ZinAmp at Nov 9 th and 10 th 2019 San Francisco, CA ZinAmp .. in a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

zinamp
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ZinAmp at Nov 9 th and 10 th 2019 San Francisco, CA ZinAmp .. in a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ZinAmp at Nov 9 th and 10 th 2019 San Francisco, CA ZinAmp .. in a Nutshell Hybrid Tube / Lateral-FET Integrated Tube Phono and Pre-amps, loosely based on Marantz 7 Power Amp Class A/B Lateral FETs with Class A BJTs - in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ZinAmp

at Nov 9th and 10th 2019 – San Francisco, CA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ZinAmp .. in a Nutshell

  • Hybrid Tube / Lateral-FET Integrated
  • Tube Phono and Pre-amps, ‘loosely’ based on Marantz 7
  • Power Amp – Class A/B Lateral FETs with Class A BJTs - in parallel
  • Inspired by the GEM amp
  • GEM created by Graham Maynard
  • Output for additional power amp
  • Because you never know…
  • Auto-power off..
  • ..and on again .. even with a vinyl record!
  • weird, but fun to demonstrate 
  • EQ Toggle Switch
  • Flat and Dynamic settings
  • Similar to a loudness curve, but quite subtle/gentle
  • 120W Per Channel – probably!
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Lid off !

slide-4
SLIDE 4

..and on again!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Block Diagram

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why Bother?

  • Modern mainstream amps in 2016 sounded underwhelming to me
  • Got interested in vintage equipment – 70s & 80s Technics et al
  • Research led me to a “dream combo” of a Hafler DH200 and a Marantz 7
  • Couldn’t find these affordably in the UK
  • Wanted a Tube Phono Integrated with a Class A output – didn’t exist!
  • I was going to have to build this amp!
  • Found a really good mentor to help me
slide-7
SLIDE 7

My Mentor

Henry Dulat – UK “Top Repairman”!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Acknowledgements

Doug Self Rod Elliot - ESP https://sound-au.com

slide-9
SLIDE 9

In memory of…

Graham Maynard

  • UK DIY Audio and Radio enthusiast
  • Creator of the GEM Amp
  • Respected contributor to diyaudio.com
  • Passed away in October 2014
  • www.bovan.net
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Conventional design with …
  • Class A/B stage
  • Single Ended Class A stage
  • Two local feedback loops
  • Quiescent supply of 600mA
  • Carlos from Brazil built one

The GEM Amp

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Graham’s Mission

  • To achieve the sound of John Lindsley-Hood’s 1969 Class A design
  • 100-200W power – needs Class A/B
  • Crossover distortion in A/B made worse by back EMF from loudspeakers
  • Not visible when testing with steady sine waves into resistors!
  • but is present with real music signals into speakers, due to transient back-EMF
  • Parallel Class A stage mitigates effects of back EMF
  • Smoothing the crossover region
  • Similar idea to Quad 405 current-dumping design from 1978
  • More info at www.bovan.net
slide-12
SLIDE 12

John Linsley-Hood - 1969

slide-13
SLIDE 13

My Challenge

  • To get the GEM amp to work in my ZinAmp integrated box
  • I have respectable heatsinks, but not like mono-blocks!
  • Limited space for filter capacitors
  • Avoiding noise and hum is a key constraint…
  • ….followed by space inside the box
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Keep it Simple (Stupid)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Design Decisions

  • Push-pull Class A would be more efficient
  • Suggested by my mentor, Henry Dulat
  • Should requires less quiescent current
  • Cooler running than the GEM single-ended
  • Lateral Mosfet A/B Stage
  • Interest in Hafler led me down this path .. prototypes already developed
  • Requires fewer components than BJTs
  • More thermally stable etc.
  • Regulated Power Supply
  • Smaller capacitors but a little more dissipated heat
  • Remove one of Graham’s LFB loops
  • Feeding back into –ve rail
  • John Broskie (tubecad.com) suggested this would be noisy at high-volumes
  • Broskie also suggested a regulated supply
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Power Amp - schematic

  • Push/Pull Class A BJT Output
  • in parallel with
  • FET Class A/B Output
  • Local Feedback to VAS
  • Bootstrapping for VAS
  • Additional Bootstrap driving +ve side
  • f Class A stage
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Driving the Push-pull Class A

  • VAS with parallel followers
  • VAS Follower 1
  • VAS Follower 2
  • Collector of each follower drives
  • ne side of output
  • Both followers are bootstrapped
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Power Amp - PCB

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Regulated Supply - schematic

  • Conventional Design
  • Rod Elliot / ESP
  • +/- Rails
  • Load Limiter
  • Big Power Transistors
  • Darlingtons
  • 10-15A rating
  • FB transistors also need to be fairly

robust

  • Dissipates a little heat
  • Does the job!
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Regulated Supply – PCB

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Setup and Biasing

  • Aim: to maximise the amount of class A current without overheating!
  • Using double-die FETs so twice the A/B bias current
  • Class A stage will not ”mop-up” c/o distortion from under-biased FETS
  • FET bias current of < 70mA can sound ’chalky’ (Exicon FETS)
  • Sweet Spot
  • Class AB biased to 75mA – or double-die FETs to 150mA
  • Class A biased to 200mA
  • Sounds nice and doesn’t run too hot
  • Class A stage generates most of the heat though
  • Tempted to try mono-blocks with bigger heat-sinks!!
  • Plenty of scope for experimentation … and a bit more current!
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Setup and Biasing cont..

  • Voltage across Rbias = 700mV
  • VGS = 350mV per device
  • underbiased
  • Voltage across Rbias = 900mV
  • VGS = 450mV per device
  • Sweet spot - sufficient
  • Voltage across Rbias = 1200mV
  • VGS = 600mV per device
  • Ok with single-die FET
  • Double-die FETs run hotter
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Trade-offs

  • Rails can’t go beyond 48v without encountering heat issues
  • Tried 58v - sweaty – approx 160° F
  • Power output intrinsically limited to about 120W pc music-power
  • How much power do you need?
  • Push-pull Class-A vs Graham’s Single Ended
  • Better Rail Rejection – although regulated supply mitigates this
  • Lower current, less heat
  • Lower second order harmonics perhaps no longer predominant as with single-ended – although

class A stage is only providing 1 watt or so.

  • This is a work in progress!
  • Subjective listening is good….
  • …though full measurement/analysis is required
  • Bob Cordell measured a THD of approx 0.07% yesterday, mostly lower 2nd 😏
slide-24
SLIDE 24

How does it sound?

  • Really good … well, I would say that!
  • Definite step forward from the Class A/B amp I had built previously
  • I wouldn’t go back
  • Gives a sense of space between notes and sounds – no smear
  • Like the blacks in the picture on a good plasma-screen TV
  • Vocals and drums sound particularly life-like
  • Anything that’s acoustically mic’d
  • My wife likes this amp – and she has better hearing than I do👃
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Please come and listen

Questions welcome – thanks!

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Why not just over-bias the FETS?

Over-bias FETs into Class A:

  • Moderate heat dissipation
  • Class A at moderate volume

| At the expense of |

  • Slight loss of headroom
  • Loss of Class A performance at higher volume

Class A/B in parallel with Class A:

  • Moderate heat dissipation
  • Class A at moderate volume
  • Retaining headroom

| At the expense of |

  • Loss of Class A performance at higher volume

Either way, as you crank up, the speaker back-EMF increases and the Class-A effect diminishes

| Although with the parallel class A stage, you get a little more headroom |

…but the GEM amp was simply too interesting not to try!