From Cancer Genomics to Cancer Treatment : from hope to reality
Yusuke Nakamura
Human Genome Center Institute of Medical Science The University of Tokyo
Yusuke Nakamura Human Genome Center Institute of Medical Science - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
From Cancer Genomics to Cancer Treatment : from hope to reality Yusuke Nakamura Human Genome Center Institute of Medical Science The University of Tokyo International HapMap International HapMap Consortium Consortium October 27, 2005
Human Genome Center Institute of Medical Science The University of Tokyo
October 27, 2005
Country Genotyping Center %Genome Chromosome Platform Japan RIKEN 24.3% 5, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19 Third Wave Invader UK Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute 23.7% 1, 6, 10, 13, 20 Illumina BeadArray Canada McGill Univ. / Genome Quebec Innovation Centre 10.1% 2, 4p Illumina BeadArray China Chinese HapMap Consortium 9.5% 3, 8p, 21 Sequenom MassExtend, Illumina BeadArray USA Illumina 16.1% 8q, 9, 18q, 22, X Illumina BeadArray Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT 9.7% 4q, 7q, 18p, Y, mtDNA Sequenom MassExtend, Illumina BeadArray Baylor College of Medicine 4.6% 12 ParAllele MIP UCSF / Washington Univ. 2.0% 7p PerkinElmer AcycloPrime- FP Perlegen Sciences All High-denstity
IC asked 235,841 patients IC obtained 201,805 patients ( 85.6%) IC asked 235,841 patients IC obtained 201,805 patients ( 85.6%) Total Cases 295,278 cases Withdrawn 172 individuals Total Cases 295,278 cases Withdrawn 172 individuals
Hyperlipidemia 42,354 Prostate cancer 5,839 Leukemia 1,597 Diabetes 39,982 Periodontitis 5,652 Esophageal cancer 1,461 Cataract 19,070 Pollinosis 5,572 Cervical caner 1,405 Cerebral infarction 16,012 Glaucoma 5,257 Hepatitis B 1,391 Arrhythmia 15,440 Lung cancer 4,845 Uterine corpus cancer 1,189 Stable angina pectoris 14,855 Unstable angina pectoris 4,161 Nephrotic syndrome 1,038 Myocardial Infarction 12,956 Rheumatoid arthritis 4,155 Ovarian cancer 976 Bronchial asthma 8,657 Atopic dermatitis 2,967 Tuberculosis 894 Cardiac failure 7,438 COPD 2,797 Keloid 814 Breast cancer 7,349 Cerebral aneurysm 2,735 ALS 788 Colorectal cancer 6,957 Arteriosclerotic obliterans 2,609 ILD 780 Gastric cancer 6,869 Liver cirrhosis 2,494 Drug-induced hypersensitivity 598 Urinary stone 6,605 Liver cancer 2,452 Pancreatic cancer 531 Osteoporosis 6,412 Hyperthyroidism 2,320 CCC 503 Myoma uteri 5,988 Epilepsy 2,250 Febrile seizures 475 Hepatitis C 5,962 Endometriosis 1,827 Total 295,278
Myocardial Infarction LTA Nature Genetics 2002 LGALS2 Nature 2004 PSMA6 Nature Genetics 2006 Rheumatoid Arthritis PADI4 Nature Genetics 2003 SLC22A4 Nature Genetics 2003 FcRH3 Nature Genetics 2005 Diabetic nephropathySLC12A3 Diabetes 2003 ELMO1 Diabetes 2005 (Diabetes) KCNQ1 Nature Genetics 2008 IgA nephropathy SEL-L,-E Am J Hum Genet 2002 Osteoarthritis Asporin Nature Genetics 2005 Calmodulin 1 Human Mol. Gen 2005 GDF5 Nature Genetics 2007 DVWA Nature Genetics 2008 Disc herniation CILP Nature Genetics 2005 Brain Infarction PRKCH1 Nature Genetics 2007 Kawasaki disease ITPKC Nature Genetics 2008 Crohn disease TNSF15 Human Mol. Gen 2005 Colon cancer multipel genes Nature Genetics 2008 Lung fibrosis TERT JMG 2008 Hapmap Nature 2003 Nature 2005 Nature 2007
Target Molecules Target Molecules SMC
Dominant-negative peptide
Target Molecules Target Molecules SMC
Dominant-negative peptide
