WTO Law Class 5: MFN Treatment, National Treatment Ferrara 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

wto law
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

WTO Law Class 5: MFN Treatment, National Treatment Ferrara 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WTO Law Class 5: MFN Treatment, National Treatment Ferrara 2018 Dr. Holger Hestermeyer Shell Reader in Interna;onal Dispute Resolu;on, Kings College London Today s Program MFN NT MFN Basics Requirements Exceptions


slide-1
SLIDE 1

WTO Law

Class 5: MFN Treatment, National Treatment

Ferrara 2018

  • Dr. Holger Hestermeyer

Shell Reader in Interna;onal Dispute Resolu;on, King‘s College London

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Today‘s Program

  • MFN
  • NT
slide-3
SLIDE 3

MFN

  • Basics
  • Requirements
  • Exceptions
slide-4
SLIDE 4

MFN Basics

A B D E F G

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MFN Requirements

  • Measure at issue covered by Art. I:1
  • Grants advantage, favor, privilege,

immunity

  • Like product
  • Advantage immediately and

unconditionally granted to all like products

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Like Products

slide-7
SLIDE 7

De facto discrimination

Model I: Model II:

clupea pilchardus clupea spraDus clupea harengus

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MFN Exceptions

  • Art. I paras. 2-4
  • Enabling Clause (GSP) (EU Drug

Arrangements challenged in EC – Tariff Preferences: non-discrimination, must be granted to all similarly situated dc members)

  • Art. XXIV
  • Art. XX, XXI, Waiver
slide-9
SLIDE 9

National Treatment

  • Basics
  • Requirements
  • Particular Issues
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Purpose Art. III

  • Combat protectionism
  • Equal treatment of products once

imported

  • Equality of competitive conditions

– Trade effects irrelevant – Protection of expectations – More than protection of concessions

slide-11
SLIDE 11

NT: Basics

  • Art. II, XI
  • Art. III: NT
slide-12
SLIDE 12

NT: Basics

  • Structure:
  • Art. III:1 principle
  • Art. III:2 internal taxation (sentence 1 like products, sentence 2 DCSP)
  • Art. III:4 internal laws, regulations, requirements
  • Goal: expectations of equal competitive relationships (actual trade effects not

relevant), not just prevent undermining Art. II

  • Art. III applies to internal measures, not to border measures (read Note Ad III)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Art III.1-2 GATT

  • Article III National Treatment on Internal Taxation and

Regulation – 1. The contracting parties recognize that internal taxes and other internal charges, and laws, regulations and requirements affecting the internal sale, offering for sale, purchase, transportation, distribution or use of products […], should not be applied to imported or domestic products so as to afford protection to domestic production. – 2. The products of the territory of any contracting party imported into the territory of any other contracting party shall not be subject, directly or indirectly, to internal taxes or other internal charges of any kind in excess of those applied, directly or indirectly, to like domestic

  • products. Moreover, no contracting party shall otherwise

apply internal taxes or other internal charges to imported or domestic products in a manner contrary to the principles set forth in paragraph 1.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Art III.1-2 GATT

  • Ad article III, Paragraph 2

– A tax conforming to the requirements of the first sentence of paragraph 2 would be considered to be inconsistent with the provisions of the second sentence only in cases where competition was involved between, on the one hand, the taxed product and, on the other hand, a directly competitive or substitutable product which was not similarly taxed.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

NT: Requirements (III:2)

  • III:2 s. 1
  • Like products
  • Taxed in excess

■ III:2 s. 2 ■ DCS products (ad Art.) ■ Not similarly taxed (ad Art.) > ad

minimis

■ So as to afford protection (III:1)

Threshold issue: is it an internal tax or charge on products (accrues due to internal event)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Like Products

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Luxury tax on automobiles

  • Luxury tax (10% tax of the excess of the retail

price over a fixed threshold value) imposed on cars with value >US$30K

  • Are cars below/above US£30K like?
  • Panel: ‘aim and effect’ test

– statements by legislators – wording of legislation (% of cars sold in US above the threshold) – sales data (predominalty affecting EC/US cars?) – design, production and marketing capabilities