workshop on stochastic analysis and finance 09
play

Workshop on Stochastic Analysis and Finance 09 Application of the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Workshop on Stochastic Analysis and Finance 09 Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sdes Laurent DENIS Universit e dEvry-Val-dEssonne and Chaire Risque de Cr edit City University of Hong-Kong, June


  1. Workshop on Stochastic Analysis and Finance ’09 Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s Laurent DENIS Universit´ e d’Evry-Val-d’Essonne and Chaire “Risque de Cr´ edit” City University of Hong-Kong, June 29-July 3, 2009 Based on a joint work with N. Bouleau. Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  2. Introduction We are given: • ( X , X , ν, d , γ ): a local symmetric Dirichlet structure which admits a carr´ e du champ operator i.e. ( X , X , ν ) is a measured space, ν is σ -finite and the bilinear form e [ f , g ] = 1 � γ [ f , g ] d ν, 2 is a local Dirichlet form with domain d ⊂ L 2 ( ν ) and carr´ e du champ operator γ . • N : a Poisson random measure on [0 , + ∞ [ × X with intensity dt × ν ( du ) defined on the probability space (Ω 1 , A 1 , P 1 ) where Ω 1 is the configuration space , A 1 the σ -field generated by N and P 1 the law of N . Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  3. Example: the finite dimensional case Let r ∈ N ∗ , ( X , X ) = ( R r , B ( R r )) and ν = kdx where k is non-negative and Borelian. We are given ξ = ( ξ ij ) 1 ≤ i , j ≤ r an R r × r -valued and symmetric Borel function. We assume that there exist an open set O ⊂ R r and a function ψ continuous on O and null on R r \ O such that 1. k > 0 on O ν -a.e. and is locally bounded on O 2. ξ is locally bounded and locally elliptic on O . 3. k ≥ ψ > 0 ν -a.e. on O . 4. for all i , j ∈ { 1 , · · · , r } , ξ i , j ψ belongs to H 1 loc ( O ). Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  4. We denote by H the subspace of functions f ∈ L 2 ( ν ) ∩ L 1 ( ν ) such that the restriction of f to O belongs to C ∞ c ( O ). Then, the bilinear form defined by r � � ∀ f , g ∈ H , e ( f , g ) = ξ i , j ( x ) ∂ i f ( x ) ∂ j g ( x ) ψ ( x ) dx O i , j =1 is closable in L 2 ( ν ). Its closure, ( d , e ), is a local Dirichlet form on L 2 ( ν ) which admits a carr´ e du champ γ . r ξ i , j ( x ) ∂ i f ( x ) ∂ j f ( x ) ψ ( x ) � ∀ f ∈ d , γ ( f )( x ) = k ( x ) . i , j =1 Moreover, it satisfies property (EID) i.e. for any d and for any R d -valued function U whose components are in the domain of the form U ∗ [(det γ [ U , U t ]) · ν ] ≪ λ d where det denotes the determinant and λ d the Lebesgue measure on ( R d , B ( R d )). Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  5. Choice for the gradient • ( R , R , ρ ): an auxiliary probability space s.t. L 2 ( R , R , ρ ) is infinite. • D : a version of the gradient on d with values in the space L 2 0 ( R , R , ρ ) = { g ∈ L 2 ( R , R , ρ ); � R g ( r ) ρ ( dr ) = 0 } . We denote it by ♭ . • N ⊙ ρ the extended marked Poisson measure : it is a random Poisson measure on [0 , + ∞ [ × X × R with compensator dt × ν × ρ defined on the product probability space: (Ω 1 , A 1 , P 1 ) × ( R N , R ⊗ N , P ⊗ N ). Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  6. Creation and annihilation operators ε + ( t , u ) ( w 1 ) = w 1 1 { ( t , u ) ∈ supp w 1 } + ( w 1 + ε ( t , u ) } ) 1 { ( t , u ) / ∈ supp w 1 } ε − ( t , u ) ( w 1 ) = w 1 1 { ( t , u ) / ∈ supp w 1 } + ( w 1 − ε ( t , u ) } ) 1 { ( t , u ) ∈ supp w 1 } . In a natural way, we extend these operators to the functionals by ε + H ( w 1 , t , u ) = H ( ε + ε − H ( w 1 , t , u ) = H ( ε − ( t , u ) w 1 , t , u ) ( t , u ) w 1 , t , u ) . we denote by P N the measure P N = P 1 ( dw ) N w ( dt , du ). Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  7. Upper Dirichlet structure From this, as explained in the previous talk, we are able to construct a Dirichlet form ( D , E ) on L 2 (Ω 1 ) which admits a gradient operator that we denote by ♯ and given by the following formula: � + ∞ � F ♯ = ε − (( ε + F ) ♭ ) dN ⊙ ρ ∈ L 2 ( P 1 × ˆ ∀ F ∈ D , P ) . (1) 0 X × R Moreover, we have for all F ∈ D � + ∞ � E ( F ♯ ) 2 = Γ[ F ] = ˆ ε − ( γ [ ε + F ]) dN , (2) 0 X and ( D , E ) satisfies (EID). Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  8. The SDE we consider We consider another probability space (Ω 2 , A 2 , P 2 ) on which an R n -valued semimartingale Z = ( Z 1 , · · · , Z n ) is defined, n ∈ N ∗ . Assumption on Z : There exists a positive constant C such that for any square integrable R n -valued predictable process h : � t � t h s dZ s ) 2 ] ≤ C 2 E [ | h s | 2 ds ] . ∀ t ≥ 0 , E [( (3) 0 0 We shall work on the product probability space: (Ω , A , P ) = (Ω 1 × Ω 2 , A 1 ⊗ A 2 , P 1 × P 2 ) . Let d ∈ N ∗ , we consider the following SDE : � t � t � c ( s , X s − , u )˜ X t = x + N ( ds , du ) + σ ( s , X s − ) dZ s (4) 0 0 X where x ∈ R d , c : R + × R d × X → R d and σ : R + × R d → R d × n satisfy the set of hypotheses below denoted (R). Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  9. Hypotheses (R) For simplicity, we fix a finite terminal time T > 0. 1. There exists η ∈ L 2 ( X , ν ) such that: a) for all t ∈ [0 , T ] and u ∈ X , c ( t , · , u ) is differentiable with continuous derivative and ∀ u ∈ X , t ∈ [0 , T ] , x ∈ R d | D x c ( t , x , u ) | ≤ η ( u ) , sup b) ∀ ( t , u ) ∈ [0 , T ] × U , | c ( t , 0 , u ) | ≤ η ( u ), c) for all t ∈ [0 , T ] and x ∈ R d , c ( t , x , · ) ∈ d and t ∈ [0 , T ] , x ∈ R d γ [ c ( t , x , · )]( u ) ≤ η ( u ) , sup d) for all t ∈ [0 , T ], all x ∈ R d and u ∈ X , the matrix I + D x c ( t , x , u ) is invertible and � � ( I + D x c ( t , x , u )) − 1 � sup � ≤ η ( u ) . � � t ∈ [0 , T ] , x ∈ R d Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  10. 2. For all t ∈ [0 , T ] , σ ( t , · ) is differentiable with continuous derivative and t ∈ [0 , T ] , x ∈ R d | D x σ ( t , x ) | < + ∞ . sup 3. As a consequence of hypotheses 1. and 2. above, it is well known that equation (4) admits a unique solution X such that E [sup t ∈ [0 , T ] | X t | 2 ] < + ∞ . We suppose that for all t ∈ [0 , T ], the matrix ( I + � n j =1 D x σ · , j ( t , X t − )∆ Z j t ) is invertible and its inverse is bounded by a deterministic constant uniformly with respect to t ∈ [0 , T ]. Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  11. Derivation of the equation H D : the set of real valued processes ( H t ) t ∈ [0 , T ] , which belong to L 2 ([0 , T ]; D ) i.e. such that � T � T � H � 2 | H t | 2 dt ] + H D = E [ E ( H t ) dt < + ∞ . 0 0 Proposition The equation (4) admits a unique solution X in H d D . Moreover, the gradient of X satisfies: � t � X ♯ D x c ( s , X s − , u ) · X ♯ s − ˜ = N ( ds , du ) t 0 U � t � c ♭ ( s , X s − , u , r ) N ⊙ ρ ( ds , du , dr ) + 0 X × R � t D x σ ( s , X s − ) · X ♯ + s − dZ s 0 Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  12. Derivative of the flow generated by X Let us define the R d × d -valued processes U and K by n � D x σ ., j ( s , X s − ) dZ j dU s = s . j =1 � t � t � D x c ( s , X s − , u ) K s − ˜ K t = I + N ( ds , du ) + dU s K s − 0 X 0 Under our hypotheses, for all t ≥ 0, the matrix K t is invertible and K t = ( K t ) − 1 satisfies: it inverse ¯ � t � ¯ K s − ( I + D x c ( s , X s − , u )) − 1 D x c ( s , X s − , u )˜ ¯ = I − N ( ds , du ) K t 0 X � t ¯ � K s − (∆ U s ) 2 ( I + ∆ U s ) − 1 ¯ − K s − dU s + 0 s ≤ t � t K s d < U c , U c > s . ¯ + 0 Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  13. Obtaining the carr´ e du champ matrix Theorem For all t ∈ [0 , T ] , � t � K s γ [ c ( s , X s − , · )] ¯ ¯ K ∗ s N ( ds , du ) K ∗ Γ[ X t ] = t . K t 0 X Proof : Let ( α, u ) ∈ [0 , T ] × X . We put X ( α, u ) = ε + ( α, u ) X t . t � α � X ( α, u ) c ( s , X ( α, u ) , u ′ )˜ N ( ds , du ′ ) = x + t s − 0 X � α σ ( s , X ( α, u ) ) dZ s + c ( α, X ( α, u ) + , u ) s − α − 0 � � � c ( s , X ( α, u ) σ ( s , X ( α, u ) , u ′ )˜ N ( ds , du ′ ) + + ) dZ s . s − s − ] α, t ] X ] α, t ] Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

  14. Let us remark that X ( α, u ) = X t if t < α so that, taking the t gradient with respect to the variable u , we obtain: ( X ( α, u ) ( c ( α, X ( α, u ) ) ♭ , u )) ♭ = t α − � � D x c ( s , X ( α, u ) , u ′ ) · ( X ( α, u ) ) ♭ ˜ N ( ds , du ′ ) + s − s − ] α, t ] X � D x σ ( s , X ( α, u ) ) · ( X ( α, u ) ) ♭ dZ s . + s − s − ] α, t ] Let us now introduce the process K ( α, u ) = ε + ( α, u ) ( K t ) which t satisfies the following SDE: � t � t � K ( α, u ) D x c ( s , X ( α, u ) , u ′ ) K ( α, u ) dU ( α, u ) K ( α, u ) ˜ N ( ds , du ′ )+ = I + s t s − s − s − 0 X 0 K ( α, u ) = ( K ( α, u ) and its inverse ¯ ) − 1 . Then, using the flow property, t t we have: ) ♭ = K ( α, u ) ∀ t ≥ 0 , ( X ( α, u ) K ( α, u ) ¯ ( c ( α, X α − , u )) ♭ . t t α Laurent DENIS Application of the lent particle method to Poisson driven sde’s

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend