WORKING ING G GROUP 3& 3&5: 5: PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
Susan Tansey / Pirkko Lepola Chair / Co-Chair WG 3&5
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 1
WORKING ING G GROUP 3& 3&5: 5: PUBLIC-PRIVATE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
WORKING ING G GROUP 3& 3&5: 5: PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP Susan Tansey / Pirkko Lepola Chair / Co-Chair WG 3&5 25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 1 Enp npr-EM EMA WG 3 G 3&5 &5 Role: le: Facilitat ilitate
Susan Tansey / Pirkko Lepola Chair / Co-Chair WG 3&5
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 1
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 2
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5
Current W WG 3&5 m members: Martine Dehlinger-Kremer Stefanie Breitenstein Susan Tansey ( Acting Chair) Pirkko Lepola (Co-Chair) Jenny Preston Pamela Dicks Andrea Waβmuth Grünenthal Mark Sorrentino PRA Industr try y colla llaborators f for W WG 3&5 r recom
ndati tion
3
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 4
16/05/2017 Enpr-EMA Annual WS / WG3+5 5
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 6
16/05/2017 Enpr-EMA Annual WS / WG3+5 7
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 8
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 9
■ Selecti tion o
networks prepared t to p parti ticipate i in Pilot t FOR FR FREE*
(*=no f fee b e by Enpr pr-EMA! ! – if t the r e req eques est requires es eg
Consultation A Agree eemen ent, n net etwork e exper erts can d do that at b by the e network f fees es – we c cannot g guar arantee free ee ser ervices es – too broad l list o t of services / expertis tise f for s sele lectio tion)
– Circulat ation o
questionnai aire – Su Survey ( (“Tick B Box
each n network real practi tical c capabiliti ties a according t to the R Recommendat ation ( (timepoints ts 1.-4.) –list o
services es –diffe ferent f from t the WG Networ
Survey ■ Selec ection o
inter eres ested ed companies es for pilot p t phase – Approached ed b by P PRA – ? I IMI MI2 C Call 10 sponsors ■ Proposal t that e each n net etwork propose se their o
e and administ ster er it – Could v vary depen ending on c complexity o
the PIP a and services es required ed/provided ed – Net etworks c s curren ently c charging f for similar s services es may b be a able to provide a e advice e regarding a appropriate e fees es ■ After p pilot p t phase; survey y to th these companies; e evaluation and a analysis o
these ser services s – did t they y bring a any v y value ue?-> > PoC ■ Publication o
the survey r resu sults; c collec ected ed e exper erien ence ■ Decision of t the c conti tinuati tion
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 10
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 11
These are the listed services under the 1.-4. timepoint s X
25/10/2017 Enpr-EMA CG TC / WG3+5 12
X X X