1
play

1 Satellit project on project MDMA & Mem ory Database 1 : MDMA - PDF document

Reference corpus of Dutch drug users I : IAFPA research grant MDMA / Ecstasy Viktria Papp, Rice University/ NZI LBB Maartje Schreuder, Eef Theunissen, Jan Ramaekers, Maastricht University I AFPA 2011 Bundeskrim inalam t Vienna, Austria


  1. Reference corpus of Dutch drug users I : IAFPA research grant MDMA / Ecstasy Viktória Papp, Rice University/ NZI LBB Maartje Schreuder, Eef Theunissen, Jan Ramaekers, Maastricht University I AFPA 2011 Bundeskrim inalam t Vienna, Austria July 27, 2011 Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Overview Drugs- intoxicated speech • Drugs-intoxicated speech databases • Wire-tapped phone calls • Research context – Drugs-related crimes • Database 1: Methyleen Dioxy Meth Amphetamine – Under the influence of drugs (Ecstasy) • Effects of alcohol quite well-described – Effects of heroin: Papp (2008) – Effects of other drugs: unknown • Relevant for forensic speaker identification/ verification Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Psychopharm acological drugs research Drugs Research team: • CNS depressants – Alcohol • E.L. Theunissen, PhD (Project Manager, – Heroin Investigator) • CNS Stimulants • J.G. Ramaekers, PhD (Principle investigator) – Cocaine • K.P.C. Kuypers, PhD (Co-investigator) • Hallocinogens and Psychedelics • C.J. van Leeuwen, MD (Medical Supervisor) – Cannabis • Anique van Dorp, MD (Medical Supervisor) – MDMA (Ecstasy) Maastricht University, Department of (CNS = Central Nervous System) Psychopharmacology & Neuropsychology Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience 1

  2. Satellit project on project “MDMA & Mem ory Database 1 : MDMA ( Ecstasy) perform ance” The four-way crossover study design • Acute administration of MDMA causes memory (double blind, (pseudo-)random). deficits in humans 1 st treatment • Aim to investigate whether memantine (Alzheimer’s placebo or Memantine disease medication) can reverse the memory impairment caused by acute MDMA administration in humans 2 nd treatment placebo or MDMA placebo or MDMA � Ethical approval granted (NL35155.068.11 / MEC 11-3-007) Treatment 1 2 3 4 Start: August (first week) Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Methodology Speaking styles, stimulus m aterials • 16 participants (within subjects design) • Word lists (35 words), read 3x, • All recreational users of MDMA, not addicted within sentence ‘ I k zeg nu het woord …tegen jou ’ • Medical tests [ I now say the word …to you] • Drugs/alcohol tests on each test day – Controlled for (written) frequency (Celex) – All Dutch consonants As recommended by Morrison et al. (in press): • + some non-Dutch consonants, in loan words • 2 x 4 non-contemporaneous recordings of each speaker • + some clusters • Within each session: different speaking styles • Combined with all Dutch vowels, on basis of – Place • each session (at the same time): – Manner – recorded in studio quality – Voicing/ sonority – recorded through a mobile phone line Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Speaking styles, stimulus m aterials • Free (guided) conversation (through phone) • Picture descriptions – With target words containing / a/ , / i/ , / u/ • Price list com pletion of illegible text – Numbers, strange words – Interaction – Meta speech • Pseudo-police-style interview on drugs use – Also questions answered with ‘ Ik maak gebruik van mijn zwijgrecht ’ [ No comment] • Each session different lists, pictures, price lists (to overcome repetition effect) Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience 2

  3. Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Recordings Recording equipment • Direct recordings: – Sound-attenuated cabin • Conversation: – M-Audio MicroTrack 24/ 96 Memory Card recorder – Knowles electronics in-ear microphone (mini) FC-23652-P16, • Pictures: mounted on simple headset, Omni-directional – Windows PCM WAV, 44100 Hz, 16-bit, Mono • Price list: • Via phone line: • Police-like interview: (will be bett er quality) – Blackberry mobile phone – B-line Yellowtec telephone hybrid – Recorded with Adobe Audition 3.0 on PC (Dell Optiplex 760 with Soundmax high definition integrated audio device sound card) – Windows PCM WAV, 44100 Hz, 16-bit, Stereo (speakers in separate channels) Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Drugs Effects of MDMA • CNS depressants • Intensifies bodily senses (taste, smell, touch, vision, hearing) – Alcohol • Experience mental imagery and auditory and visual distortions – Heroin • Increased confidence, intimacy, energy, endurance, alertness and wakefulness • CNS Stimulants – Cocaine • CNS: initiating motor activity • Hallocinogens and Psychedelics – Starting and stopping motor events – Cannabis – Coordination of co-occuring events – MDMA (Ecstasy) • respiration, initialization, phonation and articulation during speech (CNS = Central Nervous System) Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience 3

  4. Research objectives – speech effects MDMA – acoustic measurements Hypotheses: • Tim ing of articulators: delayed or uncertain • Reaching vowel targets and consonant loci uncertain • Vowel formant values • I m paired synchronizing of • Center of gravity (/ s/ and / S/ ) – Respirat io n – Init ializat ion • Formant structure of nasals and laterals – Phonat io n – Art iculators • F0 range, unit-by-unit pitch variation • General m uscle stiffness, cheek stiffness • I ncreased energy: • Articulation rate – Possibly : not undershoot, but overshoot of art iculatory targets ( hyper-art iculate) • Speech rate – Wider f0 range – Larger pitch variat ion • Number of syllables per breath group – Faster art iculat io n – Higher speech rate – Higher heart rate and breat h rate: decreased num ber of sy llables per breat h group – Extrem ely t alkat iv e Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Perceptual differences I AFPA • Speakers under influence of MDMA perceived differently than without MDMA? Corpus available to IAFPA members – If so, general perceived differences? – What differences? • Speakers under influence of MDMA still recognized when speaking without MDMA? – (And vice versa?) Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Questions Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience 4

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend