5
Prevalence of SI BO*
H2RA 17% PPI 53% Chronic diarrhea 33% Older patients 14.5-15.6% IBS 10-78%
* varying by testing method used
Clinical Predictors of SI BO
Choung, Alim ent Pharm Ther 2 0 1 1
675 who had duodenal aspirates 8% positive for SIBO Associated:
Older age Steatorrhea Narcotic use IBD SB diverticula Pancreatitis
Setting for I BS
Hypochlorhydria
Gastric disease or drugs
Immunodeficiency
IgA
Dysmotility
Diabetes, Scleroderma, Pseudo-obstruction
Structure
Blind Loop Diverticulosis, stricture, fistula
6
The “Old”
Scleroderma Steatorrhea/ Malnutrition Structural disorders Immunodeficiency Sprue Malnutrition
The “New ”
Diarrhea Older age Hypochlorhydria IBD Pancreatitis Colorectal cancer Fatty liver Rosacea Any dysmotility- Disease, IBS, medications, narcotics
W hat are the diagnostic
- ptions?
7
Diagnostic Options
Jejunal aspiration for bacterial colony counts and strain identification Schilling’s test Nuclide tests
14C-glycocholic acid 14C-D-xylose 14C-sorbitol
Hydrogen and methane testing after glucose or lactulose challenge
Lim itations of Culture Testing
Invasive Oral flora contamination Culture transport difficulties Miss distal overgrowth Unclear relevance of increased bacterial colonization in the elderly
8
H2 Response to Lactulose Challenge
Fasting elevation, early rise Double-peak
Call for Good Testing Methods
Hydrogen and methane Standard dose of challenge Confirm fasting state when fasting elevation found in lactose and fructose testing Test 30d after antibiotics and before colon cleansing for colonoscopy (or 30d afterwards)
9
SI BO test results vary greatly by m ethodology
Positivity criteria % positive tests
Fasting H2 > 10ppm
22%
Fasting H2+ 2X CH4> 10
43%
Early rise H2 > 20ppm < 20min
4%
Early rise H2+ CH4 > 20ppm < 20 min
11%
Rise H2> 20ppm < 90min
37%
Rise H2+ CH4> 20ppm < 90 min
45%
Rise H2 + distinct 2nd peak
17%
Rise H2 + CH4 + 2nd peak
21%
Knudsen, Di Palma ACG 2010
Perform ance Characteristics
- f Breath Tests
Highly variable Few careful studies of hydrogen vs. quantitative cultures Glucose Sensitivity 27-93% Specificity 30-86% Lactulose Sensitivity 17-89% Specificity 44-100%
Sm artPill Capsule
Senses and records pH, pressure and temperature data Wirelessly transmits data to the SmartPill Data Receiver
pH SENSOR PRESSURE SENSOR BATTERIES TRANSMITTER MICROPROCESSOR
10
Diagnostic Options
Jejunal aspiration for bacterial colony counts and strain identification Schilling’s test Nuclide tests
14C-glycocholic acid 14C-D-xylose 14C-sorbitol
Hydrogen and methane testing after glucose
- r lactulose challenge
Em piric Treatm ent
W hat are the treatm ent options?
Treatm ent for Bacterial Overgrow th
Correct the underlying condition Surgery Prokinetic agents Nutrition Lactose-restricted, low residue diet Increase calories Micronutrient supplementation (B12, fat soluble vitamins, trace elements) Antibiotics
11
W hich antibiotic? Antibiotic choices
Tetracyclines Amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid Cephalexin and metronidazole Trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole Quinolones Chloramphenicol
Rifaxim in
Di Stefano, Alim ent Pharm acol 2 0 0 0
Non-absorbable rifamycin derivative Design: Randomized, blinded Study subjects: 21 defined by H2 responses to 50g glucose Methods: Received rifaximin 1200mg or chlortetracycline 1g for 7d Results: H2 normalized in 70% after rifaximin and 27% after chlortetracycline
12
Comparison of Antibiotics
ANTIBIOTIC EFFICACY IN SIBO Flagyl <20% Neomycin 25% Augmentin or Doxycycline 30-40% Rifaximin 70%*
DiStefano M, Aliment Pharm Ther, 2000.