Diagnosis Tumor Marker Prediction to chemosensitivity Diagnosis Tumor Marker Prediction to chemosensitivity cDNA microarray consisting of 32,000 genes
Comparison of expression profiles of cancer and corresponding normal tissues Comparison of expression profiles of cancer and corresponding normal tissues Expression profiles of 30 normal human tissues Expression profiles of 30 normal human tissues
Treatment Small molecular compound Monoclonal Antibody Peptide Vaccine siRNA Treatment Small molecular compound Monoclonal Antibody Peptide Vaccine siRNA
N
m a l d u c t a l c e l l s N
m a l t i s s u e a R N A a R N A l a b e l i n g C y 5 C y 5 C y 3 C y 3 C a n c e r t i s s u e c
y b r i d i z a t i
l a b e l i n g
C a n c e r c e l l s
T 7
a s e d R N A A m p l i f i c a t i
( 2
n d s ) T 7
a s e d R N A A m p l i f i c a t i
( 2
n d s )
L MM L MM H i g h
e n s i t y s p
t i n g 2 s p
s / g l a s s
Tissue Number Tissue Number Lung 126 Bile duct 45 Breast 135 Uterus 44 Soft Tissue 101 ALL 25 AML 87 Kidney 25 Colon 78 Endometriosis 23 CML 84 Liver 20 Ovary 59 Pancreas 20
Malignant lymphoma
54 Melanoma 20 Prostate 54 Thyroid 20 Stomach 51 Neuroblastoma 16 Bladder 55 Testis 13 Eshophagus 45 TOTAL 1200
proportion of clinical cancer samples examined (S, P, R, A)
(S, R, A?)
proportion of clinical cancer samples examined (S, P, R, A)
(S, R, A?)
Criteria for selection of candidate targets for drug development (S) Small molecular compound (P) Peptide vaccine (R) siRNA (A) Antibody
Chikako Fukukawa Satoshi Nagayama Toyomasa Katagiri Chikako Fukukawa Satoshi Nagayama Toyomasa Katagiri
RT-PCR
Northern Blotting
Frizzled family (Wnt signal)
SS cell SS ; Synovial Sarcoma
Wnt? M S C MFH LMS L S SS cell lines MPNST Synovial Sarcoma 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 15 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
b2MG FZD10
Heart Brain Lung Liver Kidney Bone marrow Pancreas Placenta HS-SY-2 YaFuSS
9.5 7.5 4.4 2.37 1.35
SS487 SS582 SS CL Srug.
β2MG FZD10
N T M Pr 34 41 59 69 123 124 128 129 141 146 147 149 150 151 153 154 155 201 N T N T N T N T N T N T N T N T N M Pr N Pr N M Pr N M Pr N M Pr N M Pr N Pr N N T SS
β2MG FZD10
FZD10 expression in colon cancer
Protein expression of FZD10 in colon cancer
03-24640 04-25950 04-26192
Paraffin slides EDTA buffer (pH9.0) 125oC, 30sec α-FZD10 mAb 92-13 20μg/mL, 4oC, O/N
FZD10
Celler Immunization
Cells(COS-7 etc.) transfection Immunization to mouse Hybrydoma Monoclonal Antibody
Monoclonal antibody recognizing a complex structure
pCAGGS-FZD10 (FL)-myc・His
Ag
Antibody stayed at tumor lesion at 5 days after injection
Internalization of anti-FDZ10 antibody Internalization of anti-FZD10 antibody
SYO-1 YaFuSS LoVo FZD10(+) FZD10(-) No Tx 92-13 93-22
90Y-CD20-Ab
Day 0 Day 9
90Y-anti-FZD10
Day 0 Day 5 Day 9 Day 33 Day 40 Day 54 Day 40 Day 54 Day 9 Day 0
90Y-anti-FZD10
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Days 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Tumor Volume (cm3)
Non-treated (n=5) Non-Labeled 92-13 (n=5)
Balb-c/nu (male) / SYO-1 tumor
90Y - DTPA - antibody 100uCi
Intraveneous injection Single injection on Day0
Injection
90Y - 92-13 (n=11)
11 / 11 4 / 11
Discovery of Tumor specific antigen (T. Boon, Science)
Clinical Trial against melanoma (Int J Cancer)
IL-2 + Peptides (Rosenberg, Nature Med) DC + Peptide (Nestle, Nature Med)
Less than 3% response rate for advanced cancer (Rosenberg, Nature Med)
33% reduction of recurrence for lung cancer after surgery 33% reduction of recurrence for lung cancer after surgery (GSK, ASCO) (GSK, ASCO) 50% reduction of recurrence for breast cancer after surgery 50% reduction of recurrence for breast cancer after surgery (Peoples, San Antonio Int. Breast Cancer Meeting) (Peoples, San Antonio Int. Breast Cancer Meeting)
1991 Tumor antigen 1998 Promising Results on melanonma 2003 Rosenberg report 2007 Effect on reduction
2015 Approval
CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL
CTL<<<<<Cancer Cells CTL<<<<<Cancer Cells
CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL
Canc er Canc er Canc er Canc er Canc er Canc er Canc er Canc er Canc er
CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL
Canc er Canc er
CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL
CTL<<<<<Cancer Cells CTL<<<<<Cancer Cells
CTL CTL CTL CTL
CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL CTL
Development of cancer vaccines using novel tumor-specific oncoantigens identified through genome-wide cDNA microarray analysis and subsequent functional analysis Development of cancer vaccines Development of cancer vaccines using novel tumor using novel tumor-
specific oncoantigens
identified through genome through genome-
wide cDNA microarray analysis and subsequent functional analysis subsequent functional analysis
Growth suppressive effect of MPHOSPH1 siRNA Growth suppressive effect of MPHOSPH1 siRNA
Organizer: Takuya Tsunoda, Yusuke Nakamura
Organ Num of Hospitals Esophagus 7 (2) Stomach 4 Colon 6 (1) Liver 3 (1) Bile duct 2 Pancreas 5 (1) Kidney 2 (2) Bladder 1 Lung 2 Breast 1 (2) Head and Neck 0 (2) Total 33 (11)
(Aug 31, 2008)
( Total 212 cases)
Month
Cases
2006 2007 2008
5 1 1 5 2 2 5 3 3 5 4 4 5 5 A u g
c tN
a n F e b
p r M a y
u l A u g
c t N
a n F e b
p r M a y
u l
5 1 1 5 2 2 5 3 3 5 4 4 5 5 A u g
c t N
a n F e b
p r M a y
u l A u g
c t N
a n F e b
p r M a y
u l
Phase 1 Phase 2
Yamanashi University, First Department of Surgery
Yoshiki Mizukami Hideki Fujii
1 Vac 2 Vac 3 Vac 4 Vac 5 Vac Vaccination day 1 day 8 day 15 day 22 day29 day43
Evaluation
Before (07.3.7) After 2 months (07.7.9) After 1 course (07.5.2) S1 S1+2 S1 S1 S1+2 S1+2
Before (07.3.7) After 2 months (07.7.9) After 1 course (07.5.2) About 1X1011-12 cells Total number of peripheral lymphocytes=~1 X 1010 cells
Specific Spots ratio
. 2 . 4 . 6 . 8 1 1 . 2 1 . 4 1 . 6 1 . 8 2 U R L C 1 T T K 5 6 7 K O C 1 B e f
e A f t e r 2 i n j . A f t e r 1 c
target molecule + HLA transfectant/HLA alone transfectant
R/S:1 *p<0.05
* * * * *
Pre-vaccine Post-vaccine 76th day Post-vaccine 104th day
Shorter and faster enrollment (short evaluation period) Small sample size Allows tumor response evaluation
Shorter and faster enrollment (short evaluation period) Small sample size Allows tumor response evaluation
Longer trial period Large sample size Trial endpoints may be challenging
Longer trial period Large sample size Trial endpoints may be challenging
Often multiple prior cancer treatment Incompetent immune status (from prior therapies) Inadequate evaluation due to rapid disease progression
Often multiple prior cancer treatment Incompetent immune status (from prior therapies) Inadequate evaluation due to rapid disease progression
Fewer prior therapies Better in immune status Adequate time for evaluation before disease progression Optimal for the proposed MOA of cancer vaccines
Fewer prior therapies Better in immune status Adequate time for evaluation before disease progression Optimal for the proposed MOA of cancer vaccines