with iridotomy Mariia Dvoriashyna 1 Rodolfo Repetto - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

with iridotomy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

with iridotomy Mariia Dvoriashyna 1 Rodolfo Repetto - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aqueous Humor Flow in the Posterior Chamber of the Eye with iridotomy Mariia Dvoriashyna 1 Rodolfo Repetto Jennifer H. Tweedy 1 2 1 Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy 2 (ne


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mariia Dvoriashyna Rodolfo Repetto Jennifer H. Tweedy

Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy (née Siggers) Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, UK WIAM16

Aqueous Humor Flow in the Posterior Chamber of the Eye with iridotomy

September 1st , 2016

1 1 2 1 2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa) WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 2/11

Introduction

Figure 1. Sketch of the cross section of the human eye

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa) WIAM16

Introduction

Figure 1. Sketch of the cross section of the human eye

Motivation:

  • Investigate the effects of the iridotomy

procedure on aqueous flow and find optimal iridotomy size and location Aims:

  • Find pressure difference between anterior

and the posterior chambers – indicates risk of angle closure glaucoma

  • Find shear stress on the surrounding tissues –

indicates risk of tissue damage

September 1st , 2016 3/11

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Introduction

Motivation:

  • Investigate the effects of the iridotomy

procedure on aqueous flow and find optimal iridotomy size and location Aims:

  • Find pressure difference between anterior

and the posterior chambers – indicates risk of angle closure glaucoma

  • Find shear stress on the surrounding tissues –

indicates risk of tissue damage

Figure 1. Sketch of the cross section of the human eye WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 3/11

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Model

Figure 1. Considered domain and Coordinate system

Mechanisms that drive aqueous flow: aqueous production in the ciliary body and miosis (i.e. iris motion due to the pupil contraction) We use Lubrication theory to simplify Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible flow in a long and thin domain. (1) (2) Where p is independent of r and the subscript ‘h’ indicates that only 𝜄, 𝜒 − components are considered. We assume that the iris is moving with the velocity distribution v. The, from (1) we get the dependence of the fluid velocity on the pressure gradient: integrating (2) with this velocity we get the governing equation

WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 4/11

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Model

Figure 1. Considered domain and Coordinate system

Governing equations:

inlet flux F at ciliary body imposed pressure at the pupil

We model iridotomy as a point sink. 𝑄𝑗 − pressure related to the sink, 𝜖𝑄𝑗 𝜖𝜄′ ~ 𝑅𝑗 𝑏 → ∞, 𝑏 → 0. where 𝑅𝑗 - flux through the iridotomy and 𝑏 is radius of iridotomy. To avoid singularity at the point of the sink, we introduce regularised pressure: 𝑞𝑠𝑓𝑕 = 𝑞 − 𝑄𝑗. To close the problem, we assume that the flux through the iridotomy is proportional to the pressure drop across the hole (Dagan et al, 1982): 𝑄𝑗 =

𝑅𝑗 8𝑚𝜈+3𝑏𝜌𝜈 𝑏4𝜌

, where l is the thickness of the iris.

WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 5/11

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Considered Geometry

Figure 1. Ultrasound scan image of the human eye Figure 2. Interpolated height of the Posterior chamber (distance between posterior iris and anterior lens) WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 6/11

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Flow due to aqueous production

Figure 1. No iridotomy Figure 2. Iridotomy with diameter 50 um Figure 3. Iridotomy with diameter 100 um

Pressure distribution and normalized velocity vectors

WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 7/11

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Flow due to aqueous production

Figure 1. Flux through the iridotomy out of the total flux for different locations of the iridotomy: blue line – halfway along the posterior chamber, red line – 5/6 of the way from pupil to ciliary body Figure 2. Maximum pressure in the posterior chamber with blocked pupil (i.e. the iridotomy is the only outlet) WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 8/11

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Flow due to miosis

Figure 2. Volumetric flux (as a multiple of that produced by ciliary body) passing through the iridotomy at the start of the miosis. P – percentage of the volume change in the posterior chamber during miosis. Figure 1. Schematic velocity distribution at the iris during miosis Ԧ 𝑤 is chosen to satisfy the given volume change

  • f the posterior chamber after miosis:

𝑊

𝑜𝑓𝑥= 1 − 𝑄 𝑊, 𝑄 − percentage of PC

volume change, V – initial volume of the PC WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 9/11

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Flow due to miosis

Figure 1. Maximum wall shear stress on the cornea located at the distance 0.2 mm from the iridotomy, for different percentage of PC volume change Figure 2. Maximum wall shear stress on the cornea for the iridotomy diameter 80 um, for different percentage of PC volume change WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 10/11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Conclusions

  • The geometry of the posterior chamber and the presence or absence of pupillary block

have a strong influence on the choice of an iridotomy size

  • Iridotomy diameters of at least 40 um are required in case of pupillary block
  • Even a small variation of the volume of the posterior chamber produced during miosis

can generate velocities that are much bigger than those with a fixed iris.

  • During miosis, a jet through the iridotomy is produced. The resulting jet velocity and

wall shear stress on the cornea are strongly dependent on the radius of the iridotomy and on the volume change of the posterior chamber. Our results suggest that there could be a risk of corneal endothelial cell detachment if the cornea is too close to the iridotomy and/or the volume change of the posterior chamber is sufficiently large.

WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 11/11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Mariia Dvoriashyna (University of Genoa)

Conclusions

  • The geometry of the posterior chamber and the presence or absence of pupillary block

have a strong influence on the choice of an iridotomy size

  • Iridotomy diameters of at least 40 um are required in case of pupillary block
  • Even a small variation of the volume of the posterior chamber produced during miosis

can generate velocities that are much bigger than those with a fixed iris.

  • During miosis, a jet through the iridotomy is produced. The resulting jet velocity and

wall shear stress on the cornea are strongly dependent on the radius of the iridotomy and on the volume change of the posterior chamber. Our results suggest that there could be a risk of corneal endothelial cell detachment if the cornea is too close to the iridotomy and/or the volume change of the posterior chamber is sufficiently large.

Thank you for your attention!

WIAM16 September 1st , 2016 11/11