Y P O C Mechanisms of TES: T O Neurophysiology N Flavio - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

y p o c
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Y P O C Mechanisms of TES: T O Neurophysiology N Flavio - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Y P O C Mechanisms of TES: T O Neurophysiology N Flavio Frohlich O D University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Department of Psychiatry E Department of Cell Biology and Physiology Department of Biomedical Engineering S Department


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mechanisms of TES: Neurophysiology

Flavio Frohlich

University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill

Department of Psychiatry Department of Cell Biology and Physiology Department of Biomedical Engineering Department of Neurology Neuroscience Center

North Carolina State University

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

University of Bern

Department of Neurology

www.networkneuroscientist.org

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • UNC owns IP for my inventions in the field of brain

stimulation.

  • UNC has determined a “COI with administrative

considerations” for our treatment clinical trials.

  • I am the founder, chief scientific officer, and

majority owner of Pulvinar Neuro LLC (paid as consultant).

  • I speak with many companies and have received

industry funding from Tal Medical (travel + research + consulting).

  • I frequently travel and give presentations. I typically

receive reimbursement and a stipend.

  • I receive an annual royalty payment for sales of my

book “Network Neuroscience” from Elsevier.

Conflicts of Interest

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Standing on the Shoulders of Giants

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Psychiatry Beyond “Chemical Imbalance in the Brain”

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Brain is an Electrical System.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-6
SLIDE 6

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Alpha Oscillation

Brain Rhythm

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-8
SLIDE 8

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-9
SLIDE 9

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Synchronization

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-11
SLIDE 11

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Sellers et al (2016) Attention No Attention

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-13
SLIDE 13

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-14
SLIDE 14

NEUROTECHNOLOGY

Synergies with other treatments. Adaptive, individualized therapies. Mobile, on-demand diagnosis and treatment.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Frohlich et al. 2015 Brunelin et al. 2012

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Sellers et al. 2015

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Lesson #1 Do not skip measuring brain activity (EEG, fMRI, etc.). #BeDifferent

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-18
SLIDE 18

VERTICAL INTEGRATION

Patients Model Systems

COMPLEXITY TRACTABILITY Clinical Trials Brain Stimulation, Human Neurophysiology In vivo (Animal) Electrophysiology In vitro (Animal) Electrophysiology Computer Simulations

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Lesson #2 Leverage the tools of (network) neuroscience. #Collaboration

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-20
SLIDE 20

TRANSCRANIAL CURRENT STIMULATION STUDY DESIGN

Behavioral Target Network Target Target Engagement

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Lesson #3

Make sure you know your target and have a plan how to engage it. #RationalDesign

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-22
SLIDE 22

TARGET ENGAGEMENT

How do we best engage a network target? We need to understand what the effect of stimulation is on the brain in terms of neurophysiology.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-23
SLIDE 23

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-24
SLIDE 24

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-25
SLIDE 25

OUTLINE

  • 1. Cellular Effects
  • 2. Spatial Targeting
  • 3. Targeting Network Dynamics

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-26
SLIDE 26

ELECTRIC FIELDS

How do electric fields change electric signaling in neurons?

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-27
SLIDE 27

“Anodal” Depolarized Soma Hyperpolarized Dendrite “Cathodal” Hyperpolarized Soma Depolarized Dendrite

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-28
SLIDE 28

CABLE EQUATION

Frohlich and McCormick. 2010

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-29
SLIDE 29

NEURONAL MORPHOLOGY AND STATE

Change in somatic membrane voltage:

  • Increases with cable length.
  • Decreases with membrane conductance.
  • Increases with cable diameter.

A B vs.

Radmann et al. 2009

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Change in somatic membrane voltage can be modeled as a sub- threshold somatic current injection.

Frohlich and McCormick. 2010

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Lesson #4

tDCS/tACS cause small changes in neuronal membrane voltage. #synergy #EndogenousBrainActivity

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-32
SLIDE 32

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-33
SLIDE 33

The cadaver research “should make the crowd nervous that favors tDCS and tACS,” says David Poeppel, a neuroscientist and psychologist at NYU. Marom Bikson, a biomedical engineer at The City College of New York in New York City who uses computer models and slices of rat brain to study the mechanisms of tDCS and tACS, says that many in the field already accepted that the 1 or 2 milliamps the methods use don’t directly trigger firing. The tDCS field is “a sea of bullshit and bad science—and I say that as someone who has contributed some of the papers that have put gas in the tDCS tank,” says neuroscientist Vincent Walsh of University College London. “It really needs to be put under scrutiny like this.”