Do prokinetics help? Prokinetics
Stasis and outflow No proven benefit of metoclopramide, cisapride Erythromycin in small reports Low dose octreotide 50ug daily in scleroderma Optimism for 5HT3, 5HT4 agents
13
W hat about probiotics? Probiotics in SI BO
Experimental studies in animals suggest that probiotics enhance the mucosal barrier, inhibit bacterial growth, modulate immune system and have anti-inflammatory effects that might benefit patients with SBBO Human studies suggest benefit with some agents, but no large studies reported yet
Quigley EMM, Gastroenterology 2006 LR Schiller
I rritable Bow el Syndrom e?
14
Prevalence of SI BO in I BS based on lactulose breath test
Author Type of Breath test Gases Measured # subjects Prevalence (% ) Galatola, 1995 Xylose H2 80 56 Pimentel, 2000 Lactulose H2/ CH4 202 76 Pimentel, 2003 Lactulose H2/ CH4 111 57-84 Nucera, 2004 Lactulose H2/ CH4 200 75 Nucera, 2005 Lactulose H2/ CH4 98 65 Walters, 2005 Lactulose H2 39 10
Active Treatment 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Placebo Rifaximin
RIFAXIMIN IN IBS
*P=0.02 Mixed Longitudinal Model for 10-week difference
No Active Treatment Percent Global Improvement
Weeks after Rifaximin
Pimentel, et al, Ann Intern Med, Oct., 2006
Sustained relief
Pim ental, TARGET 1 and 2 DDW 2 0 1 0
Rifaxim in Placebo Adequate relief of I BS sym ptom s 40.7% 31.7% Adequate relief of I BS bloating 40.2% 30.3%
Rifaximin 500mg TID, n=1260, 12w response after 2w treatment
15
I rritable Bow el Syndrom e
70 60 50 40 30
% answering “yes” at Week 4
80
- B. infantis 1x106
- B. infantis 1X1010
- B. infantis 1X108
placebo
P=0.0118
Global Assessment of Symptom Relief
70 60 50 40 30
% answering “yes” at Week 4
80
- B. infantis 1x106
- B. infantis 1X1010
- B. infantis 1X108
placebo
P=0.0118
Global Assessment of Symptom Relief
N=90 N=92
Whorwell, Am J Gastroenterol 2006 LR Schiller
Does CHO Testing Predict Clinical Response in SI BO?
Long, DiPalm a DDW 2 0 1 5
Lactulose challenge test, n= 100 Clinical Response No criteria 67% One 76% Three 85% Four 77% Overall 73%
Criteria-Fasting elevation, early rise in 2 0 or 6 0 m inutes, second, colon peak
Constipation?
16
Methane revisited in IBS subjects
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 H2 CH4 and H2 CH4 % of patients Constipation Diarrhea
Chi-square=16.6, p<0.001 Pimentel, DDS 2003
Rifaxim in and Neom ycin for Methane I BS
Low , Am J Gastro 2 0 1 0
Design: Retrospective Subjects: Methane producing IBS patients I nterventions: Neomycin 500mg BID for 10d, Rifaximin 400mg TID for 10 days,
- r both
Rifaxim in and Neom ycin for Methane I BS
Low , Am J Gastro 2 0 1 0
n Clinical Response Methane Eradication Neomycin 8 63% 33% Rifaximin 39 56% 28%* Both 27 85% 87% *Of these who did not eradicate methane, 66% who had subsequent treatment with both drugs normalized their breath test
17
Proton Pum p I nhibitors SI BO and PPI
Lom bardo CG and H 2 0 1 0
PPI n=200, IBS n=200, controls n=50