SLIDE 1 Ombeline Sculfort Evolution of chemical defenses within Heliconiini butterflies
Bastien Nay Violaine Llaurens Marianne Elias
LABEX
SLIDE 2
INTRODUCTION – Heliconiini butterflies
SLIDE 3 INTRODUCTION – Mullerian mimicry
Toxic species sharing common warning signal: wing pattern ▪ Convergent evolution ▪ Mimicry ring
bybio.wordpress.com Modified from Mathieu Joron
TRY
SLIDE 4
INTRODUCTION – Mimicry ring
Toxic species sharing a common warning signal within a given habitat High abundance → low toxicity ? Low abundance → High toxicity ? Butterfly toxicity modulates predator learning process
SLIDE 5 INTRODUCTION –What influence toxicity evolution?
▪ All stages are toxic: cyanogenic glucosides (CGs) ▪ Plant secondary metabolite (plant coevolution) ▪ Some are capable of de novo synthesis (larvae and adult)
metamorphosis
Synthesized Sequestered
SLIDE 6
PATTERN TOXICITY Predation Plant coevolution (new chemicals) Mimicry ring
QUESTIONS
SLIDE 7
PATTERN TOXICITY Diversification? Predation Plant coevolution (new chemicals) Mimicry ring
QUESTIONS
?
SLIDE 8 BUTTERFLY SAMPLING
Spatial data for Heliconius butterflies and allies http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/neil_rosser/
LC-MS LC-MS/MS 155 wild butterflies 31 species, 7 genera 4 countries →To identify and to quantify toxins
SLIDE 9 v v Kozaket al,. 2015
6 basal genera (6 species) Eueides (4 species) Heliconius (21 species) Heliconiini 77 species
SLIDE 10
Phylogenetic signal: Blomberg’s K Synthesized toxins → significant Appeared in common ancestor (Zagrobelny et al., 2018) Sequestered toxins → NS coevolution with hostplant? Toxin diversification in Heliconius, linked to host plant shift?
1: Toxin diversification – qualitative variations
SLIDE 11 1: Toxin diversification – quantitative variations
20 40 60 80 100 120
µg/mg
Mean toxin concentrations per species
Basal genera Eueides Heliconius
SLIDE 12
2: Variations among mimicry rings
ANOVA Pr(>F) 0.0719 Phylogenetic ANOVA Pr(>F) 0.525
SLIDE 13
2: Variations among mimicry rings
5 2 5 4 9 6
SLIDE 14
2: Variations among mimicry rings
Within ring?
SLIDE 15
Within ring?
2: Variations among mimicry rings
SLIDE 16 3: Variations within mimicry ring – Blue
20 40 60 80 100 120
- H. congener
- H. doris blue
- H. eleuchia
- H. sara
- H. wallacei
Mean toxin concentrations (µg/mg)
linamarin epi/lotaustralin epivolkenin tetraphyllinA/deidaclin gynocardin dihydrogynocardin
Spatial data for Heliconius butterflies and allies http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/neil_rosser/
SLIDE 17 3: Variations within mimicry ring –Tiger
10 20 30 40 50 60
aerotome
felix
acacetes
tarapotensis H. pardalinus
linamarin epi/lotaustralin
Mean toxin concentrations (µg/mg)
Spatial data for Heliconius butterflies and allies http://www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/neil_rosser/
SLIDE 18
CONCLUSION
Toxin diversification
Diversification of toxin composition in Heliconius, linked with host plant? No variations in toxin concentrations
Among mimicry ring
No strong effect of mimicry among groups
Within mimicry ring
Evolution of toxicity leads to different way of acquiring toxins No significative results Toxicity evolution → Phylogeny = synthesized toxins + ecology = sequestered toxins Increase sample size!
SLIDE 19 THANK YOU !
LABEX
- V. Llaurens
- M. Elias
- K. Kozak
- B. Nay
- E. de Castro
- S. Bak
- C. Le Roy
- C. Pinna
ESEB Organizers
SLIDE 20 EMILIE SHELL RODD PLANTE/BUTTERFLIES
All the tiger butterflies, belonging to my rayed red ring
Emilie shell rodd plante/butterflies
SLIDE 21
All the tiger butterflies, belonging to my orange ring
SLIDE 22
All the tiger butterflies, belonging to my postman ring