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-34
SLIDE 34

TMS (left precentral gyrus) using Neuronavigation 2mA tDCS (M1-SO montage) Anode Cathode Sham High-Density EEG with Digitizer

TMS-tDCS-EEG study

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Replication (Motor-Evoked Potential)

Ahn et al., in preparation.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Grand-averaged TMS-evoked potential (TEP)

Ahn et al., in preparation.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-37
SLIDE 37

SPATIAL TARGETING

Tissue Resistivity [Ohm cm] Copper 2e-6 CSF 64 Cortex 350 White Matter 650 Bone 8,000-16,000

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-38
SLIDE 38

IMPLEMENTATION

  • MR Scan
  • Tissue segmentation
  • Numerical solution (e.g. finite elements).
  • 1. Develop you own code
  • 2. Collaborate
  • 3. Buy tool / use free tool

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-39
SLIDE 39

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-40
SLIDE 40

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Modeling performed by Angel Peterchev Sellers et al 2015

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-42
SLIDE 42

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Lesson #5

MR scan + Segmentation + EF modeling = Spatial Targeting #KnowYour3D #HowGoodisHD

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-44
SLIDE 44

STRUCTURE DYNAMICS BEHAVIOR

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-45
SLIDE 45

MODELING DYNAMICS

Frohlich 2014

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-46
SLIDE 46

OSCILLATIONS

Caution: Most tACS literature refers to the peak-to-peak amplitude as amplitude.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-47
SLIDE 47

NETWORK DYNAMICS

  • 1. Raw trace.
  • 2. Spectrum: Power as a

function of frequency.

  • 3. Spectrogram: Spectrum as

a function of time.

  • 4. Coherence: Interaction

between two sites as a function of frequency.

Raw Trace Spectrum

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • 1. Raw trace.
  • 2. Spectrum: Power as a function of frequency.
  • 3. Spectrogram: Spectrum as a function of time.

Raw Trace Spectrogram

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • 1. Raw trace.
  • 2. Spectrum: Power as a function of frequency.
  • 3. Spectrogram: Spectrum as a function of time.
  • 4. Coherence: Interaction between two sites as a function
  • f frequency.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Lesson #6

Brain rhythms effectively targeted by rhythmic brain stimulation #MiddleSchoolMath

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-51
SLIDE 51

TARGETING BRAIN NETWORK DYNAMICS

Write / Input tACS Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)

Neuroconn

Read / Output EEG

Berger 1929

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-52
SLIDE 52

NATURALISTIC ELECTRIC FIELDS

Frohlich and McCormick. 2010

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-53
SLIDE 53

ARNOLD TONGUE

Frohlich 2014

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-54
SLIDE 54

SPIKING NEURAL MODEL (NETWORK)

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-55
SLIDE 55

SPATIO-TEMPORAL DYNAMICS

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-57
SLIDE 57

STIMULATION PHASE

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-58
SLIDE 58

HOTSPOTS

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-59
SLIDE 59

NETWORK-LEVEL MECHANISM

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-60
SLIDE 60

CELLULAR-LEVEL MECHANISM

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-61
SLIDE 61

TARGETING A SUBPOPULATION

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-62
SLIDE 62

NETWORK RESONANCE

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-63
SLIDE 63

PHASE SLIPPING

Ali et al. 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Negahbani et al. (2019, BioAxiv)

Frequency (Stimulation-Endogenous) [Hz]

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-65
SLIDE 65

INTERACTING NETWORKS

Kutchko and Frohlich 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-66
SLIDE 66

MULTISTABILITY

“Rapid Fire” “Slow Propagating” “Spiral Waves”

Kutchko and Frohlich 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-67
SLIDE 67

STATE SWITCHING BY tACS

Kutchko and Frohlich 2013

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Lesson #7

Complexity of brain dynamics requires computer simulations to understand target engagement.

#MultiStability

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-69
SLIDE 69

TARGET: ALPHA OSCILLATIONS

  • Neurofeedback, rTMS (10 Hz), tACS,
  • thers…
  • “Offline” state, long-range

functional connectivity, gating.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-70
SLIDE 70

COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT

High Creative Ideation Low Creative Ideation

“increased alpha power during creative ideation is among the most consistent findings in neuroscientific research on creativity” (Fink and Benedek, 2010)

Lustenberger et al. (2015)

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-71
SLIDE 71

ENHANCING CREATIVITY

  • Blinding was successful (p > 0.2).
  • 10 Hz tACS significantly enhances creativity as measured by the Torrance

Test of Creative Thinking (7.45 % ± 3.11 % S.E.M.; F1,16 = 5.14, p = 0.036).

  • No enhancement with 40Hz-tACS..

Lustenberger et al. (2015)

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-72
SLIDE 72

OSCILLATION ENHANCEMENT

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-73
SLIDE 73

FEEDBACK tACS TO MODULATE SLEEP SPINDLES

Lustenberger et al. (2015)

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-74
SLIDE 74

IMPROVING MEMORY CONSOLIDATION

Lustenberger et al. (2015)

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-75
SLIDE 75

TARGET ENGAGEMENT

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Lesson #8

Individualize with feedback stimulation to enhance target engagement. #OMGWasThatASpindle

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-77
SLIDE 77

SUMMARY: TARGETING NETWORK DYNAMICS

  • Oscillations represent fundamental activity structure.
  • tACS ideal to target cortical oscillations.
  • Endogenous network dynamics represent oscillator to

be modulated by weak periodic perturbations.

  • Arnold Tongue: Necessity of individualizing

stimulation frequency?

  • Multistable dynamics: State-dependent stimulation

effects.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-78
SLIDE 78

www.flavio.network

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Neurons, Synapses, and Circuits. Measuring, Perturbing, and Analyzing Brain Networks Cortical Oscillations Network Disorders Toolboxes

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Thank you for your attention. flavio_frohlich@med.unc.edu www.networkneuroscientist.org @FrohlichLab

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